Barrick Mining Corporation (ABX) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

May 2, 2023

Toronto Stock Exchange CA Materials Metals and Mining shareholder_meeting 48 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Barrick 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. As a reminder, this meeting is being recorded. I would now like to turn the meeting over to John Thornton, Executive Chairman. Please go ahead, sir.

John Thornton

executive
#2

Good morning, my fellow shareholders. It is my pleasure to welcome you to Barrick's 2023 Annual General Meeting, those who have joined us in person here in Toronto as well as those who have chosen to participate by way of our live webcast. We look forward to answering your questions and hearing your views. Before we start, I would like to introduce the other directors who are here with me today or participating online. They are Mark Bristow, Helen Cai, Gustavo Cisneros, Christopher Coleman, Isela Costantini, Michael Evans, Brian Greenspun, Brett Harvey, Anne Kabagambe, Andrew Quinn, Loreto Silva. Our most recent appointment was out of Isela Costantini, who brings to the Board 25 years of experience in international business with a particular emphasis on Latin America. It's worth noting that her appointment increases the proportion of women on our board to 33% ahead of our 30% target we set for 2022. The past year brought a broad range of challenges, economic as well as political to the world, thanks to Barrick's integrated value-focused strategy founded on partnerships and sustainable mining, we were able to deliver creditable production and financial results while at the same time, advancing our major growth projects and initiating others. Four years ago, we launched the merger with a very strong team and I am proud to say that over time, they have grown even stronger under the leadership of Mark Bristow and his Executives. Our foundational mantra was best people, best assets, best returns. Our gold assets are demonstrably the world's best, and I think we can now confidently make that claim for our people. As for returns, Barrick's 2022 payout to shareholders was a record $1.6 billion, including dividends declared under our performance dividend policy and $424 million in share buybacks under the program introduced last year. Our returns to shareholders have not been at the expense of organic growth. We continue to invest and roll forward our 10-year gold and copper plans, which show real organic growth on a consistent base case production profile. Our focus this year will be on building Barrick's value foundation, both within and beyond our current borders. Particularly notable are the expansion of the Pueblo Viejo gold mine in the Dominican Republic, which will extend its Tier 1 status by at least 20 years and that of the Lumwana copper mine in Zambia, which will add match to our copper portfolio. Then there is the Reko Diq project in Pakistan based on one of the largest and highest quality undeveloped copper gold deposits in the world. When Reko Diq and the expanded Lumwana are in full production by the end of the decade, they will lift Barrick into the premier league of copper miners in line with our goal of becoming a major producer of this strategically important metal. Barrick remains an industry leader in sustainability and our annual sustainability report published last month, gives a detailed account of what has been achieved and what remains to be done. If you have not seen it yet, it is well worth reading and can be found in the Sustainability section of our website. On our Sustainability strategy, which is an essential part of the way we do business, is based on the belief that the challenges of climate change, poverty and biodiversity loss are inextricably linked and must be managed holistically. Many of our operations are in less developed countries, where they make a substantial economic contribution both to the state and to the people. This is in line with our stakeholder philosophy and holds that the -- sorry, which ranks our host countries and communities, equal to our shareholders and holds that the value we create should also be shared with them. A recent example among many of the support we provide is the $30 million Barrick has pledged to our partnership with the Tanzanian government for the expansion of the country's education infrastructure. While climate change remains a shared global challenge, we must also recognize that blanket policies prescribing greenhouse gas emissions present a particularly severe penalty to underdeveloped countries. Nations that were fortunate to develop in an earlier, more permissive era and which account for the vast majority of legacy emissions, owe it to the developing world to support a just energy transition and the understandable desire to achieve the same modernization for their citizens. The mining industry has to be a part of the solution by not only providing the materials for development, but also investing in the developing world and encouraging the responsible mining of metals and minerals for common benefit. In this regard, as in many others, Barrick continues to show the way. Our proven long-term strategy, our quality assets, our growth projects our world-class team and our social license to operate earned through mutually beneficial partnerships with our host countries continue to differentiate Barrick from our peers. With our banked long-term plans, we and our investors can be confident that Barrick will be sustainably profitable whatever new challenges may arise. And with that, I will hand it over to Mark, who will chair the meeting.

