Home / Transcripts / GAIL (India) Limited (GAIL.NS) · January 29, 2024

GAIL (India) Limited (GAIL.NS) Earnings Call Transcript

January 29, 2024

National Stock Exchange of India IN Utilities Gas Utilities earnings 58 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator operator
#1

Ladies and gentlemen, good day. And welcome to Q3 FY '24 Earnings Conference Call of GAIL (India) Limited, hosted by ICICI Securities. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this conference is being recorded. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Probal Sen from ICICI Securities. Thank you. And over to you, sir.

Probal Sen analyst
#2

Thank you, Aditya. Thanks, everyone, for taking the time out on back-to-back calls to attend the -- GAIL's Post-Q3 FY '24 Results Call. We have with us from the management Shri Rakesh Kumar Jain, the CFO of the company, along with other members of the senior management of GAIL, so without further ado, I'll hand over to the management for their opening remarks. And then we can get into the Q&A. Sir, over to you.

Rakesh Jain executive
#3

Thank you, Probal. And a very good afternoon to all of you. I have with me my colleagues from various departments who are heading critical department, like sourcing, marketing; and colleagues from finance. Once again, good afternoon and warm welcome to GAIL's Earning Call for Q3 Financial Year '24. At the outset, I thank you all for attending this earning call. GAIL's result for quarter ended 31st December 2023 have been declared today. I will touch briefly on the major highlights for quarter, and then we can open the question-and-answer session. GAIL's gross turnover increased by 8% to INR 34,168 crores in Q3 financial year '24, as against INR 31,728 crores in Q2 financial year '24. The major reasons for the increase is the robust physical performance by all the major business segments of GAIL. This quarter witnessed increase in natural gas prices and better realization in liquid hydrocarbon segment. Profit before tax during the quarter increased to INR 3,694 crore, as against INR 3,130 crore in Q2 financial year '24, and this is up 18%. This is mainly due to increase in LFC (sic) [ LHC ] price realization, higher petrochemical sales, improved gas marketing margins and reduction in input gas costs for petrochemical segment. Further, during this quarter, we received higher dividends, as compared to quarter 2. We received INR 403 crores, as against INR 270 crore in quarter 2 financial year '24. Profit after tax during the quarter increased to INR 2,843 crore, as against INR 2,405 crore in Q2 of financial year '24. That is up by again 18%, and the reasons are same as I enumerated for profit before tax. If we talk of 9-month basis. GAIL clocked the turnover of INR 98,034 crore, as against INR 1 lakh 11,290 crore in corresponding period of the last year. And there is a decrease of 12%, and this decrease is mainly due to decrease in gas prices as compared to last -- 9 months of last financial year. However, this is partly offset by an increase in transmission tariffs; volumes in natural gas marketing, natural gas transmission and petrochemicals. There is an increase in profit before tax by 45% to INR 8,713 crore, as against INR 5,993 crores; and PAT by 42% to INR 6,660 crores, as against 4,690 -- INR 4,698 crores. Physical performance, if I were to share with you. Total gas marketing volume was 98.14 MMSCMD in Q3, as against [ 96.96 crore in -- 96.96 MMSCMD ] in Q2 financial year '24. This increase is mainly due to increase in volume, overseas volume. Natural gas transmission volume was 121.54 MMSCMD in Q3, as against 120.31 MMSCMD in Q2. The average capacity utilization was 58%, approximately. The increase in transmission volume is attributed to increase in [ shippers' ] volume by approximate 1.26 MMSCMD. Polymer production increased by 45 TMT to 205 TMT in Q3 financial year '24, as against 160 TMT in Q2. Capacity utilization in last quarter, that is Q3, was 101%. Liquid hydrocarbon production was 249 TMT, as against 238 TMT in previous quarter. The capacity utilization was 69%. LPG transmission was almost flat. That is 1,095 TMT, as against 1,114 TMT in previous quarter. And capacity utilization was 95%. The consolidated financials for Q3 as against Q2. The consolidated turnover in the current quarter stood at INR 34,678 crore versus INR 32,952 crore, up by 5%. PBT in the current quarter is INR 4,075 crore versus INR 3,138 crores in Q2, up by 30%. Profit after tax is INR 3,195 crore versus INR 2,444 crores in Q2. That is up by 31%. On 9-month basis, consolidated financials. The consolidated turnover for 9 months in financial year '24 stood at INR 1 lakh 385 crore versus INR 1 lakh 12,445 crores in the corresponding period in previous year. The profit before tax for 9 months in financial year '24, up by 45% to INR 9,496 crores, as against INR 6,567 crores in corresponding period of previous year. Profit after tax, up by 49% to INR 7,431 crore for 9 months in financial year '24 versus INR 4,982 crores in corresponding period for the previous year. Now I'll share the performance of GAIL's CGD. GAIL is having infrastructure of 165 CNG stations and 2 lakhs 90,000-plus DPNG connections in the 6 GA allotted to GAIL. During the current quarter, 8 new CNG stations and approximate 16,000 DPNG connections were added. The physical volume is 0.3 MMSCMD during the quarter. In the next 2 years, GAIL targets to add over 100 new CNG stations and approximate 2 lakhs new DPNG connections. I will share now the performance of GAIL Gas. During the current quarter, Q3, financial year '23, '24, turnover stood at INR 3,145 crore, as against INR 2,745 crores in Q2 financial year '24. That is increase of 15% mainly on account of increase in bulk trading quantity by 12%, CNG quantity by 11%. Profit before taxes stood at INR 153 crore, as against INR 57 crore in Q2 financial year '24. There is increase of 168%. Profit after taxes stood at INR 113 crore, as against INR 42 crore in Q2 financial year '24, increased by 169% for reasons as explained ago -- as explained. The physical volume increased to 7.18 MMSCMD in Q3 financial year '24, increase of 10% mainly on account of increase in bulk trading quantity by 12% and CNG quantity by 11%. During current quarter, GAIL Gas, along with JV subsidiaries, has added 17,731 new DPNG connections and 29 CNG stations; and having infrastructure of 9 lakh 6,000 DPNG connections, GAIL Gas as a group company. If I were to talk about GAIL Gas, GAIL Gas has almost 5 lakh of DPNG connections. Bengal Gas Company Limited. As on 31/12/23, BGCL is having 13 CNG stations. 