Home / Transcripts / CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) · May 22, 2023

CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) Earnings Call Transcript

May 22, 2023

NASDAQ US Communication Services Interactive Media and Services conference_presentation 37 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Rajat Gupta analyst
#1

Great. Thanks, everyone, for joining. My name is Rajat Gupta. I'm a member of the JPMorgan automotive equity research team. Very pleased to have with us CEO, Jason Trevisan from CarGurus; and also Kirndeep Singh, Vice President and head of Investor Relations.

Rajat Gupta analyst
#2

I guess we're going to start with Q&A, just go right into it. Maybe Jason, maybe to Kirn, just a more broader macro high-level question. Could you just give us a sense of latest trends you're seeing from a consumer demand perspective? Maybe in the second quarter since you reported earnings? Maybe in early April and into May? Any pockets of weakness or any noticeable trends in your used vehicles or perhaps geographical differences that you're seeing in terms of search metrics or traffic trends?

Jason Trevisan executive
#3

Sure. Hello, everyone. Thanks for joining. It's nice to be here today. So the auto industry continues to see quite a lot of volatility since COVID, honestly. So it's been a few years now where we've seen volatility in new car production, in inventory levels and in consumer demand and pricing as a result. So all of those are interrelated. I would say most recently, some of the trends that we've seen, perhaps one of the most pronounced in the last 6 months has been the return of production of new cars. And so they were really sidelined for several years because of chip shortage. That's a long lead time for new car production, and so those have now started to come back. As a result, you're seeing new car inventories come back on dealers' lots. At the same time, used inventory has ticked down a bit over the last quarter or so. From a demand perspective, consumer demand has certainly weakened. Recession concerns and higher interest rates are the 2 primary drivers of weakened consumer demand. From a geographic perspective, no, I wouldn't say we've seen much of a difference in terms of demand. You've certainly seen -- we are always seeing geographic disparity in -- where higher demand -- stronger demand is based on the types of cars in the regions of the country. And that's actually one of the things that we think CarOffer, in particular, but also our platform can really help exploit in a good way, which is to help dealers create those arbitrage opportunities in sourcing vehicles or in selling vehicles from a geographic perspective. And then on traffic, no, I wouldn't say there's really any new trends other than consumer demand being down, which, in general, will create a higher cost to acquire traffic for us.

Rajat Gupta analyst
#4

Got it. That's helpful. Maybe just to touch upon, you mentioned affordability like financing. In the previous call, you had highlighted some softening in the consumer financing segment. I mean, obviously, small contribution from a revenue perspective for the company. But if you could share any more color around any approval or credit trends you're seeing across the audience. Perhaps details in what you're seeing with regards to consumer drop-off rates. Do you do monthly payments? Or maybe -- or opposed to like just lenders trying to just stay away or being a little more strict from an approval perspective for the consumer.

Jason Trevisan executive
#5

Absolutely. So let me just first orient everyone from a P&L perspective. We do have a small revenue stream, as Rajat said, a small revenue stream from, we call it, consumer financing, which is bounties that we get paid from lenders when we prequalify consumers for a loan with them, and then they get qualified and take on that loan through the dealer. And that's also an integral part of an evolution that we have, which is more towards supporting more of the transaction on our site. And so we are increasingly having consumers get prequalified and even fully qualified for financing for a loan. So those are the areas in which we see consumer loan activity. And yes, monthly payments have gone up materially for consumers, and in a lot of cases, 2 or 3x what they were because of interest rates. That has consumers, number one, looking for much less expensive cars. So we've seen a spike in search activity for lower-priced cars among consumers. We've also seen consumers drop out of the funnel or the process after they've seen the rates that they would actually qualify for. Furthermore, we've seen lenders qualify fewer or smaller percentage of applicants. Delinquency rates have gone up the last couple of months, in particular, for auto loans. And so lenders are scrutinizing much more carefully who they actually approve. So yes, I would say almost in all fronts, the auto loan segment is absolutely tighter today than it was even 2 months ago.

Rajat Gupta analyst
#6

Got it, got it. That's helpful color. Just wanted to move away from macro. We can come back to it again later. But just on second quarter, you've given us revenue and EBITDA guidance. With respect to CarOffer, in particular, expected to improve sequentially, slightly breakeven or higher. But if I look at like the Marketplace business, excluding the CarOffer improvement, it seems to be taking a step down from an EBITDA perspective, like just taking midpoints of guidance. Any way to quantify how much of that weakness can be attributed to like dealer cancellations, given ABRs versus just more softness in like some of the macro indicators you highlighted or maybe just on the OEM side, if you could just help unpack that a little bit.