Se-Wook Yoon

executive
#3

Thank you, John, and a very good morning, ladies, and gentlemen. With your consent, I will ask Dana Stringer, Barrick's Corporate Secretary, to act as Secretary of the meeting and representatives of TSX Trust Company to act as scrutineers. We are pleased to once again return to a hybrid meeting format for this year's meeting, which can be attended in person or virtually by way of live webcast. There are three matters to deal with as part of the formal business of the meeting: the election of directors, the appointment of an auditor and an advisory resolution on executive compensation. Registered shareholders who held shares on March 3, 2023, the record date for this meeting, and duly appointed proxy holders are entitled to vote at this meeting using an electronic ballot. If you are participating through the virtual platform, and are not a registered shareholder or a duly appointed proxy holder you are attending this meeting as a guest. Shareholders who have already voted by proxy do not need to complete an electronic ballot unless you wish to change your vote. The virtual platform will be opening -- opened for voting on all three resolutions at the same time. Once all items of business have been presented, I will give you a few moments to enter your votes and then declare voting closed on all resolutions. Shareholders and proxy holders participating through the virtual platform may submit a question at any time by clicking on the Message icon displayed on your screen, composing a question, and then selecting the send icon. For shareholders present in person, we will conduct the vote on each resolution by ballot. Shareholders who have already voted by proxy do not need to complete a ballot unless you wish to change your vote. Forms of ballot were distributed to shareholders and proxy holders when they registered with the scrutineers. Shareholders and proxy holders who have not received a ballot and wish to receive one should raise their hands so that scrutineers can distribute them to those entitled to vote. Following the formal business of the meeting, we would be happy to respond to questions from the meeting room or submitted through the virtual platform. As the scrutineers have confirmed that a quorum of shareholders is present, I declare the meeting to be properly constituted and the virtual platform open for voting on all resolutions. We will now proceed with the elections of the Directors. I move that Helen Cai, Gustavo Cisneros, Christopher Coleman, Isela Costantini, Michael Evans, Brian Greenspun, Brett Harvey, Anne Kabagambe, Andrew Quinn, Loreto Silva, John Thornton, and myself be elected as Directors of Barrick. If you are participating in the meeting through the virtual platform, please record your vote for directors now. Each shareholder or proxy holder who is present in person should record their vote under item #1 on the ballot. Please keep your ballot for voting on further matters. Ballots will be collected after the conclusion of the last matter of business of today's meeting. When you have finished voting, please sign, and print your name on the ballot. [Voting]

Se-Wook Yoon

executive
#4

The next item of business is the appointment of an auditor. I move that PricewaterhouseCoopers; LLP be appointed auditor of Barrick to hold office until the close of the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until its successor is appointed and that the directors be authorized to set auditors' remuneration. If you are participating in the meeting through the virtual platform, please record your vote now. Each shareholder or proxy holder who is present in person should record their vote under item #2 of the ballot. [Voting]

Se-Wook Yoon

executive
#5

We will now consider the last item of business. Please note that I will close the virtual platform for voting after this item so please ensure you record your vote on all resolutions. The Board of Directors has adopted a nonbinding advisory vote relating to executive compensation. I move that the advisory resolution regarding the company's approach to executive compensation as set forth in the information circular be approved. If you are participating in the meeting through the virtual platform, please record your vote now. Each shareholder or proxy holder who is present in person should record their vote under Item #3 of the ballot. Once you have completed your ballot, please raise your hand so the scrutineers can collect your ballot. I'll just pause for a little while so that we can complete our ballots. [Voting]

Se-Wook Yoon

executive
#6

We would now be happy to respond to questions relating to the business of the meeting. We will begin with questions from the meeting room and then respond to questions posted to the virtual platform. For those attending in person, we would ask that you please raise your hand and somebody with a microphone will come to you. Please make sure that you say your name before you present your question and restrict your questions to one. Shareholders and proxy holders participating in our meeting through the virtual platform may submit a question by clicking on the message icon displayed on your screen, composing a question, and selecting the send icon. We would like to give as many of you as I said earlier, as possible an opportunity to participate. So please keep your questions to a single question and try and make them concise. Let's begin with the first question.

