Aviva plc (AV) Earnings Call Transcript
January 25, 2023
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Good morning and welcome to today's in-focus session, showcasing our UKGI Personal Lines business. It's great to be able to welcome so many of you to Aviva in person. This is the first in-focus session we've actually been able to host. As you know, our in-focus sessions are designed to help you understand how we are transforming performance, building momentum in all our businesses as we seek to achieve sustainable long-term growth. With me today, Adam Winslow, CEO, General Insurance business in the U.K. and Ireland; and Owen Morris, MD of UKGI Personal Lines. Before they begin, I'd like to highlight a few important points. As you know, from our recent results announcements, quarter-by-quarter, we have continued to deliver on our strategic ambitions. We are building upon a unique position of market strength with a clear strategy to drive profitable growth. This underpins sustainable cash generation supporting the group in meeting its financial targets and delivering our dividend and capital return promises. And the UK Personal Lines business plays a core role in this. Our UKGI business represents around 20% of the group's own fund generation in 2021. And around half of this comes from our Personal Lines business. This business has a strong performance track record, providing cash generation operating profit and access to customers for the Aviva Group. It is customer-centric and is diversified across both product and distribution. And performance in 2022 has been very strong, particularly in the context of the current market conditions. So before we get into the detail, a brief update on our overall GI business across the U.K., Ireland and Canada, which continued to trade positively over the closing months of 2022. We continue to price appropriately for inflation, especially in UK Personal Lines, where we have been responding at pace to emerging data and trends. Weather experience has been an area of focus across the industry over the past few weeks. And for Aviva, our weather experience across the whole of 2022 was broadly in line with our long-term averages. This includes estimated costs of around GBP 50 million for the December U.K. freeze. At our full year results in March, we expect to be able to report a group combined ratio of around 94.6%, which is consistent with the guidance at our Q3 trading update in November. This is a strong result and testament to our disciplined delivery in challenging market conditions. It is, of course, at this stage, still subject to audit and finalization procedures. So now back to Personal Lines. We continue to see a very positive outlook for this business. And as Adam will be setting out an ambitious plan based upon the strong track record and the strong and profitable growth opportunities, which are all underpinned with excellent technical foundations. These ambitions are challenging and, of course, dependent on future market conditions. What's most important, of course, [indiscernible] due to prioritize margins and won't chase top line growth at the expense of profitability. And with that, I'll pass it over to you, Adam.
Thank you, Charlotte, and good morning, everyone. It's a pleasure to be here today to talk to you about our excellent Personal Lines business. We have, and at scale, leading Personal Lines business with strong diversification by product and distribution, exceptional technical foundations, the leading brand and firm control over claims and inflation. But what does it take to win in Personal Lines? I believe there are 5 critical success factors. The first is customer and brand. This is mainly a market where customers buy via price comparison websites or PCWs. As long as your price is competitive, it's your brand that really drives sales conversion. And on PCWs, the Aviva brand enjoys a more than 4x better click-through rate versus non-Aviva brands when positioned third or fourth on the page. And this is a material advantage that drives profitable growth for us. The second is technical foundations and efficiency, both of which we excel at. The third is scale, particularly in retail, which is the largest segment of the market. To be a leader, you must be strong in retail and in turn, that means being strong in motor. We are, but we plan to grow retail further. The 4 factors claims and supply chain, particularly true today for obvious reasons. We focus on keeping indemnity costs low and having rapid feedback loops, ensuring that we can act quickly to address inflationary pressures as they emerge. And lastly, these factors allow us to be diversified but focused. That doesn't mean doing everything everywhere for everyone, but instead making smart focused choices about where we allocate our capital to generate strong returns. And Aviva is well positioned across each of these success factors and is consistently one of the top 4 market players, each of whom have around a 10% share. Aviva strengths have been driving improved performance and despite challenging market conditions, we are winning. We've moved up to #3 in volumes, outperforming versus peers on combined ratio at half year '22 as we came out of COVID and into the new normal post-general insurance pricing practices market. So the Personal Lines market is around GBP 25 billion of gross written premium in size, with Motor & Home together making up about 75% of that volume. Half is sold direct or via PCWs by players using their own brands and underwriting capacity, and we call the segment retail. Half is sold by brokers and partners using someone else's underwriting capacity, and we call this nonretail. Most of the market profit is in retail and particularly, as you can see on the slide, in Motor. Aviva has clear headroom to grow here for its current 8% market share. But the market is undergoing significant change. We see several factors at work and are well placed across all of these market dynamics and indeed, some of them may drive an improvement in our relative competitiveness. Starting with regulatory, we were well prepared for the pricing practices reforms. Over the last 5 years, we've been taking proactive pricing action, significantly reducing the new business versus renewal differential. In terms of retail and digitization, about 90% of motor and about 75% of home customers now buy via PCWs. We have the strongest U.K. brand, and our customer franchise means we are incredibly well placed to take advantage here, already adding over 1 million policies since launching Aviva online which is our Aviva branded PCW play at the end of 2020. On inflation, we acted quickly and believe we rated ahead of the market. We disclosed rates of 8% to 10% in motor and 9% to 11% in home at the end of Q3, and that looks broadly the same at year-end with a 9% to 11% range for both motor and home. And on cost of living, we've launched new propositions, for example, Quote Me Happy essentials, which offers quality insurance at a more affordable price. So let's dive a little deeper by looking firstly at our diversified portfolio. By product, we're not reliant on any single class of business. We are #1 in home and heading towards #1 in high-net-worth post the Azur completion. And travel is returning strongly post COVID. And we have a targeted healthy share of motor. And this diversification means we have less exposure to motor churn or claims inflation and importantly, access to sizable and stable home back books. Post pricing practices, retention is up by 8 points in direct motor and 3 points in home partnerships. Secondly, we have diversified distribution. Here, we'll be focusing on retail, where we have plenty of headroom to grow, particularly given our leading brand, technical data and pricing foundations. Given our strong growth from our investment in Aviva PCW and Aviva Zero, we see this as a strong foundation to build from as we continue to invest in this channel. We've already sold more than 65,000 of Aviva Zero policies for around GBP 30 million of gross written premium since launch less than 12 months ago. Some of you will be aware that Aviva Zero has an embedded carbon offset feature, which appeals to many of our customers, but it's much more than just that. It's also a leading tech stack and offers transformational pricing speed and sophistication. We're already #1 in nonretail distribution and have been for a number of years, fueled by our leadership