Home / Transcripts / Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) · November 17, 2020

Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) Earnings Call Transcript

November 17, 2020

US conference_presentation 36 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Andrew Schmidt analyst
#1

Hi, everyone. Thank you for joining us for Citi's Tenth Annual Fintech Conference, Fintech X. My name is Andrew Schmidt. I'm fintechs -- on Citi's payments processors and IT services team, focusing on fintech software. It's my pleasure today to host Repay. With us, we have John Morris, CEO; and Tim Murphy, CFO. Thank you both for joining us.

Timothy Murphy executive
#2

Nice to be here.

Andrew Schmidt analyst
#3

So it's always helpful to start with a level set question, if you will. For investors not familiar with the story, could you help us just understand how Repay's core business got started? And since that core business -- since you started that core business, clearly, you've expanded into a number of different areas, including B2B payments. So maybe help us just bridge the gap between that origin and then where you are today as well.

Timothy Murphy executive
#4

Sure. So I'll start here. As I said, nice to be here. Thank you for the question, and excited to talk to you all today. So yes, Repay was started in the personal loan space, which at the time in the mid-2000s, was very underpenetrated from an electronic payment perspective and still is. It's probably from a card processing perspective, still only in the maybe mid- to high teens to 20% penetration versus 60-plus penetration across the overall U.S. consumer payment market. And so we recognized an opportunity that was underserved, underpenetrated, not a lot of the larger merchant acquirers participating, and that's how we got started. And then we recognized that the auto lending space was also very attractive and actually much larger than the personal lending space. So we moved into auto lending via acquisition, then branched into accounts receivable management, which was also very adjacent to let -- the lending markets. And that's really where we got started. So our core business was in, what we call, loan repayments. And now, as you mentioned, we've branched into B2B payments. And so within B2B, we're in B2B merchant acquiring, but we're also in the AP side of the transaction, with our recent acquisitions of cPayPlus and CPS, where we're processing outbound payments in building a supplier network that we're enabling to accept electronic payments. And we also have a back-end processing business called TriSource where we can settle transactions. So collectively, that represents probably over a $4.5 trillion annual payment volume opportunity. So we started in the personal loan space, which was maybe $60 billion, which is large, but certainly expanded that addressable market significantly. And now we have a much more diversified business. In loan repayments, we also recently acquired a business that is in the mortgage space. So we're in mortgage payments within loan repayments as well, which we think is very underserved. And then we're also in credit unions within loan repayments and we're in Canada in loan repayments. So loan repayments has many subverticals, B2B, a few different parts to that as well, back-end processing business with a very large growth in the...

Andrew Schmidt analyst
#5

Right. That's a really good overview. And we'll dig into a lot of those areas in just a little bit. But one thing that you mentioned a number of times is the underpenetrated nature of these markets. And clearly, you've identified -- done a good job of identifying markets that are underpenetrated, and then you've gone after them. But I just -- I think it's helpful to understand why it is so underpenetrated, why isn't anyone else going after these markets? And what is your sort of competitive advantage in addressing these markets? I guess that's kind of a broad question, but maybe we'll start with the core sort of lending verticals, repayment verticals. I think starting there would be helpful.

John Morris executive
#6

I'll take a stab, and Tim will be able to give more color there. So thank you again this morning. Really appreciate it. It's good to see you. Listen, we -- I obviously been here -- having been here from beginning, I think -- hey, I'm all 4 of less people being in the verticals we're in, right? It's less to compete. But reality is we discovered it's not a traditional retail market, right? And it's really card-not-present when you're paying your card payments or various loan payments. We discovered that a long time ago, and we think there's lots of runway left. So we've been very intentional about what we're choosing and markets we're choosing that we're going after. And these 2 are very large underserved markets with huge TAMs, but also long, long runway, where we think the move to digital, the move to real time, the move to a card payment type is there. We were going into B2B before such a thing as a pandemic happened. That's confirmed probably our thesis there that we think there is lots of opportunity. We think the market is ready for that. That kind of accelerated a lot of those decisions. We think that is still the case. Our go-to-market strategy does revolve around, our technology does revolve around our integrations into ERP systems or loan management systems, which is the ERP systems in the loan world. We think that our ability to deliver great financial technology that's integrated at the end that makes ease of the customer experience much easier, but also accelerates and takes the friction out of that whole process. We can kind of beat the total financial plug in. And obviously, we'd bring the entire payment expertise to this. We look at also our ability to truly clear and settle these funds behind the scenes. We're not just a financial technology kind of we can actually move money and understand how to do that and all the things you get with that. We build our ecosystem around that. We think that's a really strong strategy for, I call it, stickiness. It creates -- assuming we do a great job of taking care of our customers, which that's a big to us, and we deliver them an excellent product and solution, we think there's additional room to continued growth for many, many years in the verticals we're in, and we'll continue to do that organically. So that's -- we do think a competitive advantage, obviously, is our technology. That's the moat around our business, the omnichannel approach we have. The integration is very critical. And when we put all those things together, our ability to properly process those transactions that's in the best way for our customer, which would be a business, we're excited about what we still have ahead of us.