Unknown Attendee

attendee
#7

Mr. Mark, I'm a journalist and human rights activist from Balochistan. It's a war-torn region in Pakistan under Pakistan's current rule. Thousands of people have been abducted, disappeared and tortured and killed by the Pakistani government to counter social and political movements for Balochistan's right, including right to self-government and control our national resources. I'm also a victim of this bloody crackdown. I lost lots of friends, colleagues, journalists and family members, and they lost their lives because they were peaceful protests against the central government's policies and foreign investors' exploitations. Despite all that, Barrick gold signed an agreement with the central government to extract Balochistan's gold and copper without any social license and consent of the local people and local people protested Reko Diq agreement, calling it direct violation of our rights and development of national resources is under provincial government. But the central government pressurized the provisional government overnight to take our entire authorities to decide the Reko Diq and you signed the agreement with the provincial government many minister of the provincial government are allegedly abducting, killing, civilians, students, human rights activists, including women, one minister, [ communicate ] recently alleged of detaining an entire family, raping a women, killing a women and throwing acid on her face. And my question is to you and how do you claim that the agreements you signed is legitimate, brings prosperity to the people of Balochistan, if it is found to be based on abuses of rights and sign by alleged murderer and rapist? And also in December last year, you held the inference conference asked the Pakistani Government to bring some restrictive law, and Pakistani Government did in bringing a foreign minister law protection and Promotion Act in 2022. And that as don't allow us to go to courts even there is a case in Balochistan High Court one of the lawyer submitted. And neither the provincial government neither central government neither someone from Barrick Gold went to the court for the following [ nine ] hearing until the Supreme Court declared that the National Security matter. How do you explain why it is a National Security matter to publish that agreement's detail? We still don't know what is in an agreement, who did it and how it was done. And there's also barely a blackout. No one is allowed to go there. And your organization recently also met with the Chinese companies and officials in Gwadar and to use the China, Pakistan economic corridor in Gwadar port to transport materials, gold and copper from Barrick, from Reko Diq to around the world and the same CPEC project, because of CPECs, they are killing and update the security forces, deploy their special extra security forces in thousand killing and abducting people, including burning down -- they burned down my parent's house to stop us if speaking against these injustices. And they're using -- you are going to use the same project and same military forces, Human Right Watch, Amnesty International, UN declare them behind the killings and abductions and destroying the houses is. How you can protect them? And we are living in Canada. And we are living in a free country, and we are getting involved in target with the Chinese companies with the Pakistani brutal forces. And I think Barrick's is going to be responsible similar way as the Pakistani Government and military forces.

Se-Wook Yoon

executive
#8

Sorry, what's your name?

Unknown Attendee

attendee
#9

My name is [ Latif Johar].

Se-Wook Yoon

executive
#10

So, I understand that you are a person seeking asylum in Canada. And so -- and I think the critical thing here is clearly, it's been a long time since you've been back in Pakistan. And you are from Gwadar, and there are a whole lot of things that you don't understand about our project in Pakistan. And so, I'll just explain very briefly, not as perhaps as long as your speech, but I'll try and explain it to you. If we carry on stopping the development of the world, which is what everyone wants to do, particularly people like yourself, how does the world change? How do we bring proper just engagement on behalf of the people of the developing world? So, I'll just take you through a little story about Reko Diq. First of all, Reko Diq was denied development in 2013. We went through a process of international arbitration, which Barrick won and it was awarded a $6 billion award. Instead of forcing the award, we went to Mr. Khan, Imran Khan, the opposition today and suggested to him that there's a better way to do these things for the benefit of all people in both Balochistan and Pakistan and he agreed. And so we sat down and we negotiated a framework agreement, which sets out the way this project is going to be developed. And one of the things we insisted was that the Balochistan province gets 25% of the project, one of the biggest undeveloped copper gold projects in the world. and it's financed. This is the biggest single investment ever in Balochistan. And we negotiated this with Imran Khan and with the then Balochistan Government. It changed, as you know. And the new Pakistan Government affected the framework we had agreed with the Imran Khan Government. It doesn't happen in most places of the world, when one government respects the other government -- previous government's negotiation. We did the same with the Balochistan Government because, again, we negotiated with the previous Balochistan Government elected and this current Balochistan Government accepted the negotiation. I personally visited all the communities around and that will be impacted, mostly positively, in fact, all positively by Reko Diq and held mass town halls, accompanied by the Balochistan Chief Minister, both of them before and today. When we had finished those negotiations, we then approached the Supreme Court of Pakistan, and we published all the agreements. So, your point about no one knows about these agreements is just nonsense. We published the agreements, and we opened the agreements to debate with the Supreme Court under a 5-bench judge -- a set of judges from the Supreme Court. And they decided on dealing with the questions. They consulted with all interested parties, those in favor and not. And at the end of the day, they judged that this was good for Pakistan, it was good for Balochistan, the judges, not us, not the government, the previous government, or the current government. And today, we have bipartisan support and support from the Balochistan Government and the support from the various regional councils plus the individual little villages. You don't know this because you don't come from there. Sir, you've had your say. This is not an argument. You asked me a question. I'm setting the record straight, okay? So, what I suggest you do is that you do your research and you make arrangements through the offices of Barrick, and we will have somebody have a conversation with you. I didn't ask you to argue with me, sir. So, you made a statement, I did. I'm not. That's not true. Listen, sir, would you like to leave? Okay. Thank you. Just leave. Look don't swear in this audience, please. This is unbecoming of you. And if you have a problem, approach the Supreme Court. You're not -- we are not anywhere there. We don't plan to use the Gwadar port. Please, will you leave? Thank you. Lovely. Thanks. Have a good day, sir. You should go back to Balochistan. All right. Next lady. Thank you.

