Home / Transcripts / C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) · October 5, 2026

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

October 5, 2026

NASDAQ US Industrials Air Freight and Logistics m_and_a 57 min

What were the key takeaways from C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s October 5, 2026 earnings call?

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW:US) announced a definitive agreement to acquire RXO for approximately $30.25 per share, representing a 27% premium to RXO's recent trading price. This strategic acquisition is expected to create a combined company with pro forma revenue of $25 billion for 2026 and is projected to be accretive to adjusted EPS within nine months post-close. Management highlighted anticipated annual cost synergies of $300 million within two years, driven by the application of their lean AI operating model, which is a key factor in their growth strategy moving forward.

What topics did C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. cover?

What were C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.'s October 5, 2026 results?

The acquisition of RXO represents a significant strategic move for C.H. Robinson, positioning the company for enhanced growth and operational efficiency. The expected synergies and revenue growth opportunities could serve as strong catalysts for stock performance. Investors should monitor the integration process and the realization of projected synergies as key indicators of success.

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator operator
#1

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the C.H. Robinson to Acquire RXO Conference Call. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded, Monday, October 5, 2026. I would now like to turn the conference over to Chuck Ives, Senior Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Charles Ives executive
#2

Thank you, Donna. Hello, and thank you for joining today's conference following our announced agreement to acquire RXO. Before we begin, please note that certain information presented on this call contain forward-looking statements, including statements regarding the timing, consummation and anticipated benefits of the proposed transaction. These statements are subject to future risks and uncertainties, such as those factors described in the slide presentation available on our website as well as those described in C.H. Robinsons and RXO's filings with the SEC, including each company's most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K. Please note that the company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. With me on today's call are Dave Bozeman, our President and Chief Executive Officer; and Damon Lee, our Chief Financial Officer. Presentation materials, along with our recent press release can be found in the Investors section of our website. Our discussion today will be strictly limited to the transaction that we announced this morning. Any comments related to our quarterly financial results will occur as part of our Q3 earnings conference call later this month. With that, I'll turn the call over to Dave.

