Dhampur Bio Organics Limited (DBOL) Earnings Call Transcript
January 22, 2024
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Dhampur Bio Organics Limited Q3 FY '24 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Navin Agrawal, Head, Institutional Equities. Thank you, and over to you, sir.
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. It's a pleasure to welcome you on behalf of Dhampur Bio Organics and SKP Securities to this financial results conference call. We have with us Mr. Gautam Goel, Managing Director; and Mr. Nalin Gupta, CFO. We'll have the opening remarks from Mr. Goel, followed by a Q&A session. Thank you, and over to you, Gautam.
Thank you, Navin. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us on this earnings con call. We discuss the operational and financial performance for the quarter and 9 months ended 31st December 2023. The company's results and investor presentation have already been uploaded on the stock exchanges and the company's website and we hope you have had the opportunity to go through them. I will be covering the major policy decisions on restricting the diversion of sugar in ethanol and its effect on us as an industry and company, along with the key operational highlights for the quarter. Our CFO, Nalin, will then give an update on the financial performance of the company. The uneven and reduced rainfall in the cane growing regions of Maharashtra and Karnataka and the resultant reduction in yields for 2023-'24, and the potential for further reduction in the area for 2024-'25 in this region would substantially reduce the availability of sugarcane and thereby sugar in the country. This, coupled with the high international sugar prices, the government of India took a cautious stand and curtailed the diversion of sugar into ethanol by restricting the procurement of ethanol from juice and B-heavy. The government capped a diversion of 1.7 million tonnes of sugar into juice -- by way of juice and B-heavy derived ethanol. As per the latest data, the quantity of juice-derived ethanol, which has been accepted in the tender has been revised to 43 crore liters as against the 36 crore liters, a reduction of about 68% and B-Heavy-derived ethanol has been revised down to 115 crore liters from the tendered quantity of 130 crore liters, a 12% reduction. Our current estimates of net sugar production that is post diversion of about 1.7 million tonnes of sugar are in the region of 31 million tonnes of sugar, plus/minus 0.5 million tonnes. We estimate Maharashtra to produce around 9.5 million tonnes and Karnataka to produce about 4.5 million tonnes, up from about 8.5 million tonnes and 4 million tonnes, respectively, due to better-than-expected yields. We are estimating We are estimating UP to produce about [indiscernible] million tonnes [indiscernible] yields and substantial increase in diversion [Technical Difficulty] central parts of UP. The domestic consumption is estimated at 28.5 million tonnes [indiscernible] closing stock to increase by...
Gautam, sir, sorry to interrupt you, but we are losing your audio.
Is it better now?
Yes, sir. Sorry, we are still losing your audio. [Technical Difficulty]
Sorry about this interruption. So yes, as I was stating, the consumption -- the domestic consumption is estimated at 28.5 million tonnes, and this should result in our closing stock to increase by about 2.5 million tonnes in the region of about 7.5 million tonnes. Going forward, the key factor to watch would be the overall planting in Maharashtra and Karnataka region. It is estimated a further reduction of about 20% from this region. In such an event, we are inclined to believe that the Government of India will further restrict the diversion towards ethanol to ensure adequate sugar supply for the '24-'25 season. Our efforts to keep ourselves abreast with potential developments that could have a material impact on our business have helped us put in place a strategy to minimize the diversion of ethanol into sugar. We believed that in the event of a potential reduction in sugarcane acreage, the Government of India will mandate a reduction in diversion. We, therefore, took steps to augment our boiling house capacities as well as reinstate our C molasses manufacturing capacity in both our Meerganj and Mansurpur units. This year, we refrained from tendering for any juice-derived ethanol as compared to the previous year wherein we had diverted about 0.6 million tonnes of cane towards ethanol. We were also cognizant of the additional loss on B-heavy as compared to C molasses due to the UP government's levy on molasses policy. Initially, we had planned to manufacture C molasses from about 35% of our crushed cane. These numbers will change with more cane going towards C molasses due to the restrictions on diversion of sugar to ethanol. These factors will result in a substantial reduction in ethanol production in this sugar year. The same is reflected in the sales figure for ethanol in the current quarter, which has experienced a decline, decreasing from 17.35 million BL from the previous year's 25.06 million BL during the same quarter. Even