Unknown Shareholder

shareholder
#11

I brought notes, so I could be brief. My name is [ Rachel Small ]. I'm a shareholder. So as you may have heard, there was a protest outside of this meeting right now in people shouting and in the past month, the communities around the world in Argentina, Dominican Republic, Papua New Guinea, Alaska, Nevada, Pakistan and the Philippines. And as you know, many of the places where Barrick has mines have organized public actions and protests against Barrick mine, they allege oppressive violence, perpetual water pollution, violations of indigenous rights, destroyed livelihoods from Barrick Gold operations. Just last night, I was sent photos of 95 homes in the Dominican Republic with cracks in the walls allegedly from Barrick's operations, the Pueblo Viejo mine. So, I'm hearing and I read the annual report, I see that it claims recognizing respecting human rights are a fundamental value for the company. But as a shareholder, I'm asking, given the wide range of serious human rights and environmental allegations that these communities are raising around the world, what specific actions or steps will Barrick Gold take to restore its relationships with communities? If communities all over the world are protesting your mines, there is a problem with that relationship. So how will you restore the relationships, how will you ensure human rights due diligence increase transparency and provide remedy for the negative impacts?

Se-Wook Yoon

executive
#12

Thank you for that, [ Rachel ]. Just let me know how many shares do you own?

Unknown Shareholder

shareholder
#13

[indiscernible].

Se-Wook Yoon

executive
#14

So. And the allegations you make, have you ever visited Dominican Republic? Okay. And Argentina? And Argentina? We've got lots of that because there's social media. What about Papua New Guinea? And what about Tanzania? Okay. So, I do. Every 3 months, I'm there on the ground. I meet with the communities. I engage with the activists not people like you who just make a noise who have a demonstration outside that don't even have the right logo for Barrick. If you're a shareholder, you should at least know that we changed the logo 4 years ago. So allegations are one thing, real protest based on fact is another. And we have lots of people coming to speak to us. We work with NGOs, human rights on the ground, not human rights that are based in their luxury apartment in Toronto, who work on the ground. As I said earlier, as our Chairman said in his introduction, what we do is we change lives. How many jobs have you created in your life? So, we employ 40,000 people across 18 countries. We represent in Dominican Republic, 20% of the taxes paid in that country. We rehabilitate old environmental impact. We've spent $70 million doing that. And again, we are absolutely committed. Should there be any transgression, any violation of our sustainability principles, our values, our DNA, submit to us those allegations along with evidence and names and we'll follow up and we'll report back to you. We always do that. We do that every single day of our life, and we'll be happy to do it to you even if you're a shareholder with 1 share because you know what? You heard the Chairman again; our communities and our host countries are as important as our shareholders. So, we'll be happy to do that. So if you're oblige, just leave your name, we'll follow up and we'll certainly report on it once you give us the evidence. Thank you very much and thank you for coming.

Unknown Executive

executive
#15

Okay. Mr. Chairman, we have several online questions from [ Stuart Donaldson ]. Unfortunately, he doesn't state where he's from. So, I'll select a relevant one. There is now -- there are now two lawsuits ongoing against Barrick, brought by indigenous career peoples from communities around the North Mara mine in Tanzania who led extreme violence leading to life-altering naming or death at the hands of mine security and police guarding the mine. When will Barrick settle these cases to bring some relief to the families and when will Barrick stop using Tanzanian police to guard its mines?

