Home / Transcripts / People Incorporated (PPLI) · December 7, 2023

People Incorporated (PPLI) Earnings Call Transcript

December 7, 2023

NASDAQ US Communication Services Interactive Media and Services conference_presentation 30 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Ross Sandler analyst
#1

All right. We're going to get started. Thanks, everybody, for joining. My name is Ross Sandler. I head up the U.S. Internet research team. Very excited to have the team from IAC back again this year. Chris and Mark, thank you for attending.

Ross Sandler analyst
#2

Maybe, Chris, to start things off. Just a high-level question. We struggled with this admittedly ourselves, and we get this from investors quite a bit. But like, I've covered IAC for a long time. We've had different eras of the IAC kind of equity ownership story from splitting the company up into 5 pieces in 2008, then it was like a big capital return period, then there was the period of like the Match IPO and the spins and that led us into kind of the pandemic and now we're in this new era. So I guess, how would you describe the era that we're in right now relative to those prior eras where in one sense, we're returning lots of capital to shareholders, in the other sense we were spinning and IPO-ing things? How would you compare this era?

Christopher Halpin executive
#3

Sure, and thanks for having us. I think the core themes of capital allocation long-term commitment to creating value through digital and flexibility in terms of transaction-types, sectors, et cetera, are still in place. If you go back 2 years, when I joined, there was the base of portfolio companies. And the question was really where are we going to allocate capital going forward and as well as growing. Clearly, we've had a challenging 1.5 years with Angi and with Dotdash Meredith. We feel -- we will talk about both of those. We feel good about where we are in their respective paths and very different reasons that it's been a major endeavor operationally over the last, say, 2 years. Coming out of it, we've got a strong portfolio. We are interested in allocating capital and taking advantage of trends. And we think we trade at a value that doesn't reflect what the representative value of our assets. When you look at our 2 public holdings in Angi and MGM plus our cash, we're really not trading for much more of that. And when you think about our private companies of Dotdash Meredith, Care, Vivian, our stake in Turo and our Search business, there's just tremendous value embedded. So for us, it's perform, prove the value out and then allocate capital wisely.

Ross Sandler analyst
#4

And on the last point, you guys have done a nice job of allocating capital. MGM, in particular, very well-timed and your influence there is notable. I guess, given the situation with Entain, they've now got a few more of these active investors around it. you guys have limited control in that sense. But how do you see all this playing out? And how do you kind of maximize what you have with MGM?

Christopher Halpin executive
#5

Yes. So the -- obviously, the BetMGM partnership has been fluid for years since it was founded. There have been a number of different moments during that period where potential M&A or also different strategies with our partner at Entain. What we're focused on is working with the BetMGM team who had their Investor Day this week to maximize their opportunity in the United States. Clearly, big product opportunity. The product has lagged at different times some of the competitors, great marketing opportunity and the omnichannel strategy is one we're big believers in given the size of MGM's loyalty database and how strong that brand is. And it's hard for us to weigh in on the shareholder situation at Entain. I know they're heads down, focused on their business and working through it. But we believe BetMGM is a singular asset in the U.S. market.

Ross Sandler analyst
#6

Another smart investment you guys have made well-timed was Turo, and we get this one from the investment community often. But with the kind of peer group of gig economy companies, DoorDash, Uber, we had Lyft here yesterday, all effectively kind of doubling in 2023, it seems like there is appetite for that kind of asset as a public company. So you're obviously kind of at an arm's length, but could you talk about prospects for an IPO in the planet Turo?