David Bozeman executive
#3

Thanks, Chuck, and good morning, everyone. We're excited to be here to discuss this significant milestone for C.H. Robinson. As described in our press release, we have entered into a definitive agreement to acquire RXO in a stock and cash transaction. This transaction will bring together 2 complementary businesses to define the future of third-party logistics while driving significant value for shareholders. This is a natural step in the transformation we began just over 3 years ago. Together, we expect to create a more resilient business, and we expect to apply our proven lean AI operating model to unlock significant synergies and improve financial performance of the combined company through freight market cycles. Additionally, this acquisition is expected to expand our capabilities to better support customers as they navigate a dynamic supply chain environment, increase penetration across verticals and win new business. We are confident that this will allow us to enter a new chapter of profitable growth that will translate to significant value creation for C.H. Robinson and RXO shareholders. This morning, I'll walk through the transaction and provide some context about why this is such a compelling opportunity for both businesses. Then I'll pass the call to Damon to discuss some of the financial benefits. Before we begin, I want to thank the C.H. Robinson employees for their hard work and dedication to our transformation that made this transaction possible. I also want to welcome RXO employees to C.H. Robinson. Our people are our greatest asset, and they have to have been key to the success of our company and our customers. I am confident this transaction will create new and exciting opportunities for our team as we bring C.H. Robinson and RXO together and unlock incredible potential of our combined platform. With that, let's get going. I'll start with a summary of the transaction terms. We are acquiring RXO for $17.25 in cash and 0.0856 C.H. Robinson shares per RXO share, implying a value of approximately $30.25 per share. The transaction represents a premium of 27% to RXO's 90-day volume weighted average price and 29% to RXO's closing price on Friday, October 2, 2026. This also translates to a $5.8 billion enterprise value for RXO. This transaction is an opportunity to take a massive step forward in accelerating our growth and strengthening our financial foundation and earnings profile. We are creating a combined business with pro forma revenue of $25 billion for 2026 and significant opportunities to expand operating margins and accelerate profitability through improved offerings and operating efficiencies. This transaction is expected to be accretive to adjusted EPS within 9 months of close, which we expect to occur in the first half of 2027. By the end of fiscal 2028, we expect the transaction to be mid-teens accretive to adjusted EPS. This accretion is driven by the significant synergies we expect to unlock. By applying our proven lean AI operating model to RXO's business, we expect to realize $300 million in net annual run rate cost synergies within 2 years post close. These synergies and cash generation are expected to provide us with a clear path to rapidly delever to our target leverage range of 1.75 to 2.25 by the end of 2028. We have a proven track record of driving productivity and cost savings and expect to realize these synergies by using the same playbook. This transaction will allow us to advance our strategy and drive significant profitability and support meaningful long-term shareholder value creation. Turning to Slide 4 and an overview of the value drivers of the transaction. At its root, this transaction is an opportunity to accelerate our proven strategy with a combined platform to enhance our resilience and better compete. Our transformation has centered on the implementation of our lean operating model and lean AI capabilities that have allowed us to move faster, operate more efficiently and deliver industry-leading service to our customers and carriers. This transaction will enable us to implement our unique lean AI operating model across our combined business to accelerate the productivity improvements we've realized in recent years, driving the $300 million in net annual cost synergies I just mentioned. Achieving these synergies will enhance our operating leverage, expand our combined margin and drive considerable cash flow generation. This is also an opportunity to accelerate our growth strategy with expanded capabilities and improved network density. RXO's complementary capabilities will further diversify our business, expand our reach and strengthen the value proposition of our platform. It also broadens our solution set across multimodal truck brokerage, managed transportation, last mile and expedited services. creating a broader and more comprehensive offering to deepen customer relationships and cross-sell our solutions to meet our customers' end-to-end needs. With expanded capabilities, increased network density and a broader customer base, we will have an enhanced ability to drive growth through market cycles. This will allow us to build on our strong financial foundation. Given our expected productivity improvements, cash flow generation and anticipated rapid delevering, we expect to maintain our solid investment-grade ratings. On Slide 5, you can see the scale and diversity of offerings that we will provide together. This combination materially increases our network density, bringing together approximately 93,000 shippers and 600,000 carriers. We will also have an expanded business mix with the combined company offering more solutions across the supply chain. This network density and diversity will allow us to enhance freight matching, improve service levels and better compete across transportation markets. Our wider network of partners and expanded capabilities will allow us to support customers with more precision and speed than ever before. Offering a stronger, more diversified service product will help us further penetrate across modes and segments, win new business and deeper relationships with customers. Taking a step back, Slide 6 provides a snapshot of RXO's business. The RXO team has built a fantastic business with a technology-enabled platform, a talented team with deep industry expertise, strong customer relationships, a high-quality carrier network and a proven track record of growth. Like Robinson, their success has been driven by customer-obsessed culture and a commitment to empowering their team to compete and win in the market. RXO's core business is truck brokerage, but where they truly excel is their differentiated and complementary last mile and transportation solutions. Their business is well diversified across end markets, and there is limited customer overlap between our businesses. Adding RXO's capabilities and complementary customer base to Robinson will diversify our revenue mix, enhancing our resilience and better positioning us to drive more consistent growth across market cycles. On Slide 7, you can see the expansive suite of capabilities we're creating through this transaction. Together, we'll be able to offer a comprehensive set of solutions across multimodal brokerage, managed transportation, expedited, last mile and drop trailer services, creating a more comprehensive offering to meet their evolving needs. We expect that our broader set of offerings will make us a partner of choice for customers who are increasingly looking for a comprehensive provider that can support them across the increasingly complex supply chain environment. Our lean AI capabilities will be the thread that ties all of these offerings together. We expect our AI to supercharge our capabilities, allowing us to offer more tailored solutions to help our customers become more agile and efficient. Slide 8 provides a snapshot of how these capabilities come together to create a more seamless experience for customers and carriers. C.H. Robinson is the industry pacesetter for cutting-edge innovation and differentiated solutions. With that leadership comes a responsibility to continue delivering differentiated solutions that create better outcomes for our customers and carriers. With the addition of RXO, that's exactly what we'll continue to do. For customers, the combination will provide broader solutions, greater capacity and choice, smarter execution and access to a larger, denser network spanning truckload, expedited, last mile and global forwarding services. For carriers, it will create more freight opportunities, better lane matching, enhanced network visibility and a simpler day-to-day experience through our technology and lean AI-enabled operating model. With our complementary networks, technology capabilities and operating expertise, we believe we can further strengthen our value proposition and increase volumes. This will allow us to accelerate compelling growth opportunities faster than we could on our own. While this transaction is expected to open up new growth opportunities, the value proposition of this combination is the productivity we can unlock with RXO. We have a clear and achievable path to realize the $300 million of expected net run rate cost synergies. This plan is rooted in the same principles and playbook that has allowed us to drive productivity across our organization in recent years. As we discussed, applying our lean operating model to RXO will be a primary driver of our expected productivity improvements. Our leading AI capabilities will add fuel to these improvements. Leveraging AI has become part of our DNA at Robinson, and we see significant opportunities to improve RXO's operations by implementing our AI agents across a wide variety of workflows. The cost to serve efficiencies from implementing our operating model and shared services savings from centralizing processes and functions will make up the bulk of our expected cost synergies. We expect to unlock additional synergies from the elimination of duplicative third-party services and other integration benefits such as insurance procurement efficiencies. We are confident in our ability to achieve these synergies because our plan relies on the same principles that have driven our transformation since early 2024. This transaction builds on the operational discipline, productivity initiatives and AI-enabled capabilities we've already put in place. The results of that transformation are evident in our performance, including a greater than 60% increase in enterprise productivity since the end of 2022, approximately 490 basis points of adjusted operating margin expansion in 2025 and an 8% reduction in operating expenses in 2025. Importantly, we've demonstrated an ability to scale technology efficiently, increasing AI usage by approximately 200x while growing related costs modestly, giving us confidence in our ability to integrate RXO and capture synergies. RXO brings additional volume to a proven operating model, creating an opportunity to extend these productivity and margin improvements across a broader platform. With that, I'll turn the call over to Damon to discuss the financial benefits of this transaction in more detail.