Se-Wook Yoon

executive
#16

Thank you very much for that question. First of all, let's just get this right. We do not use police to protect our mines. The police that has been referred to as community police under the auspices of the Government of Tanzania, which is a democratically elected government. That's the first just correction. Second one is, you refer to minority people. Tanzania do not have tribes. They did away with tribes and nationalized everyone the same many years ago at independents in the 1960s. They all speak one language. The third one is the accusations that you made are led by Raid R-A-I-D, which is a U.K. NGO. And they've been doing this for many years before I arrived and after I arrived. Again, like [ Rachel ], they were very clear about all these atrocities, but today, we have never received any evidence, just allegations. We are on the ground. So what we did is we invited Raid to come to the mine. And the CEO of Raid came to the mine to visit. And we took them to a community meeting. And just for those who don't understand the structure in Tanzania, each village has an elected Chairperson. They did away with traditional chiefs. So elected Chairperson, has a Chief Executive underneath that. And we introduced Raid to the 11 chairpersons representing the 11 villages around North Mara. And she was able to discuss with him. And she's been writing in the international press about all these allegations coming from the community. The elected chairpersons didn't know her, didn't know Raid, denied all the allegations. They did it in a public foreign with the CEO of Raid and they put it in writing. We can't fix things that don't -- are not part of what we do. To fix the security thing, we have security at North Mara. They're unarmed. Raid suggests because our security is unarmed, we have to lean on the police. We don't. Our security control access. When people forcibly enter our mine, cut the fences scale a 9-foot concrete wall and go and steal the gold on the rock dumps in amongst our mining activities, that's dangerous. We call the police, like you would do here in Canada, and they intervene. And in many cases, they are attacked. And so what we did with Raid is we actually showed them a video of these people in [ greeting ]. They're definitely not down and out individuals. They're organized gangs, trying to exploit and steal gold. So, we've showed them that. The court cases you referred to, we are progressing with them because it's time that the world learned the truth and appreciated that some people claiming to be NGOs that makes so much noise, raise money, live off that money are not who they claim to be. Because we work with NGOs in all these countries. And those people, as you know, are brave. They take on the challenges that poverty delivers. They work with us, they hold us accountable, and we work with them and we respect them. But we do not take kindly to people sitting here in their glass houses and working so hard to stop the development of this world so that they can earn a living. And that's the way I would explain and answer your question, whoever you might be or wherever you are.

Unknown Executive

executive
#17

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I have a question from Beverly Hoffman, Earthworks. My name is Beverly Hoffman, a 71-year-old elder living in Bethel, Alaska. I am a Calista shareholder, ONC travel member and Co-Founder of the Mother Kuskokwim Tribal Coalition. The proposed Barrick Gold -- Donlin Gold mine is one of the largest in the world on our salmon-spawning river, the Kuskokwim. Our river is already suffering from a decline in all 7 -- 5 salmon species. This river flows 900 miles from its mouth down to the ocean. Our people, our land is dependent on our fish to sustain us. We are dependent on clean water, clean air, free of risks of toxic material like cyanide and mercury. My question is, how can you talk about protecting subsistence rights in your commitment statements and honoring traditions when in this very mind and the probable risks threaten it? We are asking Barrick to withdraw from our region.