Andrew Schmidt analyst
#7

Great. And then everyone's favorite topic, which is COVID and how companies have reacted. Could you just talk a little bit about just on the loan repayment side, how -- just how COVID has impacted that business in terms of consumers being able to repay their loans? Is there a difference across the verticals you serve, personal loan, auto, mortgage in terms of repayment trends? And then it does lead to a broader question in terms of cyclicality since it is loan repayment. There's presumably some cycle exposure. So could also talk about how the business responds in various economic cycles?

Timothy Murphy executive
#8

Sure. So -- yes, so if we start with Q2, when the stimulus funds went out to the system, we saw people using those dollars to repay their loans. So it confirmed for us what we've always believed, which is that these borrowers place a very high priority on staying current on their personal loans, auto loans, mortgages, and other types of consumer debt. And so that was a very -- that's very positive, generally, I think, fundamentally for our business. One trend we did see in personal loans is that as the system was pretty flushed with cash, and consumers were paying off, either paying off loans or making larger-than-normal payments on loans, the personal lenders really reduced originations and so those reduced originations led to a slight impact to our payment volume in Q3 in the personal loan space, meaning our payment volume was down because there weren't as many loans originated and those loans are also often shorter in duration. So although there's a lag effect, it takes a quarter or so to feel that. And so I don't think it's a fundamental kind of cycle question because clearly, what just happened is in a normal cycle. And the stimulus, the ups and downs and the stimulus has created some volatility in personal loans. But I think fundamentally, we've seen that consumers want to pay these loans. In auto, it's been very strong. The demand side of auto has been there, and so originations have continued. And then the existing loans are longer in durations, they could be as many -- as much as 6 or 7 years. And so we've seen that repayment volume stay very strong and growth rates actually probably a little faster than previously there. And then the refinancing activity has kept mortgage strong as well. So it kind of depends by the vertical within loan repayments. But I think what we fundamentally have seen, like I said, is that consumers want to pay their loans. There -- sometimes if there's excess cash in the system, could really translate into reduced originations, which could, for a short term, we think only short-term, reduce their loan repayment volume, which is higher margin for us. So you can see that flow through our P&L. But again, we think that's really a function of some of the volatility related to CARES Act stimulus.

Andrew Schmidt analyst
#9

Okay. And then I think it's important to kind of level set, just the secular growth you are seeing in loan repayments and why FIs are adopting this. What is the -- so typically, you think of the cost of acceptance, there is a cost to accept in card payments. What is the value prop for the FI in terms of just accepting repayments on a card? I guess there's benefits on both sides from the consumer and the FI. Could you talk about just in the loan repayments vertical, the value-add on both sides of the network, if you will?

