Home / Transcripts / Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) · September 13, 2022

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) Earnings Call Transcript

September 13, 2022

NASDAQ US Real Estate Retail REITs conference_presentation 36 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Craig Schmidt analyst
#1

Good afternoon. Thanks for joining. For those who don't know, I'm Craig Schmidt, and I cover the retail REITs at Bank of America over here and the blonde is [ Emily Arso ]. She is on team retail. We're pleased to introduce the PECO team. Devin Murphy is on my immediate left. He is the President. His left is Jeff Edison, Chairman, and CEO. And then at the end, we have John Caulfield, CFO. I'm going to hand it over to Jeff and team and have them start with some opening remarks, brief overview of PECO, and get into questions. Plus, I want to keep it as interactive as possible. So don't hesitate to raise your hand and ask questions or just start out with the question. So let me turn over to your team.

Jeffrey Edison executive
#2

Well, thanks, and thanks everybody, for coming today. We appreciate you being here. And as we said, let's make sure we keep it interactive and questions. We love the questions. And just to get started, we're… As we all know we're in a pretty interesting environment. We became public about a little over a year ago. Our thesis at the time was that we had a very differentiated strategy from other people in the retail business and focusing on 5 shopping centers to have the number 1 or 2 grocery and are about 115,000 square feet. They sit at the corner of [ main and main ] and they deliver goods the last mile to people's houses. And 75%, 80% of that is necessity-based, and 30% to 40% of the income is coming from the grocer. And that's a very different format than a lot of different retail, whether that's power centers or lifestyle centers or malls and it operates differently. And that was our thesis, and we've continued to take that thesis and to prove out that it is a very resilient strategy. And if you look at what happened during the virus, we lost 0.7% of occupancy. Today, we have 92% retention rates among the highest we've had in the history of the company. And we're seeing very strong same-center NOI growth. We're seeing our leases move at numbers that both new leases and our renewal spreads at numbers that are very strong historically. So in an environment where the operating side of the business is going about as well as it can. And yet, there's a storm out there in the horizon and everyone wants to know what's happening with the storm, which obviously, we've been doing this for a long time. We've been in the business for 30 years. So we've seen a lot of cycles. This one is interesting and it's unique. We have a very strong employment base, which drives a lot of our customers and a lot of their shopping for necessity goods is driven by strong employment rates. And that works really well in our environment. And yet, we've got inflation, we've got a [ bed ] that's going to slam on the brakes. So we're going to deal with that. We've seen that, and that's the second thing that's going on there with obviously increasing interest rates, which are going to have a negative impact on cost capital and valuations. It hasn't happened yet. We continue to wait for the -- when I say the impact of that on the acquisition pace. That hasn't happened yet, but it is in the process, and we're starting to see that the acquisition of that change in the cost of capital. So we're working through those 3 issues of increasing debt costs, the acquisition market that's in transition and a really strong operating environment. I think the transition on the acquisition pricing, the private market pricing is going to take longer. And I say that because I think you're going to have to have some operating disruption before you're going to see pricing change the way that it has on the debt side of the -- of your cost of capital. So that is our view of sort of how the world is going and the uncertainties that are out there. What we -- the fact that we are a necessity based in terms of our retail base is we think critical. It gives us the opportunity to weather these storms as well as take advantage of these storms in a way that's really positive. We also have one of the best balance sheets in the business, and that gives us a lot of flexibility. So we think that there's going to be opportunity that comes out of what we're going into. We think it's going to take a little longer than the way it's done happened historically. And -- but that doesn't make the opportunity less. And we think with the balance sheet that we have right now, we're in a really good position to take advantage of that.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#3

Great. Well, let me kick it off now. We go to the second quarter end of June that leasing has been done very wealthy. And like you say, you've already returned to pre-COVID occupancy, your leasing spreads have been double digits for at least the last 3 quarters -- has that continued through, let's say, either end of August or mid-September?

