Sienna Senior Living Inc. (SIA) Earnings Call Transcript
November 14, 2025
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Good morning, everyone, and welcome to Sienna Senior Living's Q3 2025 conference call. Nitin Jain, our President and Chief Executive Officer, is hosting today's call alongside David Hung, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Investments of Sienna Senior Living. I'd like to remind you that some of the statements or information we discuss today are forward-looking, and actual results may differ materially. The company does not commit to updating any forward-looking statement or information. For additional detail, please see the forward-looking information and risk factors section in the company's public filings, including its most recent MD&A and AIF. A more fulsome discussion of the company's results is also available in its MD&A and financial statements for the period, which are posted on SEDAR Plus and can be found on the company's website, siennaliving.ca. This call is being recorded, and a replay will be made available. Instructions for accessing the call are posted on the company's website, and the details are provided in the company's news release. Slides accompanying the host's remarks have been posted on the company website under Events and Presentations. With that, I'll now turn the call over to Mr. Jain. Please go ahead, Mr. Jain.
Thank you, Sarah. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for being with us today. The third quarter laid the groundwork for a strong close to this year. Positive momentum exists throughout every area of our company. We posted robust operational results in both of our business lines, finished two development projects in Ontario successfully, and kept expanding through acquisitions. We remain on track to make 2025 a year that signals the next stage in Sienna's growth journey. Both operating platforms turned in strong results during the third quarter. Same property NOI rose 13.2% in the retirement segment and 6.7% in long-term care. The main drivers behind the double-digit gain in the retirement segment were a solid rise in occupancy and growth in rental rates, along with higher care revenue. Average same property occupancy climbed 230 basis points year-over-year and reached 94.1% in the third quarter. After the quarter ended, monthly occupancy rose to 94.7% in October, which puts us well on our way toward hitting a 95% target by the end of this year. Our results also reflect growth in care revenue. We increasingly bring our clinical care expertise to our retirement platform, which lets residents remain with us longer as their care needs evolve.
Other key factors fueling the retirement segment's solid results include our strong sales infrastructure and targeted marketing efforts. Incoming calls to our call center are still elevated, and property tours have risen considerably quarter after quarter throughout this year. For Q3, our leads rose 37% versus a year earlier, matching the prior-year period, and we're likewise heartened by how our National Open House turned out in October. That event produced a far bigger double-digit lift in fresh leads than the one we held back in July. On top of that, we stay sharply focused on hospital outreach and keep outstanding ties with healthcare and business partners across the communities where we operate. We expect all these efforts to fuel rising lead generation and future move-ins. Alongside the solid same property results and the retirement segment, we're happy with how our optimization work paid off at five of our properties. In Q3, occupancy across the optimization portfolio climbed 970 basis points year-over-year and helped drive NOI growth above 40%. Our steps to position these assets better in their local markets are plainly producing results. As for long-term care operations, our fully occupied homes with expanding waitlists, strong revenue from private accommodations, and yearly increases in government funding each contributed to the strength of our results.
Government-funded long-term care operations bring substantial value to our business—they offer stability and remain largely shielded from market swings or economic uncertainty. Over the next several quarters, contributions from redevelopment projects we've recently opened will also begin showing up. Turning to slide six, we opened our redeveloped long-term care community in North Bay during September, and then a campus of care in Brantford in October. Projects of this scale are complicated, demand deep expertise and dependable partners, and we take particular pride in having completed them on schedule and within budget. Each of our long-term care redevelopments, once fully stabilized, should lift Sienna's AFFO per share by roughly 3%. Given lengthy waitlists, we anticipate the homes reaching full occupancy within 60 days of opening. We also remain on track to finish our next redevelopment project in Keswick in 2027. Regarding our development pipeline, the funding improvements the Ontario government announced this summer encourage us. Enhancements for projects in the Greater Toronto Area matter especially to us, since more than 80% of our remaining redevelopment pipeline actually sits in the GTA. Thanks to these improvements, we anticipate beginning construction on one to two projects next year.
