KalVista Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (KALV) Earnings Call Transcript
July 7, 2025
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the KalVista Pharmaceuticals FDA approval call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to Ryan Baker, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Thanks for joining us to discuss the U.S. FDA approval of sebetralstat, now known by the brand name EKTERLY, the first and only oral on-demand treatment for hereditary angioedema. On the call with me today from KalVista are Ben Palleiko, Chief Executive Officer; Dr. Paul Audhya, Chief Medical Officer; and Nicole Sweeny, Chief Commercial Officer. Brian Piekos, Chief Financial Officer, will join us for the Q&A session. Ben will begin with an introduction, followed by Paul, who will provide an overview of the current HAE treatment landscape and highlights from the EKTERLY U.S. package insert. Nicole will then review the company's commercial strategy and launch plans. We will wrap up the call with a Q&A session. Please note that we will review a slide presentation during our webcast today, which will be posted to the KalVista website after the call. Before we discuss today's news, I remind everyone that we will be making certain forward-looking statements that are based on our current expectations and beliefs. We encourage you to review Slide 2 of the accompanying presentation and our SEC filings, which include detailed discussions of the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from today's forward-looking statements. With that, I will now turn the call over to Ben.
Thank you, Ryan. Today is a monumental day for the HAE community and KalVista. We are pleased that the FDA has approved EKTERLY as the first and only oral on-demand treatment for hereditary angioedema attacks in people ages 12 and older. This approval represents a major milestone, not only as the first commercial product for KalVista, but more importantly, as the first new on-demand HAE therapy in over a decade. EKTERLY delivers a long-awaited treatment that is safe, effective and easy to take anytime and anywhere. I first want to take a moment to thank the patients who participated in our clinical trials, the investigators around the world who conducted those trials, the HAEA and HAEi for their outstanding patient advocacy efforts and my fellow KalVista colleagues for making today possible. The brand name EKTERLY is a call to action for people living with HAE who act early when treating their attacks. From its inception, EKTERLY was designed to enable people with HAE to comply with global guidelines, which strongly recommend treating attacks as early as possible prior to the progression of swelling, thereby avoiding disabling symptoms caused by HAE attacks. EKTERLY represents our deep commitment to the HAE community. It reflects years of collaboration with people living with HAE to understand their experiences and significant need for an oral treatment that can easily be taken at the onset of an attack regardless of severity or wherever the patient is at the time an attack starts. Paul will discuss the label details in a few minutes. But as a headline, I will note that EKTERLY is approved for all HAE attacks with no restrictions either for severity or regarding the anatomic site of an attack, including the larynx, where speed and ease of administration can make a dramatic difference in treating an attack promptly. Given its unique efficacy and pristine safety profile, we believe EKTERLY is poised to become the foundational therapy for HAE management worldwide. With that, I will now turn it over to Paul to discuss the current treatment landscape and then review key elements of the EKTERLY label.
Thank you, Ben. I'm Paul Audhya, Chief Medical Officer at KalVista. I'm excited to share some context to the EKTERLY label and take you through some of the key details. As a reminder, hereditary angioedema or HAE is a rare genetic condition that affects approximately 1 in 35,000 to 50,000 people, roughly 8,000 people in the U.S. As you can see in the pictures, HAE causes unpredictable swelling attacks in various parts of the body, including the face and extremities. Swelling in the airway can be life-threatening if not treated. Attacks most often start as mild, but severity can increase quickly. They can also migrate to other anatomic locations, including larynx. Depending on the tissues affected, attack symptoms can last 1 or 2 days, but may persist for up to 5 days if left untreated. As noted in the current treatment guidelines, the main goals of treatment in HAE are to achieve total control of the disease and to normalize the lives of patients. To realize those goals, there are 2 main strategies. Number one, ensure that all HAE patients have ready access to effective on-demand treatment, which ideally offers rapid symptom relief, easy self-administration allowing for early treatment and a good safety profile. And number two, consider the addition of long-term prophylaxis or LTP in appropriate patients, which means evaluating the frequency and severity of attacks, the impact of those attacks on the patient's quality of life and whether adequate control has been achieved with an on-demand treatment. Let's spend some more time on that last one. Treatment guidelines recommend that patients consider the treatment of all attacks regardless of severity as early as possible after onset to minimize symptoms and reduce attack duration. In order to achieve this, patients should be well trained and have ready access to adequate on-demand medication to treat at least 2 attacks. This translates to carrying the medication at all times when leaving home and within reach at home even at nighttime. However, all approved on-demand treatments require administration by subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion, which present clear barriers for people living with HAE. Therefore, while injectable treatments may be efficacious, they may not be effective. Common barriers to early treatment include anxiety associated with pain and injection site reactions, difficulty injecting and especially infusing treatment, the lack of a private and hygienic location to administer medication outside the home and challenges with portability. As a result, patients frequently avoid treatment. And for some, the therapy may be perceived as more painful or challenging than suffering from an attack. Indeed, observational studies revealed that up to half of attacks go untreated. For attacks that are treated, patients often wait until the swelling becomes severe and thus delay therapy for hours. This is most dramatic in adolescents, a population where icatibant is not approved. And perhaps it's not surprising that given the logistical burden, less than 40% of patients carry their on-demand treatment all the time when traveling outside their homes. Underutilization of injectable