Tabcorp Holdings Limited (TAH) Earnings Call Transcript
February 16, 2021
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Tabcorp Holdings Limited Half Year Results 2021. [Operator Instructions] I'd now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, CEO, David Attenborough. Thank you. Please go ahead.
Thank you, and good morning, everyone, and welcome to Tabcorp's first half results call for the 6 months to 31 December 2020. And I'm David Attenborough, CEO of Tabcorp. And joining me on this call are: Adam Newman, our Chief Financial Officer; Sue van der Merwe, our MD of Lotteries & Keno; Adam Rytenskild, our MD of Wagering & Media; and Paul Carew, our COO of Gaming Services. And given the lockdown in Victoria, we're in separate locations today. Adam Rytenskild is with me in Sydney. Sue van der Merwe is in Brisbane, while Adam Newman and Paul Carew are calling in remotely from Melbourne. We'll be taking you through the presentation lodged with the ASX this morning, which should run for about 25 minutes. And then we'll be happy to take your questions. I'd also like to draw your attention to the standard disclaimers set out in the investor presentation. And in addition, we're not making any forecast today in respect of the second half. And if I can take you first to Slide 3, which provides our reflections on the half, which obviously occurred against a backdrop of COVID-19. The Lotteries & Keno business not only demonstrated its resilience, but its performance has been excellent across its portfolio of games. And this really reflects strong execution by the team in its approach to refreshing games and rejuvenating the player experience. And this business has delivered a compound annual growth rate in EBIT of 13.6% since our combination with Tatts in 2017 and made up circa 2/3 of Tabcorp's EBIT in the half. Our other 2 businesses face greater challenges in these difficult times with our Wagering & Media and Gaming Services retail operations facing major COVID-19 disruptions. Many hotels, clubs and TAB agencies were trading under restrictions or even closed in the half. And this reduced revenues and earnings, but we're pleased with how our teams manage the business through this disruption and continued to deliver for our customers and partners. Our Wagering & Media business is in a very competitive market. But it's now better positioned than at any time since the merger to perform and benefit from our investments in digital, data personalization and media. And we've done a lot of work over the past 12 months to reduce costs, preserve cash and strengthen the balance sheet, including the capital raising, and this has improved the group's financial position. We're resuming the payment of dividends under our reset dividend policy with today's announcement of a $0.075 per share interim dividend. And the final part of the integration of Tabcorp and Tatts will also be completed this half, with delivery of the retail venue uplift in UBET states. And this brings this complex program to an end. And our current run rate will deliver $95 million of annual cost synergies this financial year. Therefore, it's no surprise that we're seeing interest in our Wagering & Media business at this time. Recent results have been impacted by COVID-19. The risks from integration are now materially behind us and the benefits of recent investments in Wagering & Media are not yet fully reflected in earnings. I'll say more on this later. So with the worst of the COVID disruptions likely to be behind us, and the business is well positioned, we're feeling positive about the second half. I'll now hand you over to our CFO, Adam Newman, to take you through our group financials. Adam?
Thanks, David, and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us. Moving to Slide 4 now. The group reported net profit after tax, but before significant items, of $207 million in the half and statutory net profit after tax of $185 million. Group revenues declined 1.5% despite the impact of COVID-19. However, the significantly lower Gaming Services revenue largely flowed through to VC, resulting in group VC being down 7.1%. We've outlined significant items in more detail in Appendix 1. Please note the $69 million after-tax profit on sale of our Jumbo shareholding was offset by an ATO amended assessment. This amended assessment related to the tax treatment of license fees that Tatts incurred in 2016, which relates to the New South Wales gaming machine monitoring. We've lodged an objection against this assessment. There were also $22 million in one-off costs associated with Racing Queensland arrangements, the Tatts combination implementation costs and restructuring charges. The Racing Queensland top-up payment was the final one that was made -- to be made with the minimum fee obligation arrangements ending on the 31st of December. If we move to Slide 5, this bridges between first half ' 21 EBITDA in the prior period. The first half continued to be materially impacted by venue closures and other COVID-19 restrictions, especially in Gaming Services here in Victoria. There was good discipline around cost control in the half, which helped to soften the impact on earnings. If we move to Slide 6, and as David has mentioned, we have now materially completed the Tatts integration and expect the cost to implement will be at or below $130 million, down from the previously advised $135 million. As integration has been winding down, we've been moving into the next phase of optimization to further reduce our costs and simplify the business. This program of work have the focus and support of the executive leadership team. In the first half, gross EBIT savings of $8 million were delivered with cost to implement of $2 million, excluding redundancy charges. We are targeting $20 million to $25 million in gross savings for the full year. Our baseline for measuring savings is FY '20 adjusted to remove COVID impacts and other nonrecurring items. The larger savings initiatives in the first half included significant restructuring within Gaming Services, and Paul will talk to this later, the impact of the announced reseller changes in Lotteries & Keno and ongoing agency rationalization within wagering. In the second half, optimization activities will be ongoing in Gaming Services, and we'll continue to see further benefits from agency rationalization. We'll continue refining our operating model and complete a review of procurement category spend. We'll now take you through the results for each of the individual 3 businesses, and I'll hand over to our MD of Lotteries & Keno, Sue van der Merwe.