Se-Wook Yoon

executive
#18

So thank you very much for that. And again, I think you've asked this question before, and we've also engaged with you in writing. And I would just point out that, as you know, Donlin is a project that is owned by the native Alaskans. It's being developed in partnership with the native Alaskans. Specifically, the Donlin project comprises, as you point out, the Calista Corporation and the Kuskokwim Corporation. Both of them, and in particular, the Calista Corporation owns the mineral rights and a portion of the surface rights, and the Kuskokwim Corporation owns the majority of the project surface rights. The project has been advanced in accordance with the principles enshrined in the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971, which provides a mechanism for environmentally sound and socially responsible development of Alaska's natural resources for the benefit of native Alaskans. And again, all native Alaskans benefit from any natural resource development. As you would know from the Red Dog development, which has been one of the biggest contributors to the Alaskan natives over many, many years, and that's coming to an end. And so there are many conversations I've had with the representatives of the Calista Corporation and the Kuskokwim Corporation, who are duly and democratically elected have been over exactly the point that you make because all of us care about the environment. I'm a great fisherman. I care about rivers and fish. And so we are still busy with our studies, and we will continue to study and we will continue to comply with the best regulations relating to development of mines in environmentally sensitive areas. And certainly, since I've been involved, we've been able to look at ways to preserve the very river that you talk about. And again, our employees in Donlin are primarily all from the local community because it's a joint partnership. It's not Barrick. And by the way, there's another investor, NovaGold, who are our partners. We are jointly working to bring this to account -- when we go to speak to the politicians in Washington, we go with the Calista and Kuskokwim people. We don't go there on our own. And so again, ma'am, if you have a particular concern and we know the concern about the rivers, we have responded many times. We would happily respond to you and explain to you exactly what we are doing. And we can give you examples of how we operate in similar environments around the world. And again, I would just suggest to you that as we stand today, the most pressure that I'm getting from the local people is when are we going to start building the mine, not please stop building the mine, and we will, but we will not start until we've completed every single part of our impact analysis, and we have engineered our way to ensure that we can develop that mine one both profitably; and two, that it is well within all the permitting that we've received to date.

Unknown Executive

executive
#19

Mr. Chairman, just to cover our global REIT. I'm going to take one more question from [ Stuart Donaldson ]. This month, indigenous peoples from around Barrick's Porgera mine in Papua New Guinea protested the reopening of that mine of human rights claims from victims of violence and rape by mine security and police guarding that mine dating back over many years have never been addressed. When will Barrick address the legacy of human rights abuses of the Porgera Gold Mine?

Se-Wook Yoon

executive
#20

So let me explain to you something because I don't know what you're talking about in Porgera. But this last week, there were 7 people killed in Porgera, the week before a whole lot more. Last month, some more in tribal conflicts. There were allegations, which were investigated and settled on certain security issues in Porgera many, many decades ago. And they were settled. But today, we haven't operated Porgera mine for the last 3 years. And we've watched the community destroy the hospital, destroy the schools. We've rehabilitated the hospital and the schools. They're being destroyed again. We are working with the women leaders and the youth to make sure that the military and the police are deployed there to protect the normal citizens in the region. And we have absolute alignment with that community. The last big conflict where two whole villages were completely destroyed; children, women killed. I was the only one with my team that went to the community and call them out with the leadership, the leadership of the women groups in that area and point out that this barbaric behavior is not acceptable, certainly not to Barrick neither to our shareholders. And so again, these things, as you know, in Papua New Guinea, everyone's negotiating for some special deal. Everyone wants money. No one is prepared to invest in the future of Papua New Guinea. We are. And we believe that if we leave that place, we will -- no one will see what happens in the Valley, in the Porgera Valley. And the world would know better, and you wouldn't know. And we believe that we have a moral responsibility to continue to ensure that we invest to develop the people of that region. And we will continue to do it. and we'll continue to do it in a proper and just way. And right now, the principal owners of Porgera are the Papua New Guinean people themselves, 51%. We own with our partner, Zijin, 49%. But we are the operators. And so, I would again call on you to get your facts straight and work with us to make sure that the Porgera valley is a better place for those innocent people that are being exploited by the thugs in the area. And those thugs are encouraged by sort of the news that you're claiming is factual. At least I must say the young lady earlier on pointed out that it was an allegation. And so allegations, we are always 100% committed to follow up provided you can give us some evidence.

Unknown Executive

executive
#21

There are no more questions, Mr. Chairman.

Se-Wook Yoon

executive
#22

Thank you very much, everyone. That brings us to an end, and I just need to get this little note here, and I can finish off with the results. So now I'll turn back to the voting results. And the scrutineers have confirmed that each of the Director nominees named in the information circular has been elected with at least 81% of the votes in favor. The appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP as auditor has been approved with approximately 85% of the votes in favor and the advisory resolution on the company's executive compensation approach has been approved with approximately 77% of the votes in favor. Detailed final voting results of all the items of business at today's meeting will be filed on SEDAR. So, with that, thank you very much, ladies and gentlemen, for attending this AGM, and I look forward to reporting back next year. Thank you.

Operator

operator
#23

This concludes today's meeting. Thank you for participating and have a pleasant day.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Barrick Mining Corporation transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Barrick Mining Corporation earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.