Home / Transcripts / Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) · August 7, 2023

Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) Earnings Call Transcript

August 7, 2023

New York Stock Exchange US Financials Financial Services conference_presentation 43 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Unknown Analyst analyst
#1

All right. Here we go. So on behalf of Susquehanna and my group in the fintech team here, I am delighted to again this year be hosting this conversation with Shift4. It has been an exciting company to have covered since the IPO, and we have learned a lot from them and their refreshing perspective both on this industry and industry in general and even like they're just a delightful company to be covering and exciting. So with us from the company, we have Jared and Taylor and Nancy and Tom. And the structure of this one, guys, is going to be that if people want to ask questions, I'll just say this in advance, there's an app on the Open Exchange, and you can ask through there. And then I'll -- more than -- I'd be more than happy to get them in. Your questions are the most important, so I want to make sure we get them addressed.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#2

But to start out, and I'll address this to Jared. I'm just curious what's top of mind for you these days? We're fresh off earnings. What would you describe as the priorities you think the company looks to achieve both near and longer term?

Jared Isaacman executive
#3

Yes. So again, thanks for having us. I guess the best way to answer that question, I mean, number one, I mean it's certainly expanding internationally. So I know we've said it many times, but we've been in the payments industry for 24 years. We grew revenue every year, 24 consecutive years even during the downturn. And why that matters is this is an incredibly competitive market, right? So we clearly have product services and integrations that are able -- that enable us to differentiate and win U.S., and now we want to bring those same capabilities into new markets. And we're incredibly fortunate that we have, hands down, the best strategic customer that you can ask for that's guiding us into all these new markets. And we achieved a pretty significant milestone with the first market, which is Europe. So now we're ready to do the second part of that story, which is bring in all those successful products and services that work for us here in the U.S. into those markets. So I think really top of mind, of course, international expansion; two is now bringing SkyTab, which we're having a lot of momentum with here in the U.S. into the European market. So I'd say those are like kind of top 2 things. And obviously, there's a lot there. International expansion is a very big deal. Big milestones there. Second, bringing products and services on markets like SkyTab in Europe, which we're really getting much closer to prime time for in that geographic region. And then I'd say like the next part of it is, is really just continued implementation of the Shift4 way, which we've been talking about for a couple of years. And as a reminder, these are kind of philosophies that I learned during my time with SpaceX that I think enable an organization to execute at just a different level. And we started that journey 2 years ago. And it involves taking out a lot of parts, which may be more efficient and able to execute a lot faster. And we're doing that, and it's reflected in our gateway sunset initiative and sunsetting legacy POS brands to consolidate around SkyTab. And the results of which are margin expansion and higher free cash flow conversion, greater customer satisfaction. So it's lower attrition, signing new customers, and those are all like early days and playing out really well. So that's kind of our focus areas right now. You're muted, sorry.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#4

Oh, boy, that's embarrassing. Thank you. I was hoping you could talk about the competitive landscape across the end markets that can specifically comprise your high-growth core. For people who are newer, maybe explain what high-growth core means to the company and then the competitive landscape.

Jared Isaacman executive
#5

Sure. So yes, we call our high-growth course basically the business we were at the time of our IPO, which is restaurants, hotels, and kind of sounds like specialty retail. Of course, we've moved into a number of new verticals since, which are all doing well. But with respect to the core, which is kind of like you can count on this. We've been winning in these verticals for a very long time and expect to continue to do so. The competitive landscape varies based on kind of the lane you're going after. So with respect to restaurants, which is a component of our high-growth core, the landscape is really -- it's Toast and Shift4. And we both are doing a really great job winning from a lot of legacy players, older Windows-based systems, terminals, nonintegrated solutions. There's a lot of ground to go in that. That's not slowing down at all. Then there's hotels, which are probably our top competitors, U.S. Bank and [ Ola ]. We probably have, I don't know, some 5% share of hotels a handful of years ago. We talked about 40%. It's probably our fastest growing vertical, which is hospitality. It's also the one that's like shockingly the most resilient of all in the current economic climate. I mean you still got great same-store sales growth within hotels, and we're taking a ton of share. And then complex retail, which is like UPS stores and customer. Fanatics is a customer with their retail locations. That varies. You're taking share from kind of, I'd say, equally across all of the players. But it's a good question because even our core, even when we do -- what we've done well for decades is more than restaurants, which I think people kind of forget at times with the Shift4 story.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#6

So with regard to restaurants, how has the focus POS acquisition been playing out? And can you remind us what the connection to SkyTab looks like for that suite?