Thanks, Adam. And I'll start on Slide 9. The results for Lotteries & Keno demonstrates continuation of the strong momentum we've built in recent years across our portfolio of games. The strategic and deliberate actions the team takes to drive performance are delivering across our key metrics. Well-executed game changes to Set for Life and Saturday Lotto, active management of jackpot games and a solid foundation of base games has the business in a strong position with a well-balanced revenue portfolio and healthy distribution channels. Revenue and earnings growth was delivered, notwithstanding a tough comps that included record Powerball runs at $110 million and $150 million. A continued focus on customer experience, brand and channel meant the business was well positioned to respond to the impact of COVID-19. Digital growth in excess of 20% and improved reseller arrangements lifted margins, while the resilience of the retail channel underpinned a strong revenue result. The charts on Slide 10 illustrates the extent of the jackpot variance on the pcp with almost $550 million less in prize offers across major jackpot and half the number of jackpots at $50 million or more. Additionally, Saturday Lotto's major annual event fell in January this year as opposed to December in FY '20. Against this backdrop, the first half result is quite remarkable. The value of the balanced portfolio approach, investing in building powerful brands and our relentless pursuit to excel in customer experience and engagement through all of our channels is clearly evident. On a like-for-like basis, turnover across each of the games was up over 20%. Instant Scratch-Its growth of 39% is a standout as is the Set for Life and Saturday Lotto results. Through the pandemic, we've seen a shift to lotteries across the gambling entertainment and discretionary expenditure categories. Digital continues to grow strongly, accounting for almost 1/3 of all lotteries turnover. The addition of PayPal and payment options for customers aided conversion rates. Keno, too, was a solid contributor to the half. Digital growth was very strong, and the retail channel rebounded well once venue restrictions were eased. Slide 11 provides some insight into the positive performance of Set for Life and Saturday Lotto since we introduced the product changes to these games. The suite of carefully considered and well-researched changes were borne from a deep understanding of our players' motivation and extensive product knowledge and were developed internally by the team. The changes delivered benefits for our players and reinforce the unique market position for each game. Customers have clearly responded favorably with strong sales uplift and price retention figures. These were then further buoyed by category shifts and a surge in interest in lotteries. Slide 12 takes you to our focus areas for FY '21 across the game portfolio, customer experience and distribution. Consistent with our ongoing price development road map, we have again turned our attention to the jackpot part of our portfolio and are exploring a potential change to Oz Lotto. Our Instant Scratch-Its brand is an important differentiator in the portfolio as the only physical and retail-only product. It has a demographic appeal skewed younger than most draw games, and a sophisticated product segmentation model drives development of the ticket range. We're planning for The Lott app to be in the Google Play store within the second half, and we will complete the final stage of our omnichannel rollout as we implement the model into South Australia. This will allow retailers to earn digital commission and deliver benefits to our customers. Thanks for the opportunity to take you through our performance today. And I'll now hand you to Adam Rytenskild, the MD of our Wagering & Media business.
