Swisscom AG (SCMN) Earnings Call Transcript
February 4, 2021
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Now I would like to hand over to Louis for the Q&A. Louis?
Urs, Mario and Alberto for the presentation. Now it's time for the Q&A session. As previously indicated, Dirk Wierzbitzki and Urs Lehner are also joining and supporting in case of any specific question on the Swiss business. Some remarks to people being registered for the Q&A and/or raising questions. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. Now let's open the Q&A session for the second part of today's meeting, with the first question coming from Polo Tang, UBS.
It's Polo Tang at UBS. I just have 3 different questions. Actually, before I start, I would like to say best wishes to Mario Rossi on his retirement. In terms of the 3 questions I had. First one is just really about trying to understand what you're assuming in terms of COVID-19 impacts as you look forward into 2021 in terms of what are you assuming in terms of your guidance? For example, what are you budgeting in terms of any recovery, if at all, in terms of roaming? And in particular, what are you assuming in terms of any potential impact in terms of SME revenues? Are you factoring in any significant step-up in terms of bankruptcies, foreclosures? So that's the first one in terms of COVID-19. The second question is really just about the competitive landscape. In terms of Sunrise, have you seen any change in their behavior since the merger with UPC? And then also in terms of Salt, we've obviously got this new Gigabox fixed wireless access product. So how has that changed competitive dynamics? And what's your sense in terms of the take-up? And my third question is really just in terms of -- for Alberto, in terms of the Italian mobile market. So Iliad seems to be attempting to raise prices in the low end of the market. But what is Alberto's sense in terms of the competitive dynamics here? Are we past the worst?
Thank you very much, Polo. I think the first question on guidance and consideration of the COVID is for Mario. And if Urs Lehner also wants something because of the SME then fine. Second one is for Urs. And the third one, as you, Polo, already indicated for Alberto.
Okay. I take the first one on the guidance and the COVID-19 impact. In 2019, I would say, on the roaming business, we had an impact in 2 quarters -- during 2 quarters, and our budget has the same assumption that we will see low travel intensity in Q1 and Q2 and then a slight recovery Q3 and 4. In terms of bankruptcies, we monitor that on a weekly basis, the inflow on payments, both in Italy and in Switzerland. And so far, there was no impact. And so we have not included any impact from bankruptcies and so on in the guidance for '21. Maybe one remark, I think I was -- there was some misunderstanding when I explained the guidance. So the reduction of the indirect costs are approximately CHF 100 million. I think some people understood CHF 300 million. It's CHF 100 million.
Good. Then on the second question on competition in Switzerland. Have the competitive dynamic changed? I don't see a change in this dynamic in Switzerland. We have still a very promotion-oriented market. Sunrise and UPC are behaving in a separate way. Both of them are doing, let's say, aggressive promotions. And I would say even -- or Sunrise is even the more -- is more aggressive on the market or even a bit more than in Q3 or Q4. So no change on this. On Salt, the launch of this fixed wireless access product, I think we can't compare Italy, what Alberto explained, and Switzerland. In Switzerland, the landscape is another one. We have very high ultra-broadband penetration with strong performing networks, also in rural areas. So the advantage of a fixed wireless network in Switzerland is smaller than in Italy, where you have really gray areas or even white areas. So it will be interesting what is happening with the take-up of this fixed wireless access product in Switzerland. I don't think that this will be a game changer.
Okay. Then if I take the third question, maybe also a quick comment on dynamics on bad debt in Italy 2020. We didn't experience any impact from COVID. So also in 2021, we do expect that we'll have the same neutrality, I would say. For the question on mobile, yes, there are -- it seems that also Iliad is increasing prices. The outlook there, I think, is quite good, in general, for the market, specifically for us, which means that we -- with our offer, we will be even more competitive in the future, and we have -- we will have even more opportunities to grow. But overall, we do share the same view that in the mobile market in the future there will be more stability.
Thank you very much. Next question comes from Georgios, Citi.
I've got a couple. The first one is around fiber regulation. You had some news about a month ago that the competition authority wanted to make some changes. Do you mind just running us through what the debate is and maybe the timing of key decisions that could be made on this? My second question is on Italy. Alberto, when you are going through the wholesale business, as you mentioned, as you are a key partner for anyone who wants to enter as a wireline provider. Obviously, we all know one that may be launching soon. So if you could kind of provide your high level thinking between the wholesale opportunity versus a return on risk from that. And then finally, I wanted to also thank Mario for all the help he's provided us over the years. I think he's been a great professional. And I just wanted to mention, I don't think there's been many CFOs in the last 8 years in telcos that can move on and say they've never cut a dividend or issued a CapEx warning. So congratulations on that record.