in bank partnerships. Partnerships remains a strategically important channel for us where we're looking to both digitize the customer journey with partners that we have and to win new ones. And lastly, I want to touch on consistent profitability. Here, we can see that both retail and nonretail have been profitable over the long term. But as retail offers materially better margins by an average of around 8 points, this is where we've been focusing our efforts to profitably grow the portfolio. Our position today comes from a multiyear effort to transform performance. Phase 1 was portfolio reshaping, maintaining our #1 position in bancassurance, but dialing up retail to access more of those profit pools and aggressively simplify the business. Phase 2, which we're in now, continues to focus on mass market and mass affluent customers in retail. And since last year, strong specialist growth in high-net-worth where the acquisitions of both AXA XL and the Azur teams are on track to make us the leading player. So the shape of our portfolio is moving more towards retail and specialist intermediated, all of that supported by a simpler underlying model, which in turn supports an improving combined over time. We've already reduced the number of products and applications materially by over 2/3 in products and around 1/3 in applications in the last 2 years. This obviously helps reduce cost, which allows us to price more competitively and supports us in meeting our growth ambitions. In Phase 3, we'll maintain our emphasis on retail distribution, motor, home and travel products, looking to engines like Aviva Zero as we reengineer our portfolio around attractive profitable areas. That will leave us by 2027 with a majority retail business that is significantly simpler and more efficient. We expect it to generate around GBP 3 billion of revenue, which implies a 5% CAGR over the next 4 years, all at a sub-94% combined. Right now, in current market conditions, we are, of course, prioritizing profit and rate discipline over top line growth, particularly in the retail motor market, where we've focused our attention on dealing with inflation. That said, I'm still very pleased to say that we've grown gross written premium in 2022, albeit reducing motor by 4%. So how have we achieved that turnaround? And a big factor has been Owen and his team. First, this is a team of specialists with high levels of technical expertise. We have actuaries, underwriters and data experts, the very skills needed to compete and win in a highly competitive and technically demanding marketplace. Second, it's been assembled from right across the market with extensive experience between them. And we'll soon be announcing an exciting new hire as a Marketing Director from one of our key competitors. Third, to team with focus. Each business owner is clear on their customer segmentation strategy and targets and each are complementary to one another and to the whole. And lastly, it's a performing team. Personal Lines has an engaged and diverse workforce. The team understand are bought into and delivering on our strategy. So in summary, we have a diversified scale, simpler business, led by a leading team, which is growing underlying profits. We're clear on our priorities and targets, which are aligned with Aviva central strategy built around customer growth, efficiency and sustainability. Taking those one by one at a Personal Lines level, that means being a trusted customer champion and growing our retail customer base to more than GBP 5 million. means becoming a diversified growth engine driving towards that GBP 3 billion gross written premium business. It means forging first-class foundations, giving us a target overall combined of less than 94%. And lastly, it means leading on sustainability, supporting the group in achieving its own net zero targets by 2040. These ambitions are challenging and, of course, depend on future market conditions. What's more important is that we'll continue to prioritize margins and won't simply chase top line growth at the expense of underlying profitability. I'm going to talk through each of these priorities, starting with customer. Our business is built around our customer-led brand segmentation. Each segment has clear and differentiated leadership, customer propositions, distribution channels and service models. We have a deliberate targeted play for each customer group in the market. For a customer who wants good cover at the lowest possible price, they can buy a Quote Me Happy essentials product via PCW for around GBP 40 less on average than an Aviva-branded PCW policy, albeit with different and lesser features. By way of contrast, for a high-net-worth customer and Owen and the team only deal with select high-net-worth broker partners underwrite each risk individually and give a one-to-one personal claims service. These are obviously very different approaches, but they're tailored to the needs of specific customer groups. Both propositions work, both make money and both enjoy excellent customer feedback. In between those 2, of course, we have Aviva PCW and Aviva Zero focused on the mass market customer base. Well Aviva Direct looks for cross-sell opportunities in the mass affluent customer segment. We also have unparalleled reach via the U.K.'s major banks to other mass affluent customers. Our service story is one of leadership, innovation and increasing efficiency. Our TNPS performance is strong between 33 and 36 points for our main Aviva brands and an RNPS of Aviva score is around 7 points better versus the market level. These scores of course, achieved in the context of real-world supply chain disruption, and we have the #1 insurance brand. We continue to invest in our brand, having recently launched a new national media campaign. So we have excellent foundations to work from, but we have far greater ambitions for our retail business. We want to complete our work to ensure all the customer journeys can be completed online, and we want to grow voice and digital assistance services to replace legacy phone demand. We will maintain human support using AI to identify when it's needed and prioritize that voice-based support and service, particularly for vulnerable customers. Through doing this, we drive not only great customer outcomes, but also great commercial outcomes, too. And we're targeting here a 43% reduction in cost per policy by 2024, with 26% of that already achieved. And we're looking to grow our percentage of online servicing to 78%, which is where we are today, and then up to 85% of servicing online overall. Lastly, we have the Aviva customer franchise where we have proven cross-sell capabilities. Nearly half of our direct sales are to multiproduct customers. And in turn, those multiproduct customers have nearly a 7-point higher retention rate. That's very important to us, and we're focused on driving multiproduct sales where it makes sense to do so for our customers. To fully utilize this capability, we're working hard to increase the absolute number of Aviva customers we can reach. And there are initiatives underway across the wider group to grow our marketing permissions for all customers. As a result, we've already seen an increase of around 2.5 million customers with marketing permissions between 2021 and 2022. And we expect this to rise to around 55% of all customers in 2023 through MyAviva customer journey enhancements, third-party data enrichment and ongoing simplification of our marketing preference processes. And this utilization of customer relationships is already underway with beneficial relationship pricing for our pension customers being automatically applied to their Aviva PCW motor quotes, which has driven improved conversion. So in summary, we're already a scale provider with 3.4 million retail customers. With our brand reach and strong distribution assets, we can grow that base, but even more excitingly, with increased levels of permissions and our proven cross-sell capability, we can accelerate sales to existing customers and drive higher penetration and long-term retention. We believe there is real commercial upside here. On to growth. We play across all channels and see attractive segments in all of them, but our particular focus is on retail and high-net-worth. Our rationale for our growth strategies is fairly simple. This is a retail-dominated market with half of all the Personal Lines volume. Both retail and high-net-worth demonstrate