on-demand treatments in the form of delays and denial leads to inadequate control of HAE attacks. As a result, physicians and patients have turned to LTP as an easier alternative. Despite prior advancements in HAE, the promise of total control of disease and normalization of patient lives hasn't yet been achieved. With the approval of EKTERLY, we believe the treatment paradigm is ready to change. For the first time, people living with HAE can take an oral on-demand treatment at the first sign of an attack and achieve symptom relief in the same time frame as injectable therapies. EKTERLY has the potential to transform the management of HAE, truly empowering patients to comply with the guidelines to help control and normalize their disease. It is reasonable to say that injections will never be normal. By overcoming the barriers imposed by injectables, EKTERLY is poised to become the new foundation of HAE treatment. So with that background, I'm extremely pleased to share the prescribing highlights from the U.S. package insert. EKTERLY, an oral plasma kallikrein inhibitor is indicated for the treatment of acute attacks of hereditary angioedema in adult and pediatric patients aged 12 and older. EKTERLY has been approved with a recommended dose of 600 milligrams taken orally at the earliest recognition of an HAE attack. A second dose of 600 milligrams can be taken 3 hours after the first dose, if needed. The maximum recommended dose is 1,200 milligrams in any 24-hour period. Further along, you'll note that there are no contraindications and actually no warnings or precautions at all. The adverse reactions, at the top on the right, only include headaches, which were noted to be uncommon but marginally higher than placebo. Regarding the potential for drug interactions related to CYP3A4 or in the setting of hepatic impairment, dose reductions were recommended for strong and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors and in those with moderate hepatic impairment. There are also recommendations to avoid the use of EKTERLY among those taking strong CYP3A4 inhibitors and moderate or strong CYP3A4 inducers as well as those with severe hepatic impairment. Overall, these represent an extremely uncommon group of patients. Moving on, I'd like to walk you through some key takeaways from different sections in the label. First, in Section 1 on indications and usage, both adolescents and adults were included. Adolescents may be the population with the greatest unmet need as they have the longest treatment delays and difficulty managing their HAE attacks today. There is also no restriction on the type of HAE, so the opportunity to bring actually to all HAE patients in the U.S. with persisting unmet need is possible. Additionally, you'll note that there are no restrictions with regard to attack severity or location, including laryngeal attacks and no restriction on LTP breakthrough attacks regardless of LTP mechanism of action. This represents the largest number of treated attacks in the U.S. as the majority of HAE patients are receiving LTP and many continue to have attacks in all locations and severities. In Section 2, dosing and administration, EKTERLY's label is the only one to include at the earliest recognition of an acute HAE attack, which is at the very heart of treatment guidelines and reflects the most significant advance that comes with EKTERLY. We're also pleased that 600 milligrams is the recommended dose as we believe it provides a deeper longer inhibition of plasma kallikrein without any impact on safety. We also believe that 600 milligrams represents optimal dose for HAE attacks based on overall outcomes in the Phase III KONFIDENT trial and the extensive experience to date in the KONFIDENT's open-label extension. The flexibility to use second dose after 3 hours also exemplifies EKTERLY's excellent safety profile. All of this is consistent with Sections 4 and 5, where there are no contraindications, warnings or precautions. Moving on to Section 6. The table says it all, adverse reactions only comprise headache, which occurred in about 3% of patients receiving EKTERLY 600 milligrams and 1% from placebo. Again, this reflects EKTERLY's pristine safety profile, which underlies the opportunity of 600 milligrams as the recommended dose. Section 12.3, pharmacokinetics, you'll note 2 important recommendations. First, with 600 milligrams, there is greater than 90% inhibition of plasma kallikrein maintained through 6 hours, which supports optimal management of HAE attacks and increases the potential for low redose rates. The second is that there are no restrictions regarding food intake. In other words, EKTERLY can be taken with or without food. Lastly, in clinical studies, EKTERLY's label is the only one to include statistically significant faster times to begin symptom relief, reduction in attack severity and attack resolution. Starting in the lower right-hand corner, the prespecified analysis of the primary endpoint of the Phase III KONFIDENT trial was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in May of 2024. There, the median time to beginning of symptom relief for EKTERLY 600 milligrams was 1.79 hours, and 6.72 hours for placebo. However, what you'll note in the clinical study section is that the medians are based on utilization of a more conservative sensoring approach to analyzing the primary endpoint. Basically, for about 5% of total attacks, patients didn't record responses to treatment in their e-diaries. In the prespecified analysis, for those attacks, we censor them to 0, essentially counting them as neutral in the analysis as we don't know whether they improved or didn't improve over 12 hours. In the alternative analysis, these attacks were considered as not having reached the endpoint within 12 hours, i.e. right censored at 12 hours, which assumes the worst possible outcome. To clarify this change in methodology, there is a footnote for each of the endpoints under each efficacy figure in the clinical study section. The result of this change was that the separation between EKTERLY 600 milligrams and placebo starts earlier and is wired, but it also shifted out the median slightly for EKTERLY 2.0 hours or about 12 minutes longer, but much further out for placebo, which no longer reached the median within 12 hours. I'd like to finish this overview with some of the data we've reported this year from KONFIDENT, our ongoing 2-year open-label extension. As a reminder, this trial has many real-world design elements to gain insights on EKTERLY's potential to improve compliance with on-demand treatment guidelines. First, among 1,706 attacks reported through September 14, 2024, we see a median time to treatment of just 10 minutes. We also observed a median time to end of attack progression of 19.8 minutes. This highlights a rapid response to treatment almost immediately after absorption of EKTERLY. Finally, we've seen a consistent rapid response among attacks that have been highlighted as the most concerning to physicians, including laryngeal, abdominal and LTP breakthrough attacks, all of which have demonstrated a median time to begin symptom relief of 1.3 hours. On the right, as of June 2025, we've captured approximately 700 additional attacks since September 2024, which now includes 2,323 total attacks, 48 laryngeal attacks, 974 abdominal attacks and 463 LTP breakthrough attacks. Before KONFIDENT completes next year, it will be among the largest treatment experiences ever collected in a clinical trial for an on-demand product. We look forward to sharing new results from KONFIDENT later this year, including data on the very high level of treatment satisfaction among participants treating attacks with EKTERLY in the trial. I'll now turn the call over to Nicole Sweeny, who will share how we plan to commercialize EKTERLY. Nicole?
