Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) Earnings Call Transcript
January 7, 2020
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Good morning.
Good morning. Thank you, Jason.
Yes. Thank you for coming back. So as usual, you guys put out some numbers this morning. So maybe before we get started, you might want to just provide a little bit of context about what you said and what you think it means.
Sure. So with -- we're -- we finished with just about 30 million self-pay subscribers a year. So $1,063,000. That's our -- I think our 10th year of net adds above $1 million. It's a strong year. The auto sales came in pretty good. I know that when you look at the article this morning, they talk about forward sales being a little soft, but they're still at extraordinarily high levels. So clocking in right about $17 million. And a very healthy environment that -- you'll read in some of the press about incentives being up, but there was -- I don't know if you guys all saw it, but if you looked in the journal a few days ago. They had a chart of the average selling prices for new cars. And it's up to something like $34,500 or so, up from a number that looks like $24,000, $25,000 in 2010.
But there's no inflation.
Pardon?
But there's no inflation.
Well, I got to tell you, it's just -- it's sort of testimony to an incredibly healthy market, a strong consumer, the incentives are up, but those average prices in the journal are net of the incentives. And so all in all, it looks pretty good. The auto industry forecast that we've seen so far look for a little more softening again in '20, but still at levels around $16.5 million. That's pretty good. We're looking for, as you know, from previous calls, 80% penetration, which is a nice increase in pen rates. So that as you look at next year, one of the things you have to keep in mind is that in '19 installs actually declined from '18. And in '20, they're going to rise pretty significantly. So there'll be more SAC expense. You've got quite a swing in SAC in the year. But everything else looks pretty solid, right? And when we look at new car conversion rates, used car conversion rates, churn, they continue to cruise along the one spot where we obviously have a lot of work to do, and we're focused on it is the Pandora audience.
Sure. So can I ask you a question about that, the hardware going into 80% of cars over time. It just doesn't seem -- I mean maybe I'm getting old, but it doesn't seem that many years ago when it was sort of in that low-60s number. And then it went up to sort of mid-60s. It just keeps rising. Is that driven by you? Is that driven by the OEM? Like is it just a mutual agreement that it makes sense? What's driving that?
Yes. I think it's reflective of one consumer interest in the product. And I think it's also reflective of -- when you get to a certain penetration level in OEM production. It really is sort of a tipping point for them of why not just standardize, right? And so they -- there is a tendency to continue to drive it. As we go back for contract extensions and renegotiations, we frequently talk about better terms for the OEM to the extent that there's higher penetration, right? So it's really -- it's a combination of things, but it's really rooted in the fact that the customers are interested in the product.
Okay. Is there something going on with your SAC expense that sort of makes those economics work where you can get a -- you can put that hardware in some of those lower end cars, but as the SAC gets lower, it just sort of makes economic sense to go deeper?
Well, yes. Okay. And so I'm not going to be able to quote them off the top of my head, but SAC per install is now down to -- in like the $21, $23 area, right? And you've been covering this long ago -- you remember -- long enough, you remember the days when it was more than double that, right? So at the heart of it all, just like the conference going on nearby, it is a consumer electronics product. And we're able to cost down that product and expand the functionality of it over time. And so that makes it easier to incorporate.
So one of the things that I love about your business model and your company is it's easy as an analyst to sort of forecast, right, because it's a subscription-based business.
We're worried about that. We didn't want you guys to work too hard.
But the flip side of that is when I sort of think back to our old cable coverage. There was always a way where the cable companies could take that sort of substrate of coaxial cable and just reinvent themselves and do something new. And when I sort of look at my model going out 3 or 4 years, it's like, okay, I sort of expect the net adds to modestly -- smaller net adds each year just because you have a bigger installed base and churn has been good, but it's going to be in that 1.6, 1.7 range. And you guys have been pretty consistent about there's not a ton of pricing power in this business. And so it begins to look like a stock that either or a company that's either going to do something pretty different or is going to begin to become more of a return of capital story. And buy -- I know you guys have bought back a lot of stock, but I tend to think about more of a big robust dividend payer, right, as the business model sort of asymptotes. What are the debates you guys have internally about what Sirius is going to look like 5 years from now or 7 years from now? Is it just going to asymptote down and just become a slow co?