Thanks, Georgios. [Foreign Language].
Thank you, Georgios. I think -- and the third point was not a question. That was more a complement. So the first question on fiber regulation is for Urs. And then the second question is for Alberto.
Okay. This fiber regulation from Competition Commission -- they ask for this layer one product from the central office. And they also made pre -- they also ask for not for precondition measures, so that means that we are not able to sell products in the new footprint up to now, up to now. And now that we claimed against it. And I think in the next weeks, we will get a decision on it. That means if we have a relief there, we can continue to sell in the new footprint, only the new -- it only hurts the new footprint -- is this request from the commission -- from the Competition Commission. So in the next weeks, I hope that we will have clarity there. I hope that we can continue to sell in the new footprint. And then it will take time. It's hard to say. They will investigate on this competition play. It's hard to say. I think we have now to wait what the court will decide on these precautionary measures. And this will be in the next weeks. The impact -- maybe the impact today is -- it's very limited on the business as it is today because we are rolling -- it's only on the new footprint where we have this obligation.
Okay. Then I take the second question. Actually, when I was talking about wholesale and newcomers, we didn't have in mind a specific name. Iliad is clearly one candidate, but also for us, Sky will be a very important client. We just announced a couple of weeks ago our agreement. Thanks to our network, Sky will be able to cover 1,500 cities in Italy. So we have substantially increased the footprint. I think -- but for us, at the end of the day, yes, there could be some impact on our retail business. But at the end of the day, they will be offset through the wholesale margins. So it's -- at the end of the day is not a game changer. Iliad clearly could be an opportunity. We will see in the future. I think that we are already very well-kept in the wireline. We will continue to be the leader in the fourth quarter. We have been at least a very -- we had a very good performances. We do believe that also we will continue to have performances in the future. But yes, the wholesale business is a good offsetter in case. Thanks.
Thank you, Alberto. Next question comes from Jakob Bluestone.
If I can also echo the comments from the other -- from the previous -- about Mario, who's been a terrific CFO. So many thanks for all your patience and time over the years. I had a couple of questions for Mario, and one for Urs. Firstly, you mentioned earlier that you've had quite high uptake of second and third brands on the postpaid mobile side. I think it was about 18% of the base. Very little uptake on the wireline side, where I think it was only 4%, where on your no-frills brands in wireline, I was hoping you could maybe expand a little bit. Do you think that's something that will change? Why is it so low? I guess, most importantly, I mean, we've seen a significant amount of dilution on the mobile from the migration to these second and third brands. Do you see a risk that we see a similar headwind on your fixed line ARPU? And then 2 other questions, slightly shorter. Just on the CapEx side, your Fiber to the Home coverage went from 30% to 32%. You spent about EUR 0.5 billion on -- CHF 0.5 billion on CapEx. Your guidance for 2021 suggests quite a big step-up in the pace of deployment. So I think it's going -- increasing by about 7 percentage points to 39. But yet, there's only a very modest increase in CapEx. So can you maybe just help us understand what are some of the offsets? So will you be spending less on given what it looks like a fairly significant acceleration in FTTH deployment? And then just finally, just on free cash flow. Maybe it's a little bit unfair asking about future items on free cash flow. But as you mentioned, you had very strong net working capital and you also had very low tax. Can you maybe just give a little bit of guidance on those items for 2021, just given how big the boost to free cash flow from those 2 things were?
Thank you, Jakob. I think the first question on second and third brand is for Urs or alternatively Dirk. I mean, up to you. Second question on CapEx, probably Mario. And the last question definitely for Mario.
I would say, Dirk take the first one on this second and third brand penetration of broadband.
Yes. Certainly, I can do that. I really believe, let's say, the reason is that -- I mean I should say that we entered the market a little bit later there compared to mobile because you were making the comparison towards mobile. We were first this mobile and only later this broadband there. And we are pursuing the strategy that we call defend and attack. I mean, obviously, we want to defend the value on the own brand offer, yet participate in the market also, particularly in the price-sensitive segments with an equal share. And so we might see certain developments that we have seen in mobile also kicking in on the broadband side, certainly. We will review our pricing and promotion strategies there to gain a fair traction within the price-sensitive market.
And Jakob, on the CapEx. So you must be aware that the FTTS rollout was going on in 2020 and will also go on in '21, but in '21 at a lower level. And so part of the FTTS CapEx will be replaced by FTTH CapEx. That's the reason why despite the higher penetration of FTTH, the CapEx don't increase more. Then on the free cash flow, on the net working capital in the future, you can always have a swing of CHF 50 million because that's just a cash in. You cannot control in the last months. So there is no -- in the future, there is no structural positive or negative impact on free cash flow. That's just seasonal fluctuations. And yes, we had relatively low tax payments in 2020. I would assume cash out for taxes in the magnitude of CHF 350 million, CHF 3-5-0 million per year at this net income level.
