Home / Transcripts / St. James's Place plc (STJ) · July 31, 2025

St. James's Place plc (STJ) Earnings Call Transcript

July 31, 2025

Hannover GB Financials Capital Markets earnings 52 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator operator
#1

Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the St. James's Place half year results Q&A. My name is Brika, and I will be coordinating your call today. [Operator Instructions]. I will now hand you over to your host, Mark Fitzpatrick, CEO at St. James' Place to begin. So please go ahead, Mark.

Mark FitzPatrick executive
#2

Thank you, and good morning, and thank you for joining us today to Mark FitzPatrick here. I'll do for questions shortly. But before then, I just wanted to reiterate 3 key takeaways from the half year results announcement. Firstly, is in good shape, performing well and growing. We achieved net inflows that were double what they were in the first half and our FUM stood at a record 198.5 billion at the end of June. This is a testament to the value that more than 1 million clients place in their Pfizer and SJP to help them secure their financial futures. Secondly, a strong period for new business has been mirrored in a strong financial result. Growth in the underlying cash result of 17% was a result of improving new business flows rising FUM and cost control. This result highlights the benefits of our simple, scalable business model. And timidly, we're making good progress against our key programs of work and delivering on our strategy. I said 6 months ago that 2025 would be another year of heavy lifting for the business, but we're getting the work done. We're on track to implement simple comparable charges less than a month from now. We're taking costs out of the business, as we said we would, and we're moving forward with the revised approach to our review into historic ongoing servicing. And this means we've been able to release some of the provision we held against this, which we will be returning to shareholders through a buyback. So it's been another period of hard graft but a successful 1 that positions SJP for sustained growth and success. We've still got plenty of work ahead, but we're confident in our ambition to double the underlying cash result by 2030. So let me pause there and hand over to the operator so that we can open up for questions.

Operator operator
#3

[Operator Instructions]. The first question comes from Andrew Sinclair with Bank of America.

Andrew Sinclair analyst
#4

Three for me as usual, please. First, just there was a big step-up in the cash most such an improvement in H1 this year. That margin in percentage stances been going down for the last few years. So [indiscernible], but just keen to understand more about what's going on there. Second was just on adviser headcount. Just wonder if you can tell us in the run up to the new charging structure and with the productivity ex any change in departures in H1? And third was just on the Academy, just how many trainees graduated in H1 and how many are in the academy today.

Mark FitzPatrick executive
#5

Great. Andy, thank you. Why don't we start off with the -- I'll hand over to Caroline for the element of the new business and then I'll pick up the adviser headcount in the gate.

Caroline Waddington executive
#6

Yes. Thanks, Andy. So you're right, the margin on new business is higher. So we've got about 23% due to the increase in gross inflows, but it has been higher at like 40%. The rest is operational leverage, where we do actually have not everything, not all the costs are actually linear all connected to the rise with the increase in business. So that's purely what it is or some fixed costs, and we're getting a positive operating leverage from that.