Well, if we don't do anything else, that's what happens in every subscription business in a given market, right? You get fully penetrated in the market then you become -- you start trading sideways. And as you know, with the cycle of car ownership, we -- we've got a pretty long turnover cycle, right? So you look at the used car business. And we're representing about 45% of used car sales. Now we'll -- in the course of the next 7 to 8 to 10 years, the -- that's going to sort of grow progressively until we're in about 75% of used car. So there's a nice long tail to expanded distribution there. But what we're -- one of the things we're also focused on, we have been for a long time, is well what do you do with the inactive vehicles, right? So we've been reasonably successful so far. And if you look at the 120 million vehicles we have on the road, about 40 million of them are active in the business, either in a trial or as a self-pay subscriber. And if we're phenomenally successful over the next several years as our enabled fleet on the road grows from 120 million to 220 million, maybe the self-pay subscribers will grow to, let's call it, 40 million, and we'll have 10 million trials. You'll have 50 million active in the business. Great. Super. It'd generate a huge amount of money. But the inactive vehicles are going to grow from 80 million to 170 million. And so -- and that's the heart of why we acquired Pandora. It has a scaled audience, a scaled digital ad technology, a scaled native digital ad sales force. And the cars themselves are all getting connected. And so there's an opportunity to, over time, as technology changes in the car, move Pandora from being something that's just listened to on mobile phones and consumer electronics devices and laptops and able to get a bigger share of listening in vehicle. And at the end of the day, we always thought our job at Sirius XM was to maximize the amount of free cash flow we can drive off of the enabled vehicle fleet. If the subscription audio business is going to get, let's say, in -- I don't know, make it up 40 million vehicles. You'll want to monetize the other 80 million. And it's very clear that North American audience has a very strong interest in free audio where they listen to some ads. And with the growth of digital audio advertising, I think you see it in Pandora's results in 2019, they've done -- even though the audience is declining. They've done a bang-up job monetizing it. It's because advertisers find it to be an effective media. So I think there's a lot of runway for growth here.
So we're -- if we decompose sort of the Pandora listenership today. I would imagine in-car must be sub-1% or something, right? It's got to be very, very small.
It's a really difficult number to get a hold of because of how mobile phones are used and what information you get back as to how they're being used. So you get -- for instance, there's data that gets blocked when they run through CarPlay or Android Auto. So the -- but it's small. It's small.
And so what are the gating factors as you sort of think about getting Pandora in-car listenership up, what are the gating factors? Is this a OEM issue? Is it a...
Well, certainly, there's the car itself being connected, right. And then it's the presence in the HMI, right? And it being simple and intuitive for the consumer to reach out and press that touch screen to get what they're looking for.
Yes. And so how far -- I mean connected cars and the HMI, how far would you say we are today?
We're in the top half of the first, and I'm not sure batters at the plate yet.
Okay. All right. So many years of potential growth. What about -- there's been a lot in the press around iHeart. And it's a little bit unclear in the press reporting whether it's Liberty Sirius or Sirius. But I think in the past, you've always sort of said you don't really have a Sirius-level interest in radio stations or iHeart. Is that an accurate characterization of what you see out there?
Well, the filings are Liberty filings. And so -- and remember that Liberty is a very adept media portfolio manager. And so spreading bets and having optionality around the media industry is really their stock and trade. For SiriusXM, Jim and I and the rest of the team are heads down focused on Pandora. And that's got us -- that's got our plate full right now.
Okay. All right. So I've got this crazy notion about the terminal year for you guys. Do you know what my terminal year vision is?
No. Please tell me.
So the idea is that it would be super interesting if you had a company that had all of the assets in the music stack from Artist Nation to Live Nation to Ticketmaster, to Sirius to Pandora to iHeart, which would then put you in the pole position to begin to go after artists and say we can give you a larger slice of the economics than the traditional record label, and we can make the pie bigger for you as an artist because we can put you on an emerging artist channel on SIRI. We can put you on a Pandora playlist. We can promote you as -- on your song on iHeart radio stations. At Live Nation, we could put you in a festival, maybe sooner than otherwise would be. That's my sort of terminal year answer that there's this vertically integrated music entity that could very quickly become a very credible label as weird as that sounds. Does that seem just nonsense to you?