We've likewise been quite busy on the acquisitions side since the start of the year. Most of the properties we bought in 2025 are under 10 years old and sit in strategic locations within major urban centres. In the third quarter, we expanded our presence in the Greater Toronto Area by adding the 133-suite retirement residence and 192-bed long-term care home we had announced earlier. After the quarter closed, we also signed two more acquisition agreements in Ontario. Last week, we entered a purchase agreement for Highgate on Lexington, a 216-suite retirement residence located in Waterloo. We'll be acquiring that property in this attractive market for roughly CAD 93.3 million. Highgate also comes with a 4.7-acre development site zoned for either a retirement residence or residential condominium. Two days ago, we signed a purchase agreement for La Salle Park, a 123-suite retirement residence in Burlington, which is a suburb of the Greater Toronto Area. Initially we'll acquire a 78.2% interest in that property for about CAD 67.2 million, then an additional 10.9% in January 2026, with the final 10.9% coming in five years. This marks our third high-quality acquisition this year in the Greater Toronto Area, where we already hold a significant presence and keep building scale.
All together, through acquisitions and developments, we added more than CAD 800 million of assets to our platform during 2025, and our pipeline remains very strong. Investing in our team members. As our operations grow and scale, putting investment into our team members is essential to Sienna's success. With more than 15,000 employees, we understand how important programs are that focus on learning and development, leadership skills, recognition, and rewards — all of them designed to attract and retain our highly engaged workforce. The positive effect of these initiatives shows up in our latest employee engagement survey, which was completed in September. Participation hit an all-time high of 86%, and the team member engagement score went up for the fifth consecutive time. We are extremely proud of this achievement, which is vital to Sienna's continued success. Time Magazine also recognized our investment in our team members, naming Sienna one of Canada's best companies in 2025. With that, I'll hand it over to David for an update on our financial results.
Thank you, Nitin, and good morning to all of you. I'll begin with slide 10, where we cover the financial results. As our MD&A disclosure specifies, my remarks will reference operating results while excluding one-time items. During Q3 2025, revenue calculated on a proportionate basis rose 16.4% compared with the prior year, reaching CAD 261.7 million. That gain stemmed mainly from higher occupancy and rental rates, together with greater care revenue within the retirement segment. Further boosting the increase were contributions from our long-term care platform, among them elevated flow-through funding for direct care, greater private accommodation revenue, and extra revenue stemming from acquisitions closed in 2025. Same property NOI grew 9.7% to CAD 46.4 million in Q3 2025, which includes a 13.2% rise in our retirement segment and a 6.7% rise in the long-term care segment. Within the retirement segment, same property NOI was up CAD 2.6 million in Q3 2025 relative to last year, chiefly driven by better occupancy and rate growth. Those gains, along with producing higher care revenue and keeping a tight focus on operating expenses, underpinned a year-over-year 220 basis point lift in our same property operating margin. Beyond that, our asset optimization initiatives are advancing well, and those initiatives encompass five assets within the company's retirement portfolio.
For Q3, NOI across the optimization portfolio rose more than 40% versus a year earlier, and average margin was up roughly 540 basis points against the same stretch in 2024. Within long-term care, NOI rose by CAD 1.5 million. The year-over-year gain was driven by homes that are fully occupied with expanding waitlists, along with steady gains in private occupancy. In Q3 2025, operating funds from operations climbed 33.3% to CAD 31.8 million versus last year, largely on higher NOI. Adjusted funds from operations rose 36.1% to CAD 27.7 million versus last year. That gain came mostly from higher FFO, partly offset by more maintenance capital expenditures. Per share, FFO and AFFO were up 9.6% and 12%, respectively, in Q3 2025. Our AFFO payout ratio for Q3 2025 stood at 78.7%, versus 91.3% in Q3 2024. That marked improvement underscores Sienna's strong operating results and the success of our efforts to deploy the capital we raised to fund growth. Over the next several quarters, we also anticipate seeing the impact of recently finished redevelopment projects show up in our AFFO. Once each redevelopment is fully operational, it is expected to add, on average, CAD 4.7 million to Sienna's annual AFFO.