David Lauber executive
#7

Yes, sure. This is Taylor. I'll cover that. So Focus POS was an acquisition we completed in the first quarter. The idea behind this acquisition was actually a playbook that we ran incredibly successfully about 6 years ago, which is a phenomenal restaurant point-of-sale software with lots of customers using it, and yet those customers are using multiple different vendors for the payment experience. So while they're loyalty and interact with the Focus POS software every single day, the payments are typically an add-on from any number of third parties. And not only is it expensive, but it's also been [ stressful ] to manage. And we said we can acquire this business. We can tightly integrate the Shift4 payments experience. Any customer using the software gets an amazing software and payments experience bundled right out of the box, and they should be more successful in the market as they are. And over time, should merchants want to upgrade the SkyTab, we've got a nice pace of customers to do that from. But in the immediate term, you've had 10,000 customers using Focus Cloud software and not delivering payments to Shift4. So not only is there good long-term synergy in the migration strategy over to SkyTab, but there's awesome short-term synergy in helping out those 10,000 customers that are using multiple vendors. So at the time, we said it's a new acquisition give us a year or 2 to get this one under our belt. But we happy to say in the first quarter of owning that business, we've converted roughly 10% of that 10,000 merchants over. That's about $1.5 billion in payment volume that not only are the customers getting a better experience, but we were able to pull forward as part of our acquisition strategy.

Jared Isaacman executive
#8

Yes. And maybe just to layer on to that a little bit. So I don't know how familiar everybody is kind of with our history. I mean, as Taylor mentioned, this is kind of a small acquisition that just -- it just popped up. We tried to buy them 6 years ago. It's not like we went into 2023 saying this is a deal we need to get done. But the leadership there, Mike Hamm is awesome. He's like a legend and very well respected in the POS payments industry. Any opportunity kind of bringing good talent is always great. But he reached out and said, look, there's an opportunity to revisit this. There's 10,000 accounts here that are not on Shift4. You guys are pretty good at moving them over to payments. And in less than a quarter, we moved 10% over our already. So that's a pretty sizable, like $15 billion payment opportunity that we've proven works very well on how we run our playbook. But I also kind of want to point out, like this is our playbook. We don't apologize for it. We're pretty good at it. At the time that we started pursuing the restaurant ISV vertical 6 years ago, we were like a $50 million EBIT business. I think we've updated guidance towards the end of the year. We're saying, hey, we're almost 10x that. So we're pretty good at finding these kind of underappreciated and undervalued assets from time to time. And we have like a bulletproof playbook on how to move those very sticky, integrated payment customers over to our rails. And it's a pretty sizable lift in gross profit. I mean Taylor gave the math last quarter. But you just take 10,000 customers, $1.5 million a year times -- even throw out 50 basis points, which is 15 south of where our current portfolio blends at, and you can kind of get an idea of the synergy potential of it. We may not hunt these down like Focus POS all the time when they come about. And so it's an opportunity to kind of celebrate. Hopefully, people are starting to realize that.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#9

So we wanted to ask you more about SkyTab and the upselling strategy. For people who were able to attend the SkyTab presentation here in New York, it was -- in my mind, it was an awesome event in part because you got to see the intuitive features and functions that had been built into SkyTab. The ones that I remember are like the way that it fits into the waiter/waitresses' apron. The way they integrate in the back end so that the presentation layer back to the bar, for example, is done in a certain way. A lot of the -- and also the way that it fits -- the entire menu fits relative to, say, the competition. These are all very intuitive things that even someone like me could relate to. So I appreciated that demo. So we want to get your perspective in upselling. What's the value proposition if you had to name a couple of SkyTab versus some of your competitors?