John Morris executive
#10

Sure. Specifically on the loan repayment side, we see value on both sides, right? We've seen great value proposition on the B2B side as well. Especially in the middle of pandemic, we've seen demand. We saw demand for the need for a card-not-present transaction or a remote transaction, both to fund the loans, which we've seen some pickup in that activity where lenders want to be able to fund the loans directly to the consumer's bank account without actually having to come in to their branches; and then we also saw demand for the consumer, who wanted to be able to basically pay the -- make their payment over their mobile device, right? Or -- and just be able to pay anywhere, anyway, anytime. So having an omnichannel experience, we were able to start delivering that even more. Most of our existing customers would have had 1 or 2 of our channels, but they really want to be able to deliver high quality experience to different areas, so that pick up demand for wins on that side of it. The value proposition for us is really driven by their end borrower experience. And that particular consumer specifically wants to make a payment when they want to make a payment and how they want to make a payment. And what we've shown over time is when you allow them to do that, they're a happy customer and they pay more often, right, versus when they get to it. So the concept that kind of -- it puts you first in line, which becomes a competitive advantage from that perspective, you allow them to get a true virtual experience that's -- that they're experiencing in other parts of their lives because of -- this is 2020, everybody has really enhanced that overall experience, especially with the COVID piece of that. And so the other value proposition is that consumer wants to make a real-time payment, because they know when they use to save their debit card, they know that it's automatically immediately taken out of their account; with an ACH or a check, they don't know exactly when that's going to clear. So they've to kind of check that box. We know and the lenders know that consumers really want to do that. From the lending side, they realize that, "Hey, if I allow these additional products or payment methods, they will pay me more often." So if you think about a concept of, if you just get 1 more payment than you normally potentially would have, it totally pays for the freight of the offering. And if you look at all the other variables where it potentially is greater than that, but also you have a higher quality in consumer experience, those things really matter. The other thing that -- the other big characteristics on the consumer side in that the consumer also realizes that a declined debit card has no negative consumer impact. A declined check or declined ACH, there's a negative consumer impact and nobody kind of gets paid then. So the consumer actually knows that. And then -- our value proposition on the B2B side, around all that is our technology that kind of makes all that happen. That's our true value proposition. That reconciliation and the ability to truly reconcile all the way through and make it seamless and load it back into the ERP system, that in itself is kind of worth the freight in itself because of that. But then if you look at our B2B side, the same thing about the integration into the ERP systems, the ability to take a payment, and we're very underpenetrated on the B2B AR side, we're -- the low teens at best. And that consumer, that manufacturing distributor or whoever that B2B person is, they realize that hey -- and we saw this happening in the pandemic where people were paying sometimes larger invoices than normal because they needed to move things through. We even -- we saw different things out there. So -- and then on the AP automation side, we saw accounts payable departments could not go in the office and write checks, right? So the automation of that, we have seen an uptick in that piece of it, where the ability to basically outsource or really -- and give yourself internal controls, the ability to track your AP transactions, but be able to do it remotely. Obviously, we can do virtual cards. We can do ACH credits, and then we can actually print and send checks as well. So we can do it all for them. And then seamlessly integrate that into their ERP system, great value proposition. And in the AP automation world, it's basically a free transaction for them, because we give some rebates back on the virtual cards. So it makes a lot of sense for almost any business out there to be using some of these products in kind of the new digital world.

Andrew Schmidt analyst
#11

Okay. We do have some questions from the audience, but we'll get to those in a moment. First, I want to ask, in terms of just the pandemic's impact on new business wins, presumably, this is an attractive offering, particularly with the shift from the ratification of payments and things like that. But you've actually won a number of deals. You've had credit union success. You've had some announcements in mortgage servicing. So maybe kind of talk about, overall, how the pandemic has impacted new deals. And then just a little bit of detail on the credit union and mortgage servicing space, that would be helpful.

Timothy Murphy executive
#12

Yes. So we've had really strong new sales throughout the last 6 to 8 months, despite not being able to go to physical conferences and maybe meet customers in person. I think our team has done a great job of making everything virtual and figuring out ways to be more proactively engaging with either existing customers or potential new customers in a virtual way. And so that has led to some really nice wins in the credit union space, like you mentioned. We're building a nice business there. And we have key integrations with 3 of the software providers in that space, which have been really strong distribution and referral partners. And then similarly, in mortgage, as you mentioned, we have announced recently the partnership with Ellie Mae on the loan origination side, so the origination of mortgages, and we have now developed a pipeline and had some wins there as well coming out of that relationship. So I think the combination of our direct sales force engaging with merchants directly and then winning new referral partners, which we now have close to 120 on the software integration side, that provides an additional distribution path for us, which has become more significant. And it's probably helped us a lot with these new wins in the last 6 plus months just because we now have these larger referral sources. So those wins have been -- stayed strong. Our salespeople are doing a really good job hitting their monthly quota targets, which we base on gross profit. And we think that sets us up well going into next year with the implementation of a lot of those wins.

Andrew Schmidt analyst
#13

And that's actually a good segue into this question I got from the audience. Before I move on, just -- you have been very, very resilient in terms of growth through the pandemic. Is it in 20% plus organic gross profit growth in the first half, high single-digit organic growth in the third quarter? Is it fair to view the third quarter as a low watermark from your perspective? You mentioned a lot of these deals coming on board. But just what gives you confidence in terms of improvement in the fourth quarter into next year? And I think deals are probably part of that, but just a question on your resiliency, how to think about growth going forward?