though the prices for ethanol supplied from various sugar sources or the alcohol year '23-'24 have yet to be announced, the OMCs have announced an incentive for ethanol derived from C molasses of nearly INR 7 a liter, thereby increasing it from INR 49.41 per liter to INR 56.28 per liter. The price of sugar juice and B-heavy derived ethanol remains unchanged at this point at about INR 65.61 a liter and INR 60.73 a liter, respectively. The government has also imposed a levy of 50% on molasses exports to increase the availability of feedstock for the ethanol program. The government continues to encourage usage of food grains with added impetus on maize for ethanol production as is evident in the rising prices of maize-derived ethanol, which has increased from INR 66.07 per liter to INR 71.86 per liter. As mentioned in our previous call, the UP sugar industry had challenged the methodology for calculating the levy obligations of B-heavy molasses and the matter was sub judice. The industry has subsequently withdrawn its challenge. And as a result, we had to account for a onetime increase in our expenditure amounting to INR 20.52 crores for Q3 FY '24 allocated towards levy obligations related to B-heavy molasses for the molasses year 2022-'23. After adjusting for this levy obligation and a onetime income from sale of premises of INR 14.69 crores, our adjusted EBIT stood at INR 5.11 crores with an adjusted EBIT margin of 1.20% in Q3 FY '24 as against reported negative EBIT of INR 0.72 crores and a reported margin of negative 0.17% in Q3 FY '23. For 9 months FY '24, the adjusted EBIT stood at INR 45.20 crores with an adjusted EBIT margin of 2.56% as against a reported EBIT of INR 39.37 crores and the reported EBIT margins of 2.23%. Our emphasis on cane development has resulted in a much improved recovery trend with a gross recovery standing at 10.80% as of December in the sugar season '23-'24 compared to 10.39% during the same period in the sugar season '22-'23. This improved recovery will have a substantial impact on reducing our cost of production and mitigating the impact of the increase in cane price. The FRP for '23-'24 was increased by INR 10 per quintal and now stands at INR 315 per quintal linked to a recovery of 10.25%. The increase in SAP, the State Advised cane Price was announced post our board meeting. The SAP has been increased to INR 370 from INR 350 per quintal for early variety cane, which is an increase of INR 20 per quintal. This would have increased our cost of production by INR 2.1 per kg of sugar and the P&L would have had an adverse impact of INR 4.3 crores. I now hand over the call to Nalin for an update on the financial performance. Thank you.
Thank you, Gautam. Good afternoon, everyone. I'll begin with the stand-alone financial highlights for Q3 and 9 months FY '24, followed by the segment highlights. Revenue for Q3 FY '24 stood at INR 424.78 crores as against INR 693.79 crores in Q3 FY '23. EBITDA for Q3 FY '24 stood at INR 12.89 crores as against INR 34.01 crores in the corresponding quarter of the previous year. EBITDA margin for the quarter was at 3.03% versus 4.9% in Q3 FY '23. Gautam has already highlighted the reasons for drop in margins, which is mainly on account of lower sales volume in both sugar and ethanol segments and additional levy for the last season. EBITDA margin for the quarter comes to 4.41% after adjustments of onetime impact of additional levy and other income. Profit after tax for the quarter stood at loss of INR 4.16 crores vis-a-vis INR 13.74 crores of profit during Q3 FY '23. We recorded a revenue of INR 1,766.44 crores in 9 months FY '24 with a growth of 2.05% from INR 1,731.12 crores in the same period last fiscal. EBITDA for 9 months FY '24 stood at INR 74.54 crores 9 months FY '24 as against INR 97.31 crores in 9 months FY '23. PAT for 9 months FY '24 stood at INR 7.6 crores versus INR 30.08 crores during 9 months FY '23. Now moving to the segment highlights, beginning with the Sugar segment. Revenue in the Sugar segment stood at INR 237.8 crores in Q3 FY '24 as against INR 568.13 crores in Q3 FY '23. Sugar segment's contribution in revenue was at 47% as compared to 70% in the same quarter last year. Sugar segment EBIT stood at a loss of INR 9.17 crores in this quarter as against INR 10.75 crores of profit in the same quarter last year. We crushed 14.48 lakh tonnes of sugarcane during Q3 FY '24 as against 14.1 lakh tonnes in the same quarter last year. Sugar production in this quarter stood at 1.38 lakh tonnes against 1.02 lakh tonnes in the same quarter last year. We sold 0.31 lakh tonnes of sugar against 1.08 lakh tonnes in the same quarter last year. Average sugar realization stood at INR 40,142 per tonne in this quarter, up from INR 37,874 per tonne in Q3 FY '23. Sugar inventory as on 31st December '23 stood at 1.07 lakh tonnes valued at INR 34,445 per tonne last year -- sorry, this year. Sugar inventory stood at 0.96 lakh tonnes valued at INR 35,969 per tonne as on 31st December '22. We generated 99.73 million units of power in Q3 FY '24 against 105.28 million units in the same period last year. We