Mark FitzPatrick executive
#7

And on the [indiscernible] Advantage over the first half, I haven't seen any shift or change in the underlying patterns of joiners or departing very busy heads down, really focusing on clients, really focusing on supporting clients through what has undoubtedly been quite a volatile market, lots of geopolitical and broader uncertainty in the world, and that's the time when clients look to their advisers for support reassurance, and that's when the advisers really stand up and support their clients in a very meaningful way. So there's nothing in particular that stands out in any of the underlying numbers around adviser headcount. We continue to work with our advisers and with our teams in terms of broader productivity we are spending time and working hard to try and improve as well some of our technology to make it easier for advisers to spend more time in front of clients, and therefore, less time on admin and related matters and paperwork. So trying to get the [indiscernible] system to do most of that and to automate a lot of that. And on the Academy, the Academy continues to be a very, very important part of St. James's Place, not just for us, but I think for the whole industry, we attract in a large slice of all the new joiners to the profession. We will continue to do that. We think it is a very, very important role we pay, as I said, not just for SAP, but for the industry as a whole. The advice gap is enormous in this market, and we need more advisers in the market. We need high-quality advisers to be able to support more and more clients because I think more and more people are realizing they cannot rely upon the stage for pensions and the like, and therefore, they need to take [indiscernible] into their own hands. And generally, you're going to need adviser to help you do the right thing. So advisers graduating through the year and no major changes on that and advisers in training at the period end is all kind of in line with what we've what we've seen in the past, no major changes to that component. We will continue to look in the same way as we have with the partner productivity. We're also going to look to see how do we actually try and make sure that we get higher quality through the academy so that more people that join actually make it through towards the end. So that's one of the things we're going to be addressing over the course of the next 12, 18 months. but we're delighted to be bringing more young people into the academy and a lot more women coming in than generally we see across the industry because we're seeing more and more women actually gaining financial wealth, and we want to be able to give clients greater choice about who serves them who works with them along the way. So we're really pleased that we'll be able to contribute to the profession as a whole, helps shape the profession in terms of demographics and in terms of gender mix.

Andrew Sinclair analyst
#8

All great news. Just -- have you got the numbers there any chance for how many people are in it and [indiscernible].

Mark FitzPatrick executive
#9

Not in front of me here, Andy. I think the general tone that we're trying to do is an element of where we're going with this. It continues to be -- it continues to be important, continue to be something we've invested.

Operator operator
#10

Your next question comes from Nasib Ahmed with UBS.

Nasib Ahmed analyst
#11

Three questions from me as well. Firstly, on just derisking the car structure change on the 26th of August. Can you talk a little bit more about how much testing you've done, how comfortable you are that it's not going to cause any disruption? And maybe within that kind of talk a little bit about how you've traded in the first month of this quarter. Second question on targeted support and the FCA's kind of ambitions around that. Are you still committed to just face-to-face advice? Or are there other things that you're kind of looking at to support that ambition from the FBA. And then finally, on the provision release. I guess the question is the face interest rate is changing as well is coming down. You've had some experience around kind of paying claimants. But is there as you develop more experience, should we expect another reassessment of the provision at some point in the future as well.

Mark FitzPatrick executive
#12

Thank you for the broadly three questions. On the simple comparable charging, we have done extensive testing. We did address reversal of the whole transition recently. That went well. That's given us the confidence to be able to contact clients now ahead of the change, which we have now done. So all clients now informed of the change. So a high level of testing has been done and we are as confident as you can be on these things going into that public [ holiday ] weekend. I'm not minded to give a running. Kind of notes of kind of trading, suffice to say, July normally, July, August 10 to be the quieter months of the year. And as people go away and holiday clients go away in the holiday, so you shouldn't be surprised to see that, that might be kind of following that kind of broader footprint. But that being said, our partners, advisers are still very busy because there's still a lot of clients and a huge advice gap out there. So the guys are working hard. And we've seen over the first half an increase in volume of cases and for the first time in a while an increase in the value, a modest increase, but an increase in the value of cases as well. So both are up this half. In terms of the second question around targeted support, technically at the moment, the consultation paper from the FCA does not allow does not suggest that appointed reps are going to be able to take or go down the targeted support route. Now that's because the rules of the legislation has been written limiting what appointed rep can do. Treasury has recently announced that they are going to consider opening that and extending that component. For the time being, we consider that actually we are it's a key part of our purpose statement that we believe in the power of advice and the value of the price. So we think that actually providing clients with advice is a very, very important thing and providing clients with individualized advice is a very, very important thing. Targeted support, we see is going to be net positive for the industry for the market, for the U.K. for consumers, helping people take -- to start to take a little more ownership and starting to think a little bit more about their investments. That's got to be a good thing. And we're really, really keen to support that. It could in time be on ramp for individualized advice. But we don't expect it in any way to cannibalize our business. We do expect it to get people to stop thinking and engaging in a way that they really should. So we see it as a big positive. And in terms of the provision cover?

