Tata Consultancy Services Limited (TCS) Earnings Call Transcript
October 8, 2026
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Ladies and gentlemen, good day, and welcome to the TCS earnings conference call. [Operator Instructions]. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Nehal Shah from the Investor Relations team at TCS. Thank you, and over to you.
Thank you, operator. Good evening, and welcome, everyone. Thank you for joining us today to discuss TCS' financial results for the second quarter of FY 2026 that ended on September 30, 2026. This call is being webcast through our website and an archive, including the transcript, will be available on the site for the duration of this quarter. The financial statements, quarterly fact sheet and press releases are also available on our website. Our leadership team is present on this call to discuss our results. We have with us today Mr. K. Krithivasan, Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director.
Hi, everyone.
Ms. Aarthi Subramanian, Executive Director, President and Chief Operating Officer.
Good evening, everyone.
Mr. Samit Seksaria, Chief Financial Officer.
Hello, everyone.
And Mr. Sudeep Kunnumal, Cheif HR officer..
Hello everyone.
Our management team and the deal brief overview of the company's performance followed by a Q&A session. As you are aware, we don't provide any specific revenue or earnings guidance and anything said on this call, which reflects our outlook for the future or which could be funded by a forward-looking statement must be reviewed in Pandemic the risk data company. We have outlined these risks in the second slide of the quarterly fact sheet available on our website at e-mail outlook on who have opt our lending is. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Krithi.
Thank you, Nehal. Good day, everyone, and thank you for joining us. I would like to begin by calling out the key takeaways from our quarter 2 FY '20 performance. First, we sustained our growth momentum this quarter despite environment that remain selective during the year. Revenue for the quarter was INR 73,288 crores. In constant currency, revenue grew 0.5% sequentially and 2.8% year-on-year. International revenue grew 1.2% sequentially in constant currency. All international markets grew sequentially, led by the United Kingdom of 3.5%, followed by North America and Continental Europe. -- at 0.4%. Second, our growth was -- growth has broadened across our core port. BFS included 2.3% sequentially in constant currency, while manufacturing and technology services. Each grew 3.1%. Consumer business and Energy Resources and Utilities showed an improvement compared to the previous quarter. India revenue grew 6% and regional markets grew 3.6% year-on-year. Third, our order book remains healthy. TCV for the quarter was at USD 9.6 billion. This excludes the Porsche and West Bay deals. The quality of the wins demonstrate our continued relevance in large complex and strategically important transformation programs. continues to scale as a structural growth opportunity. annual revenue reached USD 3.1 billion and crossed 10% of our war ordering. Finally, we enhanced our strategy through deals ecosystem partnerships and targeted acquisitions. Our partnership with Porsche and the proposed acquisition of MMHE, which is subject to regulatory approvals, strengthen our position in AI power mobility and engineering. The best by GCC engagement highlights our ability to help clients build and transform a native global capability centers. We also launched TCS JDD agent hub for drug discovery, domain strategic agency control planes and new physical AI capabilities, including autonomous engineering labs, powered by NVIDIA in Bengaluru and an AI-first lighter factory lab in full. The demand environment has not materially changed since last quarter and discretionary programs without near-term value remain understood. Against this backdrop, our primary opportunity and focus on translating the advances in into measurable enterprise advantage for our clients. I'll now invite Samir, Aarti and Sudeep to go over our different aspects of our performance during the quarter. I'll step in later and provide more color on the demand trends we are seeing. Over to you, Samir.