exported 37.48 million units at an average realization of INR 3.44 per unit in Q3 FY '24 as against 49.58 million units at an average realization of INR 3.3 per unit in Q3 FY '23. Now moving to Biofuel and Spirit segments. This segment reported a revenue of INR 110.98 crores in this quarter as against INR 131.15 crores in Q3 FY '23. Biofuel segment reported EBIT of INR 7.25 crores as against INR 20.05 crores in the same quarter last year. Biofuel segment contributed to 22% of the total revenue as against 16% in Q3 FY '23. We produced 195.05 lakh bulk liters of ethanol in this quarter, out of which 168.94 lakh bulk liters was derived from B-heavy. There was no diversion towards syrup-derived ethanol in this quarter. In Q3, last fiscal ethanol production stood at 245.64 lakh bulk liters with 165.5 lakh bulk liters derived from syrup and 67.75 lakh bulk liters derived from B-heavy. Ethanol sales were at 173.47 lakh bulk liters of ethanol at an average realization of INR 58.87 per BL in Q3 FY '24 as against 250.63 lakh bulk liter of ethanol sales at an average realization of INR 58.81 per BL in Q3 FY '23. Out of 173.47 lakh bulk liters sales in this quarter, 168.47 lakh BL are from B-heavy at an average realization of INR 60.04 per BL. Ethanol stock as on 31st December '23 stood at 12.43 lakh bulk liters as against 5.58 lakh bulk liters as on 31st December '22. In the country liquor segment, we reported a revenue of INR 161.94 crores in Q3 FY '24 as against INR 114.57 crores in Q3 FY '23. Segment EBIT stood at INR 2.86 crores as against INR 1.45 crores in the same quarter last year. We sold 6.87 lakh cases of country liquor this quarter as against 4.83 lakh cases in Q3 FY '23. Average realization net of excise was at INR 280.15 per case as against INR 248.41 per case in Q3 FY '23. Our long-term loans stood at INR 238.27 crores as on 31st December '23 as against INR 249.53 crores as on 31st December '22. The company has repaid long-term loans of INR 19.16 crores during the quarter. Long-term loans -- long-term debt equity ratio stood at 0.28x. Net working capital stood at INR 253.13 crores as against -- sorry, as on 31st December '23. Long-term and short-term rating of the company continues to be assigned -- assigned at A+ by CARE. With that, I would request the moderator to open the floor for questions and queries.
[Operator Instructions] The first question is from the line of Darshit from RoboCapital.
So I just had a couple of -- I just needed an outlook on sugar prices and the overall industry going forward in the next year or so.
Is that the only question you have? Or would there be any more questions?
Like that's the only question. I just need an idea on the overall landscape of sugar...
Sir your audio is not clear. Can you please speak through the handset.
Now is it clear?
Yes.
So yes, that's the only question. I just needed the outlook on the entire sugar industry going forward in the next year or so.
Yes. So we believe, the sugar industry outlook with this change in government policy, we don't anticipate any sugar deficit happening for this year and for next year. The sugar production numbers are in the region of 31 million tonnes to 31.5 million tonnes. And this would increase the opening stock next year or closing stock this year by about 2.5 million tonnes, in the region of 7.5 million tonnes. So even if there is -- we do anticipate a further reduction in the overall cane availability in Maharashtra and Karnataka. The cane availability, the current estimates are -- next year, the overall Maharashtra, Karnataka region could see a further drop of about 2 million tonnes. So we would still be in the region of 29-odd million tonnes of sugar production. Government has an option to, about 1.7 million tonnes of ethanol that got diverted, in the event the situation in Maharashtra and Karnataka looks especially bad, they can mandate a further reduction in this diversion of ethanol. So we do not anticipate any sugar shortage. The cost of production has definitely gone up. We do expect post elections, the prices should tend to go up a little bit to reflect this increase in cost of production. But overall, now with this post reduction in diversion, there is no shortage, we don't see any runaway price -- the threat of any runaway price hike at this point. Currently, the prices have come down substantially from the peak of October. I believe Maharashtra is selling in the region of INR 34 to INR 34.5 per kg. Prices up north in the UP region are in the region of about INR 37.5 to INR 38 per kg. INR 37 plus/minus INR 0.50 would be my number for UP right now. Hopefully, the prices should stabilize around these levels with a potential for an upside post election. That would be my goal.
Next question is from the line of Vikram Suryavanshi from PhillipCapital.
Sir, I need your view on recovery for us because I think if you look at 10.8% recovery is still lower than historically what we used to do in these cases. So, how is the outlook for recovery improvement the way you are doing the cane development process? And what would be the expected cane crushing this sugar season?