Thank you, Paul. I'm Nicole Sweeny, Chief Commercial Officer of KalVista. I'm excited to talk about how we are working to put EKTERLY into patients' hands as soon as possible. I want to reinforce a point that Ben shared earlier. EKTERLY is based on a call to action for people living with HAE to act early when it comes to treating their attacks. And for the first time ever with EKTERLY, they are able to do so. EKTERLY is the first and only oral on-demand HAE treatment. This allows patients to discreetly carry treatment with them at all times so they are prepared for their next attack. Each dose offers injection-like efficacy. It's proven to halt progression quickly and safely without any needles or pain. EKTERLY has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in treating all attacks, all attack locations and all attack severity. Additionally, as Paul mentioned, EKTERLY has been FDA approved for use in adults and children 12 years of age and older. This is particularly meaningful for the adolescent population as Firazyr and icatibant are not approved for use. Our commercial team will be selling EKTERLY in physician offices this morning. Our team is poised to drive swift demand. Our payer team has been educating national and regional payers for the past year. Our field sales team is competitively sized, which provides complete national coverage of HAE prescribers. Our commercial team has decades of combined experience in HAE, rare disease and high-performing product launches. Leadership and field teams include professionals who have successfully launched both prophylactic and on-demand HAE therapies. As most sales reps have worked in the HAE space, they have strong relationships with target prescribers and knowledge of how these accounts adopt a new HAE therapy. Our field team is focused on driving early EKTERLY adoption with the top 1,000 health care professionals that account for 90% of HAE claims today as this is where the highest patient concentration and unmet need exists. They will reach the remaining 10% of prescribers as the summer progresses. Our field team has been active in these target accounts since February, providing disease state education and will now pivot to product education. The team has appointments in place for the months following approval with virtual speaker education launches to reach the entire care team within key accounts. Shifting gears to the patient community, our goal is to introduce EKTERLY and ensure people living with HAE can have informed discussions with their physicians about making a treatment change. Within a few weeks of launch, we will host patient education programs where patients who utilized EKTERLY in the Phase III clinical trial will share personal experience with the HAE community around the country. In addition, we will participate in the HAEA Patient Summit meeting, which kicks off July 10. This meeting happens every few years and brings together people living with HAE and their families to connect and learn more about developments in HAE. For KalVista, this creates an opportunity to introduce EKTERLY to over 1,200 members of the community. It's a tremendous event and the HAEA is a deeply valued partner to KalVista. On the access side, both our KalVista patient hub, KalVista Cares and QuickStart programs are live. QuickStart provides patients immediate access to EKTERLY at no charge during the time period their claim for paid access is in process. Each EKTERLY pack includes 2 doses or 4 tablets. Tablets are provided within wallet-sized blister cards, which provide discrete access to therapy. We anticipate product availability in mid-July. EKTERLY is the first new on-demand treatment approved in over a decade and the first oral option ever. We continue to hear from health care professionals and patients that EKTERLY fills a clear unmet need in HAE treatment. We price EKTERLY competitive to existing branded therapies in the HAE market. We believe this pricing reflects the innovation we're bringing to the community and will support broad utilization. Lastly, we've taken a comprehensive approach to ensure access support, which includes KalVista Cares, our patient hub. From reimbursement support to QuickStart Access, our infrastructure is built to minimize delays and help people start therapy quickly. As a company, we understand the importance of delivering accurate and timely visibility into launch progress. Based on historical rare disease launches, we know that third-party data sources can often lag or present an incomplete picture, especially in the early weeks of commercialization. We recognize that we will need to share regular updates externally. In the early days of launch, KPIs will focus on awareness and engagement efforts in the field as well as QuickStart demand. As launch progresses, we will share greater insights that reflect broad adoption by key stakeholders. We're incredibly proud to introduce EKTERLY, the first oral on-demand HAE treatment, and believe there's a clear path for EKTERLY to become the foundational treatment in HAE. Our launch strategy is focused and intentional. Today, we will start by driving early demand with patients who have communicated the highest dissatisfaction with current therapies, particularly patients on Firazyr and icatibant. From there, we'll accelerate adoption by converting patients on all on-demand therapies. As utilization expands and patients experience the benefits of EKTERLY, we expect treatment rates to rise and the on-demand market to grow. The opportunity is significant, and we are ready. The infrastructure is in place. Our field team is deployed, the KalVista Patient Support Hub is live. This is an immediate launch backed by years of preparation and deep expertise in HAE product launches. I'll close by extending a heartfelt thank you to members of the HAE community who supported our trials and helped us reach this moment. We are excited to bring this life-changing treatment forward to the HAE community. I'll now pass it back to Ben.