Jared Isaacman executive
#10

Yes. Well, I mean, look, I think the fact that you were there, you got to see SkyTab in action should just kind of, I don't know, dispel some of the mystique around restaurant point-of-sale payments that there's nothing cosmic about ringing up a cheeseburger. We've been saying it for a couple of years now. We've put it in our earnings reports. It's like we're very good at restaurants. We've literally been growing high double digits in the restaurant vertical for like 20 years. And we've always run into the next player who's going to -- winner take all, right? I mean at one point, it was Square, then it was Revel, it was NCR Silver, TouchBistro. And it's like the end of the day, right, you're ringing up a cheeseburger. You want to add onions, drop tomatoes. Like we love being in the restaurant vertical. But we also like being in 6 or 7 other verticals that are growing really quickly at it, too. So anyway, with respect to like competitive advantages, I think both us and Toast are advantaged in that we have a fully cloud-based solution. So why is that important and not just like buzzwords, it's -- in today's world, restaurants are relying on lots of different software to grow their business. They have integrations. They require integrations into Uber Eats, Door Dash, Grubhub, Payable, Loyalty, Gift. They want to be able to run their business from their cell phone and like see real-time stats on what's working and what's not, have great insights into labor management such like they can keep their expenses and revenue track. Cloud solutions do this really well. On-private solutions do not. So if you deliver that [ COG ]-based solution, it brings up a cheeseburger well and provides all those good business intelligence insights, and it costs a lot less. I mean, I think we tried to illustrate in our earnings report that our solution is probably like 1/3, 1/5 the cost of our competitor over a multiyear period of time, then you're going to win. And they're going to win, too. And that's fine because it's a really big market, and I think both organizations have our sites set on the globe. So there's plenty of business to chase down. But I think that's pretty -- a lot of expertise over decades of being in the vertical, cloud-based solution that runs on Android, sexy handheld devices at an attractive price point. That's how you win.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#11

And then sticking with the restaurant theme and zooming out a bit, can you talk about for strategy when it comes to marketing and winning more merchants and distributing more terminals in the restaurant vertical more broadly?

Jared Isaacman executive
#12

Yes. Well, I mean I can answer it for restaurants, but it's really a factor of the entire business, which is we do everything we can to get a foot in the door with a customer and then grow wallet share over time. So good examples of that would be over our history, we bought 2 gateways that got us over $200 billion in volume where, over time, we can move to our N10 platform and get a 3 or 5x lift in gross profit and provide them an overall lower cost of service. And we also have acquired ISVs, like Focus POS and others where you have just the software relationship, and then you can leverage that, you get payments as well and deliver them a lower cost ownership. And what I would say is that kind of wallet share growth strategy of the business is like half of our production, and that has worked very well for a long time and will continue to work well for like a decade into the future. And then we also build really good products that allow us to go out and just win new restaurants and new hotels, and that's the other 50% of our business. So when you see like Virgin hotels being announced this quarter, it was never a gateway customer. It was never a software customer. That's an example of just winning a net new customer. But if you take Clyde's Group, for example, which we talked about this quarter, which is Old Ebbitt Grill, historic restaurant in Washington, D.C., that was the software-only customer that moved over to end-to-end. And now they're paying less. But from our perspective, it was like probably a 5x uplift in gross profit. So this is kind of our strategy. So in terms of marketing and getting the word out there, we're very good at creating noise and making the phone ring. Generally, we let the products drive the demand and let customer referrals do a good part of it. But I see this past quarter, an opportunity was presented to us where maybe some trust was shaken with one of our competitors, and we decided to use a little bit of our growing free cash flow to put some marketing out there and some incentives in order to stimulate growth further, and it's working. It's bringing a ton of demand.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#13

So I just want to mention again, there's a tab in the top right corner, a tab that people could drop down. If you want to ask questions. Or you could just hit me on the Bloomberg and I'll ask them for you, or you can send me an e-mail. So I wanted to pivot over to hotels for a second. Within hotels, how does Shift4 approach that market differently versus, say, restaurants? And contractually, what might be some key differences, especially if the hotel has a franchise model?

