Stepan Company (SCL) Earnings Call Transcript

Good morning and welcome to the Stepan Company Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this call is being recorded on Wednesday, October 28, 2026. It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Mr. Ruben Velasquez, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Stepan Company. Mr. Velasquez, please go ahead.

Thanks, Sherry. Good morning, and thank you for joining Stepan Company's Third Quarter 2026 Financial Review. Before we begin, please note that information in this conference call contains forward-looking statements, which are not historical facts. These statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially, including, but not limited to, prospects for our foreign operations, global and regional economic conditions and factors detailed in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings. In addition, this conference call will include discussions of adjusted net income, adjusted EBITDA, free cash flow, net debt and leverage-related metrics, which are non-GAAP measures. We provide reconciliations to the comparable GAAP measures in the earnings presentation and press release, which we have made available at www.stepan.com under the Investors section of our website. Whether you are joining us online or over the phone, we encourage you to review the investor slide presentation. We make these slides available at approximately the same time as when the earnings release is issued, and we hope that you find information and perspectives helpful. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Mr. Luis Rojo, our President and Chief Executive Officer.

Thank you, Ruben. Good morning, and thank you all for joining us today to discuss our third quarter 2026 results. I will share the highlights of the quarter and an update on our key strategic priorities, while Ruben will take you through the financial details. Before reviewing the quarter, I want to recognize our teams around the world for their commitment to safety. Safety remains our top priority and the foundation of everything we do at Stepan. Our safety performance over the last 12 months remained strong. The third quarter was another quarter of earnings growth for Stepan. The 3 segments delivered organic volume growth and increased earnings versus the prior year. Adjusted EBITDA was $66 million, up 18% versus the prior year, driven by global volume growth, margin recovery and Project Catalyst savings. Surfactant adjusted EBITDA was up 27%. Polymers grew single digits, including onetime maintenance turnaround costs at our Germany site. And Specialty Products grew EBITDA single digits, driven by double-digit volume growth. On a consolidated basis, adjusted earnings per diluted share were $0.94, nearly double the prior year. Now I want to highlight a few elements of our third quarter performance. First, volume growth. Organic volume grew 7% with growth in all 3 segments. Surfactant organic volume was up 8%, and the growth was broad-based across most of the end markets. Polymers volume was up 3% with North America growing strong double digits. And Specialty Products delivered 20% volume growth behind a strong innovation plan in our MCT product line. We are pleased with the growth we achieved in several of our key strategic end markets despite ongoing global economic uncertainties and supply chain disruptions. Second, margin recovery and pricing discipline. Raw material cost continues to increase in a volatile environment, including the disruption related to the Middle East conflict. Our pricing actions, together with our disciplined execution of our contractual pass-through mechanism offset those higher costs. Third, productivity and cost out. Project Catalyst continues to deliver savings, and we are now projecting to exceed the 60% target for 2026. Finally, we remain focused on cash generation and balance sheet deleveraging. Our net leverage improved to 2.4x. Free cash flow was positive at $8 million despite a further investment in working capital. In October, we closed the sale of a parcel of land near our Millsdale site for $28.5 million. The full cash proceeds will be used to pay down debt and continue to deleverage the balance sheet in November. Through the first 9 months of the year, adjusted EBITDA is up 15% and adjusted earnings per share are up 40% versus the prior year. We remain committed to a balanced approach to capital allocation. During the quarter, we continued to invest in working capital. We executed our capital plan across our site, and we paid $9 million in dividends. Finally, we increased our quarterly dividend by $0.01 per share or 2.5%, marking the 59th consecutive year that Stepan has increased its dividend. With that, I will turn the call back to Ruben to walk you through the financial details for the quarter.