Thank you. Next question comes from Ulrich Rathe, Jefferies.
I have 3 questions, please. The first one is on the wholesale revenues in Switzerland. Obviously, you are about to lose wholesale revenues there from -- well, from Sunrise and presumably also UPC. But what is baked into there for 2021? And how does that phase out? The second question is on the -- sort of the overall net effect of the cost cuts versus the revenues. You are saying somewhere in the annual report that you expect the revenue decline in '21 not to be fully offset by cost cuts and an EBITDA drag for that reason in 2021. That -- obviously, there was a slight effect of that thought also in 2020, but a very small one, like CHF 19 million or so. Is it a similar dynamic in terms of the -- what you expect for the 2 trends separately? Or is there a bigger shift in 2021 in your plans currently? And my last question would be on the fourth quarter. There was an EBITDA boost from the indirect cost outside of workforce cost, really trending very differently in the fourth quarter than the third quarter. And the one item, Mario, that you mentioned there in your presentation was the bonus payment last year. So does this mean that -- this was really everything, right? Does this mean the fourth quarter 2020, the nonworkforce cost, indirect cost, that was a normal quarter for next year? Or were there any supportive items, unusual items in the fourth quarter 2020 that produced this big, big trend shift there?
Thank you, Ulrich. I think the first question is either for Urs, financial impact Mario. Thereafter net cost, Mario, and the last one, probably, again, Mario.
So I will take the first one and then Mario can take the 2 other ones. Otherwise, he's too busy. The first question on the wholesale impact, which is affected by this merged Sunrise UPC. So what is clear, we will lose the MVNO, the mobile revenues from UPC. I think this will be in the first half of this year or middle of this year. So the impact will be CHF 15 million to CHF 20 million from this mobile revenue side, MVNO contract. Then we will lose some broadband business, wholesale business from Sunrise. And it will be in the region of CHF 20 million this year. That's a bit our forecast. And then next year, CHF 30 million -- maybe CHF 30 million. But then you have to take in account that they will also remain as a wholesale customer. Broadband, in areas where they don't have a network, I think they will rely on our network also in the future. But our overall impact in this year may be in the region of CHF 40 million -- CHF 30 million to CHF 40 million.
Yes. We mentioned in the guidance that the negative MVNO impact, which will come short-term, is CHF 15 million to CHF 20 million. That's what Urs mentioned in the guidance, '21. On the EBITDA guidance for -- and that's not Swisscom Switzerland, but Swisscom without Fastweb. So we mentioned that the guidance will be CHF 3.4 billion. That compares to CHF 3.45 billion in 2020 reported. And you're right. We have this service revenue decline of around CHF 250 million to CHF 300 million. Part of it will be compensated by the cost savings of CHF 100 million. Then we have additional margin -- contribution margin for the B2B -- from the B2B segment. And -- but the overall -- so we will see a decline or we expect a decline of EBITDA in '21 in the Swiss business, if you do this math. And on the indirect costs of -- yes, in Q4, I mentioned 2 elements, 2 seasonal effects in 2019. That's the higher marketing expenses last year of CHF 10 million and the higher costs for B2B customer projects. And I would say these were the only extraordinary items in Q4. But again, as CFO, I don't look at quote. For me, it's important, is it recurring or not? And if I look at the last 4 years, that's really the proof that we are able to reduce the cost base. And at the last 4 years, we are able to reduce the indirect costs by over CHF 400 million. And you can do the calculations in 2020. They were net CHF 129 million. So we have always some seasonality in the quarter.
Just a follow-up, just to clarify 1 question there. So in the fourth quarter of 2020, there was nothing that you would consider extra or out of the usual?
No, no.
Thank you. Next question is coming from Fred Boulan, Bank of America.
Congratulations from my side. A couple of questions, please. The first one just to -- sorry to come back on Q4. So I understood all the comments related to 2019. Just interested in the bridge you show Slide 58 around the plus CHF 40 million impact you have in wholesale, IT & network and maybe you spend a bit of time on this. And where you see that going? Secondly, a follow-up on the ARPU question and the pricing question. So your postpaid ARPU trends remain pretty difficult, were down about 9% in Q4 from CHF 56 last year to CHF 51. Can you explain a little bit what is in there is COVID? Is this decoupling? Is it underlying mix? And where do you see that trend going in the coming years? In particular, is there another option to charge for higher speed, higher 5G speeds in your key offers? What kind of traction are you seeing on this? And then lastly, if you can give us an update on the difficulties you were experiencing initially on the 5G rollout, the pushbacks against the deployment in Switzerland.