Each of those projects adds roughly 3% to AFFO per share. Beyond that, they will strengthen our balance sheet and raise the quality of our asset pool even further. During the third quarter, we kept our financial position and balance sheet strong. We closed the quarter with CAD 464 million in liquidity and CAD 1.3 billion in unencumbered assets. On August 21st, we issued CAD 175 million of unsecured debentures carrying an interest rate of 4.112% in order to fund our growth initiatives. Demand for the debenture was substantial, and the offering ended up multiple times oversubscribed. As for Sienna's debt maturities coming up, including the CAD 175 million Series B unsecured debenture maturing in Q1 2026, we have several attractive financing options open to us. With that, I'll hand the call back to Nitin for his closing remarks.
Thank you, David. The results clearly show how disciplined we've been about improving how we operate. That, together with what we've achieved in expanding through acquisitions and developments, strengthens how we feel about what lies ahead for Sienna, in the near term as well as over the coming years. We remain on track to finish the year with same property occupancy of 95% in the retirement segment, ahead of our original Q1 2026 target. Consistent with how strongly we've performed so far this year, we also revised upward our same property NOI growth targets. Within our retirement segment, we expect same property NOI to rise between 13%-14% year-over-year, and in long-term care, we foresee year-over-year NOI growth of 4% or 5% across our same property portfolio. Our company stands at the start of an exceptional growth phase. Supply should stay constrained for the foreseeable future, while demand and operating fundamentals keep getting stronger. Given our expanding scale and the backing of our highly engaged team members, we believe a tremendous opportunity exists for us to deliver sustained growth for many, many years to come. On behalf of our whole team and our board of directors, I thank our shareholders and everyone on this call for your continued support.
Sarah, we can take questions now.
Thank you. To ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. Should you wish to withdraw your question, just press star one once more. Please make sure your phone is not on mute when called upon. Thank you. Your first question comes from Jonathan Kelcher with TD Cowen. Your line is open.
Thanks. Good morning. First question, just about operations, on the retirement side, it seems like you're kind of knocking it out of the park a bit here at reaching 95%. Once you sort of hit that target, what should we think about going forward when it comes to rent growth?
Thanks, Jonathan, and good morning. We’re expecting rental growth in the 4%-5% range, which comes from a combination of annual escalations. On top of that, there would be some chance to, in fact, revisit market rents when you’re operating at those high occupancy levels. Even though margin wasn’t what your question was about, we’ve said previously that once you reach the higher margin, a lot of that revenue will keep flowing through to the bottom line. NOI growth—rental revenue will be one component of it, but multiple other levers will also drive that NOI growth.
All right, understood. Moving on to the second point, regarding acquisitions, I wonder if you could provide a bit more detail on La Salle Park, specifically about that remaining 22%. Has the pricing already been fixed? And do you expect substantial room for rent growth at that property? For a retirement asset, the 5.7% cap rate seems somewhat low relative to what you have typically been acquiring.
Yes. No, thank you for asking, Jonathan. Regarding how the deal is structured, we're acquiring 78% right now for CAD 67.2 million. Another 11% gets purchased in Q1 of 2026, and the price will be identical to what we're paying today. At 100%, the value comes to CAD 86 million. Five years out, it would be priced at fair market value as of then, and there will be certain predetermined metrics guiding how we compute that. On rental rate growth, I'd say it should look a lot like what Nitin described. We're seeing an opportunity for rental rate growth of 4%-5% in that market. Much of that should also flow down to the bottom line and widen the margins at that property.
All right, thank you. I’ll hand it back now.
Our following question is from Himanshu Gupta at Scotiabank. Your line is open.
Thanks, and good morning. Starting with long-term care: what drove the NOI increase there? I realize your guidance has been roughly 2% growth, yet we've seen 4%-5% so far this year. Is there also a margin expansion story in LTC?
Yes, it comes down to a few things, Himanshu. First, all three provinces — Ontario, Alberta, and BC — are providing increased funding, and that has come in slightly above the rise in our costs. Second, there's the preferred revenue piece. We've been generating growth by filling our beds with residents paying private accommodation rates. And then a small part relates to the Nicola acquisition. We purchased that earlier this year, so it's adding modestly to long-term care NOI growth.
