Home / Transcripts / Nokia Oyj (NOKIA) · September 13, 2021

Nokia Oyj (NOKIA) Earnings Call Transcript

September 13, 2021

FI conference_presentation 43 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Amit Harchandani analyst
#1

Hello, everyone. I'm Amit Harchandani, Head of Citi's European Tech Research team and your host for this virtual fireside chat session with Nokia at Citi's 2021 Global Tech Conference. Thanks for joining us, and I do hope you and your loved ones are safe and healthy. Before I move on to introducing our main speaker, I would like to highlight that we are keen to take questions from all of you joining us on this chat. So please do send those over, either via the option on your screen or directly to me, Amit.harchandani@citi.com, and I shall ask them on your behalf. So with that bit of housekeeping out of the way, it is my pleasure to introduce our main speaker, Nokia President and CEO, Pekka Lundmark, supported -- accompanied rather by David Mulholland from the IR team. Gentlemen, on behalf of Citi, thank you for joining us and supporting our conference.

Pekka Lundmark executive
#2

Thank you, Amit. Very nice to be here. Thank you for your invitation.

Amit Harchandani analyst
#3

Pleasure. So Pekka, in terms of the plan for the session, we shall briefly start by talking about sustainability and then move on to dissecting the near-term dynamics and follow up with a deeper dive into some of the longer-term topics around the Nokia story. So let's begin. And if you could remind us, please, Pekka, of what are the key sustainability targets for Nokia? And how are you progressing against those targets?

Pekka Lundmark executive
#4

Very good. Three points, and I'll start with climate. We have a target to reduce our emissions by 50% between 2019 and 2030. And when I say 50%, it's very important to emphasize that this includes the so-called Scope 3 emissions, which are the -- which are really in our industry, the main thing, which comes from the use of our products. And this is, of course, a big opportunity area for us on the market. So that's the emissions side. And this, of course, supports the science-based targets on the path to 1.5-degree global warming scenario. Then the other part of sustainability targets is integrity, and we have been selected or nominated several times as one of the world's most ethical companies, and that's of course something that we want to continue to strengthen in the future. And then the third point, ESG target -- or sustainability targets related to culture where we want to emphasize inclusion and diversity, and we have concrete targets in all these three.

Amit Harchandani analyst
#5

Okay. Thank you, Pekka. And you talked about targets. Could you maybe help us understand how the compensation or incentives for the senior and top management are linked to achievement of theses sustainability and inclusion targets?

Pekka Lundmark executive
#6

We have done it so that 10% of the cash-based so-called short-term incentives are connected to sustainability targets, and that includes both CO2 emissions targets and then also targets related to becoming a more diverse employer.

Amit Harchandani analyst
#7

Noted. Moving on now to maybe talk about some of the near-term dynamics, Pekka. Starting with, I guess, the obvious please, mobile networks, the RAN market is seen growing 10% to 15% in 2021. While if I look at the financial community expectations for your mobile networks business, they are closer to flattish to slightly up. So help us understand, based on the strong underlying dynamic, is there upside to this expectation for your Mobile Networks business?

Pekka Lundmark executive
#8

Well, when we compare our own market size development estimates to Dell'Oro, there are actually no big differences. There are some perimeter details where we have a slightly different approach. And then it's very important to also note that when we communicate we report in Euros and Dell'Oro, for the most parts, they communicate in USDs. So that explains most of the differences. Our view on 2021 in terms of Mobile Networks volumes has not changed dramatically. We have been talking about the so-called headwinds in the North American market, both in terms of market share and also margin ups -- actually pricing development. They are still there. The good thing is that we have been able to mitigate some of those through our progress in other parts of the world. But those headwinds specific to North America, they are still there and that then feeds into the overall expectation for 2021.

Amit Harchandani analyst
#9

Noted, and we will certainly dig into some of the regional dynamics later in this session. Another topic, staying with Mobile Networks where, dare I say, the market has been positively surprised, has been in terms of your competitiveness and your product road map. Help us understand what's coming down the pike over the next 12 months? How do you perceive your competitiveness, not just in terms of functionality, but also in terms of cost structure?