This recovery for this quarter that we said -- the gross recovery is actually higher than our last 2 years' recovery at this quarter. If you see the recovery in November, December is at its lowest. So we are running about close to 0.51% -- close to 0.41% higher as of 31st December. And we do see a continuous increase in our recovery as compared to the previous 2 years. So, I think our recovery -- if the current trend continues, we do expect our overall recovery to be in the region of -- to be higher by about 0.6%, 0.65%, which is also what we mentioned in our opening remarks. We expect this increase in recovery to more than offset this increase in cane price. So this is actually a result of our cane development efforts and agro-climatic factors. We also are monitoring and benchmarking our recoveries from our peers in our region. And I'm happy to note that our recovery is amongst the top sort of 5 percentile. So we have a higher recovery as compared to our peers or amongst the top sort of levels in the industry around the region. Our expected cane crush is about slight to maybe about 4% to 5% higher than last year. This is what we were expecting prior to start of season. But with this increased diversion and lower ratoon yields, we still expect the number to be higher, but I would imagine maybe it might not be 7% to 8%, could be 4% to 5%.
Okay. Got it. So gross recovery for a full year season basis could be higher than 11% or so?
It should definitely be higher than that. Last year, we were 11.03%. If you see last year, we were -- and year before last, we were 11.3-odd percent. This year, as of 31st December, I would imagine, yes, the trends are positive and they are continuing to show us an increasing trend as compared to the previous 2 years. The delta is only increasing, not decreasing.
Got it. And second on the distilleries that we have. Are these flexible to have multi-feed and can we use surplus capacity for grain-based kind of a thing or it will take some CapEx?
As of now, our distilleries are not multi-feedstock. We do -- we are continuing to study and evaluate, converting some of our distillery capacity into a multi-feedstock for next year. We are eligible for interest subvention loan if we were to decide to go ahead with this. We're continuing to study it very actively and discussing with the board, and hopefully, we should have some decision on it sooner than later.
Okay. But is it a time consuming and slightly bigger CapEx or it can be managed within the season if we decide to go ahead?
So we expect -- if we were to go ahead and decide to do this, we would want it to be commissioned prior to start of next year. We don't expect any greater -- we don't expect too much of ethanol diversion -- sugar diversion into ethanol next year. I mean we expect the numbers -- if the sugar balance sheet remains the way it is, we expect the numbers to be similar to this year's numbers. So we've that option available to us and we also are very cognizant of the fact that there has been a lot of policy volatility. There was a ban on rice export. The maize prices have gone up through the roof. So it should show a positive value addition if we go down this path.
Understood. And lastly...
If you recollect, we've been a bit cautious on this [indiscernible] because that's the reason why we deferred our distillery in Meerganj. And I think the decision did pay off because one needs to be a little bit cautious rather than being a bit more aggressive. That would be our view. Sorry, last question.
What is the bagasse sale? Because the way we are developing surplus power and I guess we are also selling bagasse in the open market. So, was there any bagasse sale in this quarter? Or on a full year basis how much would be that broadly? If you can give us some idea about that.
We continue to sell bagasse. Last year, we sold a substantial quantity of bagasse, this year too. The prices have been softer in bagasse this year as compared to last year. So Nalin, would you have the exact numbers of the bagasse sales for this quarter?
Yes. So last year, in this quarter, we had sold of bagasse 0.6 lakh tonnes we sold in this quarter versus 0.4 lakh tonnes last year in this same quarter.
And how much would be average realization...
Average realization is down by around 25% to 30%. Last year, it was around INR 3,250 per tonne. And this year, it is in the range of INR 2,200 per tonne.
Next question is from the line of Manu Jindal from Thorin Technology.
I have 3 questions. The very first question is when you say country liquor, like do we derive this country liquor from B-heavy or C-heavy molasses? Like that is my first question. And the associated question would be like what is the impact on the margins when we manufacture country liquor vis-a-vis when we would have manufactured, say, ethanol with molasses, right? So this is the first question.
So do you want to ask all your questions, Manu, and we can answer them together?
Sure. The second question would be regarding sugar prices. When you just now mentioned that you are expecting post elections to have some surge in sugar prices, would it be -- like why is it that? Would it be more due to ethanol diversion or would there be any supply shortage? And my third question is regarding the current capacity of 312,500 liters of biofuel when you say. So is it like that same capacity can be used for -- to manufacture ethanol from B-heavy and syrup or is there a separate bifurcation to that number, 312,500 liters? So these are the 3 questions.