growth potential from their current base. We have healthy market shares already in partner and broker, but we have more headroom to grow in both retail and high-net-worth. And both are attractive profit pools. Retail is the largest profit engine for us and for the market. And high-net-worth is a growing segment with low price sensitivity but very high service sensitivity, which allows us to write consistently in the low 90s combined given our underwriting capabilities. And lastly, we believe we have the best high-net-worth team in the market, plus a consistently well-performing retail asset. We already have the foundations. We're simply scaling them up. At a portfolio level, our strategy is to grow and rebalance from majority nonretail to majority retail distribution in order to exploit the market's most attractive profit pools. In totality, we plan to double our retail business and reengineer our nonretail portfolio to maintain our #1 scale, but with a laser focus on returns. That will deliver our overall combined a sub-94 and increased operating profit to more than GBP 200 million a year by 2027. We'll achieve our ambition to become around a GBP 3 billion business writing at that 94% combined through our focus on profitable segments and by widening our competitive footprint. One important point for you to take away is that this combined ambition isn't dependent on improved efficiency. It's about repivoting the existing portfolio towards these more profitable segments of the market. But as you'd expect, we are still laser-focused on efficiency, which will, of course, help support growth through more competitive pricing. Retail will become the majority of our business by next year. On growth, we have a range of distinct brands with focused customer propositions, each with key priorities and target segments to maximize coverage and growth potential. And we've already seen significant growth in PCW that's been achieved with healthy profitability with an average combined for the last 5 years in the low 90s. Looking ahead, this multi-brand targeted approach underpinned by our leading technical foundations will generate significant growth as we reshape our portfolio. On to nonretail. First, we have our significant growth engine of high-net-worth, operating from the mid- to ultra-high-net-worth customer segments. This capability has been added through acquisition, and we're now firmly on course to be the #1 team in the market, which opens up material higher-margin growth opportunities for us. The AXA XL acquisition saw 90% client retention, which is impressive. We have distribution access via brokers asking us to grow and access to customers via our commercial SME and succession wealth businesses. Turning to mass market broker, we're being selective about the business we write, working with specialists to expand our market reach and more attractive returns and ruthlessly optimizing that broker portfolio for profitability. That doesn't mean we're shrinking the business. It simply means we're being selective about what we do and who we work with to maximize returns, but still with a growth mindset. In partnerships, we already have a leading scale position today, but we are evolving that position for tomorrow, and we're looking to the future. Today, we're the main provider of home, travel and gadget insurance to the U.K.'s main banks and renewed the home and travel deal last year with TSB to run until 2028. This partnership strength in home is a major component of our #1 home market position and share. Our strategy in this core book is shifting the model from branch to digital, reflecting changing customer buying behaviors to win new partners to access new and growing customer groups. And these long-term partnerships place us in a great position as the market evolves through the digitization and regulatory shifts we discussed at the start. Accordingly, we believe there will be opportunities to further strengthen our position in home and travel in the short to medium term. And lastly, we see partnerships remaining as a key distribution route for the future. We recognize that our markets will change in the long term with more insurance embedded and partner propositions accessed by customers in potentially new ways. And at this point, I'll hand you over to Owen to take you through the strength of our technical foundations, sustainability and tell you a little bit more about innovation. Thank you.
Thank you, Adam, and good morning, everyone. So far, we've talked about our customer strategy and growth opportunities. The key underpin of those are the technical foundations within our personalized business. This is a price-driven deeply technical, highly competitive market. Our technical foundations need to be exceptionally strong to compete, create returns and win, and I'm pleased to say they are. First, technical capabilities. We believe we have the largest and most experienced pricing team in the market. Second, we've recognized customer capability and service with a lead over the market in NPS and brand. And third, we have an experienced claims team and are investing further to enhance journeys and improved indemnity outcomes. And finally, we've continued to improve and simplify our business, reducing our product estate by 2/3 in the last 2 years. This gives us the foundations upon which to grow profitably and sustainably. We have considerable capability in data science and machine learning, not just in pricing but across the value chain to support these foundations. In data science, we have over 70 analysts and machine learning engineers dedicated to Personal Lines. And via Aviva Zero, we're now looking to deploy the next generation of AI and machine learning models to step change our market competitiveness. In pricing and underwriting, we deploy real-time price optimization across all retail, motor and home products and brands. We utilized well in excess of 1,000 individual features sourced from 40 external data sources blended with unique internal customer insights and our significant claims data assets to produce highly granular and accurate views of projected costs. In 2022 alone, we added 27 new features, including road segment level traffic patterns and driver behavior. In customer service, we use natural language processing and speech analytics to deliver a better, more personalized customer experience and greater efficiency. And lastly, in claims. Over 80 claims decision points are supported by data science to drive optimal decisions fraud detection, indemnity and improved customer outcomes. In isolation, each of these is important, but it's the connectivity of this circle that is key. It is here that we have clear strength. In the speed with which we ingest a vast range of data points, automate identification of trends, apply judgment and our insight and use these to deploy prices that are predictive for future claims costs, not just models of the past. 10 years ago, we started deploying real-time price optimization with our granular [ multi-apparel ] rating. 5 years ago, we were the first to start deploying machine learning live into our technical pricing. And we continue to evolve working to deploy fully automated machine learning models that are more predictive for future claims costs and respond rapidly to changes in claims or market trends. Given the depth of experience sitting around our technical strengths, this is a capability we will continue to invest in and maximize to support our strategy. Moving to our operations. Within our motor claims team, one our differentiators is Solus, our wholly owned car repair network. It currently manages 36% of all our motor claims, while our approved network of motor repairs more widely, which include Solus managed around 80%. Solus gives us the best capability to serve our customers with 12-day key-to-key times, faster market rates with a very low complaint rate, the ability to manage supply chain costs with lower average cost in the market and more recently reduced supply chain disruption through digital prediagnosis and 24-hour operations. For context, Solus has about 1,000 staff across 21 sites and operates nationally aligned to volume density. We have a deliberate claims routing strategy to Solus with expansion plans to move its coverage of our motor claims to 50% with our planned new sites highlighted here in the Southwest and the Northeast of the country. On inflation, we are in exceptional times, not