Well, there -- I wouldn't call it nonsense. The -- each of the components that you've described are major businesses with major infrastructure in their own -- each in their own right. And as you begin to put that stack together, the -- certainly, there's not much in the way of cost side synergies beyond just G&A-type expenses, right? And there's a reason why they have, sort of -- I'm going to call it infrastructure. But it's basically people and intellectual property and all the rest. That these are, in fact, wildly different businesses. And so managing an artist is a wildly different business than distributing the artist production, right? And then the form of distribution can be pretty varied. And so while there -- you may get synergies in terms of being able to bring, let's say, more product into your funnel that I don't know if that's worth the complexity of trying to manage those radically different things. So if you think about the Live Nation business where Mike sits on our Board, and he's run -- he has a phenomenal company. But you're talking about like giving the artist a bigger share. And then you hear Mike talk about his business and how big a share the artist's taken, the bet that he's making, each time he goes out on a tour. That is a risk management business that while there is some sort of symbiosis at the margins. With a music label or with a distributor like us. The fact is, is that Mike's risks are totally unique to the major concert business. And I'm not sure you gain a lot by taking all that and putting it together.
Okay. All right.
So on the other hand, there's a media portfolio strategy, right? If you really believe that there's a lot of good inherent growth in different components of the music industry. Sprinkling bets across those assets is -- may make a lot of sense.
I see. That's helpful. What -- maybe we can go to the poll question. I think we have a poll question. If you can pull that out. Wow, that's good.
It's a well-designed chart.
Yes. I thought about it carefully. So let's go back while they queue up the right question. Listening mix, I think it was maybe -- was it a year ago you've signed the agreement with Amazon? Is that right?
Yes. A little bit over a year.
Okay.
Yes.
So everyone sort of, I think, gets the idea that SIRI is dominant in the car and Pandora's dominant in mobile, and you guys have talked about sort of expanding the opportunity of SIRI listenership outside of the car. Where would you say you are in broad terms today versus what you think the opportunity is?
So we've been doing it for a long time, right? We've been streaming since -- I think it's the fall of 2004. We've gone through multiple generations of our app. We've gone through multiple generations of getting ourselves on like 10-foot devices and other CE devices. And so the Amazon partnership, which has been fantastic. The recent launch with Google, which has also been great. Our continuations and evolutions of that strategy, engaging people beyond the car is an important thing for us. We clearly have a great position to win people's hearts and minds in the vehicle. And then it's getting them to use it outside the vehicle is a way of just deepening that engagement and making them stickier. And so we keep hammering away at it. It's turned into a nice, healthy distribution channel. So for instance, the retail channel, which we rarely talk about anymore, is still a healthy distribution channel for us. And the stand-alone streaming business is coming up to begin to rival it as a nice, healthy contributor.
So retail is still healthy?
Yes.
Interesting. What percent of your gross adds, would you say, do retail? I used to think it was like 10% or something like that?
Yes. It's -- I'm trying to think of what our gross adds must be around $8 million, right? And so it's probably around 10% or a little bit less. And stand-alone is same as streaming is. Cracking its way up there.
That's amazing. What about the most common question, I hate to ask this because I'm sure you're tired of talking about it, but Liberty SIRI and SIRI? If you get to the point where you guys continue to buy back your stock and Liberty just naturally gets to 80% ownership. Is that something that the Board cares about? In other words, would they moderate the buyback to sort of curtail Liberty from getting to 80%? Or it's just -- if you think the stock is a compelling value. And it's in the right interest to shareholders to buy it at that price, and it just happens to push Liberty SIRI to 80%?
Well, and I think it's really that. It's -- there's -- the board is looking out for the interest of shareholders, right? And so if 80% posed some sort of a problem for shareholders, then of course, the board would take an interest in it. But we've been talking about this for 10 years. And I don't see where 80% poses any particular problem for shareholders at Sirius. It has a little bit of efficiency for Liberty, right, because a -- would then be able to avoid the tax leak in terms of dividend. And so they get a little economic efficiency there. But from the SiriusXM shareholder perspective, it doesn't appear to present any particular issues that I can see.
Okay. So we give the questions another try. No? No questions. Okay. So NOLs. You knew you were getting close to or maybe used up the legacy SIRI NOLs. And then when you bought Pandora, you got some more NOLs. How big are those now? And when do you think you'll exhaust those NOLs related to Pandora?