Devin Murphy executive
#4

Yes. We find that in the leasing market today, Craig, is, again, demand is being driven by a number of macro factors, work from home, organization, the migration to the Sunbelt, and all portfolio benefits from all of those macro trends. And those macro trends are continuing in a wheel and there's some interesting place or AI data that's recently come out that confirms those trends and shows the incremental population that is now surrounding our centers versus where it was 4 years ago. So those macro trends are driving really strong demand from the retailers. And then as you know, there's been virtually more supply added over the last 10 years. And our expectation is there will be very little supply added because when you look at placement costs today versus where we're acquiring centers in the market today, that discount to replacement cost is depending on location, 40% to 50%. So we believe that the demand cohort is going to continue and the supply cohort is not going to change. And that's going to continue to allow landlords to have really great pricing power. And as Jeff indicated, we're 97% leased today. We have 92% retention. Our re-leasing spreads in the second quarter or when the mid-teens relative to 8% to 10% historically. And our new leasing spreads were in the mid-30s, which is meaningfully higher than they've been historically. So the operating environment, as Jeff said in his opening statement is as good as we've ever seen it. And the headwinds for us are these capital markets headwinds in terms of cost of capital.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#5

Okay. And then are you hearing any comments from your retailers that this may slow given the potential recession in '23 And/or are they saying that -- I guess the way to look at it is how active have you been in '23 and '24 leasing?

Devin Murphy executive
#6

Yes. So if you look at assuming our historical retention rate or rent for 2023 is 98% in place. And for 2024, it's 95% in place. Now, that assumes we're able to retain tenants at the level we've been able to do so historically. But we're not seeing anything that leads us to believe that, that will change. I was just speaking to our Head of Leasing yesterday, and he said that in recent dialogue with retailers, they're actually more constructive today than they were in Q1 in terms of their perspective on growth. And his thesis for what it's worth is that for the consumer that is shopping at our centers, gasoline prices are a meaningful metric. And in the first quarter, when gas was going from $3.50 to 5 that had a shop factor that was reverberating through and that's obviously been mitigated. And what we're hearing from the retailers is if they can find labor, which is their biggest challenge, they will continue to open stores at the current pace that they're expecting.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#7

Okay. I mean there's actually 2 audiences you have. Obviously, you have the 10 -- the retail tenants themselves, but then you have the consumers. Are you seeing any slowing or pullback from the consumers?

Jeffrey Edison executive
#8

Great question and one that what we're hearing from the grocers is that you're starting to see a trade down to private label from the branded goods. And that's typically an early reaction of the consumer heading into a recessionary period where there's a question -- just -- it's a first step they take. They also tend to stop going to restaurants, like the restaurants and moving down brand are the 2 first steps. And there's we're seeing that more on the growth side than we are on the restaurant side, but we anticipate seeing that on the restaurant side as well. So that’s the earliest signs that the consumer is reacting to this. But it's not changing the number of business they're making, and it isn't changing the market basket dramatically according to Kroger and to public in our conversations.

Devin Murphy executive
#9

And their businesses continue to be very strong, Craig. If you looked at their second quarter results, they all had same-store sales growth in the high single digits, and they had margins that were constant or improving. And so despite the dynamic that Jeff talked about with the consumer trading down to private label, the label has a higher margin to the grocer. And so that's a positive benefit for at least in the short term as long as they can hold on to that consumer and make sure he doesn't now trade down from a Kroger to a lower-end grocer.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#10

Okay. And I guess where would you say -- I mean you had record high occupancy, how much further can you push that occupancy? And is your growth profile reduced to some of your peers?

Devin Murphy executive
#11

Yes. So we think we can take our in-line occupancy up by another 200 to 300 basis points. We think our anchor occupancy is pretty much at -- we have 10 anchor boxes currently that are vacant. So we think we're at frictional vacancy with the anchors. We still think we have occupancy upside in our in-line. And we realize that we are at the second highest level of occupancy of any of our public peers. And therefore, the way we need to drive growth is by continuing to push rents, which we will do. And if you look at our spreads, they've been pretty attractive. And in addition to those spreads, we're also getting 2.5% CAGRs built-in on top of the spreads that we're getting. And then obviously, an important component of our growth is our external growth, which Jeff will get into at some point, I guess soon.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#12

Okay. I guess what I wanted to -- I think in your presentation, you say visits to the grocer are just under 2x a week.

Devin Murphy executive
#13

1.7.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#14

There you go. How often does that Rocher softer cross-shop to the small shops that it's leased up against?

Jeffrey Edison executive
#15

So it's not a consistent thing like always does this. But the non-grocery retailers that are in our sound and our neighbors, they are -- they see that as a major driver for their bone. Now, each retailer is a little different because some are very destination and they don't rely on that, but most of them have some very positive cohabitation sort of -- it's fundamentally making the shopping experience easier to handle your necessity goods, which is what our centers do -- and we're within 3 miles of your house. So it's a really convenient way to do that. And so you tend to either go first and get your card on and then go to the grocery or you go and you work out and then you buy groceries afterwards. Those are -- that is a very typical interaction in our center and a big driver of why the small store retailers want to be near the grocer. It's that -- it's just convenience to add something on to your 1.7x when you're at the grocer.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#16

Okay. And then maybe I'll get something John involved here.