unprecedented, but certainly not market conditions, the like of which we have seen for many years. Our leadership team have significant depth for Personal Lines experience and have been through many market cycles. This combined with our technical foundations, and sophisticated feedback leaps gives us a strong platform to deal with what has been a challenging inflation environment. We acted quickly. We recognized the emerging issue in September '21 and reprojected our forecast scenarios every 2 weeks through Q4 2021 and 2022. And clearly, a key response has been our disciplined and early action in rating, reflecting our forecasts. In Q3, Amanda referenced, we have increased Motor new business rates by an average of 15% and Home by 8%. These equivalent numbers are now plus 20% for Motor and plus 13% for Home as we have continued to apply rate in the fourth quarter to mitigate claims inflation. Rate is not the only lever to combat inflation. Supply chain control and efficiency is a key asset. This gives us better, deeper data into the supply chain, enabling us to segment costs, not at a macro level, but in a granular way. For example, we identified the vehicle manufacturers, which were being most impacted by parts supply chain disruption and have targeted inflationary loadings to reflect such granular insights. To our fourth pillar, sustainability. We are committed to playing a key role in the delivery of the Aviva sustainability ambition. In climate, we're working towards net zero across claims and underwriting. In communities, we're focused on inclusivity, funding an industry-wide working group to tackle that subject in the context of the cost of living crisis. And we've made great progress on sustainability. We're just below 40% of women in senior management positions and engagement scores, the highest ever in Personal Lines. We also consider sustainability through a business lens, which brings me on to innovation. We recognize that our markets are changing, and with that comes both opportunity and the need to future-proof our business. Aviva Zero takes our technical foundations to the next stage, having 3 core features that we have built: first, a leading personalized to tech stack; second, transformational pricing speed and sophistication; and third, a sustainable motor proposition where we attract customer appeal, iterate and scale up. We've already sold more than 65,000 policies with GBP 30 million of GWP since launch less than 12 months ago. Together, these give us significant advantages dealing with instant real-time data. For example, we can take a trading decision, make the change fully test and deploy within 10 minutes and see the impacts immediately. We're excited at the prospects here and Zero will be a vital part of our retail growth plan. So exciting time to the Personal Lines business. And with that, I'll hand back to Adam to close and take us into Q&A.
As we've demonstrated today, we have strength across all the elements of customer, brand, technical foundations, retail, claims, supply chain and diversification. This provides us with a robust platform for profitable growth, and we're confident it can be delivered. Let me leave you with why we will win. Our Personal Lines business has headroom to grow in profitable and actionable growth opportunities in attractive market segments, particularly retail and high-net-worth. It has a scale portfolio already delivering strong performance against the market and competitors in a challenging environment. It has leading diversification across both products and distribution with deliberate targeted brand and customer segmentation powered by the #1 brand in the market. It has a deeply focused and experienced team, bringing excellent technical foundations in key skill sets such as pricing and machine learning deployed right across the business. It has industry leadership in sustainability and, finally, a key role in contributing to the wider Aviva group, providing cash, operating profit and crucially access and growth to mass market and mass affluent customers. We're proud of what we've achieved in our Personal Lines business so far, but also genuinely excited about where we can take the business next. Thank you. And with that, I will hand back to Charlotte.
Thank you, Adam. And Q&A. [Operator Instructions] So with that, Who wants to go first? Do you want to bring just here?
This is Ashik Musaddi from Morgan Stanley. Just a couple of questions. Could you just remind us about your reinsurance strategy in the Personal Lines business? And what you're seeing at the moment in terms of -- is it going to be a drag in terms of margins? That's what we are hearing from the reinsurers. So any color on that would be helpful. And secondly, with respect to inflation, I mean, clearly, Direct Line gave some update last week where -- they mentioned that inflation has picked up again in fourth quarter versus third quarter because in third quarter, there was a view that inflation pricing is more or less matching each other, but in fourth quarter, things went backwards again. So what are you seeing in terms of inflation versus pricing for your own book, both in Motor as well as in Home.
Okay. So let me take the reinsurance first, and then hand over to you for the inflation question. So look, reinsurance, it's been a topic that's been out there. We've really had a difficult renewal seasonal round, hardest market, I think, since about 2001. And particularly, if you think of the cat cover, there, the markets really didn't open up until just before Christmas, which is very much unprecedented. So I think if you look and the sort of data that we're hearing is that across property cat loss protection, if you risk adjust it and look at the inflation, for [indiscernible], it was as much as 75% price increases. Now we achieved pricing at a fraction of that. I assure you and terms hard and significantly across the market, but we made very few concessions and have fought very hard to keep consistent wording. So our cover is in place. Our placement is complete. That said, there were some changes to the structure compared to the previous year, both in terms of higher retention and more limited reinstatements. And these changes were necessary just simply for the market conditions that I've explained. It does mean a bit more risk has been retained, which has had a modest impact on our capital requirements. But we're satisfied that the outcome gives us a program that enables us to execute on our business plans, as we intended. And I think that's not necessarily the case across the market. So we could see some change in some ability to trade. Outside of the cat protection for us, certainly, other lines small or no rate increases. And then I think the other thing to watch is that the motor bodily injury, reinsurance comes renewal halfway through the year. So that's another point to watch. But overall, we're happy with the placements.
And if I take the question on inflation. You asked about the bridge between the third and the fourth quarter. I did note that we did see some rise up in the fourth quarter. So the 8% to 10% for motor became 9% to 11%. But it was 9% to 11% for home in the third quarter and 9% to 11% for home in the fourth quarter. And what I'd point you back to here is I think it's quite difficult to compare and contrast across the market because everyone sort of input set is going to differ. The example here being things like Solus that actually has a 3% to 5% cost advantage compared to the wider market. So the 2 weekly process that Owen talked about takes a very granular set of Aviva specific inputs to create effectively then an inflation number, which then effectively translates through to the technical price and the rates you heard Owen talk about in the market. But those inputs and outputs will, I think, differ by market participants.
Okay just find somebody holding their hands up.
Steven Haywood from HSBC. You've given the combined ratios for the retail and the nonretail, can you break them down for us between the claims ratio and the admin ratio and the acquisition ratio for both the retail and the nonretail so we can see where there is potential scope for improvement on those ones? And then secondly, the Court of Appeal gave a judgment on the mixed motor claims couple of days ago. Can you give us your view on what the Court of Appeal has said and whether this is going to lead to any particular increase in your reserves?