Caroline Waddington executive
#13

Yes. So yes, as we said, this is a 2- to 3-year program. I think last year, just as a reminder, obviously, we do a lot of builds into this year and then -- and incorporated that into our reverse methodology. And then we've also had more experience as we've gone through the program. So we've incorporated those and that's how we've calculated our best estimates of the provision now. And obviously, then we have a release from that. So H2, we can continue to execute. We will -- with all provisions, we will be reassessing it as we go through and we get more experience. But I'd say this accommodates obviously the FDA guidance and experience to date. So yes, it's -- I'm comfortable where we're at now, but we'll continue to reassess again at the year-end, obviously, if we've got some [indiscernible].

Operator operator
#14

Your next question comes from David McCann with Deutsche Bank.

David McCann analyst
#15

Congratulations on some decent numbers this morning. Yes, 3 questions inevitably from me as well, please. I'll start with the provision release since that's obviously very topical. I mean, can you confirm how much of that release that 20% release was sort of methodology change from the FDA guidance and so forth versus the experience change that you've got. Is there a way of roughly quantifying that? I don't expect it to be [indiscernible] and then on that program more broadly, when do you anticipate you'll actually start sending the letters out to clients which you think are affected more broadly? And then sort of turning to the flow numbers. What drove the improvement do you think in net flows in the second quarter? What are the anecdotes you're hearing from advisers on the ground? Is this client appetite? Is it easy in cost of living pressures. Is there anything in there related to the upcoming fee structure changes that with the incentives that are going to change for both the advisers and the fee covers declined. Is there any sort of front running, if you like, of the charging or anything in the flows for that or just curious as to what's caused the improvement?

Mark FitzPatrick executive
#16

David, last pick up the provision release piece first, and then I'll come around to the letters and the flow.

Caroline Waddington executive
#17

Yes. And I'm not going to go into detail. I think, look, it is a combination of the two. Which we take both into account, but I'm not minded to give you the detailed breakdown on that.

Mark FitzPatrick executive
#18

[indiscernible] will be going out next week to clients. So the correspondence will be start across form has been going for a little while, but it will be ramped up under the new methodology from the element of next week. So clients will start getting things out so we'll stop moving very quickly. And on the element of flows, second quarter more generally, I think we saw was the second of April liberation Day, we saw a huge uptick in terms of client questions, inquire affairs, et cetera. So we saw a lot of activity. We've also with the government talking about and there's been a lot of speculation about is what's going to happen there. As everybody knows, we don't offer a cash is, but it got people, I think, thinking a lot more about us and have I used my allowance adequately or properly. And we have seen -- you have seen from the numbers, an impressive uptick in terms of the investment bonds. And I think that's a consequence of the pensions and the inheritance tax linkage going forward through this government. So it's a combination of factors. I think the U.K. consumer is kind of holding up well. I think last year, earlier this year, seen kind of real wage growth. I think with growing -- potentially growing unemployment coming into the U.K. later on this year. There's a sense of inflation decide that's going to give rise to less wage pressure and that might slow down real wage growth. So it will be interesting to see how that plays out in the back end -- back half of this year, early next year. We are all expecting I think, banks to reduce rates. And I think that lifts up a little bit of enthusiasm and a little bit of confidence. We're seeing a relatively stable housing market. So consumer, I think, is as weather the storm incredibly well in the U.K. The big [indiscernible] have full government generally and for Treasury is just trying to read as much certainly in stability. I think extended period of speculation is dangerous and unhelpful. We saw that at the back end of last year for consumers. It may be short-term helpful for us. But for the economy and for consumers at large, it's not a great thing. So we're really, really keen on stability and certainty. But that being said, while there isn't a lot of that, we do advisers of their talking to clients and generally takes clients to move or customers to move in a different way. So it's a combination of those. In my wondering around and speaking with partners around the country and going to visit them in their practices, they're all saying they are super busy. The issues of last year, early last year, are so far in the recesses that clients don't talk about these things anymore. They're really back to talking about them, their affairs how they protect themselves and what they need to do to look after themselves and their families. So that's a conversation that should be taking place and that's probably the conversation that got lost for about 12, 15 months over the course of [indiscernible].