Thank you, Sue, and good morning all. For our Wagering & Media business, the key things to note are, firstly, underlying earnings performance was solid for the half. COVID was obviously a significant disruption, and we managed it well. Secondly, we're a stronger digital business, that we have more to do and we'll continue to improve the offer. This will accelerate now that integration is materially complete. Thirdly, the team is confident and focused for the second half and beyond. We now have a much improved platform for growth. Turning to Slide 13. Our retail channel was severely impacted, especially in Victoria, where many of our 700 venues were closed for most of the half and have been closed again this week. Given these impacts, it was good to deliver a solid result. Ex Victoria, revenues grew 5%. Retail bounced back well as it reopened, and we continue to have good digital momentum. We've quantified an unfavorable net impact to earnings of circa $25 million. This takes into account the retail closures and the data center outage and then is partially offset by the favorable U.S. election result. This was our biggest ever fixed odds book, and Joe Biden's win was a positive result. We also continue to make good progress on cost with OpEx down $8 million on the pcp. On to Slide 14, which outlines how we navigated the COVID-19 effects. It's important to remind you of the unique nature of our business in the Australian market given our multichannel network, the more complex regulatory environment we operate in and narrower margins. In that context, COVID-19 was more favorable for our digital-only northern territory license competitors. However, our digital and customer growth was strong and account customer acquisition was a record. Digital was 61% of our business in the half, and we did $5 billion of digital sales. Our digital share was lower during the period. However, I don't believe this is a proxy for future share. This was a very abnormal period with unprecedented disruptions to our business. We're now a better business with integration largely done, significant improvements made over the last 2 years and great customer initiatives to come. It's been a tough 6 months, but I'm pleased with the competitive resilience of the business and how we've responded to COVID. Regarding yields and generosities. Generosities increased significantly during the period. We were deliberate in our approach to strike the best balance between customer growth and financial performance. That's something we carefully balance given our narrow margins. Net yields were impacted but helped customer acquisition as well as retention in the days following the data center outage. Our new data and personalization capability is playing an increasingly important role in how we interact with customers. Now while we continue to make the business more digitally competitive, it also needs to be supported by reforms that level the playing field and assist the wagering industry sustainability. The recent point of consumption tax increase in Victoria was another step towards addressing the inequalities of racing industry funding. However, substantial inequalities remain. We're focused on ensuring the conditions we operate under, and the strategic choices we make in the future enable us to be more competitive and sustainable. Complementing this is our risk, compliance and responsible gambling approach. We're focused to ensure we deliver sustainable earnings in a category, and particularly for us as a business, that will continue to be closely scrutinized for the way it manages customers. Slide 15 provides an insight to our accelerating pipeline of customer experience initiatives to give customers more of what they want. With integration materially behind us, it clears a pathway for more innovation going forward. Some call-outs. We've recently extended New South Wales racing's media rights to 2035, underpinning Sky's commercial model and strategy to be the aggregator of premium racing content. This is on top of Queensland's media rights being extended to 2030. And in Victoria, we've renewed thoroughbred digital rights and are well progressed on renewing the retail rights. We traditionally under-index on sport, which we've been addressing to attract a new and broader base of customers who are then introduced to a wider range of products. We're particularly focused on U.S. sport. We want TAB to be famous for being the home of U.S. sport, and that's backed by our NBA, MLB and NFL partnerships. U.S. sport now makes up 25% of our sports turnover. Our strategy of transforming the retail experience continues to be well received by punters. Digital-in-venue turnover ex Victoria was up more than 50% year-on-year. And the ex UBET states was up 115%. We will continue to innovate in this space to take the experience to the next level. We're thinking differently about optimizing the retail network coming out of COVID. One of the things we're trialing is a cashless retail offering. We've rationalized our agency network, and we'll continue to think prudently about this part of the footprint. Enhancing our product portfolio is a key focus. Our Same Game Multi turnover and revenue was up more than 300% year-on-year and now represents over 20% of digital sports revenue. We also have a big tote innovation coming this half, and it will be supported by the personalized tote offers we have launched off the back of our new data capability. We're also still committed to national pooling, have scoped the technical build and continue to work through potential solutions with the rating industry. Moving to Slide 16. When TAB and UBET came together, we set out to integrate and then transform the business with a truly combined digital and retail offer, backed by a cutting-edge personalization platform and leaner, more efficient base. There is always more to do, but the transformation has made TAB a more sustainable and better business. The digital offering has improved, and we're better placed to take advantage of our unique position in market. We're now in the most competitive position we've been in since the merger, and we would not have weathered the COVID disruption, if that was not the case. There is obviously much speculation regarding the Wagering & Media business in the market. While the Board works through that, the Wagering & Media team is focused on the business and continuing to build on the platform we've created over the last 2 years. The team believes in a bright future for this business and are not at all surprised in the level of interest currently being shown by external parties. Thank you, and I'll now hand over to Paul Carew, COO of Gaming Services.