237-kilometer pipeline and 8,000 numbers -- of domestic PNG connection infrastructure is made available. During the current quarter, [ 1 new ] CNG stations and 22-kilometer pipeline were added. Project performance. Mumbai-Nagpur-Jharsuguda pipeline activities are moving in full swing, and pipeline is anticipated to be completed by October '24. Jagdishpur-Haldia-Bokaro-Dhamra pipeline: Out of 3,289 kilometer, 2,951 kilometer pipeline have been commissioned; and remaining part is expected to be completed progressively by June '24. Srikakulam-Angul main pipeline that is of 420 kilometer. Work is under progress and likely to be completed by June '24. The spur lines are anticipated to be completed by September '24. Gurdaspur-Jammu natural gas pipeline, this pipeline having a length of 106 kilometer -- and is likely to be completed by July '26. Dhamra-Haldia pipeline, length 253 kilometer: The work is under progress and expected to be completed by June '24. PDHPP at Usar, as you know, capacity of this plant is 500 KTA, is expected to be completed by April '25. PP at Pata, capacity at 60,000 KTPA (sic) [ 60 KTA ], expected to be completed by July '24. IPA at Usar, 50 [ KTPA ], expected to be completed by December '25. GAIL Mangalore Petrochemicals Limited, capacity 1,250 KTPA, completion date by March '25. CapEx for Q3 financial year '24 is [ 1,730 crore ], mainly on pipelines, petrochemicals, CGD projects, operational CapEx and others. Now I would like to share some segmental outlook for short to medium term. So far in the financial year, our gas marketing business has exhibited robust performance. In earlier conference call, we have -- we had given a guidance that, no matter what, GAIL will be able to earn at least INR 3,500 crore as a marketing margin from gas marketing segment during financial year '23, '24. In 9 months period ending 31st December '23, due to better arbitrage; various optimization measures like time swaps, destination swaps and shipping optimization, we have already earned gas marketing margin of INR 4,300 crore, which has surpassed our earlier guidance. With these revised numbers, our gas marketing margin is expected to exceed INR 5,500 crore mark by the end of this financial year. In the similar way, we believe that the gas marketing spread for '24, '25 will be around INR 4,000 crore; and for financial year '25, '26, will be around INR 4,500 crore. And that will be minimum we expect to earn. Gas transmission volume for financial year '23, '24. We -- it is expected to be 120 MMSCMD on an average basis. I'm talking of yearly average. And we also expect, when we close this financial year, we'll be having exit rate of at least 123 MMSCMD, 124 MMSCMD. In this regard, I would also like to inform that -- to my investors community that, in Q3 financial year '24, average transmission volume stood at 121.5 crore -- 121.5 MMSCMD. That is up from 120.31 MMSCMD in Q2 financial year '24. In next quarter, we expect to transmit slightly higher volume, so as to reach an average of 120 MMSCMD for full financial year. Further, during next 2 to 3 years, there will be increase in transmission volume by 12 MMSCMD to 15 MMSCMD [ on a year-on-year basis ]. Polymer production stood at 205 TMT, as against 160 TMT in last quarter. In this quarter, we were able to post a PBT of INR 62 crore, as against loss of INR 160 crore. As we have been mentioning to our analyst community, that we expect, when we end this financial year, we'll be around at break-even level on a yearly basis for petrochemical at Pata. This has happened due to optimization of costs, input gas costs; improved operational efficiency because we are able to run the Pata plant at more than 100% capacity. Further, in Q4 of financial year '23, '24, we plan to optimize further our gas sourcing and likely to -- as I said, likely to close at break-even level. For next financial year [indiscernible] not only normalize petrochemical operations, but we expect to earn a reasonable profit from Pata petrochemicals. Liquid hydrocarbon production stood at 730 TMT during 9 months of financial year '24. And during Q3, we were able to post a PBT of INR 257 crore, as against loss of INR 17 crores in Q2 due to better price realization. In financial year '24, production level is estimated to be slightly higher, as compared to previous years. Also, to protect our margins in this segment, GAIL is effectively involved in taking hedging for LPG products. I think that's all from my side regarding the overview of performance of -- performance and project status. Now I invite you to have any clarification and questions on the results for Q3 and 9 months ending December 31, '23. Thank you. Over to you, Probal.

Probal Sen analyst
#4

Thank you, sir. Aditya, can we open up the queue for question-and-answers?

Operator operator
#5

[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from the line of Puneet Gulati from HSBC.