Damon Lee executive
#4

Thanks, Dave, and good morning, everyone. I echo Dave's excitement about this transaction and what it will allow us to accomplish. We have made significant progress to create a more efficient, agile C.H. Robinson through our transformation. This transaction allows us to accelerate this progress. Let's start with Slide 11 and a breakdown of how we intend to apply the transformation principles that Dave just discussed to RXO's business. As shown on the left side of the slide, RXO's adjusted gross profit per employee remains below Robinson's current productivity levels, providing a clear opportunity to drive additional operating leverage over time. By integrating RXO's volumes into our network and leveraging our proven operating model, we expect to unlock meaningful efficiency gains and support our synergy objectives. The productivity opportunities, operating efficiencies and synergy initiatives supporting this transaction are largely within our control, can be executed across a range of market environments and will enable us to better serve our customers. As Dave mentioned, capturing the expected synergies will drive significant cash flow generation that will allow us to advance our capital allocation priorities. We will remain guided by the same capital allocation approach we are taking today, which balances maintaining our strong financial profile with investing in growth and returning capital to shareholders. We will continue to pursue high ROI organic investments while opportunistically pursuing M&A opportunities that will allow us to advance our capabilities. Given our strong balance sheet, we will maintain ample financial flexibility following the transaction. Our strong capital structure and cash flows will allow us to optimize our balance sheet and rapidly delever to our target range by the end of 2028. And as we execute against our priorities, we remain committed to returning capital to shareholders through our dividend. While we will pause share buybacks until we reach our target leverage ratio after this transaction closes, we expect to resume opportunistic share repurchases after reaching our target leverage ratio and when we believe it is the best use of capital for shareholders. We also intend to integrate RXO into our NAST organization led by Michael Castineto. We have created an integration task force led by Jim Rutlinger, Vice President of Robinson Operating Model to efficiently and swiftly integrate RXO operations and deliver on the run rate synergies in 2 years after the transaction closes. I would now like to turn the call back to Dave for closing remarks.

David Bozeman executive
#5

Thanks, Damon. In closing, we cannot be more excited about this acquisition and the opportunities to unlock value for employees, customers, carriers and shareholders. Through this transaction, we will build on our transformation and apply our best-in-class operating model across the combined organization. This will allow us to drive compelling cost synergies and create a more resilient platform to drive profitable growth regardless of the freight market environment. With increased network density and an expanded suite of solutions, we will be able to increase penetration across modes and segments, win new business and deepen customer relationships. We look forward to sharing additional details over the coming months and appreciate your continued interest in and support of C.H. Robinson. With that, we will now take your questions. Operator?

Operator operator
#6

Today's first question is coming from Tom Wadewitz of UBS.

Thomas Wadewitz analyst
#7

Congratulations on the deal. This was obviously a big deal, and I think a surprise, although you have talked about being active in acquisitions, I think bigger than expected. But I wanted to see if you could give some thoughts on, I think, 2 primary questions. So one is customer overlap. I think that's something where customers are different, but they could say, okay, we only want to do 20, percent of our business with a given provider. I know if you define truck, that's a big kind of big portion of a customer's book, but I don't know how customers might respond in terms of large enterprise customers that might have a constraint in concentration. So if you could talk about that. And then I think in terms of just retention of people that you think are important or salespeople or how do you think about retaining the revenue as you go through the synergy process? It sounds like it's driven more by cost.

David Bozeman executive
#8

Tom, thanks for the question. Listen, a couple of things here. On customer overlap, we feel pretty confident about this deal, and there's actually not as much customer overlap between our 2 businesses, which is good. it provides us more opportunities as we go forward. I think as you're hitting about or implying about hitting kind of ceilings or mas with customers, I think we're far away from that and have a long way to go. We'll continue to go into this deal and do some diagnosis within the company. But we feel good that there's not much overlap on the customers, and that gets us even more excited. And I think on the retention part, listen, RSO has a great team, and they are energized for this deal to be successful. Drew and I have had really good conversations, and I'm confident that between the 2 of us that we will do the necessary things to retain the talent that we need to in this deal. But there's a long way to go to close and -- but I feel good about where we are.