Thank you, Fred, for your questions. I think the first question on the wholesale Page# 58 goes to Mario. Second question on ARPU dynamics and trend might be a question for Dirk. Or alternatively, if Urs can add. And then the last question, 5G rollout and complexity, for Urs.
On the wholesale on Page 58, in this segment, wholesale is not the only -- the wholesale business, but also IT and network. And there is the EBITDA impact. So this point 3 on Page 58 includes the higher revenue -- the impact of the higher revenue we had in wholesale in Q4, I mentioned in my presentation, the CHF 30 million coming from broadband connectivity services and some high revenue on infrastructure services. And then in this CHF 40 million are also included savings, cost reductions in the network and IT division. They are mainly coming from the IT elements. So you have both impact coming from revenue and coming from costs.
Thank you, Mario. And perhaps next question, postpaid volume development, Dirk?
I think that there's several sources to the ARPU trends that you see. I mean, obviously, there's -- particularly for last year, some COVID-based stuff in that, particularly on the international roaming side. We talked about it. There is ARPU dilution from promotional activities on our own brand, where, increasingly, you see discounts for the first 6 to 12 months of whatever, half rate tariffs or so. And then there is the shift from the first brand, so the Swisscom brand to second and third brand and we reflected upon that. We see subsequent consequences of lower ARPUs. And then there's a little bit of, let's say, RGU mix in the base where certain movements from, let's say, historical tariffs, I would call them. People optimize themselves for like newer channels and so forth. Although that I would dare to say is probably the smallest part. To your question, will the trend continue? Yes, we see a downwards trend. That's basically triggered by stiff competition there. You see that from second and third brands in the marketplace. You have like an anchor price of CHF 30, even a little bit less in the recent weeks for a national flat, so that is like flat voice and flat data. And we don't see any, let's say, relaxation on that. So clearly, the strategy remains to get the best value out from the own brands and then selectively aggressive, particularly on the second and third brands. But in the consequence, the -- a bit of the trends that you have been watching will probably continue.
Thank you, Dirk. And...
I need to add on it. A good chart to explain it is on Slide 56. Mario already showed it. I think that shows quite good dynamic. So the erosion on fixed voice, I think, this will be in a region where it is. Fixed mobile converged will maybe slightly going down because of penetration. RGU mix will remain or yes, this will remain. And droving that -- a bit of this is actually COVID-impacted. But in 2021, we will have still a rolling impact. In '22, I hope it will be away. So that shows a bit what Dirk explained. The major impact is through this RGU mix. Then on the second -- on the third question, 5G rollout. So yes, we are facing a kind of blockage. We are blocked on building out new antennas. That's a bit regionally. In some regions, we have much bigger programs than in other ones. And normally, if you go more on the French side, it's more difficult. In the German side, it's less difficult. And in the Italian side, it's becoming more difficult. So in the Romanic area, it's more difficult to roll out the networks than in the German areas. I think it has a lot to do with communication, with trust. We have a debate, which is driven by emotional minority in Switzerland. And that's why it is important that the government is also communicating and explaining that we have a more fact-oriented communication in Switzerland, and I think situation will become better in the second half of this year. It takes now some time. I hope that it will become better and that we can accelerate rolling out these networks. But it will stay difficult because you don't build an antenna without opposition. That will remain.
Thank you, Urs. Perhaps, Fred, to give you some idea. The CHF 4 decline year-over-year on ARPU, half of it, CHF 2, is RGU mix. CHF 1 is roaming. Thereof 2/3 is coming from COVID and CHF 1 is to give you an idea is fixed mobile convergence for the discount. And as everyone explained, convergence is coming down, but RGU mix is definitely remaining. Okay. Thank you very much. Next question comes from Simon Coles, Barclays.
Sort of aggregating some of the questions you've had already. You talked about CHF 250 million to CHF 300 million service revenue impact in 2021. When you're saying RGU mix is probably similar in 2021 and FM convergence gets a bit smaller. Were you including the wholesale impacts from, say, Sunrise and UPC in that CHF 250 million, CHF 300 million number? Or is there something else we need to be aware because, presumably, fixed voice lines is pretty much disappearing and roaming is only 1 quarter, like you said? So could you clarify that? That would be great. And then just another question on smart homes. You obviously highlighted that we've had some good traction. Do you see that as sort of the next step after convergence? And is that a way that you think you can continue to increase average revenue per household, which is the metric, I think, we've talked about in the past?
Thank you, Simon. Second question about smart life, smart home is definitely for Dirk. And the first question, I think, is for Mario. So we start with smart home, smart living. Dirk?