All right, all right, that's fair. I'll stay with LTC, but regarding the developments, Brantford and North Bay are finished at this point. At what stage do you begin getting construction funding, and when does that start showing up in the financials? I'd imagine it breaks down between interest income and the contribution to AFFO.
Correct. The CFS money begins once a building is open. For Northern Heights, we opened the doors and welcomed our first residents on September 7th. CFS began flowing on September 7th. Oakwood Commons, located in Brantford, opened in October, and that is when CFS would begin flowing there. We have actually already started to see a small amount of CFS coming through in Q3. We will see the full impact of that, at least for Northern Heights, in Q4, and then Brantford would be Q1. As for how the CFS breaks down, we have in fact disclosed that in our MD&A. Of the CAD 3.3 million, roughly CAD 2.2 million would be interest income, and the remaining approximately CAD 1.1 million would be an add-back to our AFFO.
Understood. All right, that's quite useful. My final question concerns the retirement home segment. I mean, Nitin, you clearly referenced rental growth of roughly 4%-5%. And looking at the cost side, same property expenses, I believe they rose about 3%-4% in 2025 to this point. Is that a reasonable run rate for expenses in Q4 and afterward?
Yes, I’d say that’s a reasonable assumption—what you just mentioned regarding rental growth and expense growth. One point that comes up most often in discussions is the idea of how a larger portion of that flows through to the bottom line. The second piece is that once homes are stabilized, first, we rely on very few incentives. Incentives represent roughly 1%–2% of revenue for us, but being able to eliminate them certainly provides a benefit. In addition, on the expense side, when resident counts in a home stay consistent, you’re able to be much more consistent with scheduling and similar items, and that helps bring costs down as well. As a baseline, Himanshu, the assumptions you described are not unreasonable, though we do see a chance to actually push them lower on the expense side.
All right, that's very useful. Perhaps just one final question. Regarding occupancy at the retirement homes, I believe you said third-quarter leads rose by something like double digits, if I heard that right. So it doesn't seem as though occupancy will plateau at around 95%. Is that a reasonable assumption, considering how leads are coming in, and that you still have further room to push it higher?
Yes, that's a reasonable way to look at it. Of our 44 homes, about 25% are near 100%, or at 100% already. The rest, you could say, sit at 95%–98%. Seeing occupancy that high really isn't unusual. On a portfolio basis, though, how much of it can be sustained is still an open question. The notion that it shouldn't level off at 95% strikes me as reasonable. What's still unclear is whether it climbs to 98 or the next figure turns out to be 96% — but as an industry, I think that's something we have yet to see.
Alright. Great. Thanks, everyone, and I’ll hand it back over. Thanks a lot.
I appreciate it.
Seram Srinivas from Cormark Securities has the next question. Your line is open.
Thanks, Alberta. Morning, Nitin and David. Regarding those redevelopments the two of you finished, what's the right way for us to think about stabilization timing? I realize residents have been moving in, so should we figure on roughly 12 months, at which point occupancy sits at 98% or 99%?
Thank you. Something that people don't fully grasp is just how effectively our long-term care redevelopment performs, particularly once government funding kicks in. David noted that on September 7 we opened the property in North Bay. From day one you receive full funding, and the government expects you to be fully leased up in 60 days, and in North Bay we reached full lease-up in 60 days. Brantford opened in October, and we get full funding from day one, and it would be fully leased up in 60 days. As a matter of fact, there is no lease-up in long-term care. In Brantford, we also have a campus of care with a retirement home attached to it, and that is leasing quite well too.
Nitin, as far as Brantford goes, that location combines retirement and LTC. How is the funding structured there? Does the government have a stronger incentive to actually fund projects of this type?
Public money goes exclusively toward long-term care, and a full mechanism exists so that your capital spending gets allocated correctly to long-term care alone. Your operating costs are likewise allocated properly to long-term care only. We own quite a few other campuses, and a handful of other players also have campuses. This is a well-established area within the industry.