I think Owen and I will take the first part together, and then I'll come back to the Court of Appeal question. We aren't going to give a granular breakdown of our combined further than we've disclosed in the pack. Just to remind you what we've said, we said our retail business has delivered low 90s really across the cycle for a number of years, and our nonretail is around 8 points higher than that. And we've pointed you [indiscernible] a combined for high-net-worth in the low 90s as well. I don't know Owen whether you want to provide any further detail?
No, just to say that I think that 8 points reflects the fact that you get better retention rates, gets all the things described around better acquisition costs and you get to keep all the things in that value chain and build that, say that, better relationship with the customer. So those are the things that we want to maximize and push there.
And in terms of the motor claims judgment that came at the back end of last week, this is linked to effectively tariff claims through the portal. I genuinely think it's too early to answer the what's the read across into market practice. That judgment only came out, I think, on Thursday or Friday, last week. It's fair to say, I think there is a question in the wider market, whether that will lead to some increased claims farming as we saw pre-reform. But I think very early to point to any specific data that supports that conclusion. So as you'd expect, we keep a very watchful eye on this and all of the other inputs into our models and look to price appropriately for the behaviors and trends that we see in the market.
It's Farooq Hanif from JPMorgan. Just on the whole technical expertise side, we hear a lot from different companies about machine learning, about techniques, and it's very hard for us to appraise. What can you give us in terms of the advantages that you think you have either in terms of margin or speed to market in terms of pricing over your peers. I mean, how can we judge that advantage because it's obviously something that you started early. Second question, going back to inflation. There's been some concern recently about bodily injury inflation and care costs. And I'm just wondering what your thoughts are on that and how you feel like you've anticipated that?
Owen, why don't you take that?
So in terms of technical expertise, look, everyone is going to say they've got brilliant pricing teams, I think. When I look at our capabilities, that track record of delivering change. So if you think about 10, 15 years ago when we launched Quote Me Happy, we grew very rapidly into the market with that launch, and that was founded on exceptional pricing back then. I think when we look at our current level of capabilities, I did ask our team to sort of add up how many rate changes or whatever we made, and we added up for Aviva Online, which is our motor PCW play. And it was over 100 last year alone, just in one product and one brand. So we've got lots of agility, lots of skill and a track record of delivering it. I think the most exciting opportunity for us is our segment level penetration sales is 15% market share for low-risk drivers driving newer vehicles. Our actual opportunity is to deploy those foundations in some of those other segments that Adam is describing. And then in terms of...
Inflation, bodily injury and care costs.
Yes. So in terms of inflation, bodily injury and care costs, we look really closely at wage inflation indices to do that because I think that's obviously the bit [indiscernible] mind. So we picked various different indices and then mark our rates to that slightly below damage, but certainly reflective of wage inflation.
Okay. We can go over there.
So first, slightly linked to the previous question, but you've been top 3 in your markets for a long time. #1 and #2 seem to be relatively entrenched, not only on AI, but broadly speaking, where do you see your differentiating competitive advantage? The other one, if you can just quickly revisit on reinsurance. If you can give a little bit more clarity on the attachment points for cat risk to the extent that you're able, that would be very helpful.
I'll just cover the reinsurance. So I'm not going to give you any more detail on reinsurance today. Any more detail we'll cover on the 9th of March.
And in the first question, the sort of that competitive advantage or the differentiation. I'll ask Owen to comment more specifically in motor. But remind you against the competitive peer group, we hold advantages in home. We hold advantages in travel today. We've got some advantages and high-net-worth that we are building on. And so the headroom opportunity, I'd orientate you back towards motor. In terms of the levers, I think we've tried to address a number of them during our remarks, but things like the brand, obviously, have a big competitive advantage. Aviva is a really well-known, well-trusted brand when it appears in price comparison website rankings, then you saw that click-through advantage or you heard rather that click-through advantage we pointed to. And I think the skills and expertise right throughout the business then including coming into the claims and supply chain, things like the wholly owned motor-repair network, there is only one of our peers that owns an equivalent network. The rest of the market effectively uses open market partnerships or opportunities. And so I think there are a number of proof points we've tried to indicate that we believe in aggregate will allow us to compete to win and gain share where it's sensible and prudent to do so. But Owen perhaps you'd like to just sort of talk about Motor in more specific detail.
Yes. I'll come back to when we look -- when I came into the business and looked at the penetration we've got in those low risk drivers in kind of new vehicles, it's really leading, but we simply don't have that share in some of the other segments, such as Quote Me Happy Essentials and some of those other parts of the market we're describing. I think the upside is considerable simply by taking our skills there and deploying them in that context to serve new customers that we're underrepresented in. And I think the second advantage is around the depth of our deep data so that the length of claims data we have, the size of those assets, the ability to deploy those learnings on top across the different parts of our business gives us a real unique advantage there, too.
Alan Devlin from Goldman Sachs. A couple of questions. First of all, on the -- you mentioned your pricing if the -- and you've never get the inflation better than some of your peers. How do you expect to play that in 2023. If the market does have to catch up and push pricing ahead of claims inflation, will you take advantage in [indiscernible] pricing and grow market share and hit that GBP 3 billion target earlier? Or will you look to focus on margins at that 94% target? And then the second question on distribution, obviously, you benefited from particularly from Aviva brand being on the PCWs and building the retail, but you push that pricing practices review, how do you think distribution actually kind of evolves over the next 5 to 10 years, what PCW become less important. And the one kind of partnership didn't match was OEMs. Will they become important distributors of more insurance products in the future?
Why don't I take the first part; Owen, you take the second. So look, we believe with the rating numbers we talked about that we did successfully navigate the inflationary challenges in 2022. I'm not going to give you a forward-looking view of our pricing strategy into 2023. I think what I'd draw you back to is our need to balance the need to rate sensibly and cover for inflation. And if we can do that and grow simultaneously. We will obviously look to do so. However, and -- I draw you back to what happened in motor last year, where we can't do that and where it doesn't make sense to do so. Our primary target is a profitability is a sub-94% combined target, rather than a pure top line growth target. So we're always mindful of the ability to grow and look to find those sensible opportunities, but we need to be sensible and cautious as we do so. Owen?