Yes. Look, the business now is mostly a, let's say, accessory or device business with the associated margins there as we don't yet have, let's say, any service package with the recurring monthly fee. We are looking into it. And particularly, that will also then be enriched with, let's say, for instance, in the security space, you can think of certain services that make customers pay a recurring fee for surveillance solutions and alarming solutions and these kind of things. We are looking into that. We have not yet made a decision. Right now, it's more let's say, offering that security and convenience into the customers' homes, actually a trend that has been enforced by COVID. People are more at home and looking how they kind of upgrade and pimp up their home for connectivity, but also for convenience and so on and so forth. So it's mostly right now like an accessory or device business with the associated margins there. And also then obviously, there is a benefit, as everybody knows. The more products and services a household has, even if not paid on top, the more -- let's say, the more loyal and less susceptible to competing offer is the customers. So it's really also about loyalty, customer happiness and a great service. And whether we can monetize it from a recurring monthly fee perspective, I think the future will show.
And on the service revenue side, so the decline of CHF 250 million to CHF 300 million, there is included our assumption that we'll see quite heavy promotions in the B2C segment. So that's clear. These promotions will be going on. That's also what we saw in January. We included some expected pressure in B2B, especially in the SME segment because there, we have high market shares and high ARPUs. And the CHF 15 million to CHF 20 million decline on -- because of the service revenue of the merger of Sunrise, UPC is not included in the service revenue. We guided separately for it. So the MVNO revenues, the wholesale revenue are not included in service revenue. And as we mentioned, we expect there an impact from the MVNO business because they can move the customers from our network to the ex-Sunrise network on fixed line. On broadband connectivity, we don't think that we'll see a material impact already in '21.
Okay. So wholesales will include it. But if we think RGU mix is flat and price pressure in B2B is similar, like you've given in slide 56. You also said the other impacts are probably smaller. It sort of doesn't quite get to CHF 250 million. Or is that just rounding, and there's nothing around that?
No it's -- nobody has a crystal ball. Our assumption is CHF 250 million to CHF 300 million. We think that the promotion pressure will remain. We will have some pressure on the SME segment. There, we have high ARPUs. So we think that that's, let's say, a reasonable amount included in the guidance.
Thank you, Mario. Thank you, Simon. By the way, you don't have a crystal ball, but a crystal stone, meanwhile. Anyway, next question comes from Michael Bishop, Goldman Sachs.
Congratulations, Mario, from my side on your tenure, and I echo all of the sentiment so far. It's been really pleasure working with you. I've just got 1 question, which is around CapEx containment. And it's a slight follow-up. I think you touched on this earlier. But when we were here last year in person, I think you were basically saying, look, we're going to have to really sort of push in terms of the CapEx containment to achieve our Fiber to the Home targets in terms of the unitary cost or perhaps do some sharing to achieve that cost? And from your earlier comments, it sounds like you're not necessarily going to sign up to any cost-sharing agreements necessarily or if you do they'll be very local. So given you're reiterating the Swiss CapEx containment message, has the unit cost continue to come down? And is that related to the 20% saving, I think, you flagged on one of the slides in terms of this move towards point to multi-point? So I'm just trying to get what the big picture message is in terms of the change in message this year versus last year and what you've done.
Thank you very much, Michael. I think that question last year already came up and was answered by Mario.
You think, okay? As Urs mentioned, we are open to cooperations, but it's clear that will be not the big cooperations which we saw when we did the FTTH rollout in the big cities like Zurich, Geneva, Bern, Basel and so on. In this saving, there is part. We included some cooperations in our calculations. And then in addition, we have a lot of experience now with this FTTS rollout. And with the contracting, the construction companies in a general contracting way, and we want to use this experience also to reduce unitary CapEx in the FTTH rollout. But maybe, Urs, you have to add something?
Yes. No, it's exactly like you say. And if we are building on Fiber to the Street, we can also reduce costs because the feeder is already constructed. So we have only to do the drop and the in-house investment. So that's why the unitary costs are also coming down.
Thank you. All clear, Michael? Thank you. Next question comes from Luigi Minerva, HSBC.
Yes. I start also with my best wishes to Mario, and many thanks for your great work over the years. So my first question is -- well, I have 3. The first 2 on Switzerland. The first is on the B2B competitive dynamics. So what do you expect with Sunrise, UPC arguably becoming more active in this segment? I think they have a clear ambition to become stronger in B2B. Second is on blue. And it's very interesting what you're doing with the over-the-top to be at. So if you can share maybe some KPIs on the take-up from the non-Swiss compliance? Is it working really? And then lastly, on Italy. I have a question on FiberCop. And I just wanted to understand from Alberto his expectations from FiberCop, whether the contributions that Fastweb will make to FiberCop are included in your CapEx guidance? And ultimately, if you think that FiberCop as a project can stand up as a stand-alone project, if there is no merger with Open Fiber.