Christopher Halpin executive
#7

Sure. We are long-term holders of Turo. We've been very clear and Joey has been clear that we want to own more, not less. So for us, an IPO is -- would be a step in the progression of the company if they want to do it and in their approach to raising capital, et cetera. Having -- Being a public company versus a private company, we're supportive if that's what the board and management want to do, and there's pros and cons to that. Relative to the -- to an IPO, obviously, there were 3 or 4 depending on how you define it, that got public post Labor Day, sort of mixed performance there. And I was at breakfast hearing your colleagues at Barclays talk about when the IPO market might come back, sounds hard to predict and a bit choppy. So we're supporters. We think Turo has a tremendous market opportunity. But one of the things about going public is you wake up the next day and you've gone from X investors to multiples of that, you still have to execute yourself to put your head down. So hard to weigh in on timing and the value in front of them of just taking share in their space and growing the brand is far more important.

Ross Sandler analyst
#8

Yes. Okay. Shifting gears to the operating companies, on Dotdash Meredith to start. So at the time of the earnings call, there was a fair amount of noise, not really from you guys, but from some of the digital advertising peers around trends in October, around the Middle East conflict. Here we are 6 weeks on with most of the kind of holiday visibility in sight. How have things progressed? And there were questions around whether we would get a budget flush in digital in 2023, given the October hiccup, but what are you guys seeing there?

Christopher Halpin executive
#9

Yes. It was a good November. October was an odd dynamic because it happened so quickly. And it clearly was correlated, probably precipitated by the Israeli/Gaza conflict. But it also really ended November 1. And I don't know if that's a monthly construct at agencies or something, but we said in the earnings call, surprisingly large slowdown in October and then really starting November 1, it bounced back. I'm talking direct and programmatic on the advertising side. Direct is fine. I don't know if I'd call it a budget flush, as you said. More, they're doing what we think brands would do and agencies would do. That -- we hope that continues throughout December. There's some -- still some key weeks to go, but direct is fine. Programmatic definitely firmed up in November, on pricing, we think we're -- we definitely feel like we're outperforming the market in terms of programmatic CPM increases. We should be because we're executing and improving our platforms, et cetera. But it was a good month there. E-commerce, the cadence of when consumers are spending, we've talked about this a couple of times, it's definitely different year-to-year. This year, some things were pulled forward by Amazon and others with the Prime Deals Day, but it was a solid holiday period. We felt great about our performance, and I've heard that from our retail partners. And so we're optimistic. Last year, this time, everyone got whipsawed by the market. So we're definitely gun-shy about mission accomplished, and there's some key months to go, but it was a good holiday period.

Ross Sandler analyst
#10

And then last quarter, you guys talked about there was some new disclosure around DDM core versus noncore. I guess how do we think about this new disclosure? How do we think about monetization potential within those 2? And is there some cleanup happening in noncore that might be weighing down growth rates that would otherwise be higher currently and in '24?

Christopher Halpin executive
#11

Yes, definitely. So we put that disclosure out, which essentially a new traffic metric, which we call sessions. And we bifurcated it between core, which are 19 major sites that we are investing behind and then total, which includes noncore. Talking to investors and analysts, there's a couple of different pools in noncore. One are fine owned and operated sites that just don't get any benefit from investment. They're kind of every day working hard, doing their best, but if you put $1 or $10 in them, you're not going to get that much difference. So those should be steady, continue to operate fine. The second are long tail sites that we are -- owned and operated that we are winding down that was part of the original strategy in the merger with Meredith and both properties had sites that -- complementary strengths, really need these to go forward. And then the third bucket are third-party sites where Meredith handled the ad sales for. And those sites have gotten really hit hard. It's interesting for us because it probably highlights what's going on in the broader Open Web and publishing to sites that don't have the strength of the brands we have and the quality of the content we have, but that's been a major drag on sessions and a smaller drag on revenue. But that -- longer term, we expect that noncore to continue to diminish. And so core/noncore growth rates will be sort of over time, asymptotically will be the same. Traffic growth, we feel great about. We feel very good about where our brands are, our core brands are, and the ability to keep growing them in terms of traffic, engagement and market share.