Pekka Lundmark executive
#10

We have made a lot of progress over the past 12 months on the product competitiveness in Mobile Networks. We had a major product launch, as you may recall, in June this year, where we published or released our next-generation AirScale platform, which includes massive MIMO antennas and remote radio heads. That's now a portfolio that has 32 TRx massive MIMO antennas. 64 TRx massive MIMO antennas, 8T8R remote radio heads, which have really, really competitive bandwidth management. Massimo antennas and remote radio heads, which have really, really competitive bandwidth management. We are talking about the platform that has 400 megahertz instantaneous bandwidth and 200 megahertz of occupied bandwidth. This all comes in a pretty compact package that weighs only 17 kilograms, which is the lightest on the market. And this gives excellent features for the whole platform for frequency management, especially in the very popular 3GPP frequency band n78, which is 3.4 to 3.8 gigahertz. And all this comes with 240 watts of RF output power, excellent feedback from customers. And here, we are now seeing the results of what we've been talking about for quite some time that we have in Mobile Networks in [ timing ] with those business. We have increased our R&D capacity. On top of that, we have increased our R&D productivity. And now we are seeing results. But this launch was not only about radio. It was also about baseband. And we have now launched the world's most integrated 5G and singular baseband, which compared to the earlier generation that we had has 8x more capacity, and it can reduce power consumption by up to 75%, which has then a direct connection to the sustainability agenda also that we were talking about earlier. This is all powered by the Nokia ReefShark SoC technology that we've been talking a lot about. And this, again, shows that the SoC program is delivering. Another highlight of this launch is that this platform that we are now starting to deliver is ORAN-ready. So to the extent our customers want ORAN, we are ready to deliver that. And this really means that we believe that we are going to keep the promise that we made already about a year ago that by the end of this year, we will have, for the large parts, kind of closed the gap to the main competitors on the market. So I'm really, really optimistic about the situation in Mobile Networks at the moment.

Amit Harchandani analyst
#11

Several interesting points in your response. And I've already had a couple of maybe questions coming in from the audience listening in on this. Firstly, maybe for some of those who are less tech-savvy in the audience, could you simplistically explain, based on some of the portfolio characteristics that you've talked about, does it allow you to target a wider say, opportunity or a wider customer base, does it allow you to target more swap out opportunities? Are there more greenfield opportunities? Help us understand what, in simplistic terms, does this portfolio allow you to do in terms of what you can address?

Pekka Lundmark executive
#12

All of those examples that you mentioned are relevant. So I was talking about IBW and OBW. So very quickly, what do those things mean in practice? So instantaneous bandwidth kind of sets the frequency boundaries within which the radio is able to operate. And in our case, as I said, it's 400 megahertz, which is exactly this 3 to 4 -- 3.4 to 3.8 gigahertz bandwidth that this radio can take care of. And then the other part, which is the OBW occupied bandwidth, that's the sum of the active bandwidth that one radio can serve at the same time. And both of these are extremely competitive. And what this means in practice from operators or customers' point of view is that they get more with their bandwidth investment that they have made. They are able to provide a faster throughput, more capacity on the same bandwidth and extremely important, especially in markets where operators have invested a lot of money on frequency bands like in North America. Then the baseband part, it is now the first time when we deliver a common baseband for 5G and 4G and actually for the whole single RAND, which means that operators who are building 5G, they can install the same baseband for their old radios, 4G radios, even 3G radios and 5G radios, which, of course, is extremely important for cost efficiency point of view. And this is also, as I said, an extremely kind of tightly packaged solution, it is very small and efficient in power consumption, which is extremely important for operators because power consumption is for most operators, one of the largest cost items that they are having in their P&L.

Amit Harchandani analyst
#13

Noted, Pekka. And the other quick question, which has come in is you commented about your portfolio being Open RAN-ready. Could you elaborate on that, please, on the side of differentiator versus competition?

Pekka Lundmark executive
#14

Well, competition, of course, needs to speak for themselves, and there has been a lot of discussions, as you know, about Open RAN. And it's very important to remember that what Open RAN is and what it is not. Open RAN, ORAN, is an interface between the baseband and radio parts of the base stations. Operators are running it, driving it because they expect that to increase competition. It will be interesting to see that when and how that will happen because it does not actually reduce anyone's development cost. It is still the same baseband and the same radio that you need to develop, and this is pretty expensive development. So it remains to be seen what will happen to the competitive dynamics. We have decided to support it because for principal reasons, we want to support open interfaces and our conclusion is that if Open RAN is to come, it will come with or without us. So we have decided that it's much better that we are actively supporting it. We want to be on that train when it leaves the station. But then we do not actually believe that Open RAN will be a big needle mover in the market in the short to medium term because there's also a lot of complexity in it. 3GPP has defined thousands of features that somebody needs to take care of the trends and works in different supplier combinations across this interface. And this will take some time before it matures. And again, as we have seen so far, Open RAN has not taken any major market share. It has been mostly trials. And when you look at different market analytics firms, Dell'Oro, for example, they expect that the ORAN growth as percentage of the total market will actually be quite slow. But nevertheless, we are ready if our customers want ORAN, we are ready to support them.