Thank you very much, Luigi. I think the first question on B2B takes Urs Lehner. The second one on blue, Dirk. And the third one you, Luigi, already addressed to Alberto.
Yes. Within B2B, we definitely expect additional competition in the SME space, although it was already explained by Mario. And in the enterprise space and corporate business, I don't believe that the behavior in the market will change dramatically or fundamentally by the merger. We definitely are looking much more to the SME space. And we definitely also believe that with our integrated offerings on converged offerings on the telco side, but also in addition with the ICT services, covering full-service solutions, service solutions in the security and workplace space integrated with connectivity for our SME customers, we believe we have a strong proposition. But yes, fundamentally speaking, we have -- we are prepared for a battle within the SME space, which will keep on in the dynamics. That's what we expect from the merger in the B2B space.
Dirk, on blue?
Yes. So blue basically is, let's say, the TV solution, which is Swisscom blue. Then there's a fictional content package, the blue+, and then there's a sports package which is blue Sports. And you're right. With all of these, we have also gone like OTT also to other access operators where -- which, by the way, for sports and fictional to some extent, they have all the time been on cable networks or also with Sunrise. Now we widened up the offering and also put it under 1 common brand umbrella, which makes marketing and sales so much easier. And honestly speaking, we had the best month ever in terms of content sales since we launched it in the end of September. So there's a high demand there. Switzerland is, in a way, particularly for sports paid content, an underdeveloped country because there traditionally has been lots of content in the free TV. As that is changing, we see that consumers are more and more adopting to paid TV packages. And then blue is the right win to monetize the sports rights not only this in the Swisscom access customer base, but also beyond. And we see promising first results from that.
Thank you very much, Dirk. And now Alberto?
Okay. I'll take the third question. Definitely, FiberCop is a stand-alone project. So basically, as a great ambition to connect and to cover households in the black areas and the gray areas. And the company has specific target -- specific business plan. Also, the company will be entitled on posting directly the CapEx, is already fully funded. So all this CapEx would be financed basically by the wholesale revenues. And at the beginning from the copper revenues that they will be translated in the following years in the fiber revenues. So definitely, there will be no impact for what concerns CapEx in Fastweb at all. And as I said, it's -- we do believe that this is an industrial project. So that's why we participate to such project by contributing our, let's say, Flash Fiber assets. And with just a matter starting in 2021 to scale up operations and start to roll out the network, that's what the fiber has to do it.
Thank you very much. Next question comes from Steve Malcolm, Redburn.
Yes, congratulations, Mario, and best of luck with your retirement. I'm very jealous, I have to admit. Right. 3 questions. 2 on Switzerland, 1 on Italy, if that's okay. First, just coming back to the COMCO investigation on fiber. I understand it only relates to new areas. But if the decision goes against you, will that impact your future fiber plans? Or will you just have to proceed on a less profitable basis going forward? So interested to hear your thoughts on that. Secondly, I just want to come back to the sort of mobile -- the service revenue versus OpEx discussion. I think it's fairly simple. You're losing CHF 250 million to CHF 300 million of service revenues. That's pretty high margin, call it, 80%, 85%. You offset that with under OpEx savings and the gap is still with various things. One of the big fellows has been device decoupling and SAC and SRC. Can you just confirm that the CHF 30 million to CHF 40 million this year, is that a cash or a noncash benefit you're going to get? And after that, do we assume 0? And also on the SAC and SRC front, can you -- are there more savings? You cut that budget enormously in the last couple of years. Should we assume that that's kind of run dry as well looking into 2022 and beyond? And then just on Fastweb. Can you just shed a bit more color on the 5% revenue growth? It looks like consumers slowed quite a lot in the last couple of quarters. Should we assume good growth in wholesale? And how much of that comes from build to suit? Is that a big contribution on the wholesale side looking into 2021?
Thank you, Steve, for your questions. The first question on the COMCO investigation is for Urs. The second question on service revenue, OpEx is for Mario. And the last question is clear. That is for Alberto.
Good. On this COMCO question, they are asking for a layer 1 product and it's too early to judge what is coming out. But there would be possibilities to offer a Layer 1 product from central office or also from manhole. So -- but it's too early to judge. And it's not our ambition to change now the rollout plans of Fiber to the Home. So we stick on our plans. We continue. Now we have to find -- yes, we must get more clarity on this COMCO process.
So should we assume that the 60% is kind of sacrosanct? And will just the COMCO decision will determine the overall profitability of the project?