Timothy Murphy executive
#14

Yes. I mean, I think we have proven resilience. Like I said, personal loans just was impacted by reduced originations, but auto has been really strong and other parts of our business remain strong. And even in that, what we would consider potentially, down quarter, we were still growing pretty nicely organically, maybe not at the same rates as the prior quarters, but still growing nonetheless, organically. And we have seen positive volume trends in October with some of our larger personal lenders, which gives us some confidence that they likely started originating loans as the CARES Act stimulus ran out, so probably in early August, which would flow through to payments for us starting now into Q4. So we're seeing that in October, although we don't have -- we don't know yet if that's a true trend. It's only been 1 month of data that shows positive results versus the prior months. So with our Q4 numbers, we were also just a little bit cautious in not understanding what that trend truly could be related to originations and still sort of showing kind of mid- to high single digits organic growth in Q4. But what we said was longer term, we still felt comfortable with mid- to high teens organic growth outlook going into kind of the middle of next year when we think that, hopefully, things will have stabilized, and we truly will see the trends resulting from the increased originations that happened starting in the end of Q2 into Q3. So that's how we think about kind of near-term organic growth outlook and then longer term.

Andrew Schmidt analyst
#15

That's super helpful. I think that addresses the question. I want to switch gears to talk a little bit more about B2B. B2B is an area that we're super-excited about. It's highly underpenetrated, which is characteristic of a market that Repay would go after. But could you just provide us a rundown of the recent acquisitions? I think overall, since there is a lot of complexity on the B2B side, yet -- obviously of AP and AR, and then you have different parts of the value chain within AP and AR. Could you just talk through kind of where your assets are positioned today from a B2B perspective? And then maybe what some of the more recent acquisitions, CPS, I think you recently closed, what that brings you?

Timothy Murphy executive
#16

Yes. So we -- actually, just for reference, we put a slide in our earnings supplement. So if folks want to take a look at that, it's basically what does our combined B2B business look like today. And as you mentioned, we have made -- our last 4 acquisitions have been in B2B. The Ventanex business had a mortgage servicing part of it, but they also had a B2B health care. So if you think about those deals, APS, which we have done in Q4 of last year is in B2B merchant acquiring. So we're on the acquiring side of the transaction, which is acceptance. So it's AR. Ventanex brought us into B2B health care, where we're making outbound payments on behalf of third-party administrators and insurance companies to providers. cPayPlus, which we acquired in July, brought us into the AP automation world, where we're facilitating AP payments automated through ERP systems, and building out a supplier network in select verticals. For example, CPP was in -- or is in auto, field services verticals with a lot of spend. And then CPS is very complementary to cPayPlus in it -- that is doing very similar things in terms of AP, virtual card payments, but in different verticals. So they're in more of an enterprise level customer, doing things like education, hospitals, media, hospitality. So what we're doing now is we're not only entering spaces like AP automation within B2B, but also subverticals, which is very similar to what we did on the acquiring side within loan repayments, for example. And so -- and we're also building out a supplier network that is enabled to accept electronic payments. We now have over 50,000 in our network and we're looking to add to that each month. And so collectively, we now have over a $3 trillion addressable market in B2B. We have over 3,000 customers. We'll process on a pro forma basis, over $4 billion of payments annually between virtual card and enhanced ACH. Like I said, we have over 50,000 suppliers. And so we think it's shaping up to be a very nice business. It's probably on a pro forma basis, about 25% of our business today now. And so that's what we're focused on. We're focused on additional organic and inorganic growth there. And just looking for ways to further penetrate either acquiring or AP automation in either of the existing verticals that I just mentioned or maybe branch into new verticals. And so that's really how the B2B business is shaping up for us, and that's just been over the last 12 to 15 months.

Andrew Schmidt analyst
#17

Right. Yes. A lot has happened in a short period of time. What is -- and you mentioned both of these things, but what is the focus between adding new capabilities on B2B within the value chain versus getting into new verticals with your existing assets? Clearly, there's a lot of organic growth runway to continue to penetrate the existing verticals. But just wondering if there's priority for capabilities or vertical expansion or both?

John Morris executive
#18

Yes. So it would be both. Obviously, we like some of the technology we've -- the companies that had, the technology they had when we bought them. We really think on a couple of those. It's fairly new technology that we -- that does a lot of the -- gives us a lot of capabilities there. So we would -- obviously, anything we buy is going to come with some technology. We think we have fantastic technology with what we have. But if we found something that was easy bolt-on, we have this whole process as we go through to value the technology. It can easily add-on or we just consolidate it in. So integrations and ERP integrations will be critical. Subverticals will be critical when we look at those things or it complements our existing vertical. And if we can have those, that will -- those are things we'll continue to look for. We have technology today that does everything we need to do. But there are obviously -- sometimes they're specifically by vertical, there can be some complements to that.