Amit Harchandani analyst
#15

I guess moving on to network infrastructure now and your fixed networks business, that's enjoyed robust growth in the first half. Is this a case of demand being pulled forward? How are customers thinking about fixed over the next 12 months?

Pekka Lundmark executive
#16

Yes. We had excellent growth in network infrastructure in the first half of the year. Actually, I would say that we would have even been able to grow faster if there would be more components available on the market. There are some customers who, because of the component shortages, are now placing orders for the whole of 2022. Some customers even want to discuss outlook for 2023. But this is not, of course, driving the sales, the top line that we are reporting. So we had excellent top line. On top of that, customers are actually currently willing to increase the longer-term visibility. The overall market demand for network infrastructure is robust. And that applies actually to all 4 segments inside network infrastructure: IP routing, optical networks, fixed networks and submarine networks, all of these are benefiting from the investments into new broadband access being fixed or mobile. The network infrastructure business also benefits from the 5G investments because backhauling of base stations, of course, is a big investment into the fixed part of the network as well. So overall outlook for network infrastructure is pretty solid from a demand point of view. And once again, if there were more components available in the market, we would probably have been able to grow faster than we did in H1.

Amit Harchandani analyst
#17

Thank you, Pekka. And actually, I wanted to maybe follow up with a couple of questions on the network infrastructure business. So you talked about the overall demand, and you touched upon submarine. Clearly, submarine has grown even faster than fixed. And there have been historically some question marks on submarine, but this demand for submarine, do you see that continuing into next year? Or is that just an uplift for this year?

Pekka Lundmark executive
#18

The demand seems to be continuing. It is a fairly cyclical business. This is to be noted. It has always been cyclical, and now we are enjoying a strong cycle. But the new thing here which is driving this business is really investments by web scalers who are building their own submarine cables to connect the different continents. And this is, of course, on this scale, something that we have not seen before. So pretty strong situation there. But again, it is a cyclical business.

Amit Harchandani analyst
#19

And maybe the last bit within network infra, but talking of another part, which is seen as a combination of cyclical and secular which is the optical networks business. How do you break down the demand there? And I guess, in particular, how do things change once the PSC 5 starts coming through?

Pekka Lundmark executive
#20

Well, PSC 5 is, of course, one very important step in the technology development that we have already started our first deliveries there, so we believe that we are in a good position there. The cyclicality of this business is a bit difficult to assess at this time. Yes, right now, the demand is strong. I believe that this will be connected to the potential, I guess, word 'super cycle' would be perhaps a bit too ambitious. But we've been talking quite a lot about this, that when you think about things like 5G that it seems currently to us that, that market will behave a little bit differently than 4G, that we will reach the peak of the market, from CapEx point of view, maybe in a couple of years' time, and we believe that, that peak will continue for several years because there is this whole new wave of industrial, industry-driven investment when serious industries of this world will start to invest in their own network capacity, either directly or through slices that they purchase from operators. And this will then have significant secondary effects on things like edge cloud, edge cloud infrastructure and then all the connectivity that those data centers will need and all the connectivity that the more and more dense networks of base stations will need. So let's see. This could continue for several years. And of course, technology investment is extremely important here for competitiveness as we are seeing in all our segments. And now with the first deliveries in PSC 5, we are clearly making progress also in this segment.

Amit Harchandani analyst
#21

Absolutely. And we'll circle up maybe later come back to optical medium term later in the session. But just quickly to round off the near-term discussion. You talked about availability of components, Pekka. And if you had more, you could ship more. Could you comment on how do you see that situation coming back to normality if I could use that word? Does it come by the end of this year, middle of next year? And by that token, we talk about shortage of components. There's also a shortage of talent out there. And a lot of companies are talking about the war for talent in a very tight market. So maybe you could address those 2 elements as a part of maybe a near-term discussion before we go into the longer-term topics.