Damon Lee executive
#9

Yes, Tom, I would just add on the first half of your question there around customer overlap. We actually view that to be a very de minimis number, not material at all. And in fact, what impact we have calculated related to customer overlap is actually reflected in that net synergy number of $300 million. So just to say again, that $300 million synergy number already includes any revenue dis-synergies related to customer overlap.

Thomas Wadewitz analyst
#10

Is there any way to like help us frame the overlap, like top 10 customers overlap, anything like that? Or is it too early to say that?

Damon Lee executive
#11

Yes. I'd say we won't go that deep, Tom. What I would tell you is, as you can imagine, we went very deep and wide on that assessment. We didn't choose the word complementary lightly. We do feel like the 2 books of business between C.H. Robinson and RXO are very complementary and therefore, reduced the overlap between customers to a pretty immaterial number. So we feel confident that we'll deliver the $300 million of savings net that dis-synergy revenue assumption.

Operator operator
#12

Our next question is coming from Bruce Chan of Stifel.

J. Bruce Chan analyst
#13

Yes. I just want to echo those congratulations on the deal, certainly very transformative. Dave, I was just hoping that you can maybe walk us through the tech stack combination at a high level. Wondering if RXO is getting onboarded to Navisphere and other CH systems? Are you planning to integrate models and use maybe some of the RXO kind of best-in-breed approach for the different systems?

David Bozeman executive
#14

Yes, Bruce, good hearing you. Listen, that's the beauty of deals like this. I mean, I think we have a proven model at C.H. Robinson and a proven tech stack. So certainly, that is something that we will look at and making sure we bring a book of business within Robinsons tech stack. But also, we're going into this saying, hey, listen, there are great things that are so does. We talked about in our announcement, expedite and last mile. And so there are some things that we will certainly learn and take the best in breed to make this combination a winning combination, and we look forward to it.

Damon Lee executive
#15

Yes. Bruce, I would only add to that, that for the services that we overlap on today, truckload, LTL, those businesses will certainly -- the core system will be Navisphere, which will allow us to apply our lean AI approach to those core businesses. As Dave mentioned, they do have some very interesting technology around expedite and last mile that we think can be complementary and even additive to what we have at C.H. Robinson. But yes, for the broader business, we expect Navisphere to be the core system of record going forward. which will allow us to bring RXO onto our platforms, use our agentic technology, and that will certainly be at the core of generating the $300 million in net synergies we referenced earlier.

Operator operator
#16

The next question is coming from Brian Ossenbeck of JPMorgan.

Brian Ossenbeck analyst
#17

Damon, maybe -- and Dave as well, maybe you can just walk us through how you got comfortable in this post-bontgomery world with the claims the docket, whatever the technical term is with RXO and also with Coty and how you factor that into the valuation in terms of the deal that we see here today. Is there any contingencies? Do you have a pretty good feel for it? Do you have some stuff reserve for it later? Anything on that front would be helpful.

Damon Lee executive
#18

Yes. So Brian, I'll start. Dave can provide color. Look, I'd say we're comfortable with our docket. I'd say we went through a very thorough review case by case, both our internal experts, external experts as well as RXO's opinion on all of these cases as well. And as we put into our statement, right, we believe anything related to the legal document from RXO is neutral risk for C.H. Robinson, right? We don't believe there's anything inherently related to their docket that's different in scope or landscape versus C.H. Robinson. So I would say, in summary, we went through a very robust, very lengthy review of the legal environment and the case log for RXO, inclusive of the Coyote business. And our assessment as well as external expert assessment as well was that the legal risk to Robinson would be neutral.

David Bozeman executive
#19

No, I just -- go ahead, Brian.

Brian Ossenbeck analyst
#20

Sorry, Dan, just a quick follow-up. Would this affect your renewals for the, I guess, legacy Robinson business? I know the deal is not going to close for a while. So you probably have to deal with both of them for a little bit until you can combine both books of business from an insurance perspective.

Damon Lee executive
#21

Yes. I mean, certainly, both organizations were going through dual paths for insurance renewal pre-announcement. And certainly, I think now there's an opportunity to drive synergistic approach to our renewal for 2027. So as it relates to the insurance front, we actually think bringing the 2 businesses together is going to be a net positive for our insurance renewals for 2027.

Operator operator
#22

The next question is coming from Stephanie Moore of...

Stephanie Benjamin Moore analyst
#23

Look, I think this may be the first brokerage acquisition where AI is truly front and center. So should we be thinking about this $300 million synergy target as a floor? I mean, I just think the potential to deploy C.H. Robinson's, I guess, AI and automation capabilities across RXO's footprint seems pretty powerful. So maybe just talk a little bit about incremental volume opportunities and then also the limited incremental costs associated with that.