Puneet Gulati analyst
#6

Congratulations on great numbers. My first question is on your guidance for FY '25. Why are you guiding for lower marketing margins for FY '25 versus '24? Or are you just being conservative?

Rakesh Jain executive
#7

Puneet, we have shared the minimum marketing margin which we are likely to -- or we also -- for this year, if I were to share, we said that we earn at least INR 3,500 crore. So we are saying this will be minimum which we expect to earn. And then based on the market situations, the arbitrage available, the optimization we are able to do, we may [ better off ] than this, but for guidance purpose, we are considering a number of INR 4,000 crore.

Puneet Gulati analyst
#8

Understood. So it's fair to assume that there is 100% probability of a INR 4,000 crore marketing margin.

Rakesh Jain executive
#9

That's what we expect.

Puneet Gulati analyst
#10

Okay, [indiscernible]. Secondly, if you can also talk a bit about what's driving the improvement on the petrochemical side. It was a decent improvement. What is the optimizations that you're doing that you talked about in your opening statement?

Rakesh Jain executive
#11

Actually, first, when we were running the plant before this quarter, it was suboptimal production capacity we were running. So in last quarter, we were able to operate the plant at 101%. Once you operate the plant at full capacity or more than the full capacity, a lot of positive things happen. And one of the positive things is that specific energy consumption in terms of per MMBtu consumption [ for 1 ] metric ton has gone down significantly. Second, the fixed cost allocation is to a higher quantity. Third, we -- through our portfolio -- because in our portfolio we have options to have, make available the gases which suits the Pata petrochemical production and the viability, we are able to do that. So all these factors have enabled the profitability in Q3 for Pata petrochemicals.

Puneet Gulati analyst
#12

[ That's great ]. And lastly, if I may, if you can also talk about the opportunities on increasing your volumes for marketing business. Are you sourcing new gas? What kind of gas contracts and gas pricing are you experiencing there? What is the new volume tie-up that you expect to do [ over next season ]?

Rakesh Jain executive
#13

So our Chairman has already [ said on ] various occasions that we intend source 7 to 8 MMTPA of additional gas for our portfolio and maybe 1 to 2 MMTPA on a yearly basis. In this regard, already there was an announcement that we have signed a contract for 1 MMTPA which is going to be available to us from '26, calendar year '26. We are also in advanced stage of discussions with various suppliers, and very soon, we may be able to inform you when we conclude these deals. So we are on the job to source the gas, so as to have broader portfolio and do more marketing, [ okay ]?

Puneet Gulati analyst
#14

Excellent, sir.

Operator operator
#15

[Operator Instructions] Our next question is from the line of Sabri Hazarika from Emkay Global.

Sabri Hazarika analyst
#16

Congratulations on good set of numbers. So I have 2 questions. The first one is relating to marketing. So from what we understand generally, the marketing margin in APM gas is something like INR 200 per MSCM, which is like around $0.1 per MMBtu. And in LNG, it generally ranges somewhere around like $0.20 per MMBtu, so if we do a rough calculation, we generally end up at, say, around INR 2,000 crores, INR 2,500 crores kind of marketing EBITDA for the year, so I'm just wondering that -- when you were like citing INR 4,000 crores. So does it mean -- I mean these arbitrage opportunities. They are like more recurring on -- in nature. Or do you think -- has there been any like structural increase in gas marketing margin? Or anything of that sort has happened.

Rakesh Jain executive
#17

Actually, you are arriving at these numbers based on the sales price which includes the certain fixed -- or some fixed kind of marketing margin. That is one part of it, but our portfolio does not include the APM gas and RLNG which we market at fixed margins. Our portfolio also includes -- significant portfolio also includes wherein we have an option and opportunity where we are able to market the gas on a mid-term to long-term basis on higher marketing margins than what you have estimated. That's one thing, but apart from the marketing side, it is also sourcing side. I also narrated during my brief that we are able to do a lot of things which is -- through which we are able to reduce our cost of gas sold, like time swaps, destination swaps, ship-to-ship transfers, a lot of things which we do. And all these things [indiscernible] and then taking this position in financial markets, the [ paper ] positions, because we have a lot of portfolio or -- available to us. So all these things enables us to have at least a number of INR 4,000 crore which we have seen in last 2, 3 years. Because every year, when we are giving guidance, we are working out these numbers, right? Before this year, we said INR 3,000 crore. We surpassed given the worst kind of situation. This year, we said INR 3,500 crore. We again went back to our calculation [ suite and talked ]. Again [ we achieve it ] and then we have done it. So similarly, for next years, we see that the gas marketing volumes are growing. Growth is there in the business. And also we are able to take the benefit of a lot of options which we are exercising because we have a lot of flexible gas, at least from United States.

Sabri Hazarika analyst
#18

Right. And marketing volumes will also grow by around 5%, 6%. Or it will be even more than that.

Rakesh Jain executive
#19

We expect marketing volume to grow at least by 5% to 6%.

Sabri Hazarika analyst
#20

Okay, sir. And second question is relating to your transmission business. So the KG basin tariff order just came, sometime, back; and they have like increased the gas cost, gas pricing assumption in the quarter. I think they've taken some long-term average of HPHT. And also this is the final. Or do you think there could be further upside to the gas cost assumptions?

Rakesh Jain executive
#21

I understand you are talking of KG basin tariff. Is that right?

Sabri Hazarika analyst
#22

Yes, yes. That's right. I mean that's right. They've taken that assumption, but does it mean that even for unified tariff and integrated tariff also that assumption may be taken? Or...