Devin Murphy executive
#17

Don't go on to speak...

John Caulfield executive
#18

I'm good. I'm fine.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#19

The first part will like PECO’s net debt-to-EBITDA is 5.5%. So very attractive. But your target is low to mid-6s. How do you plan to take advantage of this extra capacity and flexibility?

John Caulfield executive
#20

Thank you for that question. So our balance sheet, we raised some equity at the end of the second quarter, and that allowed us to return our leverage back to the level it was at the IPO. And so we said as part of our IPO just over a year ago that we had the capacity by $1 billion worth of assets over 3 years. which, by the way, we are on target for. We've acquired about $375 million. But now what we've done is brought our leverage back to a point where now we've replenished that $1 billion. And so we think we continue to have that opportunity to increase our leverage over time and add external growth that will then also fuel some of the organic growth because we had been targeting assets with an 8% unlevered IRR. And now given the market changes, we've raised our own internal hurdles and moving that to now more in the 8.5% to 9% IRR range. So what the balance sheet does is it gives us the ability to continue that runway. We are going to be patient in doing that, but we still believe we can achieve that over the 3 years.

Devin Murphy executive
#21

And in addition to acquisitions, Craig, I mean, we'll use the balance sheet capacity for growth on-site redevelopment opportunities where -- and redevelopment for us is pretty low risk on a relative basis. I mean, what we're doing is typically building either a Starbucks or a Chipotle and outparcel, and that lease is in place prior to the construction starting or where you have a center that's very well leased where we know there's leasing demand that we can't accommodate, and we're building additional small shop space. And the yields on that development for us have been very attractive relative to what we can get in the acquisition market. And so we will continue to be very focused on looking for those redevelopment opportunities. And we think to date, we've said we'll do circa $50 million of that year. We're looking to be able to grow that given the relatively attractive yields we can get on that. vis-a-vis acquisitions.

John Caulfield executive
#22

And to your point, occupancy is high. So adding that GLA because there continues to be demand for space.

Jeffrey Edison executive
#23

And one of the ways we're getting that growth is partnering with our grocers, and we're in early stages with the first [ Grover ] partnership where we will actually be using part of their parking lot and our parking lot, getting their approval for an expanded small store building. And that there's tremendous opportunity in the parking lots of our shopping centers to add that expanded retail. And it's complicated because you've got to have the right grocer or relationships because it is -- it's a really difficult approval process without it. And so it's truly a partnership, you got it. It's revenue sharing, sharing all the rest that you have to work through. But we're pretty optimistic that's going to become something that we can systematically add to a lot of our centers.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#24

And is -- are the municipalities lowering your parking ratios? Or is it an that's just available on your site?

Jeffrey Edison executive
#25

It's a little bit of both. I think the 5 1, which was historically the development thing is really -- has come down. And so there are municipalities where it's more like 4:1 and even some that are 3:1. Most of the times, that's actually driven by the operating side of the grocer who run the true operations of their store. And they're the ones where the -- more than the cities are the biggest constraint.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#26

Okay. Just check and see any questions in the field? Okay. I assume that means you love the question so far. PECO just recently raised its dividend, about 0.0933% from 0.09%, an increase of 3.7%, but your dividend yields in the low 3s, -- your peers are pretty much in the floor. Is there any thought -- and I realize it's the Board decision. But was there any thought of maybe raising your dividend yield to be more in line with your peers?

Jeffrey Edison executive
#27

Yes. We looked at that. And what we want to grow our dividend like we grow our cash flow, and we want them to be consistent. We have a -- we generate about $100 million of free cash flow a year on top of the dividend. And we've got really good uses for that. I think that we would change that more if there were not -- if those opportunities were to be less. Right now, we can put that -- those dollars to work at, we think, really strong returns. And so we anticipate keeping a similar ratio -- payout ratio of our cash flow in terms of the dividend. And we would -- what we've told our investors is primarily that we want to make sure we are a consistent growing dividend just being at a point where you were a high payout ratio might put you at risk of that. We have the ability to continue to grow our dividend over a long period of time. And we will try and match that primarily with our cash flow growth as well.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#28

So sticking with your conservative nature?

Jeffrey Edison executive
#29

We are sticking with our conserving nature. And again, if we get to a point where they really are buying opportunities for new centers or development opportunities for the existing centers we have, then you move to a much more aggressive payout ratio. But in the environment we're in right now, we think that's a really good use of the capital.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#30

And then you recently updated your acquisition guidance. What are you seeing in the market that caused you to change? And are you seeing anything different more recently?