Thanks, Nicole. I'm picking up from where Nicole left off on this slide. We anticipate that the on-demand segment of the HAE market will grow by 70% to $1.2 billion by 2030, a significant portion of which will be fueled by the introduction of EKTERLY. For the first time, patients have access to an oral on-demand treatment that provides the opportunity to change how and when attacks are treated. As a result, in addition to the general transition to EKTERLY that we expect, we also expect to see an increase in the overall attack treatment rate as people with HAE are more willing and able to treat attacks that currently may go untreated for many reasons. With FDA approval of EKTERLY now secured in the U.S., we're also preparing for global expansion, beginning with a potential EMA decision and a targeted launch in Germany later this year. In the first half of 2026, we expect to launch in Japan in collaboration with our partner Kaken Pharmaceutical as well as in the U.K., pending local approvals. Additional market launches are planned in 2026 and beyond, including Canada, where we recently entered into a licensing agreement to support approval and commercialization. As we finish this part of the call, a quick anecdote to highlight how we think EKTERLY can change HAE management. At a recent conference, I met with a physician who relayed to me a real-world story about one of his patients who's been using EKTERLY. She was driving her car to work one day recently when she felt an oncoming abdominal attack. Historically, she was due to the cat event, which would have made treatment of the impending attack impossible without major changes to her day and abdominal attacks are among the most painful to endure. However, in this case, at the next stoplight, she pulled out her EKTERLY wallet, took her dose and continued to work. She reported to the physician at her next visit that her attack didn't progress further and within about an hour, she felt fine. This is exactly how people with HAE should be able to manage their disease and reflect the results we have seen to date in the data set that is closing in on 2,500 treated attacks. This is also why we believe EKTERLY is poised to fundamentally transform the HAE treatment landscape. It has the potential to replace injectable, painful and cumbersome on-demand options with an oral therapy that directly addresses treatment burden while providing the necessary efficacy and safety that people living with HAE expect. We believe EKTERLY could become the treatment of choice among adolescents, adults and if approved in the future, pediatrics. In closing, we're incredibly proud to bring EKTERLY to people living with HAE as an innovative oral therapy that redefines what's possible in HAE management, and we are fully committed to delivering its impact on day 1 and every day after. Our infrastructure, team and strategy are fully in place to deliver a successful launch and sustained performance, and we look forward to providing further updates in the near future. With that, we'll now open the call for your questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Paul Matteis with Stifel.
Congrats on the approval. I was wondering if you could share more color on the metrics you plan on sharing early in the launch and how those metrics might evolve over time as you get more information? And then I have one follow-up.
Paul, thank you for the question. I'll actually ask Nicole to give the details there.
Sure. Paul, as shared earlier on our call, looking at the early days and weeks of launch, certainly, we plan to share forward information just about engagement with our key accounts in terms of the frequency and engagement with our Tier 1, 2 and 3 accounts as well as engagement with the patient community. In addition to that, we will provide updates on demand in a general sense in terms of QuickStart requests and start forms that are being processed. And certainly, as the launch takes hold, what will be of keen interest to us as well as I'm sure you and others will be repeat use. So in the weeks and months following that we will share updates as we see repeat prescriptions coming through those key accounts as well as refills on a per patient basis. In addition to that, during the course of the upcoming months, we will also provide a view into payer engagement and a view into how the formulary process is unfolding.
Okay. Great. And just two quick things to clarify here Nicole. One, in the open-label extension, what did you see in terms of the frequency of use? And do you think that's a good benchmark for real-world use? And then two, on your point on getting on formulary, I guess, as I understand it right, everything in this category is reimbursed via special -- via medical exemption. So how much is actual formulary access going to matter here? And how much is payer access is really going to change over time?