Rakesh Jain executive
#23

I think, if you go back to the tariff order, there is no implication of any gas assumption in KG basin tariff because there is no compressor station. There is no [ fuel consumption ] in KG basin tariff, so that has no link with the tariff of HVJ which is part of the unified tariff, where compressor fuel is being used. That is a separate issue.

Sabri Hazarika analyst
#24

I'm talking about the gas price.

Rakesh Jain executive
#25

Gas price, well, gas price, how will it impact in tariff -- unless it is used as a compressor fuel or [ transmission loss ]. Only these 2 things happen.

Sabri Hazarika analyst
#26

Okay, got it, sir. So it is under review only and will come separately...

Rakesh Jain executive
#27

Right, right.

Operator operator
#28

Our next question is from the line of Maulik Patel from Equirus.

Maulik Patel analyst
#29

Sir, a few questions. Sir, now you do not have any of this APM gas for your gas compression business -- sorry, in the gas transmission business, so is this an normalized cost on transmission segment?

Rakesh Jain executive
#30

If I understood you, you are telling there is no gas allocation and at what cost we are booking. Is that right?

Maulik Patel analyst
#31

Yes.

Rakesh Jain executive
#32

So since there is no gas allocation, we are sourcing the gas for our compressor fuels. We are trying to source the gas from domestic sources and to the extent it is available. Or else, we use the RLNG for our compressor fuels, which is at prevalent market price.

Maulik Patel analyst
#33

You are using around 1.7 MMSCMD of gas for the compressor business, right, approximately?

Rakesh Jain executive
#34

Right, right, right.

Maulik Patel analyst
#35

Now from this quarter onwards, it will be on market prices, whether it's in HPHT. Or it will be export LNG.

Rakesh Jain executive
#36

Right, export LNG or the gas available out of our portfolio.

Maulik Patel analyst
#37

Okay, okay, okay. And sir, when do you expect that order to come now? I mean because earlier the assumption was that, within a year, regulator will revisit the assumptions what they made into this integrated tariff pipeline at $3.5. When do you expect that, to [ have it again ]?

Rakesh Jain executive
#38

Actually, we are following with PNGRB. And we expect them to take a decision soon, but we understand that there is issue of member legal there.

Maulik Patel analyst
#39

Okay, yes.

Rakesh Jain executive
#40

Probably that is delaying that process.

Maulik Patel analyst
#41

Got it. Sir, last questions. This is on the petchem side. Now [ you have turned ] into that, again, profitability. And this quarter, spot LNG prices are again lower than the previous quarter. Is it fair to assume that your profitability will substantially improve in this quarter? And sir, any update on that -- acquisitions, what we have done a couple of quarters back, that INR 2,000 crore which we are supposed to spend? When do you plan to start operation in that?

Rakesh Jain executive
#42

Yes. So it is fair to assume that profitability for petrochemical project or plant Pata will certainly improve, as compared to Q3, and -- definitely. And we expect it to be the level of PBT -- or rather, we will be at break-even level for Pata petrochemicals on yearly basis. Second question is with respect to the plant which we have recently acquired. That is erstwhile JBF Petrochemicals. We expect that plant to be commissioned by March '25.

Maulik Patel analyst
#43

Okay. And sir, will -- the spend is around, what, INR 2,000 crore in that, right?

Rakesh Jain executive
#44

We have acquired that through NCLT process at approximately INR 2,100 crore. And then we are expected to incur around INR 2,000 crore to bring it to the -- a commissioning level.

Maulik Patel analyst
#45

Sir -- and PDH plant will also commission around that time [ only ], next year.

Rakesh Jain executive
#46

Yes, yes. PDH will be commissioned mechanically by April '25.

Maulik Patel analyst
#47

April '25, so commercial will be -- take another 6 more months to complete it.

Rakesh Jain executive
#48

Maybe 3 months.

Operator operator
#49

Our next question is from the line of Vikash Jain from CLSA.

Vikash Jain analyst
#50

So a couple of questions. Firstly, on your volumes. Now this 121 volume that we are seeing, could you just remind us? How much of this is outside the main pipeline, which is the unified pipeline? How much of this is outside that, like the Kochi-Mangalore...

Rakesh Jain executive
#51

Maybe 10% of the volume is out of the unified networks. KKMBPL and KG basin is a large volume. Rest are very, very minimal. So KG basin may be around [ 4 to 5 ]. Again this is -- or [ 4 to 5 ] -- KG basin -- so 8 -- 9 million to 10 million volume, 8 million, 9 million. And then another, Agartala region, which are small network which are not part of this unified tariff.

Vikash Jain analyst
#52

Okay. No, because what I'm asking is that if the kind of growth that we are talking about, if we are at about 110 or so -- we get another 8, 9 MMSCMD of growth. Then we would be already at 75% utilization, right, for the main networks. In that case, incremental volume increase could also lead to tariff adjustments. Or how does that work?

Rakesh Jain executive
#53

Vikash, you know the tariff regulation. [ Actually ], we don't [indiscernible] that incremental volume will lead to reduction in our revenues before regulations are such that, any under-recovery of past years, we have right to recover from any over-transmission in coming years. So there will be years when we have under-recovery. In past, we have years. So those under-recovery will be first offsetting from oversupplies if -- whenever it happens, so there is no question, even if we reach 75% level, that we need to pass on.