Okay, okay, thanks, Manu. So Manu, basically the country liquor that is your first question, what is the raw material, till last year and to -- a bit of this -- and for this quarter, we were using B-heavy molasses, which was produced last year to make country liquor. Going forward, we expect to use C molasses to make manufacturing -- to manufacture country liquor. Now on the margin impact, the margin on country liquor has substantially reduced. If we sell -- opportunity -- the ENA realization for country liquor for us is in the region of about INR 25 to INR 26 a liter, whereas we could have sold this equivalent alcohol in ethanol sector today at about INR 56.5 a liter. As we have mentioned multiple times, country liquor business is purely because of the government of UP's levy molasses policy. If we were not doing country liquor, then we would be forced to sell ENA at about INR 19 a liter or molasses -- B-heavy molasses at about INR 1,400 or C molasses at INR 1,100 a tonne, which is leaving a substantial value addition for the country liquor manufacturers. Ergo, we have decided to venture into this business, and I'm happy to note we have a sizable volume. We are in the top 10 country liquor sellers in the state. As I mentioned in my opening remarks or the second question, we don't expect a big surge in sugar prices this year because of the change in policy where they prevented more diversion of sugar into ethanol. But we do expect the prices to go up from here to maybe a more reasonable level, keeping in mind the increase in cost of production. And so there may be a little drop in production next year. But I would not be inclined to suggest that there would be a big surge in price. Prices should -- could remain stable to maybe firm up a little bit post election. Current capacity for biofuels, you're right in presuming that the capacity we quoted is for B-heavy molasses. If we were to make C molasses, this capacity would be down to 250,000 liters per day. Does this answers all your questions?
Yes, sir. Just a last question. When the government took out this decision to not divert any syrup towards ethanol manufacturing, just wanted to understand that if all the capacity of 312,500 is dedicated towards B-heavy, then what impact did we witness by this regulation? Like did we have any material impact on this?
So see, one is the nature of distillation. When you make C molasses across board, the capacity comes down by about 25% to 30%. The government decision was basis more on account of preventing sugar from being diverted and to conserve sugar for the country. Now when you don't divert B-heavy, when you divert B-heavy, you also have more raw material for the entire off-season. Roughly -- when you make B-heavy, roughly you make 5.5% to 6% B-heavy per tonne of cane versus 4%, 4.5% of C molasses per tonne of cane. So you get an additional quantity of B-heavy molasses, which can make you run for a greater number of days from the same amount of cane. So all of us who are making C molasses, we will certainly find we have idle distillery capacity, which is what is -- and people who are fundamentally related businesses, their idle capacity will be substantially higher.
Next question is from the line of Nitin Awasthi from InCred Equities.
I have a few questions. May I go one by one because I think they are a little varied on different spaces, so I'd rather go about them one by one rather than giving it all in one go and confusing everyone. Is that okay?
That should be fine, Nitin.
Yes, okay. So firstly, basis your presentation, investor presentation, your inventory is valued at roughly INR 34.4 a kg sugar. So I'm expecting that this will get revised to somewhere around INR 36.5?
Yes, yes, that's correct.
Nalin-ji, you want to answer that?
Yes, that's correct. As of now valued at INR 34.4, then adding INR 2.1, so this will revise to the INR 36.5.
Okay. Great. And also your sales you have done is around 3 crores -- roughly 3 crore kgs of sugar. So that should be -- the cost of that production so basically gross profit shrinkage should happen by around INR 6 crores. Is that a figure close to correct or not correct?
Sorry, come again, come again, please. Yes, we sold 3 lakh quintals that is 3 crores kg of sugar at an average realization of INR 40. But...
Yes. So that was the selling price. Now you have obviously put purchasing price to that and derived your gross profit, whatever the price is basis transfer pricing. So I'm assuming that price also goes up by INR 2. Your gross cost of the said sugar goes up by INR 6 crores. Is that correct?
So no, so in this quarter, Nitin, we sold 1 lakh quintals, 10,000 tonnes of sugar, which was produced last year. Current season which is valued at INR 34.5 is just 20,000. So impact would be around INR 4 crores to INR 4.25 crores.
Understood. Sir, that explains a lot the differences. So not confused anymore on that. Okay, sir, great. This was on the specific sugar part. Secondly, I wanted to understand, you are one of the largest country liquor players in Uttar Pradesh as of now. And I understand the reason for being in country liquor is that there is a levy policy by the state government, which makes it more profitable to be in the country liquor business rather than not be in the country liquor business. However, you have substantially increased your capacity. Now would all of this capacity actually be required for the levy purpose or a good proportion of this capacity you can sell country liquor at market prices?