Pekka Lundmark executive
#22

Okay. So the component situation, first, I think I've said in connection with the Q2 report that it's a real fight out there. We have done pretty well in that fight, but that is something that you have to focus on every single day on all levels of the organization. How long will it continue? I mean there are very different opinions depending on who you talk to. And I believe that there will also be differences between different suppliers. There's a lot of capacity investment going on all the way into new foundry capacity and substrate capacity and so on. It takes time before those investments will hit the market because even the lead times for machines needed are long at the moment. In some segments, we could actually be facing a turning point already during Q3, Q4. In some segments, this could continue well into '22 or even into early '23. By later '23 and then '24, it's quite likely that there will be significantly more capacity available out there. The important thing here is that you have to take a pretty -- in the short term, pretty operational approach to this because most of the suppliers are in allocation mode at the moment. And then it's very important that you make it clear to them that the relations is important. You are important to them. They are important to you. It's a mutual dependency, that both need each other, not only in the short term but also in the long term when, then, the capacity situation has again turned for the better. And again, we've been putting a lot of time and resources into this, myself included, and we've been doing fairly well in a difficult situation.

Amit Harchandani analyst
#23

As you've gone past the halfway mark in this fireside chat, let's maybe move on to talking about some of the longer-term topics as, Pekka, you and your team continue to pivot the wider group. So again, I go back to Mobile Networks now and take a more longer-term view. And you touched upon North America earlier and some of the near-term demand dynamics. Help us understand how are you thinking about your medium- to longer-term demand prospects across different geographies and key customers. There's obviously North America where it's clearly off to the races. You got Europe, which is starting to come through. Interestingly, in China, where you've made a comeback. Please help us understand how you think about your opportunities in each of the key geographies and maybe comment on some of the key customers, if you may wish to do so.

Pekka Lundmark executive
#24

Well, I won't repeat what I already went through earlier about the product competitiveness because that's, of course, fundamental to the market share, and again, we expect to have 25% to 26% market share in Mobile Networks excluding China this year. As we all know, the investments have progressed furthest in North America, Korea, Japan as well. Now with the new frequency bands, the mid-band, especially in North America, as you have seen, the operators have actually increased their investment plan. So that market looks pretty robust at the moment. But then the interesting thing is that Europe, which has been behind in 5G investments, including 5G coverage as percentage of the total population is now speeding up, which is a very good thing. And then gradually, then also now when we get to the end of this year and then 2022, those parts of the world who have actually had very limited 5G investments so far. Latin America, Africa, India, of course, being one big target going forward. They will gradually start making investment decisions. And we are so glad that now in this -- in a way, next wave of 5G decisions will come. We will have a fundamentally stronger product competitiveness than we had when some of the first decisions were made. On top of this come then the big new opportunity, which is difficult to quantify, which is the industrial 5G, the 5G networks that will support automated manufacturing, robot control, logistics control, transportation, mining, you name it. There is so much productivity improvement that can be gained with next-generation technology connectivity investment in this industry that we do believe that this will be driving some of these investments for many years to come. You mentioned China. That deal is something that we are proud of because of the fact that, of course, the technical requirements that Chinese customers have on 5G are extremely tough, and we are proud to have been selected as a vendor as, in that particular case, as the largest foreign supplier.

Amit Harchandani analyst
#25

Noted. And in terms of -- you talked about your competitive sort of competitiveness, your product portfolio. Specific to Europe, how do you see that sort of I guess, to some degree, Huawei replacement, but how do you see sort of the demand dynamic playing out in Europe between the real demand and say, call it the swap-out demand, if I could put it that way?

Pekka Lundmark executive
#26

It is clearly both. We have estimated that we have won about 50% of these opportunities where operators have decided to do swaps because of various reasons. So we have clearly taken our share of that. But of course, it's not only that. As I said earlier, if you take the 5G coverage as a percentage of population in Europe and compare that to the U.S. or even more so to Korea, we are still quite far behind. So there is a lot of catch-up to be done and that's, of course, kind of completely new investment. It has nothing to do with any swaps.

Amit Harchandani analyst
#27

Understood. Understood. Moving on to another topic, which I guess gets a lot of attention is the Mobile Networks' margins. Now I appreciate the first half was flattered by one-offs, and you have given the 2023 guidance 6 months ago. There's a lot of uncertainty out there, but let me give it a shot. Is it fair to say that there's more upside than downside risk to your 2023 targets as things stand today?