Jason Trevisan executive
#7

Sure. So just to simplify it to top line and then EBITDA. From a top line perspective, the 2 -- again, oversimplifying, but the 2 areas of revenue for us are marketplace subscription, which are dealers subscribing to our platform and then non-subscription revenue, which is OEM, auto manufacturer advertising and consumer financing. And so in the guide we've given, we've said that softness in automotive advertising and consumer financing, based on what we just talked about, are a headwind that's offsetting subscription revenue growth. Subscription revenue growth is -- subscription is growing. It's growing primarily because we're growing what we call QARSD, which is quarterly average revenue per subscribing dealer. So that's a metric that we've continued to grow for the last many quarters, and that's driven by a number of things. But lately, it's been driven more by us holding firmer on unit pricing with dealers as well as renewing dealers into new packages, higher packages and also adding new products like digital deal, which is a migration to transactions on our platform. So those are the high-level dynamics from a revenue perspective. Really more of the story as it relates to EBITDA and the guide is about expense increase. And so there, we have taken on a new lease this year for a building we're moving into next year, but we're paying sort of double rents this year. That started in Q1 but it only had 2 months in Q1 so we have a full quarter of it in Q2. We have headcount grow over. And then we also have marketing expense, which can fluctuate quarter-to-quarter.

Rajat Gupta analyst
#8

Got it. And just on CarOffer, you guided to sequential improvement, slight improvement in EBITDA there. How much of that is a function of you trying to just maybe shrink the business a little bit, focus more on optimizing operations versus gross margin or just leverage? Just if you could give us a sense of that trajectory. And any more comments you can give us like on future trajectory of that business from a profitability perspective?

Jason Trevisan executive
#9

Yes. So again, just to level set, CarOffer is our Digital Wholesale platform, a business we acquired a couple of years ago. It has grown very quickly as a business. It's still a young business. And toward the end of 2022, when unit prices in the wholesale industry went from 2 years of growing to starting to decline, we recognized a number of operational inefficiencies and challenges in the business that were not relevant or didn't expose themselves in a rising price environment. And so very quickly, we and the CarOffer team worked together to really scrutinize every aspect of the business operationally to understand what was driving some of this new dealer behavior in a price declining environment and make sure that our platform and our system worked well in both rising and falling price environments. And so Q4 identified and quickly jumped on those issues. Q1, worked very hard to remedy those issues and, frankly, did a better job than we expected to. Both our team and their team have done an outstanding job and getting in front of the operational challenges. Just to give you a sense of where that focus has been, inspections is a great example. If we had -- if you have an inspection process that doesn't catch enough of the issues or most or all of the issues, and you send a car through that ultimately gets arbitrated by the buying dealer, that can trigger a series of dissatisfying events for the buying dealer and the selling dealer and us, frankly. And so really fixing inspections was at the heart of what we did. But it also includes focusing on transportation and actual arbitration itself, on account management, on our policies of the company and systems. And so we've said it's going to take a few quarters to really get that to a point where we feel as if we can be highly predictable about what's going to happen with any cohort of transactions and make sure that we can repeatably scale the business in a very profitable way. So we're in a mode now where we were in Q1 and we remain there in Q2, where we're keeping volumes low. We're making sure that we have absolutely dialed in on all of the KPIs across the business before we start to scale it up again. And so I think that's the mode we're in. You then have the external factor of if wholesale unit prices are rising or falling. And if they're rising, you tend to find dealers more inclined to transact. They want to bring in more inventory to their dealership because they believe prices are rising. And so by the time they recondition that car and go to sell it, it's going to be worth more because it's been an appreciating asset. If they feel that prices are going to decline over the next 4 weeks, then they're going to be much more reluctant to trade in wholesale. Instead, they're going to rely just on their trade-ins. And so that is an external factor that we can't always predict. But we have shared, we think we'll end the year at slightly lower prices per unit than where we are today.

Rajat Gupta analyst
#10

What makes you decide whether when to step back on growth there? Is it the macro? Or just you need to feel more comfortable with the operations? I mean, because there are obviously a huge market share opportunity there for the business. So it's -- it's up to you. Yes.