Thanks, Adam, and I'll commence on Slide 17, the Gaming Services. The period continued to be heavily impacted by COVID-19. Gaming venues that were open traded with density restrictions, and in greater Melbourne, venues only reopened in November. It's worth noting that Victoria represents around 30% of the Gaming Services business revenue. As we said at the full year, we suspended fees to venues that were shut, notwithstanding any contractual obligations they may have had with us. The fees have been progressively returning to pre-COVID levels once venues have reopened. This decision did wipe out the majority of earnings in the half, but as a major industry player, we took the position that it was the right thing to do. In all states, we have returned to billing at 100% of usual rates, except in Victoria, which is at 75% and will likely go to 100% by the fourth quarter. The gaming market is buoyant at the moment, and even though less than 100% of machines are operational, customers clearly want to continue to patronize their local venues. As well as managing through COVID-19, the emphasis was on the turnaround plan to improve things like the business' cost structure and capital intensity. We've got good traction there, and I'll cover this in more detail on the next slide. In terms of extensions to the remaining Victorian EGM contracts, COVID-19's uncertainty has made it difficult to meaningfully engage with venues and progress new extensions. Now moving to Slide 18. This slide takes you through the key initiatives of the 5-point turnaround plan. It delivered $3 million in savings in the first half of F '21 with 70 roles removed from the business as well as rationalization of the property footprint and our fleet. This will deliver $9 million in savings on an annualized basis and forms part of the 3S program of work. We've also completed leadership team changes and put in place a simpler operating structure. We're currently focusing on the review of the technical services function, and that's where a lot of the cost base is in this business. We're looking at optimizing field operations, streamlining supply chain processes and the operating model and improving client management. Basically, this is simplifying the way we deliver and allowing us to focus on the areas that add the most value. There's more to do, but the overall turnaround program is delivering what it needs to at this stage so we can lift performance and profitability of the business. Thank you, and I'll now hand back to Adam Newman.
Thanks, Paul. If we now take a look at capital management, and we'll move to Slide #20. You'll remember at the full year release that we announced revisions to our key capital management targets regarding gearing and dividends. We also undertook a $600 million equity capital raising. Those funds were used to pay down existing drawn syndicated debt facility and a USPP note that matured in December. I'm pleased to say that as at 31st of December, our gearing was at 2.8x, comfortably within the new target range of 2.5 to 3x. But that was assisted by some deferrals of lottery taxes. However, we remain confident of remaining within the target range at year-end, even after those deferred lottery taxes have been fully repaid. We understand how important dividends are to our shareholders. So as David has mentioned, we are pleased that the Board has approved the resumption of dividends, a $0.075 fully franked dividend. This represents 80% of net profit after tax before significant items. This will be payable on the 17th of March to shareholders registered on the 23rd of February. Finally, in relation to CapEx, with lower CapEx in the first half primarily due to COVID-19 and actions taken to optimize our spend, we now expect full year total CapEx to come in at around $180 million to $190 million. Depreciation and amortization will consequently be a little lower than earlier expectations and is now anticipated to be around $380 million to $390 million for FY '21. I'll now hand back to David for his concluding remarks.
Thanks, Adam, and thanks also to Sue, Adam and Paul for taking you through the performances of our businesses. And as we conclude on Slide 22, I'd like to leave you with a few final points. The first is that we are in a much stronger financial position as a result of the various actions we took last year and our strong operational cash flows. Secondly, all 3 businesses are well positioned for the second half. Lotteries & Keno has entered the second half with strong momentum, with excellent performance across the whole portfolio and accelerated jackpot sequences activated. Wagering & Media has essentially completed its integration, largely transformed its TAB and Sky businesses and is focused on continuing to develop the digital-in-venue offer, sports and racing media content and personalized customer experiences. And as licensed venues are returning to a more normal state across the country, Gaming Services cash flows are progressively returning towards pre-COVID-19 levels. We'll also expect increased benefits across all 3 businesses from our optimization program. We'd like to acknowledge the significant impact of COVID-19 had continued to have on our people and our partners. And it continues to be challenging as the current Victorian experience tells us, so we'd like to thank them for their commitment to helping Tabcorp deliver excitement with integrity. We're committed to working with our venue and industry partners to reinvigorate their venues and racetracks and help them reconnect with our customers. And finally, there has been considerable commentary in the market about our Wagering & Media business. We have confirmed that we have received a number of proposals and unsolicited approaches in relation to a potential transaction involving this business. The details of these approaches and proposals remains confidential. They are indicative and nonbinding in nature. They are also highly conditional and subject to numerous requirements, such as due diligence, financing and various regulatory and racing industry approvals. The Board will take the appropriate time to carefully consider all of the relevant issues and strategic options that arise in respect of these matters. Thank you, and we're now happy to take your questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Matt Ryan at UBS.