Understood. Perhaps I'll make my final question about acquisitions. Clearly, you folks have been quite active in both the retirement and LTC segments. Looking at the headlines today, we see plenty of infrastructure funds or private players examining these types of assets. As you compete in the market at present, are you noticing far more private funds entering, or what does the competition look like?
Sure. Senior living is a pretty competitive area. Knowing how to run these properties is one of the main things that sets us apart. This isn’t purely a rental operation. Running them is complicated. The fact that we have 15,000 employees — that might equal all the real estate companies put together, just given the type of work we do. One advantage we have is truly grasping how complex the operations are and pulling synergies from that. This business is also heavily relationship-driven. Even though we’re all rivals, much of the sector has existed for a long time. Relationships matter here. Typically, when a seller comes along — whether it’s a generational sale or they built it and now want to sell — they want assurance they’re selling to people they know can close on a timely basis. Since so many team members and residents are involved, they want to be sure it lands in the right hands. All of that comes into play. Rather than me claiming we’ve been quite successful, you can simply look at our numbers.
We've done pretty well at securing those acquisitions and completing the deals.
Absolutely, 100%. I understand completely. Apologies — I suppose I have one final question. You clearly noted that these are businesses with heavy operational demands, and labor costs are a very significant piece of that. Looking ahead to 2026, do you anticipate any bottlenecks on that front, and what difficulties could arise when it comes to sourcing talent?
Seram, is this from the standpoint of labor you're referring to?
That's right.
From a labor standpoint, I'd say the industry overall has improved. Immigration was a big help. Five years ago we made a significant shift around the whole notion of, "If you look after your team, they'll look after your customer, and residents and the business will look after themselves." Simple as that sounds, the results for us have been tremendous. Over the past two years, turnover has fallen by 60%. We're hiring far fewer people. Staff are staying much longer. In retirement homes, that benefits us beyond the labor side — it helps us drive occupancy. Residents feel comfortable, they refer us more. In long-term care, it's driving fewer compliance issues and fewer quality issues. Residents are happy. We're seeing huge improvements on the labor front. Apart from a few very hard-to-fill areas, we actually have no vacancies across our portfolio.
That's really helpful context. Thanks. I'll hand it back over.
I appreciate it.
Our following question is from Giuliano Thornhill at National Bank Capital Markets. Your line is open.
Morning, everyone. Hey, folks. I'm curious — what drove that significant jump in occupancy across your same property portfolio during August?
Thank you, Giuliano. We've been at this, and our strategy hasn't changed. We operate in a very, very local way. Our ties to the hospitals, our ties to other healthcare providers, watermark — every one of those matters. Frankly, it isn't rocket science. What you want is a set of processes in place, and you want to be sure they get executed. Rather than inventing new programs, our approach is to stay disciplined about what we already have and to execute those things well, consistently. That holds true for our call center. It holds true for the way we follow up on leads. It holds true for the sales cycle. We're already seeing solid results from this, and we fully expect that to keep going.
All right, regarding that retirement piece — does it stick to a particular region at all, or is it tied to just a handful of properties, or would you say it's fairly widespread?
Occupancy gains, once more, are spread widely. It isn't the case that a single home boosted occupancy sharply and thereby shifted the needle. What we're observing is a steady rise throughout most of our portfolio.
All right, a further question, if I may, about the capital funding initiative the government rolled out during the previous quarter. What I'd like to know is whether that modified funding scheme has caused you to think about, or perhaps strengthen your capacity to move ahead with your GTA properties — specifically those Class C GTA properties.
It is, Giuliano. We've been looking into the new program with a lot of interest. Within the GTA sits 80% of our properties, and funding inside the GTA gets a meaningful boost from this program. Right now we're finishing up some analysis regarding which projects it would make sense to move forward with. Our intention would be to move ahead on one to two projects in 2026 within the GTA.
That’s clear. When you’re choosing which opportunities in the GTA to move forward with, how do you make that call? Is it largely driven by—yeah, how are you taking land cost into account in that choice, I suppose?