So I think our last disclosure was probably right after the Pandora transaction, right, where we trued up the NOLs for the effect. And so they were about $1.3 billion back in the spring. Obviously, we made a little money this year. So we've worked them down. I think we're looking to become a cash taxpayer late in '21. The Pandora NOLs, they get strung out over a number of years. So we'll -- but we will use them all. But I think the net of it is, is that we'll start -- it will be -- in '22 we'll be a full year taxpayer.
Okay. And is that important to not -- I mean do you guys actively think, do we really want to be efficient and pay less taxes? And so if we get to the point where we exhaust these Pandora NOLs. If there is an asset that made strategic sense that had NOLs that would sort of garner more interest?
Well, I don't know that I see us someday buying assets for NOLs that don't fit some other operating strategy. Not to say that, that couldn't happen but if it did, it would, I think, be an odd one-off transaction. The -- are we going to try and optimize tax payments within the rules? Well, of course, we have, right? It's part of our responsibility.
So what about churn? I mean your churn rates at least have been surprising to us that they've been so good. If you unpack that, what would you ascribe it to? Is it just a healthy economy? Is it the content spend that you've -- the content investments that you've made?
I think the answer is yes to both those things, right, that we are just a discretionary product. Nobody really needs us. And so people choose to spend money on it, presumably in a downturn that there would be some people who would choose to cut back on discretionary spending. So a healthy consumer definitely helps us. But at the root of it all, we believe the business is all about what you hear when you turn it on. And the content investments are critical.
Any questions from the audience? If you do, just raise your hand, we'll be happy to take it. So what -- I want to talk about a recession because one of the things that's going to be a bit different if we do go into recession this time is you've got Pandora, right? How should invest -- what is the ad exposure on Pandora? I have $1.3 billion in my notes, is that about right?
Yes. It's -- yes. Yes, it's a little bit less than that, but yes.
Okay. How should investors think about -- I mean, I think investors intuitively think of you as a subscription-based defensive business. And we haven't seen your multiple get impacted at all, even though investors seem very nervous about a recession with this Pandora business. How should investors think about that ad business if you do go into a recession? Is there enough underlying growth where they just may grow just at a more modest rate? Or do you think there are more material risk to that $1.3 billion of cyclical exposure?
Well, certainly, digital advertising is a pretty mature business these days. It's hard to imagine that it wouldn't be recession-sensitive, right, because in economic downturns, people tend to cut back on advertising. And you got to believe that's going to hit all sectors of advertising. I think the -- to me, what happens in a recession to SiriusXM, the overall economic results, the satellite radio side of the business will probably be a little bit late to the recession and a little bit early, coming out of the back-end. Presumably, it means that auto sales are declining. And so there's going to be a significant drop in subscriber acquisition costs as a result of lower installs. And so as we look at a recession, we still think that you -- you're looking at growth in satellite radio products. It's just slower growth, right? And then on the ad-based side, yes, you're going to have an economic downturn in the ads, and it'll pick back up again. It's -- if it comes, it hits everybody in the U.S. market. And so the thing that I kind of like about our companies that we do have incredibly strong free cash flow. And we do have a good growth trajectory. So as you look at stocks that are maybe a little more resilient in a recession than others, I think we might be one of them.
Do you think there's any scope for the Board? I think you've raised your dividend about 10% a year, last couple of times you've raised it. Do you think there's any scope for you guys to -- or the Board to sort of accelerate that? Or you sort of think investors just sort of think of that as just the steady grower in terms of the dividend?
Well, that's clearly a Board discussion. The Board obviously debates what to do with it each time they make a decision. So far, what you've seen us do is that the increases in dividends sort of offset the amount of the buyback. And so we end up with a dividend payout that's around $200 million, give or take, a little bit. And we've talked for a long time about how we generate about $2 billion a year in excess cash flow from the -- our excess capital, in part from free cash flow. And in part from the growth in EBITDA that allows for a little bit of additional leverage, right? And so the combination of the 2 is you're kind of looking at the dividend, there's about a 10% allocation of the excess capital.
Okay. That's helpful. What about you're getting ready to launch. I think one happened last year, one's going to happen this year in terms of new satellites.
Both in '20.
Both in '20. Okay. Once those are done, what would you suggest investors think about in terms of CapEx for the business?
Something north of $200 million, right, is, I think, the way to think about it. Now with a number of different products we have across the SiriusXM product set, the Pandora product set, the AdsWizz product set. There's a lot of development work that goes on. And so I think it's a little bit north of $200 million.
And how many more years before there's another satellite launch? I don't think my model goes out that far.