Jared Isaacman executive
#14

Yes. So I think the key to winning hotels is a unique 550-plus software integrations that like basically solve every possible combination of software required in a hotel resort. If you're even short one integration, you're out of the mix, right? So you take some of our customers that we -- whether it's Virgin Hotels or Pebble Beach, for example, you're not going to be able to win that relationship if you don't have a key integration. Pebble Beach is not going to switch and say, okay, you can do everything for me but our golf [ houses ]. That's not going to work. All the software has to be able to talk to each other, work over common tokenization, encryption and business intelligence and settlement for the entire resort environment in all of the revenue centers. So the point is you need 550-plus software integrations across a lot of years of urgent history to even have a seat at the table. And there's 3 companies in North America that can do that. They're Shift4. There's one that I mentioned before that lives inside U.S. Bank. And then there's 1/3, which just does gateway services, so only owns kind of one piece of the value chain. And as a result, all those software companies I mentioned before that all have huge teams of sales force out in the market trying to win hotels will steer those customers to Shift4 because they know the overall cost of ownership for payments will be less because there's simply just less hands in the pie and we're able to provide a lot more value to the [indiscernible]. For the devices, we basically only experience end-to-end. So the merchant gets a lower cost of ownership. These software companies have less pain and friction in the sales process. And it probably also comes down to a much narrower competitive landscape when you have, again, only other 2 competitors that are capable of addressing the vertical, and we just have more links in that value chain. Just kind of the one throat to choke or one hand to shake-type environment. I don't know if there's anything you want to add, Taylor?

David Lauber executive
#15

No. You covered it well.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#16

So about that, what are some of the metrics you track when thinking about customer stickiness across the high-growth core more generally? I mean you're saying that there's a ton of software on the back end, say, for hotels. I would assume that, that would imply that it is really durable and sticky in that respect. But how is the churn in there?

David Lauber executive
#17

Yes. So the churn is incredibly low. I mean what you'd find basically with any merchant that's using software that's tightly integrated to a payment experience is the churn is substantially lower than a merchant who is using a nonintegrated or stand-alone payment experience for the obvious reasons. As the merchant uses more and more software, the stickiness grows in conjunction with that. So these are -- for better or worse, these are mature markets. You don't typically have a lot of new businesses popping up and/or failing inside of these verticals. And so you can imagine a merchant that's relying on 20 or 30 or 70 different pieces of software to power their estate and every one of those needs to work flawlessly with the payment experience, they are very hesitant to switch that out. And as Jared mentioned, the competitors that can serve them are so few and far between that it really doesn't behoove them to do so. So what they're asking for is an experience that works reliably, 100% of the time, no matter what, and also an enhanced view of their customer. They want to be able to follow their customers throughout this web of revenue centers in a reliable way. And if Shift4 can provide all that, plus make things easier like your device management, like calling one vendor for 5 or 6 things that might have been separate phone calls before, the customer is highly likely to stay.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#18

Okay. I wanted to shift over to consumer spending trends. What's your view on how consumer spend feels these days? Are there any pockets of weakness that have appeared? Or is it generally running at or better than expected?

David Lauber executive
#19

Well, so I'll start, and then if Nancy wants to layer in. I would say we've been pessimists for a long time on this topic, and we're happy to be proven wrong. So consumer spending has been quite resilient. It does feel like the economy is firing on slightly different cylinders, though. So for example, you had really strong restaurant trends in 2021 as a result of the pandemic, but you hadn't yet had hotel travel pick up. And so while we've seen restaurants moderate, you're not seeing spending decrease, but you're also not seeing it grow substantially. Hotels, on the other hand, are going really well, as is sports and entertainment. So it really looks like the consumer to us is eager to spend. However, the categories they're spending on are slightly evolving. As the world is reopened, and they get to engage more experiences, they're seeking that out. And restaurant spending, which has been strong for 2021 and 2022, is holding more than we would have expected, quite frankly.