Thank you, Kritihi. Good day, everyone. Our quarterly revenues, our category revenue was INR 788 crores a growth of 1.3% sequentially and 11.2% on a year-on-year basis. In dollar terms, revenue was USD 742 million, a growth of points sequentially and 2.4% year-on-year. In constant currency terms, our growth was 50 basis points Q-o-Q and 2.8% Y-o-Y. Our operating margins remained stable sequentially at 24%. Consistent with our philosophy to drive long-term profitable growth, we continue to prioritize investments for growth. In Q2, we made investments in strategic partnerships, M&A-related initiatives and hiring of net talent. As we build future capacity as we build future capacity and navigate demand transitions, -- we have invested in a higher bench and increased hiring of subcontractors to meet near-term skills and delivery requirements. This quarter, we were able to mitigate these headwinds partly by currency gains and operating leverage. Many of these investments are strategic in nature and our focus on long-term value creation. Our disciplined approach to margin management remains unchanged. As growth improves, we expect to benefit from enhanced scale efficiency while continuing to optimize our cost structures align capacity with demand and maintain our disciplined execution. While we are prioritizing investments, we are focusing on 5 key areas. First, we continue to strengthen our portfolio through targeted capability and acquisitions. Second, we are adding a stronger partnership ecosystem with frontier AI companies, hyperscalers semiconductor ecosystem, Tier 1 industrial suppliers and enterprise software providers. Third, we are accelerating investments in our high-growth service areas, we are making investments in sales, solutioning, service transformation, new offerings and business model across the 5 bets we have called out with a specific focus on AI and data. Fourth, we are investing in talent and capability creation at scale on learning and development as well as on hiring net talent. Lastly, we are creating new growth engines throughout the future. We are expanding into adjacencies, such as data center services, increasing our offerings for GCC and the mid-market segments, spending our presence in areas such as ServiceNow, public services and Southern Cloud. Our priority remains clear: Convert investments into sustainable growth while preserving the discipline that has consistently underpinned our profitability. Our net margin for the quarter was 19%. DSO stood at 74 days constant sequentially in dollar terms. Our cash conversion remained strong at 102.2% of net income and investment funds at the end of the period stood at $5.98 billion. Our capital allocation policy remains unchanged, and we remain committed to returning substantial free cash flow to our shareholders while judiciously investing to support our long-term growth aspirations. I'll now hand it over to Aarthi.
Thank you, Samir. Good evening, everyone. The biggest opportunity in front of us is in helping clients translate advancements in AI into business outcomes. Clients see TCS as a partner who can use AI to enable growth speed efficiency. We are keen to invest the productivity benefits from AI into enterprise transformation initiatives that will make their organization future-ready. TCS is benefiting from this shift. As evidenced by our growing AI revenues that crossed $3 billion on an annualized basis this quarter. Our priority is clear, use AI to create measurable value for our customers and to improve how we deliver work for this. This quarter, we made progress on both fronts with growth in our AI business and wider adoption of a human plus AI services delivery model. We are seeing 3 distinct demand factors, AI-native solutions and business outcomes, AI-led transformation of enterprise systems and autonomous GBS. Enterprises are also prioritizing investments in modernizing legacy data estate and building AI-ready data foundation. Across these demand partners, strong AI governance with secure AI platform is becoming a top need for enterprises. Let me share an example of how we are building AI solutions with assured business outcomes. For a global industrial manufacturer, we are using an AI-native approach to solve a critical business need, compressing lead to core time from 4.7 days to under an hour. We achieved this within a quarter, clearly demonstrating speed to value. The next step is to improve their lead to conversion metrics. This is a good example of focused problem solving and business outcome realization with AI. Now let me share how AI is changing the approach to transforming enterprise systems. AI is playing a key role in process mining, which helps us understand existing workflow redesigning processes with a human and AI approach by default is enabling upfront identification of agentic opportunities and the acceleration of implementations with AI is real. In a large complex S/4HANA enterprise transformation, spanning 27 sites, more than 70 legal entities, we are using AI to redesign processes and accelerate implementation. Our approach supported by TCS agentic platform targets 25% to 30% faster implementation. Last quarter, I spoke about autonomous GBS and how Agentic AI in business process execution is scaling significantly. Business ops teams are now embarking on agentic transformation across finance, HR, procurement and customer service. This is opening new opportunities for us to engage with business teams and create new value proposition. For the North American energy resources company, we are transforming their global HR operations to double operational efficiency and increased self-serve adoption from less than 10% to 30%. Beyond AI, cybersecurity is another area enterprises are prioritizing globally. While enterprises continue to strengthen fiber controls, the focus on cyber resilience and recovery is rising. Frontier models are also changing how enterprises manage vulnerability enable enabling discovery prioritization and validation. For a European bank, we are imagining enterprise security through an integrated AI forward operating model. Recent AI-related fiber security incidents are a reminder that AI needs the same rigorous engineering and operational discipline as any enterprise technology. Strong governance and clear guardrails must therefore be built into every enterprise AI deployment. As agent scale enterprises will need more robust orchestration, access