Jason Trevisan executive
#11

Yes, yes. So huge market share. I mean today, CarOffer probably has 2% of the wholesale market. Purely online wholesale -- or online has probably less than 10% penetration of overall wholesale and that's up from 0% 3 years ago. So huge runway for growth of digital penetration. CarOffer is one of the top online providers. They have a matrix programmatic buying model that is different and more efficient than a lot of the traditional auction models. And we have customers that are using it for, in some cases, the majority of their wholesale buying or selling. But still very small market share overall. So yes, huge runway. What's tempering the volume today is 100% getting the operations more dialed in than they had been.

Rajat Gupta analyst
#12

Understood. That's helpful. Maybe I just wanted to turn to the audience. Any questions on some of the topics we've discussed so far? There's 1.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#13

Just a question, if you have visibility or see-through to the financial health of your dealers across the entire dealer network, what's the state of their well-being financially, considering this environment? And I know it's a broad -- obviously, dealers of all sizes. So maybe if you could speak to some of the smaller ones versus larger guys.

Jason Trevisan executive
#14

Okay, sure. So yes, I was going to start with the larger ones, there are 6 or 7 public, so you can see those and most dealers enjoyed extraordinarily -- relatively extraordinarily high margins in the past couple of years and those are starting to be pressured now in ways they hadn't been over the past couple of years. Among smaller dealers, they're commonly cited as some of the hardest hit because they don't have the sophistication from a systems and technology perspective, nor do they have the scale of buying. And so mistakes for them sourcing cars are much more costly to them. We have seen more consolidation. That's a trend that a lot of people have seen. And in some cases, in addition to consolidation, we've also seen a slightly higher rate of closures among some of the smaller dealers than we had in the past. There's around 42,000 to 45,000 dealers in the country. About 2/3 are independents. And so those that have -- those independents that have less than, say, 50 cars make up a high volume of rooftops but they don't make up really that high volume or that higher percentage of total units. So small has been harder than big, and I think there's been probably a lowering tide across the board as well.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#15

How do you increase the quality of inspections without dramatically changing the cost structure of the CarOffer business?

Jason Trevisan executive
#16

So we -- for our inspections, we have a partner model. So we work with a handful of inspection partners. We are -- we have increased our -- how closely we work with them to also be tighter with how we grade our partners in what they're doing, how we measure and grade their performance at both the vendor as well as the actual individual inspector level. But I would say the step function change has been that we have gone from almost exclusively cosmetic inspection to now electrical, mechanical and frame inspection on certain segments of cars that have a higher propensity for issues there. So we don't do that on 100% but we do that on much more than what we did before. And we -- in order to do that, number one is we've raised the price of our inspections from about $100, about $150. Number two, inspection partners that can do, say, mechanical inspections at scale at that -- at an appropriate price have grown a number from what existed a year or 2 ago, where we were trying to almost create the market for third-party inspectors who can do all those things. Now they're more out there for us to partner with at the right price.

Rajat Gupta analyst
#17

Any other questions? No. Maybe shifting to the pricing discussion, like big topic on the earnings call. You've seen a lot of your competitors make the same moves. Could you -- and maybe you can throw in digital deal in there as well. But just early results from these ABR discussions so far. What dealers -- what concerns the dealers the most? Is it just uncertainty around inventory supply or perhaps just the moderating gross margins from the peakish levels? Separately, what is the key ROI proposition you're pitching to dealers with this new pricing? And are there any underlying industry assumptions also embedded in those discussions?