A distinctive aspect of our business is that we hold a substantial amount of land across the Greater Toronto Area, and that kind of land is typically the hardest to come by. These projects have been in the works for three or four years, since the planning process takes a long time. Roughly four projects have been moving forward gradually, with the expectation that suitable financing would eventually be available, and that moment is now here. Where each project sits in the planning cycle, what the returns look like, and which ones deliver the greatest operational impact will determine how they are prioritized. To illustrate, we have a couple of homes that would not only address and create capacity at that particular site but would actually allow us to decant another home, letting us relocate all of its residents there. All of those considerations come into play. These projects will exceed the 160 beds we have seen previously. Once completed, we would expect a material impact from those projects.
Alright, thanks. This is my final question, and it concerns the ATM: how are you all viewing it as a source of funding? Do you expect to be fairly active with it, or will you lean more toward the debt markets for liquidity from here on?
That is a fair question, Giuliano. During Q3, we issued 1.3 million shares through our ATM, and the average price came in at CAD 18.13. Our approach to using the ATM has been pretty disciplined. Whenever we evaluate acquisitions or redevelopment, we will look at every form of capital available. This quarter we issued roughly CAD 24 million through the ATM, but we also raised CAD 175 million in the unsecured debt market, since the cost of capital there was attractive enough to fund our acquisition. Truly, we are considering both avenues. With respect to the ATM, we want to be certain there are specific uses for it whenever we issue shares.
All right, thank you, everyone.
Our following question is from Pammi Bir at RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.
Morning, everyone. So, circling back to the SAL deal — you're picking up a non-managing stake, and the cap rate is lower than what you've typically paid before. What was it about this opportunity that drew you in compared with other options out there in the market, and do you anticipate doing additional transactions of this kind with this same seller?
Thanks, Pammi, and good morning. Reitman Senior Housing owns La Salle Park. Our partnership with them, Elgin Falls, has been quite successful. That home was built by us jointly. They ran it for a while, after which we'll acquire it. A 5.75% cap rate really isn't all that out of the ordinary for truly high-quality properties. When I describe La Salle Park as fully occupied, I don't mean 95% — occupancy sits nearer to 100%. Rental growth there is strong. The building was constructed very well, so it will withstand competitive pressure over time. We keep seeing occupancy improve steadily as time goes on. In this instance, managing the property was what the seller wanted. Given that a relationship already exists and their management makes us comfortable, that arrangement suited us. Looking at returns, we believe this opportunity will perform extremely well for us.
All right, you brought up Elgin Falls too. Within their pipeline, are there additional ones like that which you could potentially pursue through your acquisition program during roughly the next year?
Yeah. If they ever choose to do additional deals, I hope they'll keep us in mind. Again, their strategy isn't something I'm privy to. Obviously, they've occupied this space for a long period of time, and my sense is they don't plan to exit it. This was a one-off opportunity in which other partners were involved and they wanted to sell. Should another one come along, we're hoping they'll consider us first.
Alright. Then one final item, regarding the additional care revenue — I believe you brought that up a few times as a source of some of the growth. Could you elaborate on which new services are being offered, or is it really just higher volume of perhaps the same services already being provided? I'm just curious whether you have a sense of what the growth rate in your service revenue has been, maybe on a year-to-date basis, compared with where it stood versus last year.
Absolutely. Honestly, at Sienna this could end up being among our biggest difference makers, since we aren’t hesitant when it comes to delivering care, and I’d say we’re quite skilled at it. Our long-term care expertise—how do we apply it within retirement and not just deliver additional care, but do so at a price residents can afford? We made a change recently. Jennifer, who headed our long-term care, was shifted over to retirement with the goal of figuring out how to bring the proper care services into our retirement living. One element would be expanding our care services, and we’re seeing rising demand for assisted living and memory care. That would be one. Second, we examined how our care is priced. Between 2022 and 2024, our care hours rose substantially, yet they contributed little to the bottom line. Our pricing was incorrect, and we also lacked the proper structure to ensure greater efficiency. We’ve corrected that this year. It’s a multi-year strategy, because you don’t want a major shock to the system.