David McCann analyst
#19

[indiscernible] around that if it's all due to the fact that you've already mentioned?

Mark FitzPatrick executive
#20

The big thing to remember, David, is that these are not spontaneous actions from clients. Very few clients wake up suddenly say, right, I need to do ex need to do why vis-a-vis this particular part of the world. So at the edges, there may be an element, but we think it's at the agents will only be able to get to see that later on. Because bear in mind, from a client perspective, the delta is not particularly large. And we're encouraging clients to do things that they should be doing and making the most tax advantages ideally that they should be taking advantage of that are available. And that's why pensions is still such an important part of the investing landscape.

Operator operator
#21

Your next question comes from Enrico Bolzoni with JPMorgan.

Enrico Bolzoni analyst
#22

So one, you say that you will introduce a positive range within your Polaris product. So can you give us some color perhaps on whether you see in the immediate term that more as an opportunity or a threat? So I'm thinking do you see clients that want passive location and because you cannot offer that yes, they are currently allocating somewhere else? Or do you think that, that could have a bit of an impact on your margins per up and put some pressure there? So that's my first question. My second question is on the dividend policy. You clearly are performing exceptionally well. When shall we expect a potential reversal in the capital distribution policy and therapy, again, higher dividends being paid. And finally, on the cash balances, you had quite a bit of money with Flagstone. Can you give us an update there, perhaps on the amount and whether you think that this will eventually move back into investment products anytime soon?

Mark FitzPatrick executive
#23

Thanks, Enrico. I'll take the first and third and then hand over to Caroline for the second on the dividend piece. In terms of [indiscernible] we see it as a net additive because at the moment for clients who want to have some type of exposure to index tracking funds and the like. We can't offer that today. And therefore, those assets will set outside of the SP guidance. Ideally, what we'd like to do is be able to expect. And we've deliberately called the Polaris multi- calling at the large multi-index levering fantastic success that we've had with Polaris so far. So we see it as a net additive. In terms of margin, when it comes -- once we have regulatory approval, then the guys will be able to talk a lot more about what we think the margin on this is going to be and the overall picture. But suffice to say, we're doing this because we think it's going to be the right thing for clients. We think it's going to be very helpful to our advisers and we think it's going to be good for shareholders as well because it's going to be an incremental value and incremental FUM coming into the garden. On cash balances with Flagstone, Flagstone balances have gone up. I think they're $5.2 billion at the half year. We have seen more clients putting money there. The average client balance is slightly down from where it was previously, but we have seen more clients linking in there. We are looking during the course of the first half of next year to explore what and how we might do things ever slightly differently with -- but it's working really, really well for our clients. It's really working really, really well for our advisers in terms of being able to have that offering. And I think what it probably speaks to is just you would have seen us with the banks reporting out earlier this week. It's just people saving just with a little bit of a niggle and growing uncertainty in their minds going forward, just hedging the bets a bit in terms of diversification. We're seeing good intake and good uptake in this as you saw flows, people actually investing in the market. But there are, I think, people as well saying, I'm just going to hold a bit of cash for the time being, just given some of this uncertainty that's out there. Now cash, I believe, and I've said this to the chancellor is an important part of everybody's portfolio. That being said, we are concerned across the U.K. as a whole that people are probably slightly over safe and underinvested. And that's something that our advisers are continually talking to our clients about. It's not something I think our clients really struggled, but it's a broader U.K. consumer but it is something, I think, that we are mindful of. And as confidence builds, we're looking to make it easier and easier for people to be able to move from Flagstone into the SJP Garden to be able to invest and Polaris multi-index may provide a useful avenue, useful opportunity and catalysts to drive some of that. But let's see. Caroline, on the dividend policy.