Andrew Schmidt analyst
#19

Okay. That's helpful. And I think a similar question. In terms of your growth algorithm, there's a lot of drivers. There's increasing penetration in the existing customers because certain clients you're not fully penetrated. There's new customer expansion in existing verticals, there's vertical expansion. How do you balance all these different growth drivers? I guess, what do you feel like is the largest opportunity for growth if you had to sort of force rank all the different drivers out of you?

Timothy Murphy executive
#20

We still think the largest driver of organic growth is penetration with existing customers. And we now have a lot more of those customers and a lot more verticals to penetrate. And we -- our strategy for that, historically, on the acquiring side has been our channel strategy. So as John was discussing earlier, if you can have a customer taking payments on all of the different channels we offer, so web, phone, IVR, mobile text, that -- historically, we've seen that increases penetration of card payments, which is our -- we lead with selling debit card processing that side of the business. And then it can be credit card or virtual card processing on the B2B side. So that channel strategy, we think, has been effective. And then, again, adding additional software integration, which gives us new distribution for new business. So you have the existing customers further penetrating. And now we have a direct sales force of probably 75-plus with some of our acquisitions and 120 software partners, which provides opportunities for new customer wins. And then all that stacks up, and that's the growth algorithm. So it's still largely -- to answer your question, the biggest opportunity we think is existing customer penetration, but certainly have put ourselves in a position to grow new customer wins as well with the direct sales force and the software partners.

Andrew Schmidt analyst
#21

That's helpful. And then in terms of just switching gears to M&A. Clearly, you guys have been very successful in the past several years in terms of M&A. It seems like a core competency. But as you look across the spectrum, you shifted the mix towards B2B. Should we expect that sort of debt to continue? Do you continue to focus on B2B? Are there opportunities in your other verticals? Just a question in terms of strategic priorities when it comes to M&A?

John Morris executive
#22

Yes, sure. So we actually look for some key attributes when we're making acquisitions, obviously, integrations, the ability to obviously process payments and things that match well with what we do, the underserved markets that we look for. So we would like to continue to expand our offerings in our verticals and subverticals in B2B. We like to complement our existing loan repayment verticals. There could be some opportunities out there for some verticals that are something totally different than that. My goal here is to manage this for the long term, where we can create the most long-term shareholder value, which I think as we are set up well for long-term growth, if you look at just how underpenetrated and underserved the existing market verticals are, and we're talking as to $4 trillion number, and we're just processing a few billion. So we truly love -- we love where the future can hold when we -- obviously, post-pandemic on a normalized basis, we like even more what we see but we will continue to look at opportunities that can make us stronger, that can give us additional software integrations that we talked about. So that's where we'll see to continue to spend our time. As I'm looking 3 to 5 years out, both of our large verticals are growing really nicely organically and should continue to do that, especially on a post-pandemic basis. We think that we don't forecast acquisitions. We don't have to do those. We do think when the opportunity is there to find really attractive assets, we don't get to choose when something is for sale. We do get to choose to participate with their buying. We have a history of picking up very talented people with our acquisitions as we build out our strategy, and we like that a lot. And that seems to match well with some of the size of assets we're looking at. There are some bigger assets probably that will come around out there, something that we'll look at from time to time. We think we have built a core competency around our ability to integrate things. We have a very detailed methodology we go through internally to do that. And so far, those integrations have gone really well from the things we've acquired just in the last 12 months. We're on track and on pace to continue to do what we need to do there. So we will be -- we do have a strong pipeline there. It is very actionable, certain things, but we're pretty disciplined around that. We want to do what's best for our shareholders and complement the things we continue to be doing. But we are excited about what's out there.

Andrew Schmidt analyst
#23

And how about the competitive environment for deals? Typically, they have been on the smaller end of the spectrum, maybe have flown under the radar. But has there been a change in the deals that you're looking at, a change in competitive intensity in terms of bidders? B2B payments is obviously a very hot category, but it's also very fragmented. There's a lot of different players. So -- but just more broadly, just looking out, how is the competitive intensity from a deal perspective changed?