I haven't understood you. Could you remind...
When we're trying to model, should we assume that you will proceed regardless, but the decision that COMCO gets to on layer 1 will determine how profitable your investment in fiber will be over those 4, 5 years?
Let's see. We can't touch this now because they don't question point-to-point, point to multi-point technology. And so if we can deliver a layer 1 product for this, the cost wouldn't be too high. That would be a low investment for a layer 1 product. So that -- I don't have a crystal ball. I don't know what they decide, but out of the view today, we don't think that there will be a big impact, but we don't know the decision.
And Malcolm, on your question on the guidance. That clear service revenue, CHF 250 million to CHF 300 million, that's high-margin revenue. Part of it will compensate, as indicated, is around CHF 100 million cost savings. Then the decoupling effect that started in Q2 2019 when we introduced a new product portfolio. And this item -- this reconciliation item washes through the balance sheet against the revenue. And we will have an impact of CHF 30 million to CHF 40 million in '21. That's a noncash benefit. And most of it will come in the first half because the contract typically have a lifetime of 24 months, and we introduced that in Q2 2019. And on the SAC, I would say, in the guidance, they are assumed more or less flattish. But you feel that the acquisition and retention costs nearly on a monthly basis, you saw that also during 2020, we had quite low in Q3 and then high acquisition costs and retention costs. Retention costs are more important in Q4.
Thank you. Then I take the third question. Basically, even if you do, clearly, the math would suggest a deceleration in the revenues in the fourth quarter. That was entirely due to a huge performance in Q4 2019 in the wholesale business, as I said, specifically to the rollout of BTS that has -- cannot be calendarized, and it depends on the orders from clients. But if you neutralize that definitely, all our segments, consumer, both mobile and wireline, enterprise and, I would say, the wholesale volume business are growing nicely. So you will see also in 2021 a consistent growth in all the 3 segments. Wholesale will be a contributor, as I explained in the presentation because clearly, we do expect the ultra broadband connections will increase. And so our appliance will require and will do more orders. But nevertheless, I think that we will have also a huge opportunity in growth in consumer and mobile and fixed and in the enterprise. Well, growth will come from both. We see a very strong business. Also, the start of the year has been consistent with where the markets are growing, and they will follow this trend all across the year.
So we should think about 5% being evenly spread across consumer, enterprise and wholesale?
I think so. It's a good start. Let's do the 5%. Then we'll see.
One final one. Can you just give us an idea of the sort of overall magnitude of build-to-suit revenue? And what the cash margin is, not the EBITDA margin, on those sales when you build in the CapEx to execute those contracts?
It depends on the -- there is always some CapEx attached because, yes, definitely, we are talking about high margin. High margin both, I'd say, in the ultra broadband connection and also on the BTS, with the difference in the BTS. Clearly, when you do a big rollout of the BTS, the first lots are clearly closest or on net. The other are sometimes you do need to do specific links. And therefore, they are generating CapEx. All in all, I'd say that wholesale typically high-margin CapEx with these specific -- sorry, the margin would be specific distinction from BTS and volumes, I would say.
Thank you, Alberto. Thank you, Steve. Thank you. The next question comes from Andreas Müller, ZKB.
Yes. I've got 2 or 3. One was on the margins. You mentioned that on the solution side, margins are going up. Can you give us the driver behind this development? Also, we know that solutions are growing. It's probably clear, but what are really these drivers also, say, in 2021? Next question on cost savings. You mentioned this CHF 100 million for the next years. What is going to be the driver beyond, say, 2022 for these cost savings? And then I would have an add-on probably on the multi-point issue.
Okay. Thank you very much, Andreas. I think the solutions outlook and improved profitability is a question for Urs Lehner. Second question, cost savings 2020 and beyond is mix between Mario and Urs, but I think it is a question for Urs. And then point to multi-point, I leave all to you, Urs.
Starting with the solution business. The profitability evolution I would say has 3 prime levers. One is, let's say, a better performance in professional services, higher percentage of workload, which was delivered to, let's say, impact on the way how we managed our professional services business, which have paid off in '21. That will remain way forward. Second one is, first, let's say, effects of simplicity activities. Mario mentioned the 1 -- or Urs mentioned the 1 B2B program, which starts to pay off in certain elements on process costs. And last but not least, we definitely have, let's say, good new business, new customers arriving in our managed services solution, where, let's say, the foundation, of course, is pretty given and all new customers are also paying off with variable costs. So therefore, I would say, these are the 3 predominant levers. And I say I see a sustainable trend of the 3 levers also way forward.