So Nitin, we haven't really made any major CapEx to increase the capacity. It's more a function of sale. And at this point of time, our first target is to try and achieve 100% of our levy obligation through our own country liquor sale. That is our first target. We are at about 70%, 75% of the target. We don't -- it's only much later will we really have a visibility to this. And the levy pricing -- sorry, the country liquor pricing mechanism basically works is a reverse calculation the government does, they fix the MRP for the country liquor segment, and they've done a backward calculation to fix the raw material price all the way down to molasses. Whenever we fulfill our own levy obligation from sugarcane, we will have the option to buy cheaper molasses or ENA from the other sugar manufacturers who do not have country liquor manufacturing capacity.
The next question is from the line of [ Falguni Dutta from Mansarovar Financials ].
Sir, just to understand this part a bit more, this INR 20 crores that you have provided. So is it the difference between this INR 19 and INR 56 that you mentioned, is that the difference which comes to INR 20 crores? I mean how has the accounting been done is what I wanted to know?
[ Falguni ], there are 2 parts. Let me take the first part, which was the legal part and maybe the exact numbers, Nalin can explain to you. During our last quarter's con call, we -- in our investor presentation, we had highlighted there was a -- what we believe there was a miscalculation in the way UP government had imposed levy on B-heavy molasses. The industry had gone to court and we had got a stay from the court, and we were hopeful of the case being won. Therefore, we had not accounted for that additional levy, which the government calculation thought -- mandated us to give. We had made a noting in our results, and we had also accounted for -- we had also said the same during our investor call. In the event we lose this case, we will have to make this additional INR 20 crores adjustments. Post our last con call, somewhere in October, we -- the industry decided to withdraw that case and therefore, this adjustment. Further detailing of this, Nalin can explain to you if required.
[ Falguni ], what we do -- so whatever molasses we produce. So one is B molasses and one is molasses which is to be given in levy. So the molasses which is to go towards levy, we value at the levy rates. There are market rate for C-heavy molasses, which goes under levy and B-heavy molasses, which goes under levy. So we account for at the rate -- at the market rate for arriving at our cost of production.
Okay. So what I wanted to know is the differential between the cost and the rate at which you are having to sell? I mean, is this the loss that you are incurring because of the rate being lower than the cost? Is that what you mean to say?
No, no, no. Molasses and bagasse being the byproducts, their market value is reduced from the gross cost of production for arriving at the cost of production of sugar. This INR 20 crores was additional levy, which we have accounted for directly in this quarter P&L, but it does not affect our cost of production of this season.
Okay, sir. We will not have any more such losses in the coming years or coming quarters?
We can hope so.
No, what I mean is...
I mean there is no carryforward loss. The specific loss, [ Falguni ], was specific. We had made -- we don't have any more losses or any carryforward or potential package losses that we should need to provide.
What I mean to ask you further, is this practice -- I mean is this accounting done every year for that particular year? Or it's -- this is just -- this was just the backlog and the other years it's just embedded in the number? And is it a number which is separately disclosed, sir?
So this particular number was separately disclosed last quarter. And it was basically because there was an amendment UP government came out with, with regards to levy calculation, which we as an industry had challenged. So there was a stay against that order. It was only specific to that particular year, that particular period because they had come up with an amendment which we had challenged.
Okay. And sir, finally, the cost of sugar for us for this season, would it be about INR 36 -- INR 36.5 per kg for the season ending September '24?
So [ Falguni ], cost of production is basically derived by the recovery, sugar recovery, which our Managing Director informed that is going to be up than last year. Of course, cost for production is going to be lower than last year. But for December quarter, of course, it stands at INR 34.45 plus INR 2.10, which is on account of increase in SAP. So for March quarter, of course, it will depend upon the recovery, which we are expecting to go up.
Okay. So you mean to say broadly the -- directionally, the cost would go down from INR 36.5 by the end of the season?
We are very confident of that, yes.
Next question is from the line of [ Saket Kapoor from Kapoor & Company ].
Sir, question was for this sugar segment, sir, if you could explain the reason if we compare the last year number with the current year, what factors attributed to the lower profitability for the sugar segment, particularly the sales part also and hence the profitability?
See if you recollect on the sale, it's basically fundamentally a factor of sales. If you see our sales have been down in the Sugar segment by about close to 40%, if I'm not mistaken, the total sales on the rupee to rupee terms, it's been down by -- in the sugar segment, we've been down.
58%. Sugar segment revenue is down 58%.
58%. And that's because last year, we had additional quotas plus we had -- the government of India had allowed sugar exports, and we were exporting our own sugar. This year, the quotas have been severely curtailed and therefore, we are carrying this sugar in our inventory.
So sir, how will this translate going ahead, say, for Q4, when the inventory gets diluted? And what we heard you in the second quarter, you were looking -- so I mean second quarter number for this Q3. However, that did not worked out, I think so as per the changes in the ethanol plan and all. So what's the outlook? How will exit this, this year?