Thank you, Luis. As shared in our third quarter 2026 earnings release, reported net income was $17.8 million or $0.78 per diluted share, up 64% versus $10.8 million or $0.47 per diluted share in the prior year. Reported results include a $5.6 million pretax restructuring charge largely related to the previously announced close of our Fieldsboro, New Jersey site, the decommissioning of select assets at our Millsdale, Illinois and the Stalybridge, United Kingdom facilities and the global salaried workforce reduction we announced in July. Let's move to Slide 6, which shows the adjusted net income bridge for the third quarter of 2026 versus the third quarter of last year. Adjusted net income was $21.7 million or $0.94 per diluted share, up 98% versus $10.9 million or $0.48 per diluted share in the prior year. The increase in adjusted net income was primarily due to higher surfactant earnings with additional contributions from polymers and specialty products, partially offset by higher corporate expenses and a higher tax provision on the stronger earnings. Adjusted corporate expenses increased by $1 million or 6%, primarily due to higher incentive-based compensation associated with the improved operating performance. Slide 7 shows the total company adjusted EBITDA bridge. Adjusted EBITDA was $66.3 million, up $10.1 million or 18% versus the prior year. This increase was primarily due to higher surfactant earnings driven by sales volume growth and margin recovery with Polymers and Specialty Products also up, partially offset by $1.6 million of higher corporate expenses, reflecting higher incentive-based compensation. I will now cover each segment in more detail. Turning to Surfactants on Slide 8. Net sales were $487 million, up 15% versus the prior year. Selling prices were up 10%, primarily due to the pass-through of higher raw material costs and targeted pricing actions. Reported volume grew 3% and organic volume increased 8%. Foreign currency translation positively impacted net sales by 2%. The organic growth was led by double-digit increases in consumer products, including laundry, Construction & Industrial and oilfield end markets, partially offset by lower crop productivity demand. Surfactants adjusted EBITDA was $48 million, up $10 million or 27% versus the prior year. North America and Asia earnings improved on organic volume growth in Consumer Products, oilfield and Construction & Industrial, together with margin recovery. Latin America earnings increased on double-digit organic volume growth, pricing execution and margin recovery. Europe was modestly lower as reduced crop productivity demand more than offset growth in our consumer end markets. Moving to Polymers on Slide 9. Net sales were $179 million, a 24% increase versus the prior year. Selling prices were up 22%, primarily due to the pass-through of higher raw material costs. Sales volume increased 3% in the quarter. North American volume was up double digits, driven by rigid polyols and Phthalic Anhydride, including continued significant growth in our spray foam product line. This growth was partially offset by softer demand in Europe and Asia. Foreign currency translation negatively impacted net sales by 1%. Polymer adjusted EBITDA was $23 million, up 4% versus the prior year as North America's strong volume growth in rigid polyol, spray foam and Phthalic Anhydride more than offset the 5-year regulatory mandated maintenance turnaround costs at the company's Germany site, lower rigid polyol volume in Europe and softer demand in China. North America EBITDA was up $3 million on volume growth and margin improvement. Europe was down $2 million, primarily due to the maintenance turnaround at our Germany site. Asia was slightly lower on softer demand for specialty polyols in China, partially offset by improved rigid polyol margins. Specialty Products net sales were $27 million, a 12% increase versus the prior year and volume increased 20%. Adjusted EBITDA was $11.7 million, up 5% versus the prior year, primarily due to higher volume in the MCT product line, partially offset by less favorable product mix. Now turning to cash flow and the balance sheet on Slide 10. Cash flow from operations before working capital was $49 million in the third quarter, while free cash flow was $8 million after $21 million of capital expenditures. Free cash flow reflected a $32 million working capital build from accounts receivables, account payables and inventories, driven by stronger sales and higher raw material costs. Free cash flow included $6 million of restructuring-related cash payments. We ended the quarter with net debt of $536 million. Our net leverage ratio improved to 2.4x from 2.7x a year ago, reflecting continued progress in deleveraging. Improving cash flow and further strengthening the balance sheet remain key priorities across the organization. Moving to Slide 15 and Project Catalyst. Through September, we have recognized $76 million of pretax restructuring charges. The year-to-date cash impact of restructuring is $13 million. Project Catalyst continues to deliver savings in line with our plan. The savings run rate increased to approximately $23 million in the third quarter. These savings were partially offset by inflationary pressures on operating expenses. For 2026, we expect to exceed the 60%, 2-year $100 million pretax savings target. With that, I will turn the call back to Luis for an update on our strategic priorities and Project Catalyst.