Yes. So on distribution, I think if we go back to, say, prepricing practices, I think we called reasonably, well, what we thought would happen to the different components of the market as we went through '21 to '22, and we're pretty pleased with how that landed. I think the way we think about it going forward is given the price walking won't happen, you will see slightly lower renewal increases across the market. That's probably not that big. It's probably a small single-digit percentage would be my estimate. That will cause renewal rates to rise, which is a good thing for big established players and to build those trusted relationships with customers. I think you will, as a result, and actually, the size of the increase is generally what drives people to shop, see slightly less new business. Do I think it will be that material in terms of overall strategic change? No. But it's certainly an effect that we'll -- and we'll see how that levels out over the coming year or 2. That would be my thought on that. And then building to your question, OEMs. Absolutely, I think there's a potential that, that will happen and that change will come, I think we're preparing ourselves for it with things like Aviva Zero. So one of the reasons for that data layer that really runs through that platform is to be able to deal with connected motor data as and when that arises. I think also in terms of things like electric vehicles, we tend to over index by about 40% on electric vehicles relative to combustion engines, reflecting our sort of low-risk newer vehicle segments. So I think we're well placed when that market does move in that direction. But yes, it's something we're watching very closely.
[indiscernible] from HSBC. My 2 questions. First is on since COVID, we've seen a reduction in claims frequency potentially structurally. But as said, [indiscernible] pointed to Q4 seeing an uptick in claims frequency, what are your views in terms of reduction in claims frequency versus pre-COVID level? And the second is on the household market. Their data points suggest that there still remains a differential between new and renewal business pricing. At the half year is around 30%, given the fact that you have quite a large back book, do you still expect to do some more work in terms of adjusting for that new renewal differential?
Owen, you take part one, I'll take part 2?
Yes. So in terms of COVID reduction and sort of systemic change, I think -- there's definitely something about mindset and thinking about where we are now and understanding the patterns now and projecting forward. I think it's very easy to go 3 years back, but it's starting to get less relevant. So we're very much focused on projecting frequency out. I think in terms of what do we see in terms of frequency, the key things we look at are things like driving patterns, as I said in my presentation, those are the sorts of things I look at for indicators of where I think frequency is going to go where the new normal is going to settle. I think actually, we got it very close actually in terms of when we thought -- where we thought COVID would come out. I think everyone remains very vigilant on frequency as we go through '23 to make sure those patterns don't shift. And if they do, we get ahead of them. And I think those are lead indicators of driver behavior and traffic densities that sort of stuff will help that.
[indiscernible] mentioned home frequency as well as it seems that you just...
Yes. So on home frequency, we've certainly seen some home frequency drops since COVID, particular things -- some sort of -- slightly more attritional-type perils. I think that has enabled us essentially to -- within our rating to effectively take a little bit of -- when we think about inflation, we said inflation is 9% to 11%. Our home rating is at 8% against that. That's a combined renewal, new business split. And the difference, of course, is the frequency reduction. So we've certainly rated ahead of inflation in our view, on home.
Sorry. On home, we're hearing about pickups on escape of water claims that have sort of come down during COVID. So would you have to readjust for that in 2023? Or do you think we're going to get to sort of a lower level of claims frequency on home as well from now on?
I think my general view on home is that with more people working from home more of the time than pre-COVID, which I think was the basis of the question. Payrolls that may have been picked up after a longer passage of time are now being picked up more quickly. And I think that's the sort of -- that's the reference point I'd sort of ask you to think about with home viewed through the sort of customer lens. And then if we can move on to the sort of near renewal differences, we believe that we are fully compliant with general insurance pricing practices. We have obviously -- we planned to be fully compliant. We've submitted our returns to the regulator on that basis. I do understand the question on the basis, I think there is a body of, if you will, of sort of press articles that speaks to a difference. And I think I'd draw you back to some of the inflationary points because the way pricing practices needs to work is there can't be a difference from new business renewal for the same product in the same channel. Does that mean the prices can't go up year-on-year? Well, no because obviously, inflation on a purely on a like-for-like basis will and has pushed pricing up in the market year-on-year. But I think that point about making sure that people are comparing like-for-like, apples-to-apples in terms of the product and the channel when they're drawing those conclusions, is, I think, an important read through. And ultimately, we are awaiting regulatory feedback as is the market.
Greig Paterson, KBW. In terms of Motor, I mean you're talking about you've done well, et cetera. What is your combined ratio for Motor in 2022, please? And what was it in 2021? Because you've given us a whole description, but we want to know what the bottom line is to sort of, how can I say, to a hygiene test on that? And the second thing is some of your peers have pointed to your Essentials product, which is a new product, and therefore, does not fall within pricing practices, comparison rules this year having a problem in 2023 renewals because you'll have a comparison and they argue that you put a new business discounting on that product this year. So I wonder if you want to talk to that theme? And then finally, I'll sneak another one, you want to say something on pet, whether you see that as an opportunity or not?
So why don't I take the first 2, and Owen on pet. We are going to provide a more granular product breakdown between motor or home. What I would say is over the cycle 10-plus years, both lines of business have performed are relatively close to each other in line with the retail combines that we've given you in the pack. And so I'll just remind you the disclosures we've talked about is low 90s in retail, low 90s in high-net-worth and an 8-point difference to nonretail. I think in terms of peers and the Essentials product, I can just remind you the Essentials product, we built really to face into customers very legitimate cost of living concerns. Motor is one of the very few legally required lines of insurance in the U.K. and consequently, having a solution that solves for the very legitimate and genuine customer needs where they still need motor insurance, but want to spend a little bit less for potentially fewer features and options as a consequence. That's why we built Essentials. That's the purpose of Essentials. And I think that purpose, if anything, will be absolutely maintained through 2023. So I'm not worried about the read across the pricing practices. I'm worried about the -- what was the genuine customer intent behind having a more essentials. Some people call them values, we call it essentials, but use the phrase isn't a change. That's why we built it, and that's what it's there for. Owen, on Pet?
Yes. Look, pet is definitely one that we watch and look for in terms of what we might do there. I think right here right now, I think there's only so many things you can do as a business. And I think what we're trying to do is bring focus and discipline and right here right now, as I say, Motor and Home and the strategy we've outlined is where our focus is. But yes, want to watch and think about it in the future.
It's Barrie Cornes of Panmure Gordon. First question I got, just slightly surprised you didn't talk much about customer satisfaction levels for the products you sell. Just wondered if you [indiscernible] the data on how you compare to others? And second question, in terms of distribution, I just wonder how you manage the conflict or potential conflict between broker and direct and PCW? Bearing in mind, you're looking to grow in a high-net-worth and direct.