Sure. And why don't I address your second question first, and then I'll turn it over to Paul. As with other HAE products, we do anticipate in the early months of launch that medical exception will be the primary means for an individual to gain paid access to EKTERLY. Certainly, the payers have indicated that they typically take about 6 months to see how demand comes in for a new product, and then they'll set their formularies at the close of that 6-month time period. So again, as with other HAE products, we anticipate heavy medical exception for the first 6 months of post approval.
And then on the first question earlier around frequency of use in our open-label extension, we are seeing upwards of 80%, 85% of attacks being treated. So it's exactly what we expected that the rate would be much higher than we see in observational studies with the injectable drugs, which are basically have -- really to a maximum about 2/3. So this is really much higher.
Our next question comes from Maury Raycroft with Jefferies.
Congrats on the approval milestone. Just based on the patient interest you're seeing from your awareness website and doctor interest, how are you setting expectations for the early launch? And then as a follow-up to Paul's question, can you talk more about how you'll customize drug supply for patients with different monthly attack rates? And what you think the typical prescription and supply will look like for patients?
So Maury, so we -- on the second part at least, going to the last part first, we have the KalVista Cares, as we talked about, set up as an organization that will be in close contact with patients as we go forward. And so the idea here is that patients will get their initial box of EKTERLY, but we'll be checking with them routinely to make sure that their supplies aren't running low and making sure they always have sufficient on hand to be comfortable treating attacks. We do know that one of the reasons people don't treat attacks is the fact that they worry about not having available when needed. So the idea is to make sure that they're never in that position. And then on the first part of the question, Nicole can you please take that?
In terms of the prescriptions and how we anticipate the physician writing a prescription for EKTERLY, we anticipate that the initial fill will be for one box of EKTERLY and then they will write similar as they do to other on-demand treatments, PRN, refill as needed. And that is an approach physicians take today, recognizing that the burden of disease and the number of attacks really varies from one of their patients to the next. So therefore, we anticipate, again, they would take that similar PRN approach for EKTERLY.
Our next question comes from Debanjana Chatterjee with Jones.
Congrats on the approval. Could you expand a little bit more on the drug interactions labels and how it might have any influence on the uptake?
So in terms of drug-drug interactions, we did some studies. We see that with moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors or those that have stronger inhibition or induction that it can increase or decrease the concentration. It's overall a relatively small population that have these other drugs on board. So we don't actually think that it's going to have very much impact at all. In terms of the exposure or experience that we've had with this in doing our open-label extension in our clinical trials, there are very, very few patients who were not eligible due to use of these other therapies. So we don't think it's going to really have any material impact. And again, just as a reminder, HAE patients are patients who don't have a significant number of other comorbidities. And because of that, they're not really using these drugs in a meaningful way. So we don't think it will have any impairment on uptake.
And I have a quick follow-up. How should we think about the gross to net as the launch progresses?
We're going to bring Brian Piekos in here to pick up those questions.
So the gross to net will be on a long-term basis, typical for what you see in rare disease in the upper teens to low 20s. As we're getting to the launch and there are some fixed fees, the gross to net may be slightly higher. But again, it will quickly normalize to that rate we've talked about.
Our next question comes from Joe Schwartz with Leerink Partners.
Congrats on the great achievement. Do you see different phases to EKTERLY launch? For example, are there early, mid and later adopters? And how would you characterize different subgroups as you look at the HAE patient population? And then I have a follow-up.
Yes. So Joe, I'll start, and I think Nicole can [indiscernible] in here. When we talk to physicians, we do hear that effectively, they believe EKTERLY is appropriate for everybody. So we don't actually see them making distinctions between different populations that might have a greater or lesser need for it. They seems to be very confident that there's a uniform desire among the patient population to have access to this. And I think the data set we've generated, which shows efficacy in all these important subgroups, right? I mean, abdominal attacks and people on LTP and certainly laryngeal attacks, that has really become the basis of this physician enthusiasm, which is there's effectively no subgroup where we've shown that this doesn't have a substantial improvement in terms of their time to symptom relief and sort of control of their attacks. So as a general comment, which may be a little bit simple, the physician community, we think is going to want to talk to effectively everybody about this. Now in terms of -- from the patient side, where the greatest [indiscernible] will be, certainly, Nicole, you've got some thoughts on that, and we can talk a little more detail about who we think will be the first calls to the offices?
Yes, absolutely. With research that we've conducted with patients that are utilizing various on-demand as well as prophylactic plus on-demand treatment, we see that the patients that have experienced and are currently on icatibant and Firazyr see the -- express the greatest interest in adopting EKTERLY swiftly. And that was about 80% of the Firazyr and icatibant patients communicating a high interest in adopting EKTERLY. And just one other thought going back to the physician side of things. As our sales team has been in the field profiling all of the physicians, all 2,000 physicians, the Tier 1s, 2s and 3s, we see interest -- and high interest to utilize EKTERLY throughout those tiers. But to answer your question, we certainly anticipate the earliest adoption, those earliest prescriptions to come in from the Tier 1 physicians as they manage those patients that have the highest unmet need and really signal that the highest urgency to try something new with EKTERLY.