When a resident is paying $100, the last thing you want is to jump that price to $300. That shift will happen gradually. It is going to change. We keep asking ourselves how to bundle services in a way that serves our own interests, those of team members, and those of residents, and we will move forward with that. My answer would be that it will involve a mix of every one of those elements. So when Jonathan raised his question focused solely on rental rate growth, my view is that this represents just one component of how we grow. The remaining piece, honestly, will come from care services.
Would you say care service revenue is expanding more quickly than the blended 4 to 5% figure you referenced?
Sure. Those costs run a little higher in that area as well, so the figures move more quickly. Care revenue is expanding much faster than anything else. It began from a small base, sure, but it has grown at a high double-digit rate over the past few years, and we anticipate that will keep going. Every province where we operate has a shortage of long-term care beds. Residents require additional care. Hospitals are at capacity. A resident who doesn't need long-term care shouldn't be in a hospital—that person belongs in a retirement home. The question is how we can make that happen.
Right, okay. So that part of the business sees a smaller margin, though volume growth there is stronger.
Absolutely.
All right, understood. That covers everything on my end. Thank you very much.
Pammi, thanks.
Tal Woolley from CIBC has the next question. Your line is open.
Hello there, and good morning. I hopped on a bit behind schedule, so in case a few of these points have already come up, just let me know and I'll check the transcript. What I'm wondering about is how you expect acquisition pricing to unfold across the coming two years. My sense is that over the past five years, whenever retirement assets came up in our discussions, the going-in cap rate was essentially around 6%, give or take. Given that your share prices are climbing and occupancy across the sector is getting tighter, what's your view on where deal pricing expectations are headed during the next two years?
Competition is going to pick up in the transactions market, and honestly that's positive, since it keeps valuations elevated. And once more, that fits with the notion that this industry isn't disappearing any time soon. We've seen considerable expansion here. As we've mentioned previously, we're at the start of the coming 25 years. Competition was always going to be there. Every deal we've completed this year — our Alberta portfolio, the Ottawa properties, the Waterloo property, the Mississauga one, the Burlington one — faced intense rivalry. We don't win every single one, but we capture our fair share. It's simply about confirming the deal structure suits the vendor, our capacity to do other things, and staying flexible in how we approach it. Plenty of those factors come into play. You're correct that it has been sitting at 6% for some time. When it comes to Class A properties, 5.75% isn't an unreasonable figure. Take our Highgate property in Waterloo as an illustration. We acquired it at roughly CAD 430,000 a door, while construction costs for our Brantford property ran near CAD 500,000 a door, despite that one being a considerably larger home featuring long-term care.
That figure remains well under what it would take to replace it.
When you think about your overall appetite, is the limiting factor the availability of capital, or do real operational management constraints exist regarding what you can take on in a given year?
I'd say it's a mix of every one of those factors, but landing at CAD 813 million in development acquisition isn't something that happened by chance. This has been our largest year to date. In our view, it isn't an outlier. Going forward, we should expect that to continue. Early this year we devoted considerable time to our structure, making certain the right people were focused on the right tasks, since the last thing we want is for acquisitions to disrupt our operations. The results show that we're not only acquiring and developing, but our operational performance also remains robust. The structural work we carried out at the start of this year has paid off very well for us, and we'll keep fine-tuning it. We do that work. I'd say we keep seeing more and more opportunities. That pipeline remains very strong, and I believe we'll keep finding opportunities in both development and acquisitions.
And finally, regarding the La Salle Park deals — if my math is right, that works out to roughly CAD 700,000 per door. Would that be the priciest transaction you've done on a per-door basis?
Yes, that's right. And once again, one of the elements you take into account is clearly the per-door figure. The second thing is how much NOI does it produce? That home performs very strongly. Take the per-door figure — not every suite is identical, for instance. We own a property in Ottawa that we acquired at roughly CAD 300,000 per door. Those suites are half the size of the ones at La Salle Park. The mix of suites differs quite a bit, and so does the location. The CAD 700,000 is fairly near replacement cost in certain cases, yet it comes fully leased, and it is an incredible part of Burlington.
It's good to know that management contract is now set up. Looking ahead, would assets of this kind—larger in value—be something you'd want to get involved with more substantially?