Ross Sandler analyst
#12

You touched on this earlier, but performance marketing has had a huge reacceleration this year at DDM, brand lagging a little bit, but also picking up of late. So I guess it sounds like those trends continue in 4Q, what is the outlook look like for '24 on those sides? And we were talking earlier about Chrome cookie deprecation potentially being a catalyst for the IAC properties or DDM properties. Can you just talk a little bit about that?

Christopher Halpin executive
#13

Sure. Taking the first part, we feel good about how our sites -- I mean, at the end of the day, it's price times quantity on the advertising side. So quantity is traffic. We talked about that. That should be a tailwind. On price, it's the combination of direct premium sales and programmatic sales. So direct premium is about 2/3 of our advertising revenue. If you look at our digital P&L, about 2/3 of that is advertising. About 1/4 is -- a little less than 1/4 is performance marketing, e-commerce and then the rest is licensing. Within that 2/3, that is advertising, 2/3 is premium, 1/3 is programmatic, we get much higher CPMs on premium, although we feel like we do well in programmatic. On the pricing side, both premium and programmatic should be solid in Q1, Q2 and be tailwinds. They were tough last year. I think we -- you and I have talked about this a bunch. It was just a tough ad market starting from mid-November last year through the spring, barring some exogenous shock, the comp should be pretty attractive. And we hope to see some firming. That's on the advertising side. And also on the programmatic side, we keep improving our ad tech stack. We keep improving our execution and longer term, we think D/Cipher can be an engineer. On the performance marketing side, we've had the first -- second derivative positive momentum throughout the year of 0, 12, 22 -- up 22 and expect to be a very strong quarter. We think it should continue. There's definitely always the question of how will the consumer spend and what will that look like. This holiday has been as good or better than expected, I'd say, in terms of consumer activity. But that would be the main overhang I think about for next year in performance marketing.

Ross Sandler analyst
#14

Okay. And then on the cookies?

Christopher Halpin executive
#15

Yes, sorry. So we get asked about this a lot. You can see the experience with what Apple did on eliminating cookies and the performance, the winners, the losers and what happens to pricing performance therein. When Google does something similar on their properties, first-party platforms will benefit. Those with first-party data and direct ad relationships will benefit, heavily reliant third-party retargeting, generic, et cetera, will all struggle. We feel -- it's actually a core thesis of the Dotdash Meredith combination and also their DDM strategy is the power of intent. And that underpins D/Cipher, which is this is our campaign management platform that's essentially a productization of the strengths of Dotdash Meredith. So if you are a brand or advertiser or agency looking to reach certain segments or demos, because of the scale of our footprint in a number of categories, home, food, travel, investment, et cetera, entertainment, we can give you major reach targeting and we have intent. We know if you're a paint company that -- because we've mapped it and done all the data science behind most likely correlations behind what they're searching for, what they're reading and where they can be monetized. So D/Cipher has been a -- was a major step for us. We are confident in its outperformance against cookie-based solutions. And then in non-cookie platforms like iOS it blows away any alternative. So we view it as a tailwind, but it's going to be choppy for the broader digital ad allocation market when cookies go away on Google just because you're going to have to work harder to figure out performance, but we feel good about it for DDM.

Ross Sandler analyst
#16

Last one on DDM. The incremental margins are ticking up nicely in the fourth quarter. I guess just -- how do we think about that on a go-forward basis? It seems like we're through a lot of the heavy lifting at DDM. What's the outlook for '24 and beyond?

Christopher Halpin executive
#17

Sure. So near term, we've said roughly 80% incremental EBITDA -- adjusted EBITDA margins. That's a reflection of the actions that were taken to combine the businesses, optimize the cost structure and then also further improve the cost structure in the context of the ad recession. Secondly, we're operating on a depressed digital ad level. So the team can bring on revenues with almost no incremental cost. I mean, basically, that 20% marginal expense is related to sales execution, maybe some small campaign COGS, those types of things. But the cost structure, besides the sales elements are really content, product, tech platform and G&A. Near term, none of those need to scale while we add revenue. Longer term, we've said 55% to 60% incremental adjusted EBITDA margins. And where the investment lies is content. So that's continued optimization of content, creation of new and engaging content in forms of consumer engagement related to e-commerce, expansions in sort of sub-brands that we see high ROI, there'll be small incremental step function investments in product and technology as revenue grows, but that's pretty controllable. So for us, it's about as we see ROI from content when we choose to invest in that.