That's very helpful color. And then as a follow-up, I'm just wondering, it's actually a question we get from investors pretty frequently. What will a patient or their physician need to demonstrate in order for a patient who's on generic icatibant to be eligible for EKTERLY prescription?
Yes. Today, that is -- today, there are patients that -- to move off icatibant. I think that's what you're referring to, to demonstrate that failure on icatibant. It's actually a fairly low bar in terms of what is utilized today. And so really it can be feedback from the physician and the patient, recognizing that the patient doesn't tolerate that product. That can be injection site reactions as well as specific reactions that happen in the abdomen area as that is where the product is administered and oftentimes, individuals have abdominal attacks. But we most commonly hear that it's just injection site reaction of any kind, which, as you know, being familiar with the Firazyr Phase III study, nearly all patients in the Phase III studies experienced those reactions. So again, fairly common and something that can be moved forward fairly quickly in terms of demonstrating a failure on icatibant.
Our next question comes from the line of Serge Belanger with Needham.
Congrats on the approval. The first question regarding for a potential second dose. I think in the KONFIDENT trial, about 40 patients redosed, I'm not sure what you've been seeing in the KONFIDENT-S open-label trial, but just curious what level of redosing do you expect to see in the real world? And then secondly, does ORLADEYO represent kind of a potential proxy for what the EKTERLY launch could look like, at least in the initial stage?
I'll take the first part. So with regard to the redose rate, you're correct in KONFIDENT, which was the double-blind study, patients have the option to take an additional dose in 3 hours. And there were very few restrictions in that regard and many patients went in and took advantage of the opportunity to take the additional dose. In the real-world study KONFIDENT, what we see there is about a 22%, 23% redose rate with the same dose that's approved in the label. So that's what we do expect to see in the real world. We've seen over 2,300 attacks treated. And so the exposure that we've learned is good. And again, just to remember, as a comparator with Firazyr, that tends to be between 25% and 40%, depending on the observational data that you look at. So this is certainly well in line, if not a little bit less. I'll turn over the second part around ORLADEYO.
It's important to remember with regard to ORLADEYO launch that prophylaxis has got a fundamentally different sort of revenue profile because obviously, when people start paying commercially, that's a constant number. So I think what we've consistently said to folks is in terms of the uptake, sort of a unit type curve, we do expect it to follow kind of a traditional launch curve. And you can even look back to the Firazyr curve to get a good idea, but the Firazyr curve, frankly, looks a lot like the ORLADEYO curve from a units perspective. From a revenue perspective, it will certainly be somewhat different. It will be a little bit of a longer initial point to get to the revenue side just because, again, people are refilling as needed and because of the QuickStart program, effectively, everybody will get their initial box without the payment. So again, the curve overall, we think looks about the same, but when we talk about that, we focus really more on the unit curve as opposed to the revenue curve.
Our next question comes from the line of Stacy Ku with TD Cowen.
Congratulations on the EKTERLY approval. And we noticed that it's just in time for the HAE community patient summit, which should be key. So our first question is on the first-mover advantage that you all have. Can you discuss how you could really fully execute on that? It sounds like you're getting a running start with clinician outreach today. So just remind us what's the expected timing for your sales force to reach and educate the [indiscernible] prescribers, which we believe you said in the past, you've already kind of had a lot of interaction with. So that's the first question. And then the second is on EKTERLY and Firazyr efficacy. So in general, our KOLs view the Phase III and open-label extension data as showing similar efficacy. But Nicole, kind of based on your commentary on prescriber and patient activation, can you just go into more detail around the launch strategy that you think is key for helping clinicians and patients gain experience just to ensure that the community gets the same conviction as KOLs that EKTERLY is performing similarly to Firazyr?
I'll start and you can [indiscernible]. So in terms of the first-mover advantage, we've got a lot of things we put in place here over the last several years actually and pretty intensively over the last 6 months. As you know, Stacy, we've had a field team out doing physician education and activities since late February. And so of the 2,000 physicians who are in our database, they've contacted all except maybe a relatively small number of the Tier 3 types. All Tier 1, which is about 200 physicians, I'm quite sure we've seen multiple times at this point. The Tier 2s, which is the next 800, we've seen most of them multiple times. And so there's a very high level of awareness in the physician side here that we're comfortable is going to come to play here to our benefit. On the patient side, obviously, you really can't do any of those activities until approval. But we have, over the past year, developed a database of patients who chose to opt in to communications from the company. And that as of approval is just shy of 3,000 patients, which again is certainly 1/3, maybe closer to 1/2 of the entire population in the U.S. So a very sizable group of people who indicated desire to get more information. And as of today, they will start to get that information. So that's going to very quickly move out to them. And that will only be enhanced by the patient summit that starts at the end of this week. That has between 1,200 and 1,500 attendees typically. And so that's another terrific group for us to get to. So the activities have started today. The field team is actually already out and making calls as of this morning. And a lot of these communications have already been kicked into gear and will sort of escalate here over the next few weeks. So the desire, the goal is to obviously very quickly get as broader reach as we can here with both those populations, get everybody activated and allow us to sort of move at a fairly rapid play. And then I'll bring you to the second part?