Jason Trevisan executive
#18

Sure. So 1 thing to sort of acknowledge about the auto industry is many auto dealers think in terms of monthly budgets. And so the idea that there is comfort in having a fixed monthly price is significant with many auto dealers. Putting that aside, inventory is probably the single biggest driver for many auto dealers in terms of their propensity to spend on marketing. We give them stats around leads per unit, leads per dealer, cost per lead, et cetera. And so that's a big driver. What we ultimately try and get dealers to think in terms of is cost per sale and really ROI. And so because we do not, though, have a full closed-loop attribution model with them, that is often a discussion and it's not a hard and fast number that everybody can point to. But when you look at the, say, cost per lead and then the quality of leads as measured by the conversion rate of those leads, you can get to a cost per sale. And then the dealer knows what they're making on the front end and the back end per sale, so sort of on the gross margin of the metal as well as the F&I and any additional add-ons they have. And from a lot of our research, we know that on average, we are priced below our competitors from a cost per lead perspective. We know that the quality of our leads are exceptionally high. So the -- I think one of the more helpful metrics is that consumers are 3x more likely to use our site last before purchasing a car than any other site. So that gives a proxy for conversion rates. We also track conversion rates from third-party attribution sources so we have a good sense for the conversion rate of leads that we send to dealers. And so volume, price and quality typically results in surveys that we do and research that we do is that we're the strongest ROI. We began, several years ago, pricing quite low in the market in order to gain a seat at the table. We have slowly, I would argue, moved that up over time, but we still feel that we have the most advantaged ROI in the industry. And then I'll go on to digital deal later, but.

Rajat Gupta analyst
#19

Yes, I was going to just ask on that, like how much of that ROI differentiation is due to digital deal or are you already embedding that in that -- in those assumptions yet? Or is that more of.

Jason Trevisan executive
#20

So everything I just said is on, call it, just our core lead volume. We have been making a multiyear push to bring more of the transaction on our site. Consumers want that and now dealers want that too. The reason consumers want it is because they obviously are much more comfortable doing more things online. But spending 4 or 5 hours in the dealership has never been -- has been a pain point for consumers. So they'd love to take some of that time and move it online. Dealers also are more amenable to that because during COVID, they typically shrunk their sales forces quite a bit. And so their sales teams now can't field or can't manage all of the leads that come in. They're starting to pick and select the ones that they think have the highest propensity to close. So we've been moving a lot of the transaction online. And that -- today, that has manifested itself most clearly in something called Digital Deal, which is something that a dealer can sign up for, and it allows them to have -- to enable all of their inventory with the ability for a consumer to not only get prequalified for financing but to get fully qualified for a loan on that car. The dealer can cross-sell any other F&I products that they would sell that consumer in their dealership on our site. They can get a trade-in valuation on our site if that consumer has a trade-in. So the consumer can then, with tax title registration factored in and everything else I just said, get a penny-perfect deal amount. So we will tell them on our site, you're going to put $4,000 down and this is going to be your monthly payment. They can then set up an appointment with the dealer and they can put down a deposit with the dealer if they'd like to. So consumers who come through that flow of the funnel and go to the dealer are converting at 2 to 5x the rate that our standard leads are converting at. We're selling that as a fixed-price product that dealers can sign up for. And again, that becomes an ROI exercise where we say X percent of your leads are going to be Digital Deal enabled. They convert at, we get more precise than this, but call it 3x the rate of a standard lead. And so therefore, the ROI on this add-on is X and we're charging you Y, and that's still a very strong ROI value prop. So increasingly, we're growing the percent of consumers on our site who are going through that flow and spending an hour in the dealership instead of 5 hours in the dealership. We launched that product, digital deal, 9 months ago. In the first 9 months, we've got about 10% of our dealers have adopted it. And we are framing this as the future, the new normal. This is how consumers want to behave. This is how dealers increasingly want to behave. And so it's, we hope and think, quickly going from early adopter dealers to the norm and the NPS among consumers who use this is extraordinarily high.

Rajat Gupta analyst
#21

Got it. That's helpful. Maybe going back to like the business reviews. Could you share any color around like how these business review decisions and the price increase decisions have tracked historically? When dealers do leave the platform, after how many months do you see them coming back? Any historical trends you can point to that you could share with us today?