controls, security, observability, cost controls and policy enforcement. Cost discipline matters just as much. We help clients manage AI total costs to benchmarking model and architecture selection, total economics and [ sign of advertising]. Our focus is to deliver the right level of intelligence at the right cost. This creates a significant and growing opportunity for TCS across AI government services and platforms. We recently won an engagement with a major global insurer to build an enterprise AI agent platform and a common agency control tower for managing both in-house and third-party agents. Our engineering depth and working demonstrations helped create differentiation. We are also working more closely with business teams to turn their priorities into realized benefits. In one engagement where TCS was not the incumbent, our team identified pain points and build working demonstrations during the 3-day customer workshop, which helped us secure the deal. 21 forward deployment engineers are now working directly with business on execution. Over the last 12 months, we have made good progress in deploying our human plus AI service adornment model across client engagements. For agentic AMS, TCS has earned top rankings from customers, underscoring the strength of our differentiated capabilities delivered at scale. Our investments in sales force are delivering results by combining the strength of coastal cloud listing at and our own sales force structure, we are driving significant growth. Recently, leading analysts have recognized this progress ranking TCS as the #1 sales force services partner. Looking ahead, we'll continue to engage customers across the business and technology transformation agenda, leveraging our capabilities, context, and industry platform solutions to create distinctive value proposition. These are early days. So being progressive and proactive with our ideas and solutions is essential. And we are doing this the way we know best with a customer-centric approach. Thank you. I'll now hand it over to Sudeep.
Thank you, Aki. Hello, everyone. This quarter, we continue to invest in future ready talent onboarding top talent globally, taking our workforce to 598,56 associates. Our hiring strategy continues to balance experienced talent, early career talent and the internal mobility. As client demand evolves, we remain focused on strengthening AI and remain expertise, improving employment readiness and investment in continuous learning. For the past year, we have significantly expanded our technology and AI capabilities to large-scale learning and reskilling initiatives. Our learning hours saw a 17% Q-on-Q increase to 17.1 million hours. Learning LTM action in IT services reduced by 30 basis points sequentially to 13.3 percentage. This ability to combine workforce stability with continuous at-scale learning remains a key differentiator for TCS. We remain committed to building a future workforce and the workplace to our associates can learn on top of. Thank you. Now I hand it over back to Krithi.
Thank you, Sudeep. Let me now provide some additional color on industry trends before concluding our prepared remarks. BFSI was our strongest large vertical and the largest contributor to growth. with 2.5% sequential and 3.9% year-on-year growth in constant currency. Growth was broad-based across banking, capital markets and insurance, with strong momentum in the U.K., Europe and Asia Pacific. Clients continue to invest in AI, risk and regulatory modernization, cyber resilience, data platforms and operational efficiency. Manufacturing grew 3.1% sequentially and 4.2% year-on-year. Demand is improving around factory automation, engineering productivity, product life cycle modernization, supply chain resilience, predictive maintenance and industrial AI. Our investments in led vehicle engineering, smart manufacturing and physical AI are helping us participate in larger and more strategic programs. Technology & Services grew 3.1% sequentially and 4.8% year-on-year. Growth was driven by enterprise software, technology products, engineering, to modernization and digital transformation. At the same time, traditional application and infrastructure portfolios are seeing an increase in agent PK adoption. We are leading with a first software engineering, autonomous operations, platform simplification, and read data foundations. Consumer business declined by 0.7% sequentially and 1% year-on-year. Retail and consumer products remain sensitive to inflation energy cost and selective consumer spending. Travel transportation and hospitality demand remained resilient, but discretionary spending is affected by cost pressure and increase in sourcing. We continue to see opportunities in operational efficiency, supply in visibility, customer experience, pricing, cloud, data and modernizations. Life Sciences and Healthcare grew 0.3% sequentially, with stable demand supported by long-term priorities in compliance, clinical and research platforms, data modernization, enabled digital discovery, patient engagement, revenue cycle modernization and cybersecurity. Communications and Media was broadly flat, with growth in media publishing and digital platforms, offset by continued pressure in the telecom vertical. Energy Resources and Utilities declined 0.5% sequentially, although investments in grid modernization, resilience cybersecurity asset optimization and enabled operations remain relevant. International revenue grew sequentially performance improved across most industry groups and growth broadened across the core portfolio. Our TCU was at $9.6 billion. Our win rates improved and annually revenue reached USD 3. We believe clients are moving forward towards a new phase of enterprise adoption. Opportunity is shifting from isolated use cases to redesign the value chains governed agentic systems, AI led infrastructure and human plus I operating models. Our infrastructure to intelligence strategy, artectural knowledge, delivery capabilities, platforms and ecosystem partner position us well for this transition. We will continue to execute with discipline, invest in differentiated capabilities and help our clients achieve measurable outcomes and growth, productivity and resilience. These priorities support our aspiration to become the world's leading AL led technology services company and create sustainable value for our clients, employees and shareholders. With this, we'll now open the line for questions.