David Bozeman executive
#24

Yes. Thanks, Stephanie. Listen, the way we look at this as we've always looked at it when we've gone through the transformation at Robinson is it's really a symbiotic relationship that we have with our operating model, our people and our technology. And that's what's driven a lot of the success over the last few years here at Robinson. And we're just going to continue to execute that strategy. And that is, again, yes, it will be technology. We think our generative AI and intgentic AI technology will be super beneficial as we go into RXO. But it's also our operating model and how we go about identifying problems, innovating at scale and at speed and then combining the expertise of C.H. Robinson Logisticians with RXO's expertise as well. All of that combination, I think you can look back over the last 3 years and kind of foreshadow what will happen going forward. There's a big opportunity with the book of business of RXO -- and as we connect that into that operating model, we're super excited about that $300 million, and that's why Damon and I feel really good about it. And we're a continuous improvement type of mentality. So we will continue to do that. So we feel really strong about those synergies and look forward to it.

Damon Lee executive
#25

And Stephanie, I would just add. I mean, certainly, we wouldn't be committing a number. We didn't think we could deliver. So we feel very confident about the net $300 million run rate synergies that we've committed to. And as Dave said, look, as always, we never leave anything on the court as it relates to Robinson. So we'll always be trying to exceed our commitments. But we feel really good about delivering the $300 million, and we feel really good that that's a very healthy synergy number. And quite frankly, we believe only C.H. Robinson can bring this type of synergy number to this industry.

Charles Ives executive
#26

In the time frame of 2 years as well?

Damon Lee executive
#27

Yes, certainly in a 2-year time frame, right? And so again, we feel like this is a high bar. But as you guys have gotten used to, we reset the bar all the time, but we feel like this is a pretty high bar to this deal.

Operator operator
#28

The next question is coming from Rachel Harnan of Deutsche Bank.

David Bozeman executive
#29

Can you guys hear me okay? Yes, we can.

Richa Talwar analyst
#30

Okay. Great. So yes, Dave, Damon, I think you sort of prepared the street for a big M&A talking about how when you do a deal, it will make a lot of sense for the market. Aside from the broader customer base, talk to us about what the deal really unlocks for you. I know you went through it in the presentation, but what you're most excited about that you didn't have as a standalone -- on a stand-alone basis. Maybe that means digging into the synergies some more. And then Damon, in particular, you've talked about the pitfalls around large-scale M&A and brokerage. Maybe flag what risks you're very sensitive to and how you intend to mitigate them via this transaction.

Damon Lee executive
#31

Yes. So I think what makes us excited, and you've heard us say this before is, look, RXO has a very good book of business, right? I mean they have relatively healthy gross margins. And as we've said, applying our cost-to-serve model, which is industry-leading, can generate substantial opportunity for scale broker, right? And so now you can substitute scale broker for RXO. We think it is just tremendous opportunity in driving the same productivity that we've driven since the end of '22, 60% productivity since end of '22 for C.H. Robinson and apply that same model to RXO. So we're very excited that this really is about the operating model. This is really about driving cost to serve synergies that we think we've demonstrated a great track record of doing for C.H. Robinson, and we believe we can apply that same playbook to RXO. So very confident in our approach. And the thing I would say is this is very similar to what we've done with C.H. Rollins. So if you think about the transformation we've been through the last 3 years, it was really a reintegration of C.H. Rollins. And I think anybody here would have told you it felt like they got acquired and integrated over the last 3 years. And I think we're going to run that same playbook over RXO with a high degree of confidence that, that playbook will yield very similar results. Now to your comment around, look, large deals can bring risk, they can. And I'd say they can if you don't do your due diligence upfront. If you don't have confidence in your synergy case, -- if you don't control your synergy case, we feel like we do control our synergy case because it will be a productivity synergy case. And if you don't have an operating model, our operating model dictates how we run the company. It will provide rigor and discipline in how we drive the integration and doesn't let us fail, right? And so I think you can have confidence that the exact same commitments we made around C.H. Robinson results the last 3 years are going to underline the same commitments we're making about this acquisition going forward.

David Bozeman executive
#32

Richard, the only thing I -- just to kind of put a bow on what Damon said is if you look back and a number of you on the call here have been with us, and it's been -- hopefully, one word you could say is it's been consistent for Robinson in this transformation. We said from the start over 3 years ago, that our strategy was going to, one, outgrow end markets; and two, expand our operating margins. And I think we've been consistently doing that and going about doing that. But we also said that it didn't matter about the market and that we would win despite the market environment or higher highs, higher lows. And we continue to drive that consistency. This is no different than the strategy we built focusing on organic first, building our way to inorganic, and that's what you're seeing this morning. And so the same confidence that Damon and I have given over the last 3 years or so with this strategy, we continue to bring that confidence today going forward with a great partner in RXO coming into Robinson.