Timothy Murphy executive
#24

Yes. I mean, look, for example, our CPS deal was pretty competitive. They started their process pre-COVID and kind of put things on hold, but we know they had several bidders at that time, both strategic and financial. And we basically stayed in front of them. And because we have our internal team that's focused on this everyday, sourcing deals as well as executing deals, we were able to get in front of them when they were ready to come back to market and basically get ahead of the competition. So the players that were there pre-COVID, I think they probably were kind of hanging around the hoop and would have been there when they came back to market, but because we were so ahead of that process, we were able to win, and we were able to act fast. And as you saw, we announced it, signing of it and then closed within just a few weeks. So we acted really quickly on that one. And I think that's what gave us an advantage there. And we do see, though, specifically within B2B, it's become more competitive. Again, still very fragmented, so you're seeing both financial and strategic buyers. And we think, though, having our own team focused on this every day really helps in that we've seen some success with that. So -- but we're always cognizant of multiples. We're always cognizant of financing and then we try to set up earn-out structures. So the purchase price kind of comes down over time, assuming growth continues. And we think those structures have done well for us and aligned incentives. And so we're trying to continue to be thoughtful about headline price, but additionally structuring deals and then the financing falls out of that.

Andrew Schmidt analyst
#25

That makes sense. Yes. Okay. That's helpful. And then in terms of small versus large deals, would you consider a larger, more transformational deal? Or is it going to be more of what you've done traditionally, which is bolt-ons? Just curious whether there's any size preferences.

John Morris executive
#26

Well, if you look at our history, obviously, the bolt-ons have been something we've done really well. But there will be some opportunity out there for something that's more meaningful. We understand and see some things like that. So that will ultimately be a bigger long term decision we'll do what's best for the shareholders. If something that can make us much stronger and bigger and better that can deliver even better shareholder value creation, we would heavily consider that. But we -- again, we're going to keep executing on what we've been doing and see how those things develop.

Timothy Murphy executive
#27

Yes. I mean, I think we're at 2.3x net leverage today. So we still have capacity on our balance sheet. We have access to debt financing in our existing facilities. One of the reasons we wanted to become public was to be able to access the equity capital markets, which we've now done a couple of times in the last 6 months. And we think for a larger deal, we would be able to do that as well. So as John said, I think we've been successful doing the deals with the size we've done, but there are opportunities out there, and we think we could act on those if it made a lot of sense for us. So that's part of the team's review process as well as there are scale benefits to some of those larger deals. And we own our own back-end processor. So the processing cost synergies can be much more meaningful now that we can bring that in-house. So that's something we look very closely at, too. And as there's a lot more dollar volume with these bigger companies, there's a lot more synergy potential.

Andrew Schmidt analyst
#28

Yes. That certainly makes a lot of sense. This has been a great conversation. I want to wrap up with just 1 last question. If we were to look 3 to 5 years out, how does the business mix change? Does your dominant vertical go from being loan repayments to B2B? Can you -- do you see B2B getting up to maybe 40% to 50% of the business? And then correspondingly, it seems like there would be a combination of organic and inorganic factors. What -- if there is a mix shift, what sort of gets you to that point?

John Morris executive
#29

Sure, yes. So we do see B2B growing. We do see -- so both of our large verticals are growing really nicely organically. So all things considered without inorganic growth, it's kind of hard for B2B to catch loan repayment because it's going to be growing that well. So inorganic, which is where we spent resources in the last 12 to 18 months, has been -- is what's built B2B faster. I see that continue to happen. So I can see us -- I'm not sure if we get to the high end of the range you were talking about for a percentage of our business, but I do see that piece of it growing even more. But it's going to be hard to catch our B2B vertical because it's growing so well organically and if we were to make any inorganic acquisition over there. So that's a good -- to me, as you, that is a good problem to have. That contributes to this whole secular tailwind of the shift to digital shift to electronic. We think there's plenty of built up demand inside of our -- just our existing customers and we like the way our organic pipelines look and, as Tim said, as well as our integrations. So we're excited about what the next 3 to 5 years happens just organically and if you add on the inorganic pieces, we think that can only make us better.

Andrew Schmidt analyst
#30

That makes a lot of sense. That's great to hear. Well, this has been a really good conversation. Thank you, John. Thank you, Tim. Really appreciate the time. Thanks for joining us at Fintech conference this year.

John Morris executive
#31

Thank you.

Timothy Murphy executive
#32

Thank you. Nice to speak with you. Have a good day.

Andrew Schmidt analyst
#33

Good to speak with you. You too. Bye.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Repay Holdings Corporation transcript - plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.

Get an API key View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Repay Holdings Corporation earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server. Quarterly plans from $105 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.