Just got a quick question on lotteries. You're obviously seeing some pretty nice leverage through the P&L in that division, including Keno and a record VC margin. I'm just curious around that VC margin as to whether that was impacted by mix or whether you think that sort of margin can continue to increase moving forward?
So Sue, perhaps you'd like to comment and possibly Adam Newman on the VC margin. But Sue, over to you.
Thank you, David. Yes, that was impacted by mix. As we've shared before, every extra 1% of our digital turnover adds about $4 million to EBITDA. We also, obviously, saw a change in mix in our Keno business as you would have seen in the results this year with some of the lockdowns have happened in various states and a significant shift to digital for Keno, and that's been [ good stuff ].
Yes. So I guess the mix that I was probably more talking about was the mix between Keno and lotteries. So that did have an impact on that margin?
I think the mix between Lotteries & Keno, they are different product categories. The increase in revenue that we've seen from the Keno business has obviously been very encouraging, and we certainly will be doing what we can to keep that up in the future. But this is not that people shift spend between Keno and lotteries so much, if that's what you're thinking or were asking whether that shift will remain. Adam, would you want to add anything more?
Look, I don't think I have a whole hit more. I think, Matt, it's also a bit of the math because Keno VC margin is a lot higher than the lotteries. And the VC margin in Keno was impacted a little bit despite the growth in revenue, and that was off the back of daily connection fees with all of the venues being shut. So we had a big digital pickup, but the daily connection fee aspect has an impact from a VC margin perspective. So I think there's a few moving parts and pieces in there.
Sure. And can I just ask a question on cash flow? So I guess even after stripping off what we'd consider to be those one-off lottery benefits, it's still what we thought was a pretty strong cash flow outcome. And I guess, the area of focus for us is probably more around the CapEx from here. So clearly, this year is going to be a bit lower for the reasons you've mentioned. But now that we're through integration, are you getting better visibility on what you think that medium-term CapEx number might be? And I guess, is there some relief perhaps in the next couple of years at least, that you've gone through such a heavy period of CapEx that, that number might start to come back down?
Adam N., over to you.
Yes, thanks. So we've obviously seen a decline in CapEx. It would be fair to say we're working hard given we've come to the end of integration, as you rightly point out, an elevated spend. I'm not sure that necessarily this year, given the COVID interruptions in the first half, is necessarily representative going forward. I think we've guided in the past of at $200 million to $240 million range. And certainly, as we sit here today, Matt, I think that probably holds despite the fact that we're going to be under it for this financial year.
But I guess, I mean, that was always a medium-term number that we had been given. Is there a lower number that's possible at least for the next 2 to 3 years, just given how much has been spent recently?
Look, I think, possibly, but I think the range that we've given at that $200 million to $240 million, as we sit here today, looking forward, we think that's going to be about where will we be spending. There's still a lot of expenditure, particularly in the digital space for the organization, but I think the range of that $200 million to $240 million is probably okay as we sit here today.
Our next question comes from Sacha Krien at Evans & Partners.
I just had a couple of follow-up questions on cash flow as well for Adam Newman, please. So your CapEx is substantially below D&A. So you have about $400 million of D&A. CapEx, you're talking about $200 million to $240 million BAU. Your gearing is now sort of within the target range of 2.8. Look, it looks like you're going to be probably below that target range pretty quickly, and you're paying out 70% to 80% of earnings as dividends. I mean what's the plan once you do get below the target range?
Look, I mean we've got our settings that we've got at this point, so I assure that I think in the event that we start to sit below that target range, we'll revisit at that point in time. But as we sit here at the moment, I mean, we're not considering it to be a near-term issue.
Okay. I mean how do you think about that differential between D&A and CapEx? I mean, I know you've got about 100-odd of license amortization. Do you sort of put cash away on the assumption you're going to have to renew those licenses at some point, but which means you're going to go below that target range? Is that how we should think about it? Because it is sort of 200 to -- 150 to 200 gap between the 2, which is a lot of cash flow.