Operator operator
#33

The next question is coming from Jeff Kauffman of Citizens Bank.

Jeffrey Kauffman analyst
#34

Well, first of all, congratulations and best of luck with the transaction. Just a quick question on the concerns that we're hearing from shareholders on the nuclear verdict post-montgomery environment and increasing exposure to brokerage in this kind of market. I mean this is clearly a declaration of confidence that this market will settle into something a little bit more sustainable. But right now, it's kind of everybody suing brokers and adding to lawsuits and juries that seem to be very sympathetic towards that cause. So could you maybe discuss your view on that and allay investor concerns to some degree that we are exposing exposure or increasing exposure to the brokerage market in kind of an uncertain environment on the legal front?

Damon Lee executive
#35

Yes. Thanks for the question, Jeff. I'll just start with reiterating what I said earlier in that we do not view RXO's legal risk being additive to Satron,ight? We believe it's neutral. We didn't see anything in their docket that was unusual to what we're what we're dealing with on our own. And then I'll just reiterate our position on the legal environment, which is we feel very good about how we run the company. We have an industry-leading carrier vetting process. We had that pre-Montgomery. We have that post-Montgomery. We do feel like Montgomery and LP, we feel like these are the anomalies in the industry. We do not feel like these are the new norm. We do not feel like every case is going to go to a jury trial. In fact, the statistics say that's absolutely not likely going to happen. And we believe the success we've had historically where 98% of our cases never see a courtroom and are settled in due course for a very immaterial amount of our earnings. We still believe that is the path forward, both for C.H. Robinson. And again, based on our due diligence of the RXO docket, we feel like that's the path forward for them as well. And I'd just remind everybody on the call, modern logistics, modern commerce do not work without brokerage, right? There is no model where modern commerce works without brokerage, right? So this model will sustain. This model will continue to take share. It is the preferred model of the customer base, and we believe it will continue to be the preferred model as we move into the future. So just to repeat, we feel very good about where brokerage is going. We feel that once we get through the fog war on Montgomery and LP that we will return to a much more normalized legal environment. And we think that legal environment is the same for C.H. Robinson and RSO going forward. So no, we don't feel there's any change to the historical course once we get through this period of time that we're in.

Operator operator
#36

The next question is coming from Bascome Majors of Stephens Inc.

Bascome Majors analyst
#37

Big picture, there's traditionally a lot of investor skepticism in truck brokerage acquisitions. I think if you look back to maybe the last one that's consistently consensus viewed as a big success was Robinson backhaulers, and that's over 25 years ago. But Dave, I mean, you came into Robinson with nothing but skepticism and have clearly delivered on the strategy that you entailed and turn that around. And if we look internationally, there's proof that asset-light companies can integrate successfully at scale, if you look at what DSV has done over the last couple of decades. So a lot of words there, but big picture, what do you say to the skeptics? Why is this different? And how do you earn the trust that this is going to deliver that significant synergy number that you guys have laid out there?

David Bozeman executive
#38

Yes. Thanks, Bascome. And I appreciate your comments. And the short answer, and then I'll talk a little bit about it, is proven results. And you've been around us here for over 3 years at the beginning of us laying out from the diagnosis to the strategy and then to the execution. This is no different. This leadership team was built for this moment -- there's extensive expertise around integration and doing M&A at scale. But more importantly, when you look back, and we're unapologetic for this over the last 3 years, we have a high say-do ratio. And I believe we've executed on things that we're told that we could not do, which is you cannot grow end markets and expand operating margins. That's not supposed to happen in freight markets like we're in. But that is what Robinson does on a consistent basis for 13 quarters in a row, outgrow truck markets and then 10 quarters in a row, beat EPS consensus. But it's really about the consistency of our leadership team, our operating model, that transfers over into an acquisition like this. We actually look at this, Damon and I and the team look at this as just a part of our strategy going forward. This is not some separate entity. And therefore, how it clicks in, we already have mechanisms, integration plans, playbooks that I think are obviously superior, and we will execute to those as we have executed on our strategy in one of the toughest freight environments it's been in decades. And so I think you will see that. We have a super high confidence rate on these synergies. But more importantly, we have confidence that RXO coming into Robinson with the team that they've built, the new entity is going to be even stronger than we maybe even anticipate. And I have, again, super high confidence that we'll make this happen.