Yes. So Stacy, just in terms of the ideal launch and how this all needs to come together. As we've talked about in the past, it's really making sure that we're supporting both the offices and the patients to have that dialogue as soon as possible regarding making a treatment change to EKTERLY. And from the office side of things, just to expand upon some of the work that's underway. The team is in the field profiling accounts, and they profiled all 2,000 accounts, so all of the prescribing HCPs. They were able to get a sense from the accounts whether or not -- the degree, I should say, to which the accounts saw and recognized a high unmet need for a new on-demand treatment. And so that is what -- those insights are what we've utilized to really prioritize the accounts in particularly for the first 90 days. As you can imagine, we had lengthy business plan reviews to go through to see where the potential opportunity is for all of those accounts, specifically looking at the first 3 months of launch. In addition to that, as Ben was mentioning, we have planned supportive education programs, not only with the physicians, but with all of the care team members in those accounts. We will be having speaker education programs with key opinion leaders to share their experience from the clinical trials with all of those accounts. And then on the patient side of things, we'll build upon the Patient Summit, which is coming up this Thursday, where we have a number of educational programs to reach patients throughout the country. And this is important because we will have patients from our Phase III trial share their trial experience with EKTERLY with other members of the patient community. This is something that has been absolutely critical to the success of other launches in HAE. And the last point that I'll mention is from patients as we've gone and done a number of research, when it comes to adopting a new HAE therapy, some of the common barriers that we've heard relate to concerns about access or potentially the efficacy of the product. And again, this is any HAE therapy. Those are the barriers. And that's really where the QuickStart program plays a key role because it allows not only the physician to prescribe and get that experience, but more importantly, the patient that they can get that real-world experience with the drug to build the trust and really start to fully adopt that product while our team, the KalVista Cares team, works rapidly to ensure paid access. But those are probably some of the key elements.
And as the last point, I'll just say that we didn't want to talk about too much today because it's a future set of presentations for us. But we've obviously started to do some surveys already in terms of patient satisfaction, treatment attacks effect. And suffice to say, they are extraordinarily high. There's a lot of patients with the enthusiasm for how well this works. So that's the kind of data set that will start to flow out later on this year at scientific conferences and things to start to give more evidence about how well this actually works [indiscernible] compared to their current therapies, which as we've said before, in most cases, [indiscernible] Firazyr.
Our next question comes from Tazeen Ahmad with Bank of America.
A couple for me. Can you clarify whether or not you're going to be doing sampling in the early part of the launch and how we would get color on how much of use could be coming from sampling if you are doing that? And then secondly, with regards to the label, it's allowing a second 600 mg dose to be used if there's an inadequate response or recurrence after 3 hours. Wanted to ask about how you expect that to work in a real-world setting and how that compared to what you saw in the KONFIDENT study?
For your question regarding sampling. At this time, we are not planning to introduce the sample program into the communities. Our view is that the QuickStart program, which is important to note, allows that free product for that, allowing that immediate utilization of EKTERLY, but that is done in parallel with the start form. And so from our view, we want to make sure that not only we're providing free access to therapy, but also in parallel, moving forward to obtain that paid access for the individual. So again, we do not plan on utilizing a sampling program at this time. And I'll turn it over to Paul for the second part of your question.
So in KONFIDENT, which is actually our open-label extension kind of set up like a real-world study, where patients make all the decisions as to how they're going to dose and when they're going to use therapy. We've seen that patients will, in fact, choose to use that about 22%, 23% of the time with that 600-milligram dose. So that's what we expect to see in the real world. Again, this is just going to be pretty typical for these medications. Most of the therapies that are here to allow for redosing. Obviously, the benefit for us is that it can happen in a shorter time frame than Firazyr, for example, which is 6 hours. Here, after about 3 hours, the patient will be educated that they can take additional doses if needed. We've had really no issues with understanding on that front. Over 2,300 attacks have been treated in that open-label extension state. And as I mentioned, in those 20% of cases, there are really no issues with redosing. They also have portable packs that they could carry with them in the open-label extension, which is quite similar to what we'll have with the launch. Actually, what it will be with the launch will be far easier than what we have in the clinical study. But even there, we had no issues with the understanding as to when to take it and under what circumstances a patient might need it.
Our next question comes from Pete Stavropoulos with Cantor Fitzgerald.
Congratulations on the approval. Nice to see this get over the goal line. So there are about 100, 130 patients in the KONFIDENT-S, the OLE, over 2,300 attacks treated. Curious to hear the feedback that you're getting from treating physicians and patients in terms of the comfort level around using EKTERLY? And any new trends? I know you mentioned about 23% redosing. Any new trends on taking the second dose to treat an attack as these patients get experience with the drug? And any sense on the impact on the quality of life for these patients? That's the first question. And the second question I have is, as you touched on different patient populations and expectations for uptake, those on LTP and those on-demand only, do you have a sense of the ease of getting a prior authorization for those different populations? Will they be similar? Or do you expect differences?