Nancy Disman executive
#20

Yes. I think Taylor covered it. I mean we remain cautiously optimistic that consumer spending will continue to be resilient, but certainly a little bit more cautious on spending at restaurants moderating.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#21

Okay. I wanted to pivot over to sports and entertainment. How is the market here different from or similar to the high-growth core? And in your answer, if you could talk a little bit about the importance of ticketing, I think that would be instructive.

David Lauber executive
#22

Yes. Well, I would say it's incredibly similar to many other merchants in our high-growth court, which is walking through a stadium is not incredibly dissimilar from walking through a big resort. When you think about the number of revenue centers that you engage with, what the operator of that stadium is trying to deal with their fans, they're trying to push mobile engagement, they're trying to predict what you want, they're trying to bring you a beer and a hotdog in your seat if that makes your experience better. So the ability to stitch all these revenue centers together and provide a common both commerce experience and payment experience for the merchant and fan is incredibly valuable. So our success in stadiums, having had none at the time of our IPO, well over 100 now really being a category leader for us, is not at all surprising because we identified stadiums as a vertical that could use a solution like Shift4 had pioneered in so many hotels. What has been a surprise to us is that, traditionally, ticket spending has been in a totally separate ecosystem from the stadium itself. And yet as we start to engage with our teams and engage with our venues, they said, this is a major revenue center for me that I need to be able to see alongside of everything else. And can you help with that? So obviously eager to participate in solving that problem for the merchant. We engaged in software integrations with all the largest ticketing platforms and are happy to report today basically the 3 major ticketing platforms in the United States are integrated into Shift4. And therefore, any customer using them can use Shift4 for payments. So how does that work mechanically? A team says, I am using SeatGeek or I'm using Ticketmaster, and you are powering the concessions at the retail and the parking at my stadium. I want to see all the payments through a single settlement engine, through a single set of reports and analytics. Shift4 can do that simply by working with the ticketing provider to say send us the payments when the consumer engages with buying a ticket for that event.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#23

No, that makes a lot of sense, that sequence. Hopefully, you can also help make my teams any better. So I wanted to pivot over to nonprofits. So from the recent earnings call, it sounds like Shift4 has made some significant progress in the not-for-profit front. Can you talk about what you're doing there to win? And what do take rates and profitability typically look like versus say that more traditional parts of your business?

Jared Isaacman executive
#24

Yes, I'm happy to jump on that. So this was the most material update on the nonprofit verticals in almost 2 years since we announced signing St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, which was a heck of an anchor relationship for entering into a new vertical. But what you're seeing with nonprofits is very similar to the ticketing story, where you get good land and expand in a complex payment environment that requires lots of different software to deliver a commerce experience. That's what Shift4 does well. So we have one signature customer, taught us an awful lot. We then reinforced it through the acquisition of The Giving Block, which is its largest nonprofit crypto donation platform. That story is much more about access to 2,200 of the world's greatest nonprofit brands and a ticket to pursuing a $450 billion payments addressable market within the nonprofit space than it is anything we've heard of. And we basically spent again, almost the last 2 years, building out integrations and rails for traditional payment donation volume and then cross-selling all of those existing The Giving Block customers. And it was slow. I mean it takes a long time to get all of the integrations that are needed because these nonprofits use a lot. I mean that's why we were attracted to it. It's not like just a Square app going to like a charitable dinner. I mean they take donations across that are initiated through their CRM system, through their website, through a hosted payment page. Influencers are attracting donations through YouTube and Fortnite. I mean it's complicated, right? So almost 2 years later, you've got a nice breakthrough. Those reference logos, [ National Cancer Society ]. Then we put in Give Lively that we put into our earnings deck. Those are traditional payment wins. So yes, it's been hard to enter a new vertical like that, but now we're getting some real momentum behind it, which that is very much like the Shift4 story. It's the same thing Taylor is talking about. No stadiums really 2 years ago. Now the category leader in the space and not just stopping with like in-seat ordering and concessions. But going for ticketing where you get 5x the volume and 3x the spreads. It's pretty nice like expansion -- land and expand planning out. So -- and that's what we're seeing across e-commerce and gaming and our other verticals that we've entered into since the IPO as well.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#25