Damon Lee executive
#39

Yes, Bascome, I would just add, and again, we -- I don't want to make this sound too simple. We got a lot of work to do. But if you remember my past comments, right, RXO has a very attractive book of business, and we have an industry-leading cost-to-serve model, right? We're going to run that same playbook we ran on Robinson, right? And so I think historically, why nobody viewed broker acquisitions and integrations and M&A as attractive is there was no differentiation for the cost to serve. I think we've proven over the last 3 years that we've created a demonstrable differentiation between our cost to serve model in the industry. And to Dave's point, we've consistently proved it, right? Not a flash in the pen. I mean for 10 consecutive quarters, we've exceeded expectations, 13 consecutive quarters, we've exceeded outgrowth. And we believe that playbook is highly applicable to other brokers, right? And so if you followed what we've been talking about the last 6 to 9 months, I think every 1, 2 years from now, we'll start to see what we saw a year ago when we said we can run this cost-to-serve model on any healthy book of business and generate Robinson industry-leading operating margins going forward, right? To me, that's the exciting part where you can take a broker that has a healthy book of business but limited operating margins and convert them to Robinson level operating margins in a couple of years, I think that's pretty attractive.

David Bozeman executive
#40

Yes, I wish -- just to put a bow on that, I wish you could see the faces of the leadership team this morning as we talk to them about this deal, the excitement, the energy they have to do this because they know this operating model that we run with every day. It's a governor, Bascome. It governs how we execute the decisions we make, how we innovate, the pace that we go at. And it will do that doing this acquisition. And so I feel super excited about it. Thanks for the question.

Operator operator
#41

The next question is coming from Chris Wetherbee of Wells Fargo.

Christian Wetherbee analyst
#42

I guess I want to zoom out a little bit and think about sort of what the market is moving towards in brokerage in the post- Montgomery world. And I noted the synergies don't include anything from like a revenue perspective. But as you put these 2 companies together, sort of the cost to serve certainly goes down, the efficiencies and the benefits you get of scale certainly go up. And if you think about the competitive landscape for smaller players with insurance premiums rising and some other factors, it would seem like there's a decent competitive advantage there. So maybe unpack that a little bit and think about sort of what the landscape is going to look like in the post- Montgomery world and how a company this size potentially can benefit, particularly from a top line perspective, which might be incremental to the $300 million of synergies you guys have talked about.

Damon Lee executive
#43

Yes. Thanks for the question, Chris. So what I would say is our organic strategy doesn't change, right? So if you remember, our comments post Montgomery have been, look, we expect a meaningful consolidation in this industry from the small- and medium-sized players. And Robinson will be an outsized benefactor of that consolidation. Nothing changes there other than the fact that RXO has said externally that they believe a significant consolidation of the industry was going to occur as well, and they believed a large broker like themselves would certainly accrete that market share. So we believe that is a compelling, what I would call, organic strategy that we've laid out in addition to the synergistic case that we're laying out today for RXO. So yes, I mean, we're going to be running both of these plays in parallel where we're going to be getting demonstrable growth, not just from the consolidation of the industry, but by continuing to execute our growth playbook that has demonstrated outgrowth for our DAS business 13 consecutive quarters. Now we're going to get on applying that same growth playbook to RXO as well. And I think the other exciting thing is there's some really exciting complementary capabilities that RXO has that we're really excited about. I mean take Expedite, for example, they have a much larger expedite business than we do and expedite has been a strategic priority for us for the last, call it, 6 to 12 months on growing that business. Now certainly, this acquisition is going to give us a jump start to those growth initiatives. So you're exactly right, right? And this acquisition is going to give us multiple factors of improvement. What we've committed to is certainly the things we control around around cost and productivity. But the organic synergy case that we've had around consolidation of the industry, we believe RXO is going to be a benefactor of that as well. And now we'll certainly reap the benefits of having both large brokers under one roof.

Operator operator
#44

The next question is coming from Scott Group of Wolfe Research.

Scott Group analyst
#45

Damon, I know you already said that the $300 million is a net number net of revenue dissynergies. But any way you can quantify what you're assuming on revenue dis-synergies? And I know like past deals, it feels like we've certainly seen a good amount of revenue dissynergies, certainly RXO, Coyote felt like that. But maybe in the post-Montgomery world, there's less risk around the synergies. But if you can just give us sort of a number, that would be helpful.