Caroline Waddington executive
#24

Yes, Enrico. So as we're aware, we have set our return guidance for '24 -- or '25 and '26 as we go through the period of transition. And just a reminder, really, we set this to give certainty in the returns during a real period of change that we're going to in the business. And I know that we've had a good start to the year. We're also making good progress with our key programs to work. But I can say there is still a lot of work to do. We still got a lot of that going on. And obviously, there's a lot of some uncertainty in the sort of macro environment, although we can obviously that strategy, the importance of advice, obviously. So look, as a capital allocation, it sets out, we always consider returning excess capital to shareholders in we will assess the longer-term cap returns that will go to the board at the appropriate point in time, but I'm not going to preempt them by put any data on that.

Mark FitzPatrick executive
#25

Enrico, let me just -- one thing I just mentioned on the first question, your [indiscernible]. We don't envisage that large multi-index will cause us to revisit our margin guidance. that we came out with previously in terms of the 43 to 45 bps post the simple comparable charging change.

Operator operator
#26

Your next question comes from the line of Andrew Crean with Autonomous.

Andrew Crean analyst
#27

A couple of questions, if I can. Firstly, could you, on excess capital and assessing excess capital, could you provide some practical framework for us to assess when you hit excess capital so that we can understand and predict that. Secondly, could you talk about performance of your funds in the first half of this year relative to sort of peer groups. And then -- could you talk about whether on the redress issue, you've got advisers contributing to the redress issue where they've been serial offenders.

Mark FitzPatrick executive
#28

Okay. Let me -- Caroline, are you okay to start with the first one.

Caroline Waddington executive
#29

Yes. Yes, I will. And Andrew, I haven't forgotten that. I promised that -- I promised this to you. Look, we are -- we've already started simplifying our reporting. This is all part of [indiscernible], which we started, and hopefully, you've seen that we've started to sort of refine our financial reports and focus on key metrics using our data book. So we started that, but we're actually doing a much more holistic review, which we're doing in the second half of the year. Some of this is facilitated by the new charging structure. So I all brought back on that at the full year and giving you that transparency is very much one of my objectives I can assure you, it is a capital-light business we're running. I'm not holding assets over and above what we need for our solvency and what we need to invest in the business like the loans and the renewal income asset. But I am aware I owe you that and I want to do that. So I will update the full year on how I'm going to do that.

Mark FitzPatrick executive
#30

On performance of funds, the funds have actually performed like-for-like I've taken out the advice and platform fees from -- at an AUM level quarter kind of upper in second quartile. About 90% of our AUM is in those quartiles so performing really well. And on the 3 years, it's about 80s that are in the upper quartile. So really strong performance. The guys have done very well. And they kind of go into this environment with the very active asset allocation and a real opportunity to be able to focus on the very best fund managers around the world to be able to help support and guide them and that's part of the magic of the formula. And Andrew, on the third question around advisers and the historic evidence provision. The provision is still approach provision. We have not taken any allowance for any recoveries from advisers for the most egregious cases, we will be sitting down and talking with advisers. As I've said in the past, we're not looking to nickel and dime, but if there is headroom for bid, there is evidence or lack of evidence for many years across many clients in an adviser's portfolio, then we'll be sitting down and requiring some contribution from them for this because that's not really the expectation.

Operator operator
#31

We now have a question from Larissa Van Deventer with Barclays.

Larissa van Deventer analyst
#32

Thank you, and good morning. Just one very basic question for me. With the new fee structure going live in the bank holiday weekend at the end of August, what are the key steps that need to happen to ensure that this goes smoothly, please?