So I wanted to ask you about the gateway conversion discussion, which is one that's really attracted a lot of investors. Our view on it is that, to some degree, or can make your own weather through this initiative. So a couple of questions here. The first one is, we're just interested, what does the conversation look like on the back end when you go into the merchant to discuss this topic? And what kind of conversion penetration do you think is realistic?

Jared Isaacman executive
#26

Yes. So I mean this was -- this began in, call it, 5, 6 years ago. It was a $200 billion payment opportunity in cross-sell. It's the last update we gave, which was just a quarter ago, was there's about $150 billion of it left. And what is addressable? All of it. We're doing it all. I mean that's all volume that's going across our rails. We're just getting paid very poorly it. It's not like you have to bolster up the organization to handle another $150 million of volume. We're doing it already. We're just getting paid a couple of cents transaction for it. So the idea that like merchants really want to stay with GPN, Pfizer, I mean nobody wants to have like 5 or 6 people on a conference call pointing fingers at each other when something goes wrong. Like you have a single integrated solution that costs less and solves for real pain points in the business. Well, that's obviously what you choose. So for the last 5, 6 years, the conversion process has been working incredibly well. And really, it's all just timing, right? At the end of the day, we're talking about anywhere from what? Let's just call it round numbers, 50 basis points that a merchant pays for payments, right? Think about everything else that's going on in the world that has more of an impact than 50 basis points. If you're a hypothetically a Four Seasons Hotel and you doubled your room rate over the last couple of years, like 50 basis points, probably not like top of your priority list. So it's our job to sell payment points for that, whether that's mobile payments, pure payments, the next database update for their property management system, new EMV devices because of some like PCI compliance update, giving them SkyTab POS systems for their lobby bar or restaurant at a good rate. Like we have to think constantly about how to approach that population of gateway customers and solve a problem for them. That's more important than 50 basis points, hypothetically, and that's how they move over. And it happens every month. It's about 50% of our production. The nice thing is it's like a gift that will keep on giving for years into the future.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#27

Okay. When you use the word production there, Jared, what does that mean? You mean like volume?

Jared Isaacman executive
#28

No, no, meaning like number of minutes. Like we look at minutes as one of our KPIs, which is just net new customers kind of -- or new customers joining the platform, right? And for at least the last half decade, half of our production comes from just pure net new wins in a very large addressable market. So that's restaurants, hotels, stadiums, e-commerce airlines, right? And then the other half is kind of your wallet share data. That's a software customer using an end-to-end or a gateway customer moving to end-to-end. So I guess, what I'm saying is every month in terms of just production of new customers, half are voluntary needs, gateway or software customers using more of our services; and half comes from just winning a pure new customer like Virgin Hotels, for example.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#29

So about new customer wins. In the past year or so, it feels like Shift4 has won a series of kind of landmark enterprise-level wins across various verticals. How is the company thinking about this part of the business, the same or different versus your historical wins? And financially, how would these deals impact your KPIs?