[Operator Instructions]. We will take our first question from the line of Sudheer Guntupalli with Kotak Mahindra Asset Management.
My first question, your core market growth accelerated quite nicely in this quarter. Do you think the momentum in this part in the international business to continue in the coming quarters as well?
Definitely, like looking at all the parameters, like I don't want to comment on the immediate next quarter basis, which -- but on a medium-term basis, thanks to looking at the TCV and looking at the pipeline and the time conversations that we are having. We are confident the growth momentum will continue.
Sure, sir. Both BFSI and hi-tech verticals are reflecting a typical September quarter kind of seasonal strength this time. Given these 2 verticals are also are the ones which are early adopters of technology, is it fair to sort of assume or conclude that AI deflation impact, at least in these 2 verticals is now more than offset by incrementality of AI opportunity?
I don't want to say it is complete because there are -- but again, Sudheer on one hand, there is a deflation because of the productivity benefit. But also these industries use AI for modernization and it also creates vendor consolidation opportunities and are also -- for instance, if you take BFSI revenues, the percentage also grew very fast. So there are a number of things that work that are happening in these industries. I don't want to conclude saying that the deflation part is complete. But I think there are a number of opportunities in these industries we are working on, which gives us the confidence that the growth can continue.
Okay, sir. One last question to Samir. On the subcon increase this quarter, Sameer, should we see this as a proxy for visa costs, given that we would not have applied for a lot of visas given the sharp jump in vis-a-vis last year?
In the overall increase in H1, it has been across in India as well as overseas. It has more to be term demand supply skill mismatches. Some part of it could be linked to that also, but not completely.
Our next question comes from the line of Ravi Menon with Axis Capital.
First of all, congrats on a pretty good performance across multiple verticals this quarter. But we've seen the India revenue declined by about 10% and also seeing a slight decline in the 10 million clients as well this quarter and 50 million clients as well. Are both these client metrics decline. And India revenue correlated? And what caused the revenue decline in India?
Very like we've always been calling out. The regional market, while we see regional market, it's a bunch of quite a few volatile segments. And in India, we had a project deferral, which caused this revenue decrease. Otherwise, there's no structural issue and these are all the projects that will continue to get into the -- we are hoping to deliver these projects in subsequent quarters, like once the projects are reinstated and we don't see any major concern there. And on the client metrics, we had, I think, 2 -- essentially, it is only 1 specific drop. The second is coming because of the currency exchange thing. [indiscernible] a water line because of the exchange currency movement dropped below $100 million. So there's no sexual issues.
Can we think about this disclosure about AI revenues similar to what we've seen for digital when we saw that digital portfolio reached a certain level and that was growing much faster than your overall portfolio. You saw that inflection point for growth. With AI revenues now hitting 10%, can we say that from here growth has dropped out. If you look at, say, on a last 2, 3 years basis compared to looking at the next 2, 3 years, would you say that you're more optimistic that growth will be faster in the next 2, 3 years compared to the last 2, 3 years?