Jason Trevisan executive
#22

So we have contractual relationships with dealers where if their inventory stays the same and they're paying a market price, then we typically will partner with them to think through how they can get the most out of our platform. We may sell them new products. They may upgrade to new tiers. But if none of that were to happen and we were to grow the value that we deliver to them, then at 1-year anniversary or a 2-year anniversary, we will go to them and say, you're at a below market rate and we need to either -- we need to change the configuration of your package or if you want to stay exactly at this package, then we need to move you to market rates. Historically, that's been an exercise that was on pause really for 2.5 years post COVID. We have started to do those again, and in earnest, really at any sort of scale in Q1. And a few things changed within Q1. Number one is we became much more consultative than we had been in the past. In the past, it was much more arm's length. This is the new price. We would send that to them via e-mail. It was not well executed at all. We have since increased our interaction with dealers, and it's more consultative to give them options to say, here are a few different options that you can go to, to get more out of our platform, but we do need to ensure that you're paying a market rate. So the first thing that we're doing that's different is on execution. The second thing we're doing is we are selecting our dealers who are paying the furthest below market rate. And we're saying to them, you need to move up to a market rate and it's always a negotiation with dealers. It always has been, but we're holding firmer on that floor, that unit price floor that we'll accept. By holding firmer on that, we created and instigated more involuntary churn from dealers who didn't want to sign up for that. But in seeking that higher-floor efficient frontier, it actually resulted in higher monthly recurring revenue for us, which is ultimately our metric of -- I mean, dealer satisfaction is as well, of course, but we'd rather focus on high ROI revenue than on number of rooftops, for instance. So in doing that in Q1, we targeted the lowest-paying dealers from a unit perspective. We held firm on the floor. More came off the platform but we ended up with closer to what we think is the efficient frontier. We always track the percent of dealers that come back over time, and that's been a reasonably steady curve of return rates at 3 months and 6 months and 12 months. And because we just finished Q1, we're sort of in the midst of tracking it now, but we are curious to see if that curve looks any different. And so far, there's nothing to report on it.

Rajat Gupta analyst
#23

Understood. That's helpful. Any questions from the audience? Got 1 here.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#24

You mentioned the chip shortage for new cars and I guess that's been going on for well over a year now. Do you see like any potential pocket building in the vehicle fleet that could affect new -- or excuse me, used car sales a few years down the road? Or would there not be much of an impact from that?

Jason Trevisan executive
#25

So we're certainly seeing pockets of new car volume returning and it's happening now. It actually has reasonable pretty high variance between brands. So some brands' volume production is almost back to pre-COVID levels, others it's still below. A lot of those cars, new cars are hitting dealer's lots right now. And we are seeing dealers start to shift attention to being more focused about, oh my gosh, I have to make sure I keep inventory turns on these new cars at a reasonable rate" because that's something they frankly haven't had to think about for almost 3 years now. The way that, that new car volume coming in will affect used car, I think, is to be determined. I think the most likely place to see that play out first is in used car pricing because for a while during COVID, some used car prices apples-to-apples were higher than new car, and so that was just dislocated. And so I think that -- you'll start to see a more natural delta between used car and new car pricing. But we haven't said what we forecast effectively what used car SAAR would be in this year or even a year from now because of the new car influx. And just the last piece, I think you're starting to see new car manufacturers start to dial up their incentives for new cars, which they had been for the last several months. And a lot of dealers were lamenting, they were receiving cars but with no incentives, and so you're starting to see those come in now.

Rajat Gupta analyst
#26

Thank you. Any other questions? No, I guess I'll move on here. Generative AI, I think we need to talk about it. It's obviously been a growing theme. Could you give us a sense of how you're thinking about if you've already been like, has it already been a part of the operations or your product already? Or how are you thinking about implications to your business going forward? What are the opportunities? What are the concerns both from an operational perspective, internally, how you manage expenses in your headcount, but also from a consumer perspective and traffic, et cetera?

Jason Trevisan executive
#27

So we do have a small team. We have had pockets that have been experimenting with various forms of AI and large language models. We recently have centralized that activity into a small team that is orchestrating and prioritizing all of -- is a broad term, but what I would call the AI activities of the company. And recently, our CTO, Matt Quinn, posted on LinkedIn, a demo of a conversational AI beta -- alpha that we had built that allows consumers to search in a conversational way, family of 5, focused on fuel economy, yet like a smaller car. And it produces the top 5 makes, models with links to our SRPs. So conversational search is certainly an area. Content creation is also an area. And in particular, in content -- upper funnel content is an area that we have not really been active in -- an active investor in the past, but this could change the scale at which we can create that if we chose to. It also -- in car shopping a lot of times, people like to compare cars. And so AI is a good opportunity to compare 2 models with each other. We certainly see some opportunities in consumer success or customer success. Part of that could be dealer but also part of that could be consumer. As we are taking more of the transaction on our site, we have more reason to engage with consumers and consumers have more reason to engage with us. Historically, we would hand them off to a dealer, and now consumer success is an area that we're going to be building muscle groups in and AI will certainly play a role in that. And then internally with our sales team and our sales team working with dealers. We're finding applications that can help prevent churn, help recommend new products but also probably more valuable recommending merchandising as well, that if our salespeople and our account managers can deliver that to them, it will continue to position us as a thought partner to them.