Good. Then on the cost side, how do we want to reduce our costs in the future? What are the main drivers behind it? For 2021, we have a clear road map. And the main drivers for 2022 and '23, I would say, that on a high level, the drivers is digitalization. Through digitalization, we can simplify the customer interface, the customer experience, which leads to less cost in the cost center, to less visit in the shops, to less field force intervention. And so we can reduce this cost. This customer touch point cost, automization, is second important driver. Just to give you an example. With artificial intelligence, we can decrease the operational costs in our networks. This is another topic. And the third main driver for cost reduction is simplification, if we can simplify our legacy infrastructure. Now we are phasing out 2G. We have done all IP migration. We will reduce the complexity of the different platforms in our network and the IT area. So with such things, we can reduce costs. And on the development side, through agile approaches, through sourcing approaches of development resources, we can also reduce cost. So it's a bunch of different drivers, which will reduce the cost in the future. On the point to multi-point issue, just to say what -- how COMCO is thinking. They think if we built in a point-to-point architecture, smaller ISPs don't have the ability to get a dark fiber access. So -- and if they don't get a dark fiber access, they can't drive innovation. They can't be innovative or it would be too expensive to get products on layer one. So that's the thinking of COMCO. We offer them -- we offer our competitors an access to our network. And just as an example, the biggest wholesale customer of Swisscom, he is using exactly this access, and he is very competitive in the market. So that's why we think we have good arguments why we have a compelling wholesale offer. And you could do also some other kind of wholesale offers on, you call it, caller quality bundling. It's a kind of product to decouple the life on the fiber cable. But that's not a very mature technology today. So I just can tell you, it's too early to say what -- how the way is going. But I think at the end, it will not totally change this fiber game, and that's why we also stick to our ambition to roll out now this technology and point to multi-point. That's the standard how operators are building today fiber networks. And why should it be other in Switzerland?
If you had to change the architecture, just theoretically, what would be per line the additional CapEx? You mentioned it's not much. Let's say, what would be the additional percentage? And would that fit into these CapEx brackets, which you've got already? Or would that change anything on the CapEx going forward?
It's too early to touch because we don't know in which way it is going. But changing a point to multi-point architecture to a point-to-point architecture, this would need a lot of time. So that's not just switched. And so that would also mean that additional CapEx would be stretched over different years. It's too early to say, but I think now we have to wait for the next weeks, and then we have more clarity on this precautionary measures. More I can't say.
All the best to Mario.
Thank you, Andreas, also for your question. And timing-wise, I think and suggest we do one last question before closing today's meeting. This last question comes from Ulrich Rathe from Jefferies.
I have just a quick one and a follow-up. When you talk about the sort of the fair share in [ North Rose ] and the activities on the second and third brand, I'm not entirely sure whether you are indicating an increased effort, a dedicated increased effort in 2021 versus sort of change in go-to-market? Or whether that was indicating here is a continuation of what you have been doing already for some time. And if it's a change, what drives that change? That will be my question. And then just a quick clarification. I'm sorry to come back on the Sunrise, UPC question. But I heard slightly different color there from Mario and Urs. So is it just the MVNOs that are weighing in 2021, this CHF 15 million to CHF 20 million? Or is there another CHF 20 million expected to drop out of the fixed, which I heard Urs saying, but I'm not entirely sure.
Thank you very much. I think the first question goes to Dirk.
Yes. Look, I think in the last couple of months, we have seen even an incentivized level of promotional and marketing activity, which we cannot completely ignore. I mean, obviously, we want to be the leader on many dimensions, but not the leader on the lowest price. As you imagine, that's not Swisscom's strategy and statue. Nonetheless, even in the price-sensitive market with the second and third brands, we need to ensure, let's say, what I call fair share, that we have traction there. So yes, I think we want to intensify overall our aggressiveness in that space. So to some extent, be more aggressive on promotions and marketing and the overall market approach. I think that's probably fair to say.
Then maybe I'll take the second one, and Mario can add, right? So I was maybe not too clear -- I was not clear enough. This CHF 20 million -- this CHF 15 million to CHF 20 million on MVNO, so we are quite clear that this will happening because they will migrate on the Sunrise network. This other CHF 20 million, which I mentioned, that's the view of Sunrise how they saw it when they published the merged UPC, Sunrise. And that's their view. That was their view. And I think that the impact -- it's not so easy to migrate customer from 1 day to the other, from an operator network to a cable operating network. So it will need time. It's a bit too early, but I think we will not have such an impact. And that's why the guidance Mario explained is -- that's the right view.
Thank you very much, Ulrich. And at this point, that is it from our side. Thanks for your attention and participation. Stay healthy, and have a nice evening.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Swisscom AG transcript - plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.
Get an API key View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Swisscom AG earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the
EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server.
Quarterly plans from $105 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search,
and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.