Mark FitzPatrick executive
#33

There's a run with about 880 lines that is going to run through. There is a huge amount of stuff that's going to be going through on that piece. The guys who have run -- as I mentioned earlier, the guys have run through, we've done 3 dresses now, each one has had an element of learning fine-tuning. So the guys have got it down there know exactly how long each step of the 800 maybe will take. It's a fantastic team. I'm immensely proud of what they've done so far and all the testing and checking and support, et cetera. We'll have teams from around the world coming here to support us over the course of that weekend, so that if there are any wrinkles along the way that we can deal with it. And we're doing it over a bank holiday weekend so that if there are any issues, we can deal with them. We need 48 hours to 72 hours effectively just gives us the extra check and balance so that we know we can go live on the Tuesday morning with a great degree of confidence. So at this stage, we're all systems go. Clients have been communicated with all the data, all the systems that are there, and we've got everybody on an standby. At the moment, they are catching a breath. We're covering from all the testing they're doing so that they're ready to stand up in just under a month's time to go live.

Operator operator
#34

We have Greg Simpson with BNB Paribas.

Gregory Simpson analyst
#35

Three questions from my end. Firstly, can I ask conceptually how you think the 43% to 45% margin evolves over time, I guess, the asset gestation on higher margin, but you'll have more fee tiering. So outlook in the medium term there? Second question, within your fund mix. It's quite striking that only 3% of AUM is in alternative investments when many both managers are a key to get that up. Can you maybe flesh out your thoughts on private markets? And if you can leverage your scale to get better pricing and differentiated product to your clients? And then thirdly notes the Asia is now Asia and Middle East. Can you maybe flesh out data the Middle East in terms of your current scale and offering if it's maybe expats and the opportunity.

Mark FitzPatrick executive
#36

Great. Thank you. I'll pick up the second and third first, and then I'll ask Caroline to comment on the first. So in terms of AUM [indiscernible], yes, it is a fairly modest percentage of the overall partly that has something to do with the fact that the funds that we have, have daily pricing and daily liquidity and daily pricing and daily liquidity in the private market space and on natural bed for us. So also in this probably well into the kind of second half of next year. We'll look at the element of how we might extend our old offerings and what we might do with that, I'm not sure normal daily pricing, daily liquidity is necessarily going to lend itself to that. So we're going to look at different vehicles that we might do. I am a fan of private markets. I do think they can complement investors' portfolio well. We're seeing more and more of the economy in the private space. And therefore, we want to make sure that we get appropriate exposure to that for our clients. On the question of Asia and the Middle East, we opened up operation in Dubai about 18 months ago to vote. It is predominantly an expat market. I was after earlier on in June, thankfully avoiding the worst of the July heat. But as I earlier in June meeting the team, it's still a small team, but actually, the opportunity out there is huge. The market out there isn't particularly well served. So we think there is a great opportunity there. There's a lot of funds there. There are a lot of young folks there. So we want to really make sure that we give them and get them onto the right discipline and the right direction of travel. The one thing I should also mention, Greg, is at the moment, [ Floris ] doesn't invest in us. So as Polaris has got larger, that also is going to be reducing an element of the percentage. Right. So with that, let me hand over to Caroline on the margin piece.

Caroline Waddington executive
#37

Yes, absolutely. No, great. Thanks. And you're right. I mean, obviously, as the different product mix will -- it does impact that. But that is why we have the range and we think we'll be within that some aspects might be up, some might be down a bit. But we're going to keep monitoring it. We're comfortable it's in the range. And obviously, we'll get back to you in the future, obviously, in the longer term, if we could see that changing, but just it's within the range.

Operator operator
#38

We have a question from Andrew Lowe with Citi.

Andrew Lowe analyst
#39

The client retention has improved quite a bit in the first half at above 95%. Can you just talk through the drivers of that is a sort of normalization of the sort of macro environment, people feeling a little bit more comfortable? And how do you think this is likely to evolve in the future? Do you think this is a sustainable level? And how do you think this is going to be affected by your new charging structure? The second question, just following on the discussion on the advice boundary review and various changes proposed at the FDA. Clearly, it's good that policymakers are looking to encourage more investment and increasing your TAM. I'm curious if you think that the retention of high-value customers at B2C models and maybe also banks can be improved by this. And I'd love to know just in a bit more detail. If you could break down where you're winning business from in terms of the gross flows. So specifically, B2C and banks, how meaningful is that in terms of your growth flows.