Rajat Gupta analyst
#28

Got it. That's helpful. Just checking if there are any other questions. There's 1 there.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#29

From a consumer finance perspective, is there a threshold or a range on rate that you think there was an inflection or noticeable deceleration of demand and subsequently that would return on a reversion back toward that threshold range from a psychological standpoint?

Jason Trevisan executive
#30

It's such a -- short answer is no, because it's such a segmented market that you've got superprime to subprime have very different thresholds. Just maybe 2 data points I would share that are more in the mainstream. One is $1,000 monthly car payment which historically has been considered extraordinarily high is shockingly more common now. And I think that's a step function in consumers' minds. And then the other one, a totally different type of data point is, and I shared this in a CNBC interview, we're seeing a lot more consumers search for cars under $30,000. And so that seems to be a mental cutoff from a retail -- used retail perspective for people. Not sure how that translates necessarily to monthly payments.

Rajat Gupta analyst
#31

I think we got 1 more question.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#32

Somewhat backing on the AI but more broader on the customer acquisition or performance marketing. Are you seeing customers start their search journey on various forum versus just standard search? And are you seeing benefits from that from a marketing perspective? Or do you see benefits coming through for search bifurcation over the next few years?

Jason Trevisan executive
#33

And is there -- are you particularly thinking about, say, Google versus Bing or search versus social platforms or.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#34

Both of those as well as do you have an ability to gain more direct traffic and keep more of them coming to you first versus going to a search engine because of something you can develop short term and longer term?

Jason Trevisan executive
#35

Yes. Short term, I would say there has not been any major shifts. I mean, I think everyone in this room is -- the questions of AI-related, there's a lot of Google market share commentary and if ChatGPT can help Bing gain share. We've not seen material changes there. Google has introduced some new forms of auto shopping, which we're taking part in and we're finding success in. So changes at Google don't necessarily mean a negative for us at all. In fact, it can actually give us more opportunities to leverage our endemic audience, but more importantly, our proprietary content in informing those new techniques that they're using. From a social perspective, we've not seen a material change in actual low-funnel car shoppers and we really do focus on lower funnel. We have seen one of the fastest growth areas for us has been our app. And so that has been great from an efficiency standpoint and also from a consumer relationship standpoint. A lot of that is because we were candidly late to invest in app as much as we should have. So I would say it's probably us catching up to the market as opposed to consumer mindset being more app-oriented for car shopping.

Rajat Gupta analyst
#36

Great. Maybe we have time for 1 last question. Just wanted to touch on capital allocation. What are your latest and greatest thoughts there? Trying to get a sense of how you're thinking about the buyback cadence. Maybe any potential M&A opportunities within the space, tuck-in AI, something more CarOffer like or maybe like just another player in the industry, if there's any consolidation opportunity there as well.

Jason Trevisan executive
#37

From a broader capital allocation perspective, we have a lot of cash, $400 million to $500 million of cash. We generate a lot of cash. Our core business has very healthy EBITDA margins and cash flow-through. We have announced a $250 million share buyback, and we've executed on part of that but still have some runway there, which we're excited and eager to do. We do have the CarOffer step 3, which is the moment next summer where we look at the measurement period and value purchasing the balance of that company, which is the remaining 49% at a 12x trailing EBITDA multiple. So that's a cash -- we can use cash or stock, but to the extent we use cash, that's a cash need at a moment in time that is an as-yet undetermined amount because we need to see how they perform. In terms of other acquisitions, we're always looking at M&A. I would say we have acquired smaller businesses that are similar business models that have been tuck-ins. I would say more of our focus now is in added capabilities, principally around Digital Retail in ways that we can help dealers. At the same time, we are starting the process to prepare for integrating CarOffer, and that's a sizable business. And so I don't think we expect to be very active in M&A between now and then because we want to make sure that we do that right.

Rajat Gupta analyst
#38

Got it. That's fair. Thanks, Jason, for taking out the time, and thanks, everyone, for listening.

Jason Trevisan executive
#39

Thank you. Thanks, everyone.

Rajat Gupta analyst
#40

Next up is TrueCar.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete CarGurus, Inc. transcript - plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.

Get an API key View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to CarGurus, Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server. Quarterly plans from $105 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.