Jeffrey Edison executive
#31

So we changed our guidance from $300 million to $400 million to $200 million to $300 million. And the real reason for us to tell the market that when interest rates -- when barleys go up by 200 basis points, there's a change in capital, we're in a new pricing environment. It will take some time for us to get there. We're also very clear to communicate that doesn't change our goal of raising or buying $1 billion over the 3 years after the IPO, but that we were going to be cautious in a changing environment until that change actually happened. And we will see. I mean we don't -- we're early days in that in terms of seeing where the private markets will evolve. Clearly, the cost of capital has gone up pretty dramatically. We think at least 100 basis points, somewhere between 15 and 125 basis points, the cost of capital has gone up. Therefore, your underwriting has got to be to that higher number. And in doing that, your chances of the market quickly adapting to that and saying, "Oh, yes, well, we'd love to take less.” May take us a little longer to get there. And that's really the barometer for us is how long is it going to take for the private markets to recognize that and to move to the new pricing.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#32

And do you think the 75 bps possibly in September will make that -- I mean, it sounds like you feel like it's on the cost, but actually start to translate to people's new pricing?

Jeffrey Edison executive
#33

We've seen a transition already. And the transition we see this is sort of typical of these transitions, the first transition is the outlier bids disappear. And we've had -- over the last 12 months, we have a lot of outlier bids. And by that, I mean somebody who were -- they have 8 bids and 7 of them are within 25 basis points of each other, and somebody's 50 basis points more aggressive. And that has been what the market has been like for the last 12 months. And not every deal, but a lot of deals have priced at that. And that's become like the market pricing. And the rest of us are sitting there and improve were like “No, that's not really the pricing.” That is an outlier bid that will -- market price, but that's not -- that's pretty much gone from the market now. We think a lot of that was strong leverage financial buying. So we think that, that 50 basis point is gone. We never really thought it was there because we were buying at that and it was just -- it was on mark. The real question for us is how much do we move from here. The lies gone and we're going to move another 50 basis points or 75 basis points, another 25 basis points. And that's really what we're waiting to see as we let the private market adjust -- and it's so big because like this always happens that there was a rush of deals that came on to the market over the last probably 60 days, all at the old pricing. And it just happens. They don't want to lose the deals that they had, we don't think much of that will trade. Now, there will be some sellers who need to sell, and that will determine the new market. Just like the outliers we're determining the market, this is the real sellers are going to be -- are going to drive the market, and that we don't know. We do have a really good backlog. I would say, deals going into in addition to what we've got, which we bought about $200 million this year net. And we'll -- we've got a strong backlog that will should -- we hope will close. It's a little tougher closing market just because of the uncertainties with stuff, but we are pretty optimistic that we'll have some good acquisition numbers to put on by the end of the year.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#34

John, you mentioned that can be raised your IRR distribution. I was just wondering if you could talk a little bit about just [indiscernible]. What's changed there? And do you talk about maybe what's happening in the more mature type markets versus some of the more secondary [ markets ]?

John Caulfield executive
#35

Yes. There have not been a lot of trades in the top 10 markets that we've seen. So it's hard to say whether the Washington purchase of the California projects, whether that is where the market is, mid-4s or whether that was an outlier bid that. And they did have -- so I think we had a backup bid on that, not at that [ resin ]. So that's a good example of one that you -- I don't know where that would trade today. And they are putting some of their product on the market that they're not going to hold. That will be a good test to see where those projects trade. And so I would say that's probably one of your good examples of when we realize what the trade secondhand on those assets, that would be interesting. Now, they're trading off coastal, so they're trading their Sacramento deals and some noncore coastal deals. But -- so that they aren't going train the same cap rate. But we I think you'll get some good information out of that. The difference primary secondary markets, the so much depends on what you call primary and what you call secondary. We're -- Atlanta is our largest market. It's not a primary market or a secondary market. I certainly would say it's a secondary market, but it's a big market and it's got a really large number of transactions that happen in our space on a regular basis. So that -- and there, it's -- we haven't seen any transactions that have taken place that would mark the new numbers. We did lose a deal to public within the last couple of weeks, which really pissed us up, but they had a ROFR they -- but -- and they were -- their pricing was very aggressive. Now, I think you're going to have a really tough time buying anything public in the next -- in the Southeast in the next 2 to 3 years because they are back actively buying and they operate everything. So that market will get -- we'll stay really -- will probably stay really aggressive. And that -- one of the advantages we think we have is by having a nationwide footprint and not just being gold star or not just being top 5 markets or 10 markets. We don't have to buy in Florida. If you have to buy in Florida, you are going for anything public or public or you're going to overpay for it because they are the buyer and they're going to match or beat or anything in. But there are other places which it's less -- dynamics are more favorable towards the buyer. And that -- having a national footprint and 5,800 centers we've identified we'd like to own, that gives us the ability to shop in a bigger market in our mind and gives us the advantage of being able to find inefficiencies in a broader market. And that's where we're not cap rate buyers because we're really IR buyers, but it all eventually translates to separately anyway. But that's the -- that's how we're looking at the cap rate thing.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#36