Vikash Jain analyst
#54

Okay. Okay, yes. That's a useful clarification. And the other thing was this OpEx that we see, sir, for this, for gas transmission segment. That's gone up significantly, so there are -- this is because, all of this quarter, the complete allocation is gone. Or there was part of it that was around...

Rakesh Jain executive
#55

Yes, yes. This quarter, Vikash, the allocation is totally gone now in 2 stages, 1, I think, in August...

Unknown Executive executive
#56

1st...

Rakesh Jain executive
#57

1st October. And second is December 16. So with effect from December 16, we don't have any allocation of APM gas for use in compressor fuels.

Vikash Jain analyst
#58

So that is December 16, so next quarter, if anything, OpEx will be even higher. Because -- why I'm asking that, sir, is we are right now -- I mean, last year, there was this thing about the OpEx being one-off because there was higher -- much higher-priced spot LNG, $40 spot LNG, that you had to use and all of that, but even now that I see, most likely, next quarter, OpEx from gas transmission will be at a much higher level. Because you said that December 16 is when it went. Full effect will be in January to March. Is that...

Rakesh Jain executive
#59

Not much [indiscernible].

Unknown Executive executive
#60

Margin [indiscernible].

Vikash Jain analyst
#61

Because higher...

Rakesh Jain executive
#62

[indiscernible] because the quantity reduces only 0.2, yes. [ It's a little bit ] higher level, not at a much [ higher level ].

Vikash Jain analyst
#63

So 0.2 of a base of 1.7, right?

Rakesh Jain executive
#64

Right.

Vikash Jain analyst
#65

So 1.5 -- say 1.7 [indiscernible], so that is what -- so about 10%, 15% kind of an adjustment.

Rakesh Jain executive
#66

Again, a higher [indiscernible].

Vikash Jain analyst
#67

Okay. And any reason why LPG realizations look a little low? Any reason [indiscernible] you can think of that you can -- because this appears to be a little bit of a discount to what I thought was the market price.

Rakesh Jain executive
#68

Can you come back again, Vikash?

Vikash Jain analyst
#69

LPG segment realization. Any reason why they appear to be a bit low? Or you don't have any specific reason you can think of...

Rakesh Jain executive
#70

No, we don't have because it's all market-driven import parity price. And we don't have any control over it. So there's no specific reason [ international ] prices are in that range.

Vikash Jain analyst
#71

Okay. And finally, where do you see -- so when you say this 12 MMSCMD growth, that in your opinion is more you are talking. Because I think you said, over the next 3 years, average of 10 MMSCMD, 12 MMSCMD growth is what you see. So that's more like we should be thinking of more from a perspective of CAGR rather than, specifically next year, 10 MMSCMD, 12 MMSCMD coming. Is that how you think about it?

Rakesh Jain executive
#72

Yes. Let me tell you. Currently there is a disruption in supplies from one of pipeline, Dadri-to-Panipat IOCL supply, right? So we expect that 3 MMSCMD volume at least to come back. Increase in offtake: Every year, there is a growth in CGD by 12%, 13% even if you take roughly 70% of our market shares. 3 MMSCMD will come from there. IOCL Barauni, we expect to come 0.5; and the general increase. So we have the bigger data from where this 10 to 12 will be available. I have given only two, three to you [indiscernible] able to share you.

Vikash Jain analyst
#73

Why I say that, sir, because 10% increase you -- when you are increasing 10%, Indian gas demand is also rising, effectively close to that. That is something that we have not seen for many, many years. And there have been...

Rakesh Jain executive
#74

Right. You are right. We have not seen. Rather, for many, many years [indiscernible] in our country remained at -- stagnated, but this year, if you have seen, there is a good amount of growth. In fact...

Vikash Jain analyst
#75

[ Low base, sir ] -- which is of a low base. A lot of those price...

Rakesh Jain executive
#76

I agree with you. I agree with you, but...

Vikash Jain analyst
#77

[indiscernible] after the very high prices of last year due to the spot LNG prices being...

Rakesh Jain executive
#78

Right, right, right, but we expect the 10 million is possible.

Operator operator
#79

Our next question is from the line of Vivekanand Subbaraman from AMBIT Private Limited.

Vivekanand Subbaraman analyst
#80

I have 2 questions. The first one is on the petchem business. Sir, are you able to share the price of gas, the input gas, that you sourced in 3Q? And what is the assumption that you've made for FY '25, as far as the guidance on full year profitability is concerned? Second thing, could you help us understand the status of the volumes that were under dispute, the shortfall that you had from the Gazprom trading entity? And is there any compensation you received there? And resolution plans there.

Rakesh Jain executive
#81

We expect that, firstly, it is not the input gas which -- based on which we can assume that Pata will be profitable on a yearly basis. It's the function of both the sales price and also the input gas cost. So if you were to ask me based on current level of pricing petrochemical-wise, $8 to $9 is a very good price, input cost -- gas cost for Pata petrochemical. And we are able to source and supply at that level to Pata petrochemicals. Second assumption is that the pricing levels for petrochemical were lower even in this quarter, as compared to Q2. Even if you maintain the price level of Q2 which were higher by INR 8,000 per metric ton, we'll be at a good, profitable level for -- and -- in Q4 and also the next financial year.

Vivekanand Subbaraman analyst
#82

Okay. So just to clarify. At $8 per MMBtu, that...