You get the first one, I'll pick up the second one?
Yes. So I think Adam referenced some TNPS scores in his part. And I think we're pretty happy with where those are. I mean, obviously, it's a huge focus for us to try and get those TNPS scores moving forward over time because that's how you build your brand and your relationship with customers. I think on the positive side, we've moved it forward with some really good digital experiences we're starting to deploy through the journeys. And Adam, again, referenced that. I think on the negative side on TNPS, certainly, we've -- it has been more challenging with some of the claims conditions and supply chain disruption on that side. But look, we're pretty satisfied where they are, and we're also satisfied that we get actually broadly similar claims TNPS scores across Quote Me Happy and our Aviva brands, which reflecting the fact that customers are understanding and happy with what they're getting.
I think your channel conflict question. I think potentially that was more of an issue in the past than it is today for us. We have a much more tightly defined view of the customer groups that we're now targeting through our direct and PCW brand and sort of customer segment strategy. And what we're looking to do with our broker channel is effectively complement that business rather than cannibalize it or fight for the same customers. So that reference in the pack to a much more sort of specialist and defined approach with brokers where we're targeting areas of the market that our own direct and PCW brands either don't reach or we don't want to reach, but yet actually where that broker has specific skills, customer affinity, customer loyalty or brand pickup. And so we think of them now as very complementary channels, but we absolutely do look through to make sure that we're not competing head-for-head for the same customer for the same product in the same channel.
[ Rachel ], Deutsche Bank. The first question is, could you just provide maybe some retention rates for home and motor and what the direction of travel has been on those over the last 18 months? And then in terms of inflation in motor specifically, are you able to break down damage inflation into different buckets and also talk about directional trends in terms of supply chain, for example, et cetera.
Owen, why don't I pick up the first part and you pick up the second part. I think we did disclose some retention rate trends in the third quarter. Broadly, I'd say to you, customer retention rates are in the sort of low 70s up to mid-90s. It does depend by product and channel. And what I pointed you towards earlier in terms of some of the impacts of pricing practices is we did see an uplift in direct motor a smaller uplift in Partnership's home business. But in terms of specific data points, I'd guide you towards that range in aggregate.
Yes. And then on inflation. So the process we go through is to take every type of inflation that we see from used cars right the way down through the stack parts, paying all the way through, including things like, as I say, for bodily injury, those wage indices, weight those and then multiply those through to come up with our views on inflation. So that's the process. That gets reviewed very regular and obviously, we do what we can to mitigate all of those impacts. That's where the 9% to 11% comes from. And obviously, we have processes as they continue to look at actual experience as well as our views, which bring those 2 together. As we look forward, I personally think it will be quite similar as we look in -- certainly on Home as we go into '23. I think -- on Motor, I think things like used car prices, we think has been well seen in the market, probably are softening off a bit, which may give a tiny bit of a lower range as we look forward. But again, we're just going to follow the same discipline and process we have done to make sure we are rating strongly and ahead of that.
[ Thomas Babin ] from Berenberg. You mentioned the Lemonade partnership. What do you think they can offer Aviva, i.e., kind of what do they do that you can't do at the moment? It sounds like you've got quite a good range of expertise. And just thinking about Ogden next year, and yes, we've got wage inflation. I think generally, we think that Ogden rate might go up. How bigger impact is that on kind of total claims costs for body injury claims?
Owen, I do the first part and you can do the second. So on an M&A partnership, I'd remind you, Lemonade is a [indiscernible] from the U.S., its primary focus in the U.K. as it launches is on the home renters market. What do they bring to us compared to the risk carrying or the underwriting capacity component, which is what we provide to them. I think it's a few things. I think it's access to a part of the market that historically that we haven't been in, in size and scale, the home rental market. And I think if you think about that through the macroeconomic lens, we do think that more people might be renting rather than buying over the next sort of part of the cycle, the economic cycle. So clearly, that's a part of the market that we think is going to grow, where they have a legitimacy understanding and the strong track record, albeit in the U.S. market. And I think their proposition, their UX, their UI, their customer experience and journeys. I think, are very strong. And I think there's ability for us to learn from those things and align them then with the areas of our perhaps more traditional strength along with underwriting, pricing, risk selection, exact claims management, et cetera. So I think it's a partnership that while small in the total context of our personal lines business, it's a good example of where we're trying to test and learn different parts of the market.
Yes, just very quickly on Ogden. Certainly something we watch very closely in terms of understanding where we think it might go looking at the various indices that sit around it. At the moment, we're not changing our approach. But again, it's one of those things that we watch month-to-month.
[ Andy Square ] from Bank of America, two for me. Firstly, just on the repair network that you have -- you talked about having a real lower cost advantage there. Just really wondering if you can put some numbers around that and how it's evolved over the last few years in terms of the advantage? And secondly, it was just on the 94% combined ratio target for Personal Lines. I see that's an IFRS 4 target. I just wonder if you can give us an idea, given that will be IFRS 17 in 2027. Can you give us some idea there?
Thank you. So in terms of the repair network, I think I said in one of my earlier answers, if you compare Solus to the partner network, we work with the covers then the sort of totality, 80% being all the claims within that envelope, 36% is Solus. Solus has about a 3% to 5% cost advantage is what is the number I pointed towards. Where does that come from? It comes from things like labor costs, it comes from potentially supply chain, and it comes from some of the efficiencies that we're able to drive in terms of when we bring cars in, how we route cars and generally, the efficiency end-to-end in that business. It has and it will evolve. And I think as a future-facing point I'd ask you to think about is 75% of services engineers are now qualified to repair EVs. And clearly, in the EVs, as they become more technological if it's the right word in terms of their makeup, then that will change both the cost of repair in the industry and the time it takes to repair certain things. And as a consequence, motor repair networks, whether they're owned by an insurer in the open market will need to evolve with some of those future tracing trends that Owen talked about in the context of mobility earlier. Amanda, on the combined target?
Yes. So then on IFRS 4 and IFRS 17, you remember from my video on IFRS 17 in December that we are applying certainly the net-net approach to reinsurance. So we won't see any changes from that. There are some modest differences in some of the treatments. So when we do the -- as we move forward and give you more information on an IFRS 17 perspective, you'll see that these -- how these translate, but it's a very modest adjustment. So for the moment, it's easier just to focus on these numbers.