Mark FitzPatrick executive
#40

Andrew, thank you. So in terms of client retention, we are very, very pleased with it. We're pleased. It's kind of back up the levels that we saw of old partly to have been settled down significantly. The main part of that, though, is down did a fantastic job, the very professional high-quality advisers do supporting clients engaging with them and really demonstrating the true value that they bring to the conversation. The average duration of client at Pfizer relationship is nearly 10 years. I mean it is very, very impressive. And I think all of that helps to build after the element of of client retention. We're also bringing in more young clients, younger clients than we have in the past. We've got a good uptick in clients in their early 30s. So getting them engaging, investing early on. It's just so important. So if we can get that practice in early, that will also just help to drive up client retention because in an ideal world, this will be clients for the next 30, 40 years. et cetera, in terms of as we go forward. In terms of ABR, yes, I'm delighted that policymakers have got together our treasury FCA, the market, the way they've done it has been exemplary across the patch. So absolute hat off to the FCI and Treasury report they've done in the government for really leaning behind us to transit economic sector really trying to drive this through. the element of where do we think this is really going to buy. I think this model is likely to be the targeted sport model is likely to be a digital model. Because it's going to need to be very lean. As soon as somebody personal a human is engaged, you can't under hear what you've heard. And if you hear something that kind of break you out of targeted support, you're then in a more challenging situation with that potential consumer. And as for the flows from our business and the pensions and the like, it's a broad smattering of consolidation, ongoing regular premium and kind of single premium elements that come through in a way. So I know all the banks are really focused in terms of the advice guidance of foundry, very interesting opportunity for them. I think the answer to this is going to be the quality data and digital technical experience.

Operator operator
#41

Your next question comes from the line of Ben Bathurst with RBC.

Benjamin Bathurst analyst
#42

Three from me as well, if I may. Firstly, what's the client feedback been on the changes to the charges following the communications you've put out in recent weeks? Has that landed, how you had hoped? And are you confident that clients are able to understand the changes? And then secondly, on the flow outlook, I wondered, is your base case that there will be a period of adjustment for advisers from September that might slow down flows for a period post the changes? Or are you hopeful of a sort of seamless transition there. And then thirdly, any update on plans to potentially acquire more businesses as part of the BSP process? And were you any more active in this respect during the first half.

Mark FitzPatrick executive
#43

So let me -- I'll deal with the first two, and I'll ask Caroline and pick up the third one. In terms of client feedback, well, as you can imagine, we spent quite a lot of time with client-focused groups. We spoke to partners as well, and we had communication experts in talking and helping us actually craft the letters and the messages that we -- that went to the client. So in theories kind of as close as designed by clients for clients, if you will. When I asked my Chief Operating Officer the other day, what kind of uptick have we had in terms of inbound on the letters and the like he said, I think last counter was something like 51 inquiries. So nothing on that side. And I think while we, as an organization, have agonized over this for nearly 2 years, while you as analysts in the market have been very reflective in your modeling, et cetra. And while the media and the regulators agonized over this from a client perspective, actually, it's not a major event in their life. Because, ultimately, what they're doing is they have huge trade feet and trust in their adviser. They have a long-term relationship with their adviser the underlying fee component isn't changing massively one way or other. So I think as far as many clients, the vast majority of clients, they will see a modest decrease along the way. And I think that can probably -- all those factors contributing to the kind of level of feedback we are not getting. In terms of flow outlook, as you can imagine, we have been spending a lot of time with all our advisers trying to support them. One of the frustrating pieces around this program is it's taken so long. One of the upsides in taking so long, it's given our advisers' time to come to terms, get their head around, prepare us to help them and support them prepare for this new world. So they've all done online training. They've all done or how many webinars and support sessions. So they're all prepared for what needs to -- what they're about to embark upon. And from earlier this month, we have been making available to our advisers for them to make it available to clients and clients wish it dual illustrations. So they're effectively beginning to talk to clients in that new world during the course of the back half of July and will be throughout the course of August along that way. So that, I think, will also just give the advisers an opportunity to actually road test and what they've learned and engage with clients ahead of it actually going live because all these kind of things, generally, especially a pension transfer and investment bond, these things are weeks, months in the making in conversations and discussions with clients. So I don't expect there to be a major shift. I think we will see August being based low just by virtue of what it is [indiscernible], when we move into September, that's normally everybody coming back, and they'll come back in a new element. But if you're looking to consolidate your pension, if you're looking to invest wisely you'll be continuing these conversations with your adviser, there shouldn't be a major dislocation. Hopefully, those on famous last words.