Rakesh Jain executive
#83

$8 to $9, not $8; $8 to $9. Because it is always varying.

Vivekanand Subbaraman analyst
#84

Okay. At current spreads, $8 to $9 will be the break-even point in FY '25...

Rakesh Jain executive
#85

[indiscernible] break-even level is higher than $9. We are able to source and supply at $8 to $9. That's what I told.

Vivekanand Subbaraman analyst
#86

Okay. Sorry. I'm unable to understand. You said that your petchem business will break even in FY '25. I -- my question was what input gas price that you're assuming for this breakeven.

Rakesh Jain executive
#87

I never said that, our financial year '25, we will break even. I said we will be in profit in next financial year, first thing. I said that, in order to have the profitability, we need a function of 2 things. One is the selling price, and second is input gas costs. We are able to source and supply to Pata petrochemicals around $8 to $9; sometimes $9, $9.5; sometimes $8.5. And what I also said, that during this quarter, our petrochemical prices were lower even if you compare by Q2 by INR 8,000 per metric ton. So even if we maintain those prices of Q2 level, we expect those prices to be available. And if we are able to supply at $8 to $9, we will be not breakeven. We will be in a reasonable profitability for Pata petrochemicals.

Vivekanand Subbaraman analyst
#88

Understood, very clear. My other question is unanswered.

Rakesh Jain executive
#89

What is that?

Vivekanand Subbaraman analyst
#90

That's on the gas [indiscernible]. What's the legal resolution there till now? And also, on a marketing side...

Rakesh Jain executive
#91

Actual supplies, you were asking.

Unknown Executive executive
#92

Compensation...

Rakesh Jain executive
#93

Compensation. Sorry. I missed that. So that is that case is sub judice, so I cannot say anything on that.

Vivekanand Subbaraman analyst
#94

Okay. And is there any assumption that you have made with respect to any resolution, in the guidance given for FY '25 on a marketing side?

Rakesh Jain executive
#95

Any...

Vivekanand Subbaraman analyst
#96

Any resolution. And what about the cargoes from Gazprom? Are you getting it now?

Rakesh Jain executive
#97

Anything which are contingent, we have not considered.

Vivekanand Subbaraman analyst
#98

Okay. And lastly, are you getting cargoes now from Gazprom, the new entity?

Rakesh Jain executive
#99

Yes, yes.

Vivekanand Subbaraman analyst
#100

Okay, but no shortfall is being met, right? The cargoes that were not available...

Rakesh Jain executive
#101

No. The shortfall is not yet supplied by them.

Operator operator
#102

Our next question is from the line of [ Pranita Shetty ] from Morgan Stanley.

Mayank Maheshwari analyst
#103

Sir, this is Mayank. A couple of questions on the CapEx side, first. Can you just talk us through in terms of your full year CapEx for FY '25? And how much of that will be incremental enough and -- on the petchems front? And secondly, if you can just talk about a bit around the long-term sourcing contracts. Obviously, you signed one, but how does that kind of impact the overall spreads that you were talking about on the marketing side?

Rakesh Jain executive
#104

The new contracts, you are talking about, how it will impact.

Mayank Maheshwari analyst
#105

Yes. So when does that impact kick in, in terms of earnings for you? I think FY '26 or onwards. Or does...

Rakesh Jain executive
#106

Yes, yes. The supplies are to start from '26 onwards, so therefore, those impact will only come from '26 onwards.

Mayank Maheshwari analyst
#107

Like, sir, will they be back-to-back contracts as well? Or we think there will be -- kind of like we have seen over the last 5, 7 years, some of that could be...

Rakesh Jain executive
#108

Actually the back-to-back era is over, though it is always good for you analysts to have a sustainable kind of thing. We also wish to have that and we will try to do that, but nowadays you have a lot of opportunities available. It depends what kind of prices you are sourced and what kind of market it is. There are a lot of [ market here ], so we expect -- because we have good price under those contracts, we expect to have not back to back. We expect to have more than what marketing margin we are earning today.

Mayank Maheshwari analyst
#109

So sir, just out of curiosity in terms of the volumes that you are thinking on a portfolio basis now, like in 5 years' time or so, what percentage could look like on back to back and what percentage you will take exposure on your balance sheet.

Rakesh Jain executive
#110

So it is difficult to -- as on date because the supplies are to start from '26. I can share about current portfolios, but since it is too far from today -- we'll start marketing for those contracts now because we have recently signed the contract. So now we'll go to the market, as we expect -- we want those contracts to be signed on back-to-back basis with a good margin. Now when we go to the market, then only we'll be able to know what kind of -- we'll be -- exposure we will be carrying, but there will not be any exposure because that's, I think, a very good price we have entered into those contracts.

Mayank Maheshwari analyst
#111

Got it, okay...

Rakesh Jain executive
#112

And with respect to your question on CapEx. And financial year '24, '25, we target to incur INR 17,000 crore of CapEx -- Mayank, are you getting?

Mayank Maheshwari analyst
#113

Yes. So sir, can you just help us, give us a bit of that breakup? Because the numbers [ are a bit high ]...

Rakesh Jain executive
#114

Yes, around INR 3,000 crore on pipeline projects, INR 4,400 crore on petrochemicals and around INR 3,000 crore we target to incur on net zero, around INR 750 crore on operational CapEx and around INR 5,000 crores equity contributions to JVs and subsidiaries.