So Ravi, this is Aarthi here. So I think, like you said, I think we did quite well on air revenues this quarter. But when we look at our revenues, we look at traditional revenues, new services revenues and AI revenues. So our new services revenues did well as well, whether you look at it alluded to a AI led modernization enterprise cost transformation, whether it's on the ERP side or on the industrial side in manufacturing and pharma sectors. BPS, cybersecurity, all of them did well and obviously, I think the AI growth rates came out rather nicely. And on the traditional services also, vendor consolidation and AI-powered software engine, IT ops, right? How we innovate in execution is helping us differentiate and grow market share in traditional services also in a space where AI is definitely creating efficiency and productivity, but there are tailwinds on the back of vendor consolidation in those traditional areas.
One last question to Samir. To get back to the kind of towards 26% with the aspirational margin. Do you think that we'll be able to bring down subcontracting costs over time? Or what are the key levers that could take you towards 26%?
So overall, long-term aspiration remains unchanged to continue to 26% to 28%. While in the near term, as we have been talking about, we will continue to prioritize investments for growth, and looking ahead, so your question in terms of what are our levers available, Topcon, given the rate average has increased definitely is one of the levers. Also, if you look at some of the investments, we'll start to deliver results that could be another part of it. And as we we have been focused on our margin discipline as always, and the traditional levers, whether it is productivity utilization will also continue. And some of our on-net employee expenses also have been increasing. So at various points of time, we have used these levers and towards getting to '26 as we do it, these would definitely play in a role.
Our next question comes from the line of Ruchi Makhija with ICICI Securities.
I take stab on the AI question once again. So this quarter, we saw AI revenue grew by 19%, while the prediction on non-AI revenues should we interpret this as a increase in the substituting the traditional services or we are seeing incremental client spending and add to or what needs to happen for AI to become the overall revenue growth driver?
See definitely, we see AI as a net new, a driver of new opportunities. But I think, Ruchi, the way we see it, more and more AI is becoming pervasive in an organization and playing a role in every transformation a company and a -- so whether it's any enterprise transformation or business operations transformation or agency transformation, which are new ways that we can solve problems for business. I think AI is playing a role across the work.
Okay. Secondly, on margin. This quarter, outgross margin decline of -- the second part to this, given the ongoing investment we also have by GCC coming in MHP consolidation playing out in H2, so in that context, how do we think about the margin commitment we had made around exiting FY '27 is 25% plus EBIT margin range.
Sure. So first, on the gross margin impact. As you can see, there's the increase which is in subcontractors, third-party expenses directly reflects on the gross margin. The other investments, which I talk about are more G&A linked investments, right? And like I mentioned earlier, we are prioritizing investments for growth. And like you mentioned, looking ahead in the second half, we anticipate a few headwinds. The acquisition-related valuation, particularly in is likely to impact by about 50 basis points, depending on the timing of closure and when the integration starts, the normal furlough seasonality and our continued ecosystem would be our headwinds. And like to Ravi's question I mentioned, some of the Q2 headwinds will start to taper off or such giving outcomes. And at the same time, we'll try to balance. While it is an uphill task, we'll continue to endeavor to inch up on our margins.
Our next question comes from the line of Nitin Padmanabhan with Investec.
Wanted your thoughts on the regional markets, more specifically in the context of the BSNL deal. Do you think that should sort of lend to some sort of support as we get into the second half? The second bit is in the context of we entering Q3, any thoughts you have from a furlough perspective in conversations with clients. And third, I think from a margin perspective, I think we already had this thought process that -- obviously, in Q1, we had the comp increases and then as we go through the year, by the end of the year, at least from an exit perspective, we should be closer to 25%. Now from -- in terms of what has changed in that thought process from an investment perspective, and how are you -- when do you think investments really peak out? Would be great to have your thoughts on both these things as well?
Nitin, I'll answer the questions on BSNL in Q3. Samir can take up the question on margin. BSNL, like you said, it can provide a cushion for the next couple of quarters. But the fact is regional markets will be volatile if made up. we don't do that much of IT-