Yes. So the next one is probably in the 2025, 2026 time frame.
Okay. All right. And what about -- you're going to have this excess spectrum and sort of, I think you said 5 or 6 years in the last earnings call. Can you just remind us of sort of the list of potential things you guys are kicking around in terms of what to do with that excess spectrum? And any of the sort of working hypothesis feel more or less compelling today of that list?
Yes. It's still sort of the theory, right? And because we are still sort of 6, 7 years away that the triggering point is when are there few enough revenue-generating radios on the old Sirius band where you could change the content you're uplinking, right? Right now if you did that, you would disrupt service to a significant portion of the business. So you're not going to do that. But when that gets small enough, then you begin to -- you can think about altering what runs across that frequency. So look, we could increase audio fidelity, right? A lot of people debate the importance of that. We could increase the number of channels, right? The -- we could run more data across it. We have a lot of ancillary services that we run now like traffic and data services to. I think we've got 18 million service packages out there now, and that's all data that runs across the satellite. And so you know why -- video in vehicle was something that was interesting that we could distribute video across those channels. But we're still -- the good news is, is that we're heading down an architectural path where all of those product options are available to us. And so when we get closer to the date, and we see what the makeup of the marketplace looks like, we'll make a decision.
Okay. Okay. Any questions from the audience? What about 360L? That -- maybe I'm naive, it feels like the number of OEMs that have agreed to put that stuff in their new models is still pretty thin, right? You've got a couple of GM? And is that right?
Well, the number that have announced. So GM -- Chrysler has announced. And GM has announced and then the GM side, the announcement has been they're going to put it in 1 million vehicles, which I think is actually pretty significant. And we have plans with almost all of the other OEMs. They're simply not announced yet. Our long history has been we don't make product announcements for automakers.
Understood. Okay. But how do you think -- what -- let's say -- let's just fast forward to most OEMs decide to do this. How do you think it will -- how will it manifest itself in the financials? If you're on the buy side, and you're sitting there working on your model, what do you think you would see that's different?
It is meant to be an extension of existing services, right? And so -- and the whole purpose is to improve consumer engagement with the product. So there are some things that get enabled with it. We -- in a 360L environment, we're getting data back about what's happening in the vehicle. And so with data back, I think, we're -- we'll actually be -- we should expect an increase in conversion rates because we can target people a little bit better. I think we should expect a reduction in churn associated with it. We will probably have an increase in costs associated with streaming, right? We'll be paying streaming royalties to the extent that people choose music products that are delivered over IP, right? And so there'll be a little bit of an increase in cost. But it's -- to me, it's sort of an organic extension of the business. And there's nothing about 360L where there's a step function change in behavior of any of the elements of the business. But it is all improvements at the margin.
So you said something -- I think it might have been on this stage a year ago, and it's my own ignorance about your business, but it really shocked me when you said it. You said that if a consumer decides to consume SIRI over the Internet with streaming, that those are your highest margin customers?
Yes.
And that just -- I mean, I can tell you from the buy side's perspective, they don't believe that, and it certainly confused me. So I guess you can put me in the camp of that. So can you unpack that a little bit and explain because I think most -- we get the question less now than we used to. But that is still the sort of bogeyman that's out there that there's not as much of a seamless transition to sort of IP connectivity for your business model?
Well, here's the thing is -- I think it's sort of a theory, because I mean, if you ran the math, the fact is, is that while we get a lot of people in the music industry that criticize SiriusXM for not paying its fair share of royalties. It's ridiculous. We have a product that sells for $13.50. And we're paying out -- and we are a music talk service. Consumption of music in our platform is less than it is on the streaming platform. We're paying as much as interactive streamers are paying. And so the -- and for a noninteractive product. So it really -- the car implementations are going to get -- they're going to be a mix of satellite and IP. And so while in theory, you can -- if we were to shift 100% of the business today with the way they listen and what the CRB rates are, I think our royalty costs would actually go down, right? But that's just -- that's sort of a theory. It's not a real world example.
Okay. Okay. Any questions from the audience? There aren't. All right. Well, David, thank you very much. This was great.
Sure. Thank you.
Yes. Thank you.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Sirius XM Holdings Inc. transcript - plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.
Get an API key View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Sirius XM Holdings Inc. earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the
EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server.
Quarterly plans from $105 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search,
and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.