[indiscernible] from RBC. So first question on machine learning. You mentioned this, Owen, and I wonder if you could just give us sort of tangible example of what you mean by machine learning and how it would change the price if that works? And the second question on cross-selling. You mentioned that and excuse a bit of skepticism probably in this room, and we've heard a lot about cross-selling probably in this room 20 years ago, that was the start of it, but also downstairs not so long ago. Could you maybe put some metrics around that? So what proportion of your target, your ambition growth are you allocating to cross-selling? And maybe you could talk about products per customer. What was it a year ago? What is it now? What's your target?
Owen, you take the first one? I'll take the second.
Yes. So I'll -- stop me if this gets too technical, but effectively, what people use -- what people mean when -- certainly, when I talk about machine learning is the ability to pick up what we call nonlinear effects in, say, claims data. So when we used to have things like generalized linear models, what you do is you'd have to kind of hand fit -- curve through things. So you sort of say it goes like that. And then you pick a different factor, which might be age whatever, but a different line through it. What the nonlinear machine learning models allowed to do is to get a much more granular view of exactly how that moves in a sort of interaction between the 2, if that makes sense. So what we've been doing is and doing our pricing is built one of those machine learning models for each of the [ headset ] damage. So for things like third party for accidental damage, et cetera. And then we construct from a frequency and severity perspective with those models are really granular view of every risk we write. So when I think about machine learning in terms of that risk cost [indiscernible] allows us to pick in a much more fine way specific risks from other risks. And equally, you can deploy those sorts of skills in a whole different number of contexts around market in all sorts of different ways. But does that give an answer to how we're thinking about it. And so getting better and that allows you to pick risk better essentially.
In terms of cross-selling, we're not giving more targets than we are in terms of the disclosures on play 17 of the pack. But what I draw you back to is we do have a strong cross-sell base where it's appropriate from a customer perspective to do so today. That customer base is growing. So some of the numbers you see on Slide 17, as we bring customers into the business with more marketing permissions, I guided towards retail customers tend to have market permissions in the 75% or 80% range, so you generally do give their permissions. That allows us to use the product and channel or solution rather universe that Aviva brings to bear. And 2 very tangible examples, one we've talked about in the pack where for Aviva's pension customers, we are applying an automatic discount into price comparison website, motor sales. We are seeing both a new business pick up as a consequence and then some of those retention dynamics play through. And the other pilots that we are literally just starting is with the succession Wealth business that we acquired in our Life business that I think you're all aware of. They are often asked by their high-net-worth customers about their own personal insurance and haven't up until now had the ability to solve, if you will, for that question from their customers. And so actually putting our high-net-worth business together with the succession wealth business to -- I suppose, to an [indiscernible] customer query of demand is another good example of what's different now compared to the past. I think Charlotte, maybe going to say more about this.
Yes, in the March presentation, there'll be a little bit more. So we'll come back to it then.
James Pearse from Jefferies. Have you found that you've remained more competitive in the nonretail business as you've been putting through rate increases this year versus the retail segment, thinking specifically on personal motor insurance, I guess, the broker channel is less price elastic? And then second question, peers have been specifically referring to third-party claims inflation and as being an issue in motor insurance, I'm just wondering if that's something that you've also seen. And if you can provide any more color in terms of what's causing that?
Do you want to take this one?
Yes. So in terms of competitiveness, actually, our competitiveness is changing quite a similar way across the retail and nonretail parts of our motor book. The largest part by distance of our motor book is in retail, so you can kind of take that and it carries across, and we've been very disciplined in both of those. In terms of third-party claims inflation, I'll come back to the process we followed. So absolutely, we have the 2 weekly forecast that I described. But actually, we also have what I call a monthly valuation light. So we kind of get our actuaries together with our claims people together with our pricing people, not to wait for each quarter to kind of split out the result, but to really give us that granular view of what's going on. Yes, we certainly saw a slight uptick in third-party property damage as you look back through Q4. I think that's one of the reasons our 8% to 10% went to 9% to 11%. So that will be within our '22 numbers when you see them in March. And obviously, we took rating action accordingly just to pick those trends up. But yes, the process is the important bit around how to keep picking up and getting ahead of those trends and using multiple different ways of thinking about it, so you don't miss it on one, but you pick it up on another that makes sense.
Steven Haywood from HSBC. Two questions, one on reserve buffers. Currently, do you think these are adequate in the light of the higher inflation, particularly on the wage increases side on the bodily injury reserve buffers here? And any expected change to the prior year releases? And then secondly, on the reinsurance thing. Obviously, you mentioned high retention and other changes having an impact on the Solvency capital requirement. Can you give -- can you quantify that a bit in the group context of the Solvency II ratio?
So look, on both of those, I'm really not going to give any more detail today. Suffice it to say the reserving factors in all of the inflation and all of the same data as Owen and Adam have been talking about. So that feeds the reserve process and then we conclude on the best estimates there. And as I say, on reinsurance, and it's -- whilst it has led to some higher retention levels and so slightly different reinstatements. That does lead to a bit more risk, which has been reflected in the -- will be reflected in the capital requirements, but we'll take you through that in March. We'll definitely go around again at this point. So unless -- we'll take this one as the last question, unless someone that's not asked the question wants to.
Apologies in advance. Farooq Hanif from JPMorgan. I've been asked to ask it. But can you talk about inorganic growth in UK Personal Lines right now and your views on that?
Look, everything you've heard today is around our core plans, which is organic. And what we've always said is that our approach to capital is we look at the best uses of it. So we will invest it. We will consider M&A. And as you would expect, we have a team that are screening opportunities. But the bar for M&A is really high. So, as I say, everything that you've seen and heard today is around organic. But there's 2 examples that we've talked about Azur and the AXA XL, where we have looked at moments where it made sense to bolt something on to lift or accelerate our progress through the strategy. So that remains the approach, and it's consistent with what we thought we said. No. Okay. I think I'm going to cut it there. So I'd just like to thank you all for coming in on this foggy day. And thanks very much, Adam and Owen for everything we've been through today, all that detail. We look forward to speaking to you at our full year results when you'll see even more information on the 9th of March. And in the meantime, thank you again and have a good rest of the week.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Aviva plc transcript - plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.
Get an API key View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Aviva plc earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the
EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server.
Quarterly plans from $105 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search,
and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.