Ross Sandler analyst
#18

Switching over to Angie's. A lot of change this year with Joey stepping back in with the recent divestiture and just a pretty awful macro backdrop for housing. So as we flip to '24 with rates coming down potentially, housing picking up off of a depressed level and you guys having worked through some of these challenges, how do you feel about the performance that Angi is going to put up next year?

Christopher Halpin executive
#19

Yes. So this year, the themes have been reduced revenue, particularly in ads and leads as -- I'm talking net revenue because obviously, we have the accounting change that brings down services, but no impact to bottom line. As Joey and team went in and broke down the portfolio and then optimized for Pro experience and consumer experience, there's been a lot of discussion of this. We reduced -- eliminated low ROI, low-margin revenues that we were getting from consumers. We also significantly reduced the acquisition of low-value Pros and size of our Pro sales force. And then we've continued to improve overall marketing ROI as well as cost structure. Net result of that is depressed revenues or declining revenues, but improved profitability. We feel good about a baseline level of adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow. We've also significantly managed or reduced majorly excessive capitalized software activity and overinvestment that was going on. But we feel good about where we are on an adjusted EBITDA basis and just EBITDA minus CapEx that's the baseline, and we can grow from there. We have -- we obviously disappointed the market in the second quarter with some -- the further reduction in low-calorie revenues. But we feel good about the way adjusted EBITDA is trending and where margins are coming in, in Q4 and especially relative to our guidance of $100 million to $110 million. Next year is really going to be about getting through that drop, the bottom of the trough in revenue declines, a tough comp in Q1. Things will start to get easier in Q2, Q3. We are not saying when we're going to get back to revenue growth. But we should be able to continue to push on profitability.

Ross Sandler analyst
#20

And more strategically for Angie's, the stock is about in the same place that it was when you guys were buying back shares. I guess thoughts on that versus buying back shares at the IAC level, and then there's been some discussion about potentially combining Angie's with other assets like Yelp, et cetera. Any comments on that?

Christopher Halpin executive
#21

With respect to buy back shares, we said we're putting a plan in place to use our existing authorization. The biggest challenge with Angi is just the low liquidity relative to buybacks, et cetera. But we've said we're putting a plan in place subject to liquidity and pricing thresholds, et cetera. IAC, we continue to evaluate our trading levels and valuation and capital allocation to that, and we always will. So that's the story on share buybacks. What was the second one?

Ross Sandler analyst
#22

Possible M&A, combination with Yelp?

Christopher Halpin executive
#23

There was speculation with the activist at Yelp. We think Angi is a great business. We think the long-term value there is not reflected in its current share price, but we know we've got to execute. We know we've fatigued investors. So we're always opportunistic about combinations. But right now, it's very much Joey and team are heads down executing.

Ross Sandler analyst
#24

And on that point, the execution point, so we just looked at like the ads and leads segment within Angie's, like how do you feel about both growth and margin there, now that we're going to start lapping the channel cleanup in 2Q?

Christopher Halpin executive
#25

You should see continued margin improvement just from the marketing efficiencies. There was a lot of dead or poorly performing marketing dollars in that base. And to be fair, a chunk of that derives from the rebranding. So in March of '21, the decision was made to consolidate fully on the Angi brand. HomeAdvisor, as you know, was the SEO beast at the time. The underperformance in HomeAdvisor exceeded the growth in Angi, and we've been buying traffic that we would have historically gotten for free through SEO since then, and we've been public in saying that's probably an $80 million plus just straight transfer to third parties. Some of that was poor spend. Some of that was inefficient. We're -- we'll have continued marketing efficiency and improvement there. And it's now about driving SEO, driving repeat traffic, driving consumer experience, which Joey has been adamantly focused on so that consumers come back to Angi naturally and the virtuous circle continues.