Thanks, Ruben. Our strategy continues to be anchored in 4 pillars: First, customer-centric innovation to drive top line growth, diversification of our markets and customers with a focus on higher growth end markets and Tier 2 and Tier 3 accounts. Third, operational excellence, including the reliability and resiliency of our manufacturing network and supply chain; and fourth, financial strength through the free cash flow generation, deleveraging the balance sheet and disciplined capital allocation. We continue to make progress against these priorities during the quarter. Surfactants showed consistent and broad-based growth in the third quarter. Year-to-date, we have more than 300 new customers, and we have delivered nearly 900 new customer and product combination in this business with our global Tier 2 and Tier 3 customer base growing double digits. Additionally, we delivered a strong double-digit growth in North America polymers and our MCT product line. We delivered this growth while continuing to recover margin in an inflationary raw material environment, which reflects disciplined commercial execution. The Middle East conflict has added volatility to fixed costs and supply chains, and we believe we are well positioned to manage that disruption. Our regional manufacturing footprint keeps production close to our customers with a particular advantage in the United States. Our dual petrochemical and oleochemical raw material streams give us flexibility on feedstock management and maximize customer supply. Finally, we continue to improve the reliability and resiliency of our manufacturing network. Our flagship Millsdale site had a great quarter in terms of production volumes and improving all key operating metrics. Our Pasadena, Texas site continues to ramp up production and deliver the expected supply chain savings embedded in Project Catalyst. Pasadena remains a critical enabler for strategic future growth in specialty alkoxylates. Let's move to Slide 12 for an update on Project Catalyst. As a reminder, Project Catalyst is our comprehensive plan to further optimize our asset base and create a more productive and agile organization to enable balanced growth. We're executing the program safely and in line with expectations. Third quarter run rate savings was approximately $23 million, and we have identified actions that we believe will enable us to exceed the $25 million per quarter goal on average during 2027. We executed the organizational redesign phase of Project Catalyst during the third quarter. This new organization design is a key enabler for us to deliver our balanced growth strategy, which is focused on top line growth, margin recovery and disciplined cost-out initiatives. To conclude, we believe we are positioned to continue delivering growth in our businesses. Despite the ongoing and significant market uncertainties and challenges, the organization continues to be focused on executing our growth opportunities, productivity plans and cash intervention. With these actions and our strong results through the first 9 months of the year, we believe we will deliver full year adjusted EBITDA growth, positive free cash flow and continued deleveraging of the balance sheet in 2026. This concludes our prepared remarks. At this time, we would like to turn the call over for questions. Sherry, please review the instructions for the questions portions of today's call.

[Operator Instructions] And our first question will come from the line of Mike Harrison with Seaport Research Partners.

So really good to see all the pricing that you guys are getting across the 3 segments. I think we're trying to understand a little bit better the margin impact that you're seeing from raw material inflation and how much pricing is offsetting you across the 3 segments. Maybe help us understand where the margin pressure is still a factor from inflation? And should we see further pricing catch-up in Q4? Or maybe when do you neutralize the impact of some of the higher raw material costs that you're seeing?

Great question, Mike. And what I will say is this continues to be a very volatile environment when you think about oil prices and raw materials. I think we did a pretty good job in Q2 and Q3. I don't want to focus too much in quarterly numbers. But when you think about on a year-to-date basis and you look at our margins and you see surfactants double-digit margins, I mean, EBITDA margins, you see polymers in the 13% to 15% EBITDA margins. Those are healthy margins, and we will continue to work on productivity to make sure that we have the best value for our customers, right? So right now, with the current oil prices, we believe we are in a good position in several places. There are a few places where we are still making some price adjustments. But in general terms, I think the majority have been done. And again, this assumes the oil prices of Q3. We will see what happens in the next few weeks with the raw material environment. But so far, I think the margins for the year are going in the right direction, and we are pleased with the work that our commercial team have done, not only to have decent margins, but to be able to grow our volumes 4%. 4% organic volume growth in the first 9 months is almost a record, right? I mean this is a significant amount of volume growth. And we want to make sure that we -- I have talked a lot about balanced growth. And again, I want to continue balancing volumes, margins and of course, cash, but we need to keep our reactors full, and that's what we are after.

All right. And then in terms of Project Catalyst, it sounds like the savings there are running ahead of plan for both 2026 and maybe the longer-term run rate into '27. I guess the way we were thinking about it is you'd get about $60 million worth of savings this year and then the incremental $40 million coming next year. But how should we think about Project Catalyst contribution to further earnings growth in '27 versus '26. Is $40 million still a good number? Or could it be higher or lower than that?

No. Look, good question, Mike. But as we said today, we are ahead of the 60% target for 2026. So we are -- instead of the $60 million, we are more in the $66 million to $70 million range. And we already are delivering $23 million run rate in the savings in Q3. We believe we can be ahead of the $25 million on average for 2027, right? So that means $2 million, $3 million more versus where we are today. Now that's going to be, again, on average for 2027, which means ahead of the $25 million in the second half, slightly below the $25 million in the first half as we continue ramping up production in Pasadena, as we continue implementing other projects that we have in the pipeline. So that's the main component of the gradual savings increases in the next 4 to 5 quarters. And remember that we have been very clear that these are the savings from Project Catalyst. We also have the normal inflation in our P&L. You know that our fixed cost base is roughly $800 million. That's public information. And you can factor the normal 2%, 3% on the inflation piece on that base, and we will continue working on productivity, as I said before, to provide the best value that we can to our customers.