Yes. Look, I think it's obviously an interesting question with regards to -- you're right. The D&A has a big proportion of it that's related to amortization of some of those license fees at the end of the day. I -- there's a question, obviously, we've got the Vic license coming up, the near-term one. I think from a capital spending perspective, the way we think about it is that we're -- yes, I think we're quite comfortable about where our settings sit at this point in time. And I'm not sure that as the license arrangements play out, we'll get a better sense about whether we put -- need to be putting cash away or not. I think as we sit here at the moment, we've been pretty focused on how we manage through the near-term challenges that we've got from a COVID perspective. And as we come through that side, we'll have a better, clearer ear about how we're going to look at things down the track.
Yes. Fair enough. Just a couple of follow-up questions for Adam Rytenskild, please. Adam, just hoping you can provide a bit more color on the comment at the bottom of one of your slides where you talk about securing changes to license conditions and regulatory harmonization. I mean first of all, does anything happen on this front? And secondly, what's your level of confidence that you'll be able to achieve some of this? And third -- sorry for so many questions. The third one is -- a product like same race multi (sic) [ Same Game Multi ] where we still haven't seen that. I mean, is that delay in getting that sort of product to market a consequence of these license conditions and regulatory harmonization?
3 questions in there. Let me start by saying that, that comment at the bottom of the slide is not an excuse for our business. We're very focused on our digital customer experience, the way we compete and continuing to improve in that space. But the comment is that I believe, we believe as an organization, that some of those changes need to continue to happen in parallel. And I think the first logical place that, that will be considered is when we look at some of the big strategic questions coming up such as the Victorian license. Without going more into that, I think that's where we need to make sure that the shape of some of those -- out of the markets we operate in, support a sustainable future for our business, but also for the industry. In terms of same race multi -- sorry, in terms of same race multi, that's something that -- it's just a matter for us of how we prioritize our improvements to product and customer experience. We've made a lot of improvements over the last 6 months through COVID. Now that integration is behind us, we've got the ability to accelerate that. We've taken an integration with a significant task for the regulators as well as for us. So that does free up the pipe. But it's just a matter of what we want to focus on first. We've got a lot of initiatives coming in the second half, and we'll consider same race multi is in the pipeline of all of those initiatives.
Our next question comes from Rohan Sundram at MST Financial.
Just one question from me, and I'll leave it to David or Adam Rytenskild. Just on the wagering competitive landscape and competitive as always, but how would you view the last 6 months? And how well would you regard how you're competing versus previous period? Just keen to understand if you are seeing any signs of rationality in that market now that we have had a bit of consolidation?
It seems every time we -- it's Adam Rytenskild here. I'll take that one. It seems every time we talk about rationality, something irrational comes into the market. And COVID, no one could predict COVID. So the last 6 months, frankly, and the 3 months before, it was an incredibly abnormal market, and probably is that unprecedented impacts, as you'd ever see, with retail closures across the market. I think we competed really well on that. As I said earlier on the call, our business is different. The shape of our business is different. And we managed our response in that market appropriately, and I think we delivered a solid result, but have also very clear that we've got more to do. And having integration behind us allows to actually accelerate our focus on customer experience, digital customer experience, including in retail.
Our next question comes from Desmond Tsao from Goldman Sachs.
Just a question on lotteries, specifically Slide 11. Thanks for the disclosure. I thought that was a really good slide. Look, can I hear your thoughts just around the extent that there's opportunities across other games to do something similar such as price raises? And also to what extent is this sort of experience driving the changes that you're considering across Oz Lotto or whether that's just a function of a lack of change across that game for many years?
Sue, over to you.
Yes. Thank you. I'll take that one. The changes that we made on Set for Life and Saturday are really part of our regular review of our games across the portfolio. And all of those are always very thoroughly researched, and we do consider a number of options, including changes to the matrix, changes to the products, changes to the divisional price structure. And I guess that we'll settle on a change that we believe will drive the greatest incremental revenue, that always was an important consideration because each product has to have its own unique position in the portfolio to maximize revenues overall across the portfolio. So those are the changes that we did on that. And so Oz Lotto really is just the next game that we've chosen to look at. We, particularly, look across the jackpot part of the portfolio and then the basic part of the portfolio as was last time in results around the fact that we were focusing more in on the [ Phase 3 ] part of the portfolio, and hence, the change to Saturday Lotto. And we had this on impact from the Set for Life change still coming through as well. Those are, as you see in the chart, going very well. So the Oz Lotto change is really just timely for us to look at that part of the portfolio, given that we did [ TAB now ] as is a while ago. In terms of the type of change that we implement, again, we'll be considering all the options that we usually do around what I mentioned, matrix, product, divisional structure, et cetera. We haven't settled on any change yet. We'll be researching that through the rest of FY '21, and then we'll decide on whatever change we implement for Oz Lotto, and it will also be subject to regulatory approval.