Pekka Lundmark executive
#28

First of all, as you noted, just for full transparency, we had EUR 80 million one-off positive in Q2, which, of course, helped a lot when it comes to the overall profitability of Mobile Networks. Hey, look, our target is 5% to 8% comparable operating profit in 2023. And if you listen carefully to Tommi Uitto's Capital Market Day presentation, he did say very clearly that, of course, 5% to 8% is not the ultimate target for Mobile Networks. Of course, we want to go double digit. The 5% to 8% target for '23 was set only, as you said, a few months ago. So we are not ready to revisit that at this time. We continue to work on the components situation. We want to continue to deal with the North American headwinds that we've been talking about other parts of the world are progressing well. We are making progress in North America as well. So many things are going to the right direction. So certainly, I will continue to target with Tommi that one time in the future, we will be delivering double digit profitability in Mobile Networks. The catch-up that we've been playing and that will be, to a large extent, completed by the end of this year, as I said, is one step. But of course, then the next step will be to target -- will be to take the lead on the product side. And we have some exciting stuff coming out in the pipeline for '22, '23, '24 as well as I also know our competitors. So the fight will continue. The technology race will never end, but our relative position is increasing. And of course, that will, in due time, be reflected in margins as well.

Amit Harchandani analyst
#29

All right. We will watch out for that. But moving on maybe beyond Mobile Networks, we talked about optical earlier. And of course, we also briefly touched upon IP. In a medium-term context, when I look at those 2 parts within the infrastructure business, how are you thinking about competition for both IP and optical against the likes of Cisco, for example? You've also had losses for Huawei. We talked about Huawei in the Mobile Networks context, but there's also opportunity, for example, on the optical side. So help us understand medium term, how are you thinking about your competitive positioning in IP and optical.

Pekka Lundmark executive
#30

Those are slightly 2 [different ] segments at the moment. And our relative position in IP has been a little bit stronger than in optical, even though we are now making progress in optical as well. Then of course, there's a lot of theories about IP optical convergence that will start happening through pluggables, at times, optical pluggables that are installed directly into routers. And this is, of course, one reason why it makes a lot of sense to be a player in both of these games. The IP networking business is clearly one of our best businesses in Nokia, profitability that is well in double digits. And as we have hinted before, there is some exciting stuff coming out later this year. We had, as you know, a major -- as we discussed, the major product launch in Mobile Networks earlier this year, but there is something to come on network infrastructure side later this year that will then further increase our competitiveness. The routing silicon that we have had in the market, the FP4 has already been market-leading. The routing silicon, routing software and then network automation and analytics capabilities have created a very strong package, but there is more to come. So I have every reason to be optimistic about the future of that business.

Amit Harchandani analyst
#31

Got it. And any particular comment on, say, the opportunity in optical with Huawei's sort of ceding share in Europe?

Pekka Lundmark executive
#32

There are opportunities. And of course, the difference, if you will, between the optical and IP market is that the optical market is still much more fragmented. There's a lot of small players. And in all these segments, of course, Huawei has enjoyed a large market share. So anything that would, one way or another, kind of affect that market share would, of course, be an opportunity for the rest of the players, including ourselves. Some of the recent analyst -- market analyst reports, it has been noted that we actually we're -- took a market leadership, #1 position in optical networks in Europe earlier this year.

Amit Harchandani analyst
#33

Indeed, indeed, I guess moving on to your -- another of your businesses, a bit more of a turnaround story, which is your cloud and network services business. How are you talking about the recovery there in the context of say, quality of portfolio rebalancing. And maybe I could also take this as an opportunity to ask you how do you anticipate the enterprise side of the Nokia story to play out over the medium term?