Sure. What we hold now includes those. The pair of Waterford assets in Ottawa and Kingston were acquired quite a while back. Most recently we closed on Hazelbean — CAD 85 million, 170 suites, roughly CAD 500,000 per door. In BC we own high-end properties. Our approach covers three categories of assets: think of the St. Regis-type full-service buildings with extensive amenities, then the Sheraton-type full-service segment — I lean on hotel terminology since that's my background — and finally smaller-community, limited-service properties, which fit precisely what residents there require. So those three tiers are what we have, and we're quite at ease running, buying, and developing across all three.
As this market truly begins expanding, do you hold any specific perspective regarding where demand will ultimately sit when it comes to the population?
That’s a really interesting question, because you’d assume all of this demand would be concentrated in major cities like Toronto and Vancouver—and that’s true. Those markets remain quite strong. That said, we’re seeing very strong demand in the Waterloo market as well. We recently acquired Highgate, as we discussed. We have two other properties there. They’re running close to 100% full. Our market in BC is extremely strong. Even our properties in Oshawa—we have a home where we did a strategic renovation, and it’s running close to 100%. I’d say demand is going to be everywhere. The broader idea that there aren’t enough places for seniors to live is something we’re seeing play out. Apart from a few very specific markets or very specific locations, I think you’ll see occupancy gains across the board.
Alright, many thanks, Nitin.
Thanks, Tal. Appreciate you being here.
Tom Callahan from BMO Capital Markets has the next question. Your line is open.
Thanks, operator. Good morning, everyone. I’ve just got one question, on the balance sheet. Clearly, there’s a big opportunity ahead for the business in terms of both internal and external growth. I’m just curious to hear your thinking on the balance sheet from a leverage standpoint. Do you have a particular debt to EBITDA level in mind, thinking about it on a run rate basis? And on the other side, if the right external opportunity comes along and it’s a bit chunkier, where would you be comfortable leverage-wise?
That's a really good question, Tom. When it comes to debt to EBITDA, we've said for the past couple of years that we'd be under 8x. We know that right now our debt to EBITDA sits at 8.8x, but I'd highlight that this reflects a single point in time, since the debt figure is as of September 30 while the EBITDA figure covers a trailing 12 months. On a pro forma basis, our debt to EBITDA would come in under 8 times on a run rate basis. That's the level where we'd be comfortable over the medium term. If something sizable came along and we liked it a lot, we might go above that level for a while, but over the medium term we'd want to return to under 8 times.
All right, that’s clear. Thanks for that. I’ll rejoin the queue. Thanks, everyone.
Giuliano Thornhill from National Bank Capital Markets has a follow-up, and his line is now open.
Hey, guys. Sorry, I just had one more quick question. For the acquisitions you've completed so far this year, how have the integrations gone — have they really lived up to what you expected, or are they running ahead? I mean in terms of occupancy, margin, and why?
Thanks. I believe that is where our capacity to complete deals comes into the discussion. A lot of people assume that making the acquisition is the hardest piece, and my view is that operating competitively is considerably harder. That is exactly where we are achieving real success. Take Alberta: the 4 properties there are actually performing better than planned. We received some income support, which we have not used and intend to return to the owners, and that works well for both sides. Of the 2 properties we purchased in Ottawa, 1 carried an earnout arrangement for the seller, and we would be providing them an earnout arrangement. We share that, so the property is exceeding our expectations. The home we recently acquired in Mississauga, which is a long-term care home, is at full occupancy. We understand it very well. From day one, we have synergies, and it will perform better than we underwrote. Nicola Lodge, the home we purchased in BC, we already held a majority stake in. That was an excellent fit. Once the remaining ones close, we do expect them to perform, given the effort we put into underwriting them properly and then how we integrate them.
Thanks a lot. And thanks, Nitin — I appreciate it.
That wraps up the Q&A portion, and it also brings today's conference call to a close. Thanks for being with us. You're free to disconnect at this point.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Sienna Senior Living Inc. transcript - plus 133,000+ transcripts from 7,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.
Get an API key View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Sienna Senior Living Inc. earnings transcripts and 133,000+ others is available through the
EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server.
Quarterly plans from $162 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search,
and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.