Ross Sandler analyst
#26

I just want to make sure if anybody has a question, if you could raise your hand or just fire it out. I'll keep going. So let's discuss other segments, but important ones. So you had leadership changes at Care and in Search over the last the 6 months or so. Just update on progress there and what the outlook looks like for '24 on those 2.

Christopher Halpin executive
#27

Yes. We're going through a strategic planning right now across the businesses. Feel very good about Care with Brad Wilson, who we brought in as CEO and he has brought in a new CMO, a new Chief Product Officer, which were the 2 big gaps that we were focused on. Look, it's a very good business. It is a space that is early in the offline-to-online transition. It's a solid brand, traffic performs well, margins are excellent. We just -- we were underperforming on marketing, and we knew we needed a CMO. We knew -- and it's blocking and tackling on the marketing side that we need to do. And then on product, sort of some real deficiencies in the product I think were masked in the late '21, '22 period by just how robust the demand was for those services coming out of the pandemic for home care, childcare, senior care, et cetera. So we are focused on getting the product back and have had a lot of discussion around that, but where it needs to be. We look at the comps, and we're greatly impressed by the multiple paid for Rover by Blackstone. We look at the performance in enterprise Back-Up Care at Bright Horizons who is the main competitor. We know the opportunity is there and really like that business and how it's executed and taking advantage of the opportunities. And we think we've got the best portfolio between consumer and enterprise of anybody and scale for -- in that market. On the Search side, they just keep chugging. I think you've been around it for a long time. It's a business that sort of has its baseline and then comes up with new strategies, reinvents itself and they're heads-down executing.

Ross Sandler analyst
#28

On Search, probably the answer is no, but just curious, like so Google is changing all this stuff with generative -- Search Generative Experience and putting like more of their own content on the page and kind of jamming down the kind of the old school search results. Do you see that as a risk, opportunity? Like it seems like that team is pretty adapt to -- or pretty quick to adapt to any change that Google makes, but just curious on that.

Christopher Halpin executive
#29

Yes. I think the -- well, a, SG is still kind of ambiguous of what it will look like and what the prioritization will be. Search operates in a little bit of a different place. So I think they'll continue to have opportunities doing what they're doing irrespective of how generative AI and the serve page play out. But we are, as is everyone, very attuned to what does that page look like and how are they going to integrate generative AI into their consumer interface.

Ross Sandler analyst
#30

Okay. Last question. So just kind of a big picture one, but where I started was trying to assess what era we're in for IAC. It sounds like we're in a heads-down execute era. I guess, part and parcel with that, you guys are constantly making decisions around buyback, capital return and M&A opportunities. So if we look into '24, like which way is the scale kind of tipping as far as more buyback, potentially looking at M&A as things get more realistic in terms of valuations out there?

Christopher Halpin executive
#31

Yes. It's hard to say. Barry and Joey are always, at their core, opportunistic. So that is based on what opportunities come along. The M&A market has just been slow. And you guys see it, too, the volatility in price has been challenging for buyers and sellers to agree, and you need some period of stability relative to buyers think they're not overpaying and sellers thinking they're not selling cheap. And we haven't really had that. If we can get to that, you'll see more transactions. I do think higher interest rates will be a positive for people to ironically want to do transactions. You're not going to sit on your noncore subsidiary in the same way if you can redeploy that capital and you're going to see more assets trade, but we will always be opportunistic in terms of how we allocate our capital.

Ross Sandler analyst
#32

Great. Well, we're out of time. Chris, thanks a lot.

Christopher Halpin executive
#33

Thank you, Ross.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete People Incorporated transcript - plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.

Get an API key View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to People Incorporated earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server. Quarterly plans from $105 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.