Your most recent acquisition ban pending the rainfall, if you will, with those spectate assets...

Jeffrey Edison executive
#37

Yes, great question. So when you look at our most recent transactions, Denver was a market that we like and we bought a project there, anchored by Sprouts. We bought a project in Minneapolis. We bought a project in...

Devin Murphy executive
#38

By Whole Foods, Minneapolis.

Jeffrey Edison executive
#39

Yes. That was anchored by Whole Foods. The other was anchored by Kroger in Milwaukee, their high-end brand in Milwaukee. We bought a Trader Joe's Center in Sacramento. And then we just bought a center that was anchored by a Walmart is actually the #1 Walmart in Las Vegas. And so these are not primary markets. But I'd stack these trade airings up against any primary market that we look at. I mean they're --we're getting for all -- we're exceeding what we've underwritten on almost every one of them we do across the board. And in addition, they're really strong markets that we'll do them.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#40

I think the center and Vegas would be hot markets, a lot of capital coming in, what you see that was unique in those properties. So what was unique to a plan that justified on getting the highest bidder? I have a lot of competition.

Jeffrey Edison executive
#41

Denver is a market where we've got a lot of centers. We know and we were able to see the ability to grow rents in -- it was not a -- there wasn't a ton of vacancy there. It was probably low dines in terms of occupancy. But we were able to -- we saw a tremendous upside in terms of these rail spreads, and we had some development potential and outline development that would be very additive to that. That was what we saw there and not quite it's actually better than we had -- than what we thought about. Las Vegas was one where we -- this was a center that had in our mind, a really good location with a lot -- with the ton of growth around it. It has been undermanaged in our mind. It was a comeback deal, put under contract at a 5.25% cap rate. We put it under contract at a 6.5%. Interest rates changed during our due diligence period and end up buying it at 7%. And for us, that's a will -- and with really good growth in, that will be a really, I think, a really strong deal for us. But that was our story on both of those. And we up from the deal at 6.5% because we weren't -- and it was a motivated seller and an environment where it was uncertain and they wanted a certain close. So -- and if you -- there's always a story behind each one of these things. They're never -- they're never vanilla. There's always something a little different to them. And -- but that's what one of the expertise having done this for 30 years that we could go into markets and we can actually look at the 3-mile radius, and we can figure out what's the right merchandising mix? How does that going to work? Who is the -- how is the grocer doing? And then how will the small store do? And then what can we -- what does that look like for a return for us and that's where we find our opportunities.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#42

Okay. We've got rapid-fire questions. So then that -- the first, which of the following is the greatest macro challenge facing U.S. public REITs today? A, risk of higher rates; b, risk of a recession; or c, the rise of private equity and non-NTRs.

Jeffrey Edison executive
#43

Interest rates, I think, are the right.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#44

Okay. And the second, which of the following is the greatest...

Jeffrey Edison executive
#45

Just a short-term or long term on that first question? The long term, I think the NTR things is more -- is trial, but… Let's say, short-term secular question. Actually mentioned... I know a lot of you have questions...

Devin Murphy executive
#46

Qualifying as rapid fire questions.

Jeffrey Edison executive
#47

I got to speed up my rapid fire.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#48

We say the following is the greatest sector-specific risk. One, labor issues; two, supply; three, liquid capital markets.

Jeffrey Edison executive
#49

Capital markets. What was for...

John Caulfield executive
#50

Labor.

Devin Murphy executive
#51

I'd say labor.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#52

Interesting. And then last is, are you seeing any signpost of a weakened demand, yes or no? I guess it's no.

John Caulfield executive
#53

No.

Craig Schmidt analyst
#54

So that's great. Well, that ends our meeting. Thank you for coming, and thank you for going to do the round table...

John Caulfield executive
#55

Thanks for having us.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. transcript - plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.

Get an API key View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server. Quarterly plans from $105 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.