This will be dependent upon the quotas which the government releases. Now as you are aware, I'm sure you are aware that we are mandated by the amount of sugar quotas that the government tells us to sell. We do not have the flexibility to sell beyond the quota sugar. And the numbers will be a reflection of the quota that we get. We expect the quotas to be in line with last year, maybe marginally higher. But we don't expect numbers -- absolute sugar numbers to be -- they will definitely be lower than last year because we had no exports. Last year, we had done close to 76,000 tonnes of sugar export in Q3, Q4, which will be absent this year.
Okay. And sir, as you mentioned very correctly that we deferred our greenfield distillery project and for good reasons as we see today that there is a flip flop on the policy side and which is, I think, so very likely also going ahead also in terms of the agriculture crop nature and the vagaries of nature. So going ahead, sir, what would be our plan going ahead for this biofuel segment? As from the other feedstocks, I think so the gap which will not be serviced from sugarcane would be from the other agri commodities. So what would be the thought process of the management in terms of the contribution from the biofuel segment? And what kind of CapEx can we envisage going ahead?
See, I will refrain from giving the absolute CapEx number because we are working these out. We are in discussions with our Board. But we do see there is a -- they do believe there is merit in us having a dual feed distillery, at least part of our distillery to be a dual feed distillery because we believe we will be in a more competitive state producer as compared to stand-alone grain distilleries. Our raw material, we are in the rural sector. We have the ability to source raw material and our power fuel cost because of bagasse as compared to coal prices will be lower than theirs. This is under active consideration. We are discussing this. We are budgeting it out and looking at the raw material availability, projecting everything. And I think we will be taking a call on it sooner rather than later. But on the new distillery, greenfield distillery, we are still on a wait and watch mode.
Sir, for the existing one, do we have dual feedstock there also?
We don't have dual feed. We don't have dual feed as of now. We are contemplating converting some of it into dual feed in the near future. But that's still under discussion. Nothing has been firmed up.
So those activities you are telling about the retrofitting part of going ahead?
Of the existing distillery, yes.
Sir, but -- sir, for investors, what should we look forward to from DBOL, from Dhampur Bio Organics going ahead? As of now, the policy changes and the other factors, the numbers are not aligned to what anticipated earlier. So what should we anticipate in terms of the exit for the year and going ahead, what steps exactly the management is taking to improve firstly the profitability? And my other point was on the bio-based sugar, I think the pharma-based grade sugar part, how is that jelling up and what kind of revenue have we done for this quarter and 9 months, and going ahead, what should be the outlook?
So yes, so 2 parts on this. As we said, the things that are within our control, if you recollect the next 2 -- last 2 years from the time DBOL, Dhampur Bio Organics came into existing, we have steadily increased our overall cane crush. Over the last 2 years, we've had a steady increase in our cane crush, and we expect a further increase in our cane crush this year. As I also mentioned and as you see our recovery, which has the single biggest materialistic impact on our cost of production and P&L, we are seeing a substantial jump on our recovery, and we hope our recovery will be -- the losses we had or the potential loss of profit we had because of disease and pest infestation, we do believe we have curtailed that considerably. And we believe going forward, our recovery numbers should continue to be amongst the better players in the industry, which will have a long-term impact for us as a company. Now with regards to the quarter-on-quarter results, which is more dependent upon the government sales quota and things like that, that will be a manifestation or we will be a reflection of what is happening in the entire industry per se. The other thing which you could look at it from DBOL's perspective is some of the strategic calls that we did take when we did decide at the opportune time to be a bit cautious and not spend money on putting up a new greenfield distillery. There was a lot of questions at that point of time, why are we deferring the distillery, but we did. We also made arrangements to make C-heavy molasses ahead -- maybe, I don't know, a little bit faster or ahead of the curve as compared to our colleagues. So I guess these are the kind of things that we can hope to achieve from us. Pharma sugar, as you mentioned, we have invested some quantities there to improve our sugar realization. We are continuing to see an uptake in our sales and uptake in our average realization. And you would be able to see that in a higher average realization as compared to our peers. So going forward, if our recovery continues to improve and our sugar realization improves, that delta should play out, if not this quarter, in the coming quarters.
Sir, what would have been the contribution of the pharma grade sugar part for these 9 months?
See, again, you see in these 2 -- this is basically in these 2 -- as Nalin mentioned, we just about sold 20,000 tonnes of sugar this year, our new crop sugar. And bulk of the pharma or institutional buying is a little subdued in the month of September, October. So we would not be in a position to give you the exact contribution of pharma category right now, but it's an increasing trend and it's giving us positive outlook. For 9 months, in the first 6 months, last year in the -- there was certain export carryover. We did sell to some institutions. We did had some other pharma category sales. So last year was the first year we are there. We hope to have a higher volume and realization as compared to last year by about 30% to 50% going forward pharma to pharma.