Pekka Lundmark executive
#34

The turnaround, if you want to -- and I guess it's fair to call it turnaround in cloud and network services. It's really an important one for us. And Raghav Sahgal and his team, they are in the middle of a major portfolio assessment at the moment. There's a lot of products there who are ending or getting close to the end of their lifetime. There's a lot of products that will need to be phased out in the coming years and then replaced with something new. And Raghav was actually talking about this quite a lot at the Capital Market Day. And we are now kind of focusing this business around 5 to 6 key areas where, of course, 5G core is an extremely important focus area going, of course, very well together with the Mobile Networks business. Then analytics and AI-based services, for example, network quality analytics, automatic fault detection, performance optimization with the help of artificial intelligence is another focus area then private wireless and industrial automation, which I already earlier said is a major product area, not only for the radio network, but also for the core network or the data center part. Then digital operations and closed-loop automation, automated deployment of services, zero-touch management of services, service quality assurance being one focus area and then managed security increasing in importance all the time. And last but not least, monetization and billing systems. So this would be, in a way, the high-level focus of cloud and network services and perhaps to zoom a little bit more into the enterprise side of it, since you asked, the enterprise customers represented 7% of Nokia's overall sales in the latest report. And structurally, of course, there can be, because of comparables and so on, bumps up and down in individual quarters, but the general direction of travel in the enterprise business is that we wanted to go faster -- grow faster than the CSP service provider business. And without giving any guidance as to how quickly that would grow, but that market a whole is growing perhaps 10% a year. So that gives you an idea of what the ambition level roughly would be in that part of the business also. Also remembering that there can be then swings between individual quarters.

Amit Harchandani analyst
#35

Got it. As we are probably coming towards the end, the critical component that we haven't talked about, but absolutely the top of the mind is your technologies revenue stream. I guess, as a CEO, a question for you is how do you balance timely renewal of these deals versus maximizing the value for shareholders because investors are often worried when things get into a legislation or a litigation kind of a stage, sorry, but how do you go about doing that? And you've commented on technologies being stable. Why wouldn't it grow longer term given the need for greater connectivity in the world?

Pekka Lundmark executive
#36

Of course, now we are in the middle of the shift 5G, which from IP licensing point of view, still has been a very small part of the market. And of course, now we have a full emphasis on now starting to leverage our strong 5G patent portfolio. We have made one major 5G patent license agreement. It was made earlier, actually at the end of last year. And this is exactly now the time where you have to strike that balance because if you are not ready to litigate, if needed, you will not get the best deals. Litigation is always the last resort. I mean, of course, we always try to negotiate first. But we have, of course, very clear target as to what the value of our technology is, and we have invested billions in technology development. So we believe that it is fair to have a firm approach as to how it is to be monetized. And that is a balance that you have to strike all the time. And I understand that people are nervous if they see news on litigations. We were in litigation with Daimler earlier, as you know, and now that has been settled. And there has been others as well. So that is even though unfortunate, but it seems to be part of the nature of this business. In terms of the forecast, there is a lot of new opportunities. And then, of course, in a patent portfolio, there are always patents whose value will go down over time. And then there is new stuff coming in. And the question is that how quickly and how well do these balance each other out. The optimistic side of me when you talked about growth opportunities, of course, is the fact that there will be tens of billions of different types of devices, IoT included, that will be 5G connected in the future, and we will have a strong play in all of that over time. When it comes to guidance, we are -- at any given time, we are incorporating all the information that we have and then we give the guidance. If there is a reason in the future to change it, then, of course, we do. But we, again, here want to be as transparent as possible.

Amit Harchandani analyst
#37

Got it, Pekka. And maybe just one final one as I realize that we are almost out of time. We talked about the Mobile Networks margins earlier, but I guess expanding to the wider group margins. Given the impressive performance so far this year, and again, I appreciate you've given the 2023 target just 6 months ago, what are maybe some of the key puts and takes that need to fall in place for you to maybe give us update if I could call it that, on the wider group margins, given how critical that is to the Nokia investment case.

Pekka Lundmark executive
#38

The 23% margin target still valid, they look, they were actually published only 4 to 5 months ago or something like that. And we are still pretty early in our strategy execution. As you remember, we are talking about a 3-phase strategy: reset, accelerate and scale. And we are still putting many of the fundamentals in place. H1 benefited from some positive one-offs. And then we do have this market share and pricing-related headwinds that will be more visible in the second half of the year. So while we are confident that we are on the right way and we are clearly making progress on the product side, and there is promising news on the new deals, we do not want to get ahead of things. We want to take this one step at a time and only 4 months since '23 targets were published. So it's too early to talk about or speculate about revisiting them today.

Amit Harchandani analyst
#39

Got it, Pekka. Well, on that note, we are definitely out of time. On behalf of Citi and its clients, thank you for joining us, Pekka. Best wishes to you and the rest of the Nokia team. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the session on Nokia.

Pekka Lundmark executive
#40

Thank you very much.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Nokia Oyj transcript - plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.

Get an API key View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Nokia Oyj earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server. Quarterly plans from $105 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.