Mayank Maheshwari analyst
#115

[ Okay ]. And sir, this petchem CapEx will be largely driven on the PDH plants as well as PTA plant. There is no shutdowns or anything for the Pata plant, correct, for fiscal...

Rakesh Jain executive
#116

Yes, largely on Usar PDHPP. Whatever CapEx we will incur for PTA will be forming part of equity contribution to JV and subsidiaries.

Mayank Maheshwari analyst
#117

Okay, clear. And sir, no major shutdowns or anything planned for fiscal '25 on Pata, correct...

Rakesh Jain executive
#118

No, we are not expecting anything like major shutdown. Any routine shutdown may happen, but not -- as of now, we have not envisaged.

Operator operator
#119

Our next question is from the line of Manikan Garre from Franklin Templeton India.

Manikantha Garre analyst
#120

Sir, I hope I'm audible. I have a couple of questions. One is on the 1 million tonne LNG contract which you have -- Vitol recently. Vitol is a commodity trader. And this deal is probably different from other deals any other or any LNG offtaker in India, including you, have taken, so far. Is there any difference in dealing with a commodity trader versus dealing with -- dealing directly with an E&P company, in terms of probably slow path, destination flexibility or any other terms because of which you are dealing with a commodity trader now? That's my first question.

A Kaviraj executive
#121

Yes. This is Kaviraj. I'm heading LNG group. To come to your question: We don't see there will be any difference between an offtake tie-up done with directly a producer and a trader or, for that matter, portfolio, okay, but different players come with different plus and minus, okay? In this case, we got a couple of good flexibilities which we thought would be very much useful in our LNG portfolio, so we went ahead. Nothing significant different from other suppliers.

Manikantha Garre analyst
#122

So can we expect that the slope here also will be more or less in line with what we are doing with the -- directly with the producers? Or there would be any difference there...

A Kaviraj executive
#123

I don't want to -- no. I don't want to say anything on this, but definitely [ the slope ] is very competitive. I don't want to give a judgmental qualification saying it is better than producer or vice versa. All I can say is it will be very competitive.

Manikantha Garre analyst
#124

Got it. And then my second question is more of a follow-up to what Sabri was asking earlier on gas marketing side. Sir has mentioned that time swaps and destination swaps and ship-to-ship transfers were probably the key reasons for the rise in guidance in gas marketing business and continuous outperformance than what we were expecting, but if I have go back, maybe 4, 5 years back, also we were doing all of these then also, right? So what is the key change that has happened -- in these swaps or ship-to-ship transfers that has happened over this period, if you can throw a bit more color on that? And also if you can, along with that, provide: How much percentage or how much of marketing volumes were on swaps on quarterly run rate basis in FY '24, for example, versus, let's say, 3 years back, in FY '20?

Rakesh Jain executive
#125

Yes. Actually, one significant difference, what you are asking, 5 years back and today is that largely we were marketing our volume in overseas market because the demand was not to the current levels. Now the demand in the domestic market is there and we are able to consume all our sourcing from international market and domestic market. So when we were doing those swaps -- largely to mitigate our volume risks, not to optimize the cost, right? That was one factor, which is different than -- because 5 years back, the demand, as compared to today, was less. Is that, Kaviraj, [indiscernible]?

A Kaviraj executive
#126

Yes, yes. Just -- no. Yes, just to add: As our Director of Finance rightly said, in the past, we did a swap for a different objective, okay, but currently we are doing swap as part of our LNG portfolio operations, meaning, thereby, the swap which you do is on a case-to-case business. Earlier, we used to do a swap for, let's say, 1 year or 2 years, something like that, but today, perhaps almost every alternate cargo, we try to create value by doing a swap. And that is a reason there is a spike in this value. Am I able to answer this?

Manikantha Garre analyst
#127

Yes, sir. Just an extension to that: Sir has started off with saying that we have transferred more volumes to India versus selling more of them earlier in international markets, right?

A Kaviraj executive
#128

Yes, yes, yes.

Manikantha Garre analyst
#129

So do we have to take it that we are able to earn more margins on this India-sold volumes relatively than what we were getting earlier when we were selling them on international markets?

A Kaviraj executive
#130

Yes, yes, obviously.

Rakesh Jain executive
#131

Yes. I said during my brief that the marketing margin is not only a function of what price you are marketing. It is also a function of what gas -- cost of gas sold you are able to arrive at. So when we did optimization, we were able to reduce our cost of gas sold significantly. So when you -- one of the analysts or -- were asking that, "You have fixed kind of marketing margin we are not able to arrive at," so -- they are working out from top line. I'm telling we are able to reduce our costs, so both things have played role, not only the gas -- price at which we marketed. At what gas -- cost of gas sold we are able to have our costings. So those 2 things are working, and that's how we are able to have good marketing margin. And we'll continue to do so.

Manikantha Garre analyst
#132

Understood, sir. If I can just squeeze in one last question related to this only: How many trading hubs have you created currently globally from the gas marketing division?

A Kaviraj executive
#133

We have only one, in Singapore.

Manikantha Garre analyst
#134

Okay, so apart from India, it's there is only one, in Singapore, nothing in the U.S. or European markets.

A Kaviraj executive
#135

No. U.S., they handle the operation of the LNG contracts. That involves trading of gas, upstream gas, whenever we face some operational difficulties, so in true sense, it is not a trading hub.

Operator operator
#136

Our next question is from the line of Amarnath from Ministry of Finance of Oman.