Damon Lee executive
#46

Yes. Thanks for the question, Scott. I'll jump in and then Dave can add some color. Look, I think the books of business between C.H. Robinson and RXO are quite different than the books of businesses between Coyote and RXO, right? I think there was quite a bit of overlap between those 2 businesses. I do not see the same type of overlap between C.H. Robinson and -- so as I said before, we didn't choose the word complementary lightly. We feel very good that there's a lot of additive benefit of putting the 2 books together in what I would consider immaterial dis-synergies, which, again, I said we've already attributed to that net $300 million number. So I think we won't get into the specifics on that, Scott, at least not yet. What I would tell you, though, is it's an immaterial number from an overlap perspective, and it is included in that net $300 million number. And I would tell you from a customer lens, and we have examples of this even within C.H. Robinson, customers want value, they want service. right? And they want logistics solutions, right? C.H. Robinson provides those, RXO provides those. I would argue together, we'll provide them better than anyone else with a much broader breadth of offering. And so at the end of the day, a lot of the enterprise customers, even combined, we would make up a very small percentage of their freight spend. So as I said before, I'll just repeat and then Dave can jump in here. We view the overlap to be an immaterial number. It is included in our $300 million net cost synergies numbers already, but we do not view that to be a material impact to the M&A.

David Bozeman executive
#47

Yes, Scott, I think that's well said by Damon. I'd just add on this. In going through this process, look, you have to go through a very detailed due diligence -- we've always said to you guys that we will be disciplined and measured when we go out and look at a particular deal. We have been disciplined and measured on this deal in all phases, be it legal or the synergies and things of this nature. So you can count on the fact that how we execute the business with that discipline, we're executing the business on this deal, just like we signaled that we would. So I appreciate the question and look forward to the execution on it.

Damon Lee executive
#48

Yes. And Scott, one final comment. I do think certainly in the post- Montgomery world, the flight to quality is important, right? And so I think certainly, that factors into our confidence that enterprise shippers were confident in C.H. Robinson and RXO separately. I think they're going to be even more confident in our capability as a combined entity. So I think post-Montgomery World makes this discussion a lot easier as well.

Scott Group analyst
#49

If I can just ask one quick follow-up. Dave, you're by far the biggest broker, you're buying a top 5 broker. Any antitrust concerns at all with this transaction?

David Bozeman executive
#50

No. We don't see any concerns with that. We're hoping that this deal will close in the 3 to 6 months as we've First half of '27. And first half of 2027.

Damon Lee executive
#51

Yes. No concerns there, Scott. We wouldn't have announced the deal if we thought we couldn't get regulatory approval. So we feel confident there.

Operator operator
#52

Our final question today is coming from Ken Hoexter of Bank of America.

Ken Hoexter analyst
#53

Congrats on the deal, a tremendous move. So I believe that RXO was more focused on kind of enterprise mix versus C.H. Robins base, which I think is why you keep coming back to the not too much overlap. But is there any inherent margin differential we should think about based on the business or impacts that we should think about as you combine them? And then on the same thought, you talked about Navisphere before and RXO Connect their systems. Any thoughts on scalability of Navisphere given the size of this transaction? I mean you had talked, I think, about going from tens of thousands of orders per day to hundreds of thousands of orders that you could review or respond to every day. Does this just fit that bill in the system? Anything we should think about in terms of systems and integration there?

Damon Lee executive
#54

Yes. So good question, Ken. Thanks for the question. Look, I would say on the portfolio, again, we like the mix of business, right? I mean, certainly, we bring small and medium business to the fold that is less represented by RXO. Yes, they are more of an enterprise provider to customers. But as I said earlier, it's a very complementary overlap between our enterprise customers and theirs, right? So we're very excited that we're able to make a scaled acquisition with what we consider de minimis overlap between the 2 customer bases. So very excited there. On your margin question, what I would say is there's an opportunity to improve certainly margin for RXO. I think we -- we've said multiple times, we have industry-leading revenue management capabilities. And certainly, those will be applied to RXO as we go through the transition. But I would argue they're starting from a very healthy base already. And then your last question on no. Navisphere is very scalable. We don't have any concerns of limitations there. In fact, as you heard us say before, Navisphere is our core system, our tech, our AI tech that sits on top of Navisphere, we have multiples of capacity that can be absorbed there. So no concerns on the technology front. And to our earlier comments, this isn't just a -- we're only going to take Robinson Tech. I mean, certainly, we will use predominantly Robinson Tech, but we do believe RXO has some technology that is accepted very well by customers and carriers could be very additive to our technology stack, and we'll certainly go through that evaluation.

David Bozeman executive
#55

Yes. And Ken, listen, their tech is scalable as well as ours. I think the excitement coming off of this call is between the 2 of us. I think we're poised to do great things and redefine this industry. So really looking forward to it, and thanks for the question.

Operator operator
#56

At this time, it brings us to the end of our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the floor back over to Mr. Ives for closing comments.

Charles Ives executive
#57

Thank you all for joining us today. As you can tell, we're very excited about this transaction, and we look forward to talking to you in the future. Have a good day.

Operator operator
#58

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's event. You may disconnect your lines or log off the webcast at this time, and enjoy the rest of

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. transcript - plus 255,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.

Get an API key View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. earnings transcripts and 255,000+ others is available through the EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server. Quarterly plans from $145 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.