Sir, if we take the current scenario, the government's role in making sugar available in the country at reasonable prices and the ethanol -- they were stopping the diversion for ethanol. Do you think that the advantage which the sugar players were earlier having as value-added product from ethanol that gets dented and there is now -- there's going to be, at least for the time being, a lull in the profitability, as you mentioned, that sugar sales would be on a quota basis. Ethanol, we are having curbs because of these reasons. And molasses, the export also, there is an export duty of 50%. So putting all these things into the perspective, these are the reasons that would not allow the profitability to improve going ahead? Or correct me there, sir, or what steps are we taking to improve given these circumstances?
I think this year is a little bit of an aberration for various reasons, climate playing out, elections coming in. But to be fair, the Government is also being proactive, and they recognize both the importance of the ethanol program, and it is just, I think, a temporary blip. They also realize that sugar industry is a very important agro-based industry, which is very efficient. In the pass-through to the farmer in the circular economy, sugar industry is sort of probably one of the most efficient industry in that manner. So I would -- things that are within our control, which is the cost of production, recovery, efficiencies, quality products, selling, I think we focus on them. Barring 1 or 2 minor blips here and there, I would be more inclined to expect reasonable approach from the government because that is what they have done in the last 8 years. I would not like to say, it will be unfair from my part to say that the Government has been unreasonable because the ethanol policy has been a reasonable policy. Maybe there will be -- I am quite hopeful that there will be some course correction, maybe if not now, post elections.
Earlier, what -- sugarcane molasses being the feedstock, now they have been more skewed towards, I think, to the grain. Earlier also grain was a major, but now the thrust is majorly on the grain part, at least for this season. That is what we are observing in terms of pricing.
Yes, see you have to keep in mind that if we have to have a successful ethanol blending program of 20%, 25% and especially [ vehicles ], which is the overall direction which we are taking, no single feedstock will be able to fulfill the demand. So it's not really a matter of this versus that. It's purely a matter of every feedstock will be able to -- will have a place in itself, will have a place in this whole ethanol blending program. And this program, I think, is here to stay. I don't see any movement away from the program.
[Operator Instructions] Next question is from the line of [ Pavan Sharma ], an individual investor.
So my first question is regarding, as you told that government is inclined for the biofuel, no?
Yes.
So why we have stopped the program, biofuel program, like they have stopped our capacity expansion. So if you are thinking that the government is inclined to go for this ethanol and this is a temporary glitch, so we should move on to the ethanol blending program.
Pavan-ji, could not be clear. You are saying why we have stopped or -- we believe that the Government is definitely committed to forwarding the ethanol blending program. As far as [Foreign Language] for ourselves, these are to augment -- we already have a sizable capacity. Now, as per the Government mandate, we can't divert more B-heavy into ethanol. Therefore, it's purely the mandated requirement for this particular year which have caused these sort of aberrations. Long term, again, these are big CapEx decisions. We should see -- we should take decisions on a more -- I think as a company, we need to be a little bit more cautious keeping seasonal seasonalities in mind. That would be our view as a company. We don't want to stress our balance sheet. We want to maintain a strong and healthy balance sheet.
Next question is from the line of [ Hari Kumar S ], individual investor.
My only question is on the plan of branded sales.
So we don't have a branded sugar -- Dhampur -- so we have -- is that branded sugar you're talking about I would imagine?
Yes, sir. Yes, sir.
See, we are one of -- yes, I think we were one of the first people to launch the brand Dhampur that was launched by me many, many years ago. We are looking at institutional plays, branded play, third-party packaging to see where our value addition and long-term strategy comes into play. At this point of time to invest very heavily in putting up a big brand play for sugar, that is not making sense. We have to have a bigger vision to have multiple food products, FMCG things which probably is still a little bit -- we are maybe a little distance away, could be happening in the future, not right now.
Ladies and gentlemen, this would be the last question for the evening. I request you to forward your questions to SKP Securities. I would now like to hand the conference over to Mr. Goel for closing comments.
Thank you all very much, and thank you for taking time out to attend our con call. And please do -- any questions which we could not answer, please share them with us, and we will get back to you immediately. Thank you so much.
Thank you, everyone.
Thank you very much. On behalf of SKP Securities Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us. You may now disconnect your lines. Thank you.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Dhampur Bio Organics Limited transcript - plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.
Get an API key View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Dhampur Bio Organics Limited earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the
EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server.
Quarterly plans from $105 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search,
and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.