Okay. So it sounds like it's potentially more sort of second half '22 story, if there are changes put through.
It's not going to be in this -- certainly not going to be in FY '21, obviously. It's usually around a sort of 12-month time frame or less for us to develop a game change. But we have no specific date yet. I can't really give you any indication of when it would happen.
Sure. No problem. And just a second question, just on wagering. I think you guys flagged that there's still more to do. And there's a strong pipeline of customer initiatives to come despite the significant investment already put into wagering. Can you guys perhaps just flesh that out a little bit more, the quantum of investment and timing? And what could we expect over the next sort of 6 to 12 months?
Sure. In terms of quantum, all I'd say it's within our CapEx envelope. We prioritize that as much as we can to customer initiatives. So you shouldn't think about that in terms of incremental spend versus what you might be expecting. The investments over the last couple of years, we've talked over the last couple of years about it being very important to invest in transformation at the same time as doing integration. So over the last couple of years, we've invested very heavily in our data capability. That's now very good, and we'll continue to improve that, but that's now becoming more and more important for us. Our digital customer experience we've invested in as well, media as part of that has been key, what we focus on over the last couple of years. With integration behind us, it allows us to solely focus on the things that are important for customers. And without going into specific details, the theme are the things that are coming over the second half around vision innovation, data innovation, [ live ] betting innovation, tote innovation, more payment addition to initiatives like venue mode. The thing that I think is exciting about that is it's not only in areas that you see across the market, it's in areas that are unique to our business and will be unique to our customer experience. So we look forward to delivering on those over the coming months and then moving forward from there.
Our next question comes from David Fabris from Macquarie.
I'm interested in the cost optimization program. I can see you guys have provided FY '21 guidance. But where can this get to over 3 years? Are you able to talk aspirational OpEx to revenue ratios in the various businesses maybe?
So the first thing I'll say is we're not intending to give any targets today, looking beyond FY '21. And the program itself is broad in nature, covering not just cost, but a lot of simplification and process improvement and really looking to streamline areas that post integration, we can now really focus on making us as effective and efficient as possible.
Okay. And just a question on wagering. Just with wagering opening up in North America, is there an opportunity to provide more vision into these markets to monetize your media rights? I mean, is there anything restricting that? Would the racing bodies be supportive?
There is -- the racing bodies are supportive. They have been. Not only the racing bodies in Australia, we actually distribute in -- if you're talking about the U.S. market, we distribute not only Australian racing, but racing from South Africa, Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea. We have the bulk of international racing going into the U.S. We're now delivering. And certainly, it's very popular, was through COVID. And sudden -- we see it as an opportunity, not only for extending pari-mutuel activity, but should fix odds betting on racing be approved. It's primarily a B2B business that we have there. It's nicely profitable, and it does deals with, right now, a lot of the ADWs. The hubs that offer pari-mutuel betting should fix that, or if betting be allowed, it would then do B2B deals with all the players that you've been following probably very closely.
Got you. And just those comments that it did well through COVID. Can you give any indication of how the media business performs, so we can think about from a forecast perspective?
We don't break out the media business separately, and that's partly due to competitive. It's important for us that we don't highlight areas that might help our competitors understand opportunities. But also it's -- if you want to get an idea, there was a strong top line growth of sales, pari-mutuel betting on all racing product delivered into the U.S.
Our next question comes from Alex Paton from Citi.
Just a couple of questions on behalf of Bryan. On lotteries, you've been accelerating or boosting the jackpot sequence of Powerball for some time now, using that price reserve fund. How long do you reckon this can sustainably continue? And how are you thinking about it?
Sue?
Right. I'll take it. Yes, look, the accelerating sequence we put in place at the beginning of FY '21 is something that we said at the time was something we thought would be sustainable through the financial year, and it certainly has been, and it still is sustainable going forward based on current sales levels. Obviously, we actively manage that all the time. You would have noted that in January, we further accelerated the sequence on Powerball. That really has been a short-term tactic, taking advantage of the momentum that we saw in sales through the first half. And so that is not something that we would intend to continue for a lengthy period of time, and it really is subject to how sales go. The overall sort of the games are performing exceptionally well -- is performing very well across all of the jackpot levels. So the accelerated sequence is designed to get us to those higher jackpots more quickly. But importantly, we're also very focused on driving the performance at each of the level through the sequence, and we're seeing very positive results and has been through the half on all of those levels.