Okay. So on the first question with regard to taking the second dose, what we have seen over time is that actually the proportion of patients who take -- or proportion of cats, which is second dose used actually is trending downwards a little bit. And so that's the trend we've detected to date. We've done 2 interim analyses, one in January of 2024 and then again in September. And we will be cutting that data again later on this year to be able to see if there are any additional changes. But it has kind of stabilized around that 22% number, which again falls into line with what we may have expected. In terms of quality of life, we didn't have specific quality of life measures set up just because it's an intermittently dosed drug. But what we have observed in our preliminary assessment of satisfaction is that there are very, very high rates of satisfaction among the patients for each attack. So 24 hours, we ask the patient how satisfied are you with basically actually for this attack. And we see very, very high rates. We'll be putting out data later this year to highlight that. But what we're seeing is that patients are treating large numbers of attacks. We have some patients who have treated over 60 or 70 attacks over the last couple of years and consistently have seen positive results and haven't really opted to change their therapy. Most of them are using it into and through the course of the full 2 years of the study. We'll start seeing all the patients coming off next year. But a number of those have even transitioned to early access. And so there's been a consistent interest in including dosing with EKTERLY. So all positive.
I think the slide that Paul presented really shows everything that's really important, which is all the data continues in the open label to look, if anything, better than it did in Phase III. I mean time to treatment is really short, high proportion of attacks treated. The time initial symptom relief, especially in these important subpopulations we've looked at recently is really impressive, down to about 1.3 hours. We think that's a terrific number. So the open label, again, being more real world has certainly evolved over the longer time into what we think is an even stronger proposition in terms of the value of the advantage it can offer to people HAE. Nicole, do you want to cover the other question?
Sure, absolutely. In terms of prior authorization, today, nearly all patients on a prophylactic treatment also have access to an on-demand treatment. And so whether a patient is on prophylaxis or not, the requirements for PA for the on-demand treatment are essentially the same. So we don't anticipate that to be any different relative to EKTERLY.
And it's important to note also that essentially everybody has a prescription for an on-demand medication, whether or not they use prophylaxis. I mean it's probably more than 90% [indiscernible]. So there is no difference in the need for prescription or any way of how one gets it filled.
No. I mean when I say prior authorization, I don't mean for an on-demand treatment itself, but basically, let's say, 2 branded drugs, LTP versus on-demand. Any point...
No. I mean, people have that nowadays. There's quite -- RUCONEST, right; BERINERT, KALBITOR, they're all approved. They're all branded and there's no differential for that.
Our next question comes from Jon Wolleben with Citizens.
I know you guys gave us the metrics you'll be looking at early and mid-launch with the expectation revenue may lag some of those early indicators. I was hoping you could give us some of your internal benchmarks on how things should be tracking so we can see if you guys are hitting your internal targets and how things are progressing relatively early on?
Yes, Jon, we -- as you know, and I think as is extraordinarily common in these kind of situations, we're not really talking about what we expect the numbers to do, especially in the early days where you can have a lot of variability and where a lot of the day-to-day information is not really all that helpful, frankly. We have, however, committed to providing reasonably fulsome updates when we have the opportunity and certainly as the launch progresses. So we are going to ensure that we give people access to the important information they need to make their own decisions as to how the launch is progressing. But I'm not sure it's particularly helpful at this point to give really granular thoughts on how it might go, especially in the early days. These things take a little bit of time to get started, and we want to give the team the ability to get out there and really start to have some high-quality interactions and build base here in the early days.
Okay. I might have missed this. Can you just talk payer mix and then also your expectations for adolescent use? I'll jump back in the queue.
Sure. So I'm glad to address your question on the payer mix. In HAE today, it's about 70% that are on the commercial payer side, the private payers, and then about 28% that is Medicare, 4% Medicaid and then a single percentage point that is cash. And so that is what we see in the marketplace, and we would expect use of EKTERLY would mirror that.
And in terms of adolescents, it's well known that they have the longest delays in times in terms of time to treatment, in terms of treatment proportion of attacks, like there's a lot of unmet need there. So despite the fact that it's obviously a smaller subpopulation, we do think that the opportunity for adolescents to make use of this is really high, and we expect there to be a pretty significant level of [indiscernible].
That concludes today's question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the call back to Ben Palleiko for closing remarks.
Again, thank you all for joining us today, and thank you for being part of the journey so far. We do look forward to the next opportunity to provide an update on our progress with EKTERLY. And with that, we're off to work here. And we wish you all the best rest of the day. Thank you. Bye.
This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete KalVista Pharmaceuticals, Inc. transcript - plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.
Get an API key View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to KalVista Pharmaceuticals, Inc. earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the
EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server.
Quarterly plans from $105 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search,
and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.