All right. Just a couple more for me. Apologies if I missed this earlier, but what was the impact of the maintenance costs in Germany in the Polymers business in Q3? And is that cost completely isolated to Q3? Or is there some carryover into Q4 or next year?

Yes, Mike. Effectively, as you mentioned, we have that turnaround in Europe in our Germany site. That's a turnaround that happens every 4 years. It's regulated, it's mandated. And the impact on the Polymers business for Q3 was $2 million plus driven by that maintenance.

Remember, Mike, that we talked last quarter that we had $4 million, $5 million of headwinds in turnaround maintenance costs, both Germany and the U.S. So Germany was more Q3. You will see the impact in Q4 in U.S. with all the maintenance and turnaround costs that we need to do in our PA facility. So it's coming in line as expected and as planned.

All right. And then last quarter, you had talked a little bit about some volume that you felt like was being pulled forward or some prebuying that might be happening. I think at the time you expected that maybe that was as much as a $10 million impact to EBITDA. Now that we're sitting here in October and maybe you have the numbers to fully understand how much impact you saw. Is there any way to help understand how much stronger Q2 was than what might have been normal and how much weaker, I guess, that made Q3? Any color on that would be helpful.

No, yes. I agree, Mike, that we talked about the $5 million to $10 million impact from Q3 to Q2 last call. I will say that some of that was expected on the volume side, but a lot of that was expected on the margin side as well, right? I mean we grew in Q2 6% volume, but the reality is that we grew with lower cost inventory in our tank. Now we're accelerating the growth actually to 7% with a different mix, with a different mix than we had in Q2 as well and with a normalized cost position in our tanks and our inventory. So what I will say is that I think the best way to look at Q2, Q3 will be averaging both. When you think about the $75 million and the $66 million, there was some swing for sure, but delivering $140 million in those 2 quarters shows the discipline of our execution plan, shows a strong volume growth, which, let's be clear, when you think about 6% volume in Q2 and 7% volume in Q3, we are expecting a lower growth in Q4 for sure. When you think about the year, when you include also Q1, we're growing volumes 4% on an organic basis. That's still a very strong performance when these markets are basically not growing, right? These markets are 0% to 1% growth. So that 4% growth on volume is coming from a lot of new customers and share growth in the different end markets. So we're happy with a 4% volume growth. If we can continue that throughout the year, that will be an outstanding year of volume growth for Stepan Company.

One moment for our next question. And that will come from the line of Dave Storms with Stonegate.

Luis, I actually wanted to go back to kind of what you just mentioned around margin growth coming from both new customers and share growth. I was hoping, given you mentioned approximately 340 new customers, 900 new combinations, can you help us understand how much of the margin growth came from new customers versus share growth?

No. Look, when you're growing volume 7%, of course, you have the benefit of reducing all the fixed cost and improving the margins this way. So again, we are seeing very strong performance in the surfactants business when you think about especially the Americas, you can do the math, right? On a year-to-date basis, our Surfactant business grew EBITDAR in all the regions. I mean, grew EBITDAR in North America, grew EBITDAR in Latin America, actually even grew EBITDAR very slightly, but grew EBITDAR in Europe. So the business -- the Surfactant business continues to be strong based on share growth, Tier 2, Tier 3 strength and actually a few very good quarters on the crop productivity business. Q3 was a little bit softer. But when you think about the year, crop productivity is still okay and still positive. So we feel good about the Surfactant business. And when you think about polymers, again, very strong performance in North America with a strong double-digit growth. The rigid business is strong, and we are growing a lot of share in spray foam and in PA. We have talked the PA business in the past. It's not secret. We are growing significantly in the PA business. So we feel good about how the margin profile is going vis-a-vis the leverage that you have when you are growing volumes 4% or 6% or 7%. Again, this is not related to one side of one customer or the others. I mean this is across the board.

Understood. Appreciate that. You also -- in that answer, you mentioned North America polymers is growing strong, but Europe and Asia still remain weak on the polymer side. Any green shoots there? Any signs of improvements? Is that just a macro story? Anything we should keep an eye out for there?