That's very clear. And just one on wagering as well. How much of the increased generosity is around the back of that outage you guys had at the Spring Carnival? And I guess more generally, what does the current generosities' run rate look like into second half '21?
Look, generosity has increased significantly. Our generosities were up about 90% versus the prior year during the half. If you back out the generosities we spend following the outage and also as part of the UBET account customer migration, they would have been up about 70%. Based on what we can tell, our competitors are up far more than that, but we believe that put us in a good competitive position, helped customer retention and allowed us to compete well during the period. In terms of going forward, it's a bit difficult to tell. But I think what I've guided previously around net yields, which is the best way to think about it, sort of 13.5% to 14%, if you adjust for those 2 things, we're sort of in that range.
[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Larry Gandler at Crédit Suisse.
A couple of questions. Adam, just on the wagering optimization S3, I think that involves closure of retail or optimization of retail. Can you put some more color on that in terms of how many agents you're at, where you're going to and whether this involves third-party agents like pubs and clubs as well?
I'll take it, Adam N., if you like. You're throwing the line out to 2 Adams, Larry. So I'll just note, firstly, the 3S optimization program is a group program. But I'll just focus on the question around retail, wagering retail. We've -- our retail network, as you know, is over 4,000 venues and circa 300 of those stand-alone retail agencies. The license venue component of the network is a very efficient network in terms of most of the costs are variable. It's increasingly digitally integrated. It's a great digital acquisition channel for us, and we'll continue to innovate through that channel. We think it's valuable and important for our business. The agency network is a profitable network, but we have rationalized it over time. We closed something in the order of 70 agencies in FY '20. We've closed 30 -- circa 30 agencies in this financial year. We'll do so progressively. And it remains a profitable network, but we'll just continue to evaluate that in the context of our broader digital channels and license in new channels.
Okay. Great. So you said 4,000 total network distribution points?
Yes. It's over 4,000 and 300 of them are stand-alone shops. The rest of them are license-venue installations.
Okay. Great. And then a question for Sue. Sue, looks like instants had an exceptional half. I'm just wondering -- obviously, it's COVID-related. To what degree do you think you can sustain that growth with instants, maybe new players are becoming attractive to the game? What do you think the sustainable growth rate is?
Yes. Excellent results for Keno, and obviously very pleased with it. It's come about through a number of deliberate sort of initiatives put in place by our team around game designs and planning, stock, planning distribution, retail-risk activities and the like. So we launched 41 new games in the half versus 32 -- 30, sorry, in the pcp, which is I guess just shows the interest in take up of Instant Scratch-Its. We also had a very strong marketing focus and campaigns to support new tickets. We had exceptional results for all of our event-based periods in Instant Scratch-Its, Father's Day and Christmas and the like. We also implemented some changes to the supply chain processes around allowing retailers to have more relaxed settlements to all the stocks that was about ensuring that the pipeline there with all customers went into store. So I think some of those things are -- some things that will take forward into the future. We -- for our Christmas range, we've had a forced order out to our retailers. So we actually bought stock into the network for the first time, and that worked exceptionally well. [ I expect those will happen moving ] forward. The increase in revenue is coming from an increase in frequency and spend, and that's a little bit skewed to the younger demographics. So that's all being encouraging. So there's some really good signs showing an increase in engagement and an increase in interest in the expense category. And we do have a quite sophisticated model to developing tickets and to target different [ motivation ]. Look, with all that said, I think that the lift that we've seen is very encouraging. But obviously, we definitely have also benefited from some of the COVID [ disruptions ] and some of that would taper off. We can't really predict what's going to happen at the moment with some of those government support payments and the like.
There are no further questions in queue, so I will hand back to David Attenborough for closing comments. Thank you.
Yes. Thank you very much. And I really appreciate everyone that joined us on the call today and support our business. Thank you very much, and good day. Thank you.
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes the call today. Thank you so much for attending. You may now disconnect.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Tabcorp Holdings Limited transcript - plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.
Get an API key View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Tabcorp Holdings Limited earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the
EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server.
Quarterly plans from $105 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search,
and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.