Jared Isaacman executive
#30

It's only getting better. I mean when you look at every earnings report, I get this is -- it's like a chaotic time in the market, where like everybody just burns the first 4 pages of the earnings release and just flips right to the guidance. But like it's like actually those logos that are in every earnings report that are still delivering the results of the quarter that people don't seem to care as much about, which informs guidance, right? So it's like if you look at the logos, I mean every quarter since a public company, it's only getting better. I mean this past quarter, the happiest place on earth and the most magical place, whatever you want to call it. I mean pretty much every quarter, you're just dropping in a dozen of the best live sports stadiums in the country, the best new hotels that are being built and all the existing ones, whether it's in Vegas or other attractive markets. So we are continuously moving upmarket into the most desirable places where people want to spend time. And it's working, right? I mean look, as Taylor mentioned, we are paying a close eye to consumer sentiment and economic conditions in the market. We have to, given our verticals. When you grow payment volume, 60% year-over-year, I'd be that sensitive if same-store sales declined 1%. It's clearly a factor of winning share and gaining more wallet of your existing customers, and it's working really well. In fact, it's actually what's contributing to the expanding margins and free cash flow of the business. Because at the time of the IPO, when we were almost all restaurants, that is like the most labor-intense customer. And it's the highest customer acquisition cost. I mean it's lots and lots of hardware, and restaurants calls for everything. Changing menu prices, counties have different taxes, manager quit, needs to be retrained. It's very labor-intense. When you're moving into the enterprise customers, it's airlines, it's gaming, huge resorts, stadiums and ticketing. Like you have almost no hardware deployed, so your customer acquisition cost is down. And the amount of overhead that's required to support those customers and all their incremental volume is so minimal. So like we're thrilled about the average customer size going up as much as it has and as many new enterprise customers as we've been winning.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#31

Okay. You alluded to this in the prior answer. But in terms of wallet share, you talked more on the quarterly call on growing share of wallet, and we were hoping you could double-click on that.

Jared Isaacman executive
#32

Yes, I think it's just -- it's -- what's lost in our story is just the gateway conversion and all of our software customers that are just inevitably moving over to our end-to-end solution. And in doing so, they're saving a lot of money and solving a lot of pain points, and it's a huge gross profit lift for us. And maybe the way we've been describing how gateway conversions work or how software-only customers move over and take on SaaS like was too complicated before or underappreciated, which is why we're just saying, look, it's all just a wallet share gain. If you have a gateway customer, or in our case, tens of thousands of them doing a $150 billion year in volume and they decided to move over to end-to-end, we're throwing the switch. In terms of like a wallet share gain, we're taking a ton of revenue away from legacy fires that we were outputting the volume to. So like we said, it's about a 4 to 5x uplift in gross profit for us, and the customer is paying less. The same applies to customers that were just using our software and paying 3 or 4 different vendors when there was a different gateway, different merchant acquirer, buying devices somewhere else. When they switch to end-to-end, all those problems go away. They're paying less. It's a big wallet share gain for us. And that's half the story, as I mentioned before, in terms of our new production.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#33

Okay. We're starting to get some questions from the audience. This one is about, how much can you lean into the Toast trust issue? And if so, could it be an opportunity throughout this year and potentially even to next year?

Jared Isaacman executive
#34

I think the history is a really good indication of future performance, and we have been winning and growing volume high double digits in restaurants for like 20 years. So we don't need a marketing campaign or a misstep by a competitor to ensure continued success. I just think that for a while, people drank the wrong Kool-Aid and thought there was some sort of like AI craziness magic or something going on with the ringing up a cheeseburger and maybe now like regrounding with there's 2 great companies that have the capabilities to go out and win in the restaurant vertical, and we'll both continue to do so in the U.S. and in international markets. And really, the only other difference is, we happen to be really awesome at stadiums, retail and commerce airlines, hotels and a lot of other verticals who are maybe a little more diversified. But does this trust campaign help us? Sure. And are we going to do fine without it? Absolutely.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#35

I wanted to ask you about the margins of the business. It's something that you have really delivered on since the IPO. So how should investors think about the operating efficiencies of the company going forward?