Caroline Waddington executive
#44

Hi, Ben. As you know, we have got a small number of investments across the partnership. We've used them when there's been sort of sortation succession where we're confident with some good use of shareholder capital. And we're going to take this philosophy going forward. were minded as part of some succession to take stakes, but we've done nothing in the first half of the year. And look, it's not going to be a major sort of significant part of my capital allocation, obviously, but we're open-minded.

Operator operator
#45

We now have Charles Bendit with [indiscernible].

Charles John Bendit analyst
#46

I had one on the upcoming fee structure change and another on performance. So first of all, I think adviser economics are improving as part of this change from 50 basis points ongoing to 55 basis points ongoing these appeal to new advisers. And as a follow-up, longer term, do you think the portion of the 80 basis point supplies fee might shift further in favor of advisers? Or do you think that's now set. And then my second question is on performance. I think the fee structure change is going to have a very positive impact on performance metrics. How important do you think that will be reputation-wise for SJP?

Mark FitzPatrick executive
#47

Charles, thank you very much indeed. On the adviser ongoing advice concerned, you are right, it has gone from 50 bps to 55 bps. I don't plan on changing that apportionment any time soon. I think we need to get into the new world, see how everything settles down in that regard. I think the element of the overall fee structure that we are coming out with is very much in line with what I think we see in the marketplace, it's very, very competitive. From an adviser perspective, I think there are many reasons that advisers come to SJP. The element of the fee than is one component, the element of the breadth of the products, the quality of the products the quality of SJP that stands behind them, the element of the guarantee that we provide for the advice that they provide the support that we can give the Academy and then ultimately, the BSP component and that Caroline picked up we've been short on ago. Those are all key components of the proposition for our advisers and you might expect me to say this, I honestly believe we have the best quality advisers in the market. We have far more chartered and fellows of financial planning in the market. It's a great, great community of advisers and they do their clients are proud. So cost that mix than we think. And the fact that we are now aligning more closely with the market I think there were some people that were been interested to try and get them to join SJP for a little while. But they weren't big fans of the early withdrawal charge structure. In light of the new change, we are having conversations with some of them and some of them are chatting to us about actually what life might be like in the new world and whether they might make a separate cost. So let's see what happens with that. Secondly, on performance you're absolutely right. It will be a significantly positive change, removing the advice fee and removing the platform fee in the new world will give rise to effectively a reduction in the costs that come off our fees of about 107 bps. So it will be a significant improvement in our relative standing. And I think that will, a, go some ways to improving reputation in the marketplace. But it is important to point out that while investment performance is a very important part of what we provide, but we also provide us the peace of mind to long-term financial planning. The two go hand in glove. But the fact that actually we have such strong performance to date. And we have now this new headwind of this tailwind, rather, that will come in on our relative performance. We think we'll stand is in exceptionally good stead. So thank you for asking those questions. I am conscious that we have -- we have run quite long, and we've got a meeting very shortly with the shareholder. So I was minded to draw sums there if that's possible. I think we've had questions from everybody at this stage. And if anybody has a second round of questions, please do link up with the IR team. But just in conclusion for my [Audio Gap]

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete St. James's Place plc transcript - plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.

Get an API key View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to St. James's Place plc earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server. Quarterly plans from $105 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.