Amarnath Bhakat analyst
#137

I hope I am audible.

Rakesh Jain executive
#138

Yes.

Amarnath Bhakat analyst
#139

Yes. My first question was with respect to these value-unlocking activities which the management and the Board were thinking whether with respect to CGD or with respect to merger or reverse merger with your petrochemical side. Any updates you can give on this regard at the moment?

Rakesh Jain executive
#140

Actually, we have not come out with any such kind of value creations through disinvestment of CGD or petrochemical. Yes, we are internally evaluating and we will take this call at an appropriate time, but till now we have not concluded what we'll do about the investments in CGD. And there is no thought about petrochemicals.

Amarnath Bhakat analyst
#141

One thing I'm just trying to understand. Now every year, the capital expenditures towards this petrochem side is -- keep on increasing, whereas the uncertainty relating to that business, compared to our main business of gas transmission and marketing, is quite high. As you correctly said, the output price is not in our control. Only thing we can do, something with respect to our input price. So what is the rationale behind so much of expansion towards the [ pricking ] side of the business and increasing the overall uncertainties [ in petrochem ]?

Rakesh Jain executive
#142

Thank you. First thing is that Indian demand on petrochemical side is lowest if you compare with the world average per capita consumption; even if you compare with the developed countries like China, significantly lower, so let us talk, first, there is a demand. Second, with respect to uncertainty in terms of realizations, the current investment which we are doing in Usar is on PDHPP, the input for which is propane. And the output polypropylene is directly having correlation with propane price, so we expect to earn a certain delta of margins between input and output price. So our investment is quite cautious based on long-term analysis of input and output price. And we -- like we currently have [ some time ] uncertainty about the Pata petrochemical. And we [indiscernible] we will have consistent profit in the new investment which we are making for PDHPP in Usar.

Amarnath Bhakat analyst
#143

Sir, just to [ interrupt ]. See. Making the profit is not all the things. It's the allocation of the capital and the return on capital employed. Now if you can help us to understand, compared to the capital allocation towards your main business and compared to that with the petrochemical business, how much return on capital do you earn from that business of the petchem, so far, on an average?

Rakesh Jain executive
#144

Actually, we are there to [ invest, yes ]. And currently, we have been able to win all the authorizations for pipeline which PNGRB [ comes out ]. We [ overall ] are not in a position to decide and lay the pipeline. We certainly can look for the -- any opportunity for investment in pipeline projects, but at least that should be available. So currently, there is no opportunity available. And we are the only entity, last few years, who have -- through [ PNGRB have ] won all the authorizations. We were rather sometimes single entity to have bid and got the authorization. So we are there to invest in our core business that is laying, building, operating the natural gas pipeline, but at the same time, if we find there are opportunities for investment in other business segments and -- which we continue to do because ultimately we have to find growth. And if -- we find that growth in some of the business is sustainable, so that's how we decide and allocate our capital.

Amarnath Bhakat analyst
#145

Yes, understood, but is -- that capital allocation towards your petchem, which apparently have much lower ROCE, is taking your entire company's ROCE quite drastically down. That is the point I just wanted to have. [ Of course ], you need to have allocation...

Rakesh Jain executive
#146

Yes. [indiscernible] your experiences of Pata petrochemicals, that's how -- based on that -- based on the availability of projects [ like -- for ] Usar which is on a different field. So in order to -- not to have the uncertainty, we have gone for propane dehydrogenation, not gas-based plant.

Amarnath Bhakat analyst
#147

Any idea about this hydrogen plant related investment, where we are? And also what is your reason with respect to the expansion to that side of the business? Though it is very -- at the very infancy stage relating to hydrogen, but -- last call, I have understood from you that you guys are thinking kind of diversifications towards this non-gas...

Operator operator
#148

Sorry to interrupt, sir. Sir, we request that you return to the question queue for follow-up question, as several participants are waiting...

Amarnath Bhakat analyst
#149

This is my second question only.

Operator operator
#150

Yes, sir, but...

Amarnath Bhakat analyst
#151

Sir, this is my -- the second question. You allowed me to -- asking 2 questions, right?

Operator operator
#152

Okay, sir...

Amarnath Bhakat analyst
#153

This was my second question only.

Rakesh Jain executive
#154

So regarding your question on hydrogen. We are only putting up a pilot project at our -- one of the unit. And then you asked why: because energy transition is taking place. And whether we like it or not, the energy transition will happen, so in order to be future ready, so -- we are -- as pilot project, we are putting one of dehydrogenation plant at -- hydrogen plant at our -- one of the units. And the investment...

Amarnath Bhakat analyst
#155

Hello...

Rakesh Jain executive
#156

Yes. You got it...

Amarnath Bhakat analyst
#157

Yes. Okay.

Operator operator
#158

Ladies and gentlemen, that was the last question for the day. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Probal Sen closing comments.

Probal Sen analyst
#159

Thank you very much. I would like to thank everyone for sparing their valuable time to attend the call. And thank you so much to the management for taking the time to give such detailed answers to all of the queries that have been put. Appreciate that. We can end the call now. Have a very nice day [indiscernible]. Thank you, sir...

Rakesh Jain executive
#160

Thank you.

Operator operator
#161

On behalf of ICICI Securities, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us, and you may now disconnect your lines.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete GAIL (India) Limited transcript - plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.

Get an API key View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to GAIL (India) Limited earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server. Quarterly plans from $105 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.