Nancy Disman executive
#36

Yes, I'll take it. I think, Jared kind of mentioned it just now in some of his conversation, but there are so many components. And pretty much, I'd start with everything we're doing right now is margin accretive and free cash flow accretive. It starts with just the overall scalability of the business by maintaining whether it's flat headcount or taking out the parts. We're really streamlining all of operations. I know we kind of teased out a little bit about AI and some of the other investments we're making, really to, I would say, upgrade our internal systems across the board. So pretty much every kind of strategic initiative aimed at expense that we have going on right now is going to improve productivity. And I think the other piece of that, that focuses on expense, but it's really about moving up market, right? What it takes to service our enterprise clients, we are just not adding anything to the SG&A of the business. So while that revenue might come at a lower blended spread, it's completely accretive from a drop-through really straight through to EBITDA and free cash flow. So again, I think the investments are being made, but they're all driving that incremental margin generation that you saw us set into the guide.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#37

And Nancy, can you remind us what you have said about free cash flow conversion targets and what some of the inputs might be?

Nancy Disman executive
#38

Yes, for sure. And we really didn't put out a target. I think we've learned a lot about free cash flow this year. I mean, I think you could see first half of the year really overperforming our guide. We've steadily kind of continued to increase the guide. I would note, I know you just asked about kind of our competitive campaign, whether it's against host or just going out in the restaurant space, all of the kind of investment to do so is included in that new guide that we put out. So it really comes down to the efficiency, right? So there's investments within that. So while we're not targeting, I would say it's probably the guide point that I would say I feel most bullish about when you think about the new increase guide that we just put out.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#39

And then since we're talking about the guidance, can you revisit what the guidance message was? And specifically the contribution from Finaro, how it's baked into the '23 guide?

Nancy Disman executive
#40

Yes. Taylor, do you want to take the Finaro piece first?

David Lauber executive
#41

Yes, sure. So we had included the Finaro transaction in the back half or a portion of it in our guide simply because we've got a really good line of sight on that closing imminently. Had we not included Finaro, we would have increased both the gross revenue less network fees and the EBITDA by $10 million. So that can give you a sense for 2 things: number one, the organic growth inside the business; and also, as Nancy mentioned, the margin expansion. But I think it's worth noting that we do expect Finaro to close, so that's incremental to that. We're not exactly sure when in the quarter it will close, so we gave ourselves some wiggle room inside of the guide framework. But again, it would have increased by $10 million on both gross revenue less network fees and EBITDA.

Nancy Disman executive
#42

Yes. And I think when you think about why is that flowing through at 100%, that really speaks to all of kind of the initiatives that we have going on, on the expense side of the business.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#43

Thank you. That was a great incremental insight. And then I was just curious. Taylor, what is it that accelerated your view about the potential close on Finaro? Was it a regulatory thing? Or why did that move up?

Jared Isaacman executive
#44

I'm just curious to your choice of words, accelerated because we have signed and announced a deal in March 1, 2022. So there is no one on this side [indiscernible] anything was asked about this.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#45

You're right. That's not -- I didn't phrase that right now that I remember that, but still something happened that made you say you could close it now. That's what I was getting at.

David Lauber executive
#46

Yes. It's actually a variety of things. So for those not as close to the story, Finaro operates as a European bank, fully chartered with the U.K. branch as well. So the approval that we've been waiting on, which is the last of a series of different approvals, is the transfer of ownership in a European bank. We've had some really strong developments on that process as well as just a handful of other solutions from our advisers that have pulled the time line in from something that was kind of nebulous and hard to predict into something that's much more predictable.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#47

Got it. Okay. That makes sense now. Okay. Wow, that was a lot. So we started out talking about what was top of mind. For Jared, growing the high growth core. Focus POS was a great discussion. We talked about restaurants, hotels, customer stickiness, consumer spend, sports and entertainment, nonprofits, gateway conversion, enterprise, and then we hit on some of the financials. And we did get more detail on the Finaro impact. So Jared, Nancy Taylor, Tom, thank you all for joining us today. I know you got additional meetings coming up. So we're really grateful.

Jared Isaacman executive
#48

Thank you.

David Lauber executive
#49

Thanks much.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#50

See you again.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Shift4 Payments, Inc. transcript - plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.

Get an API key View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Shift4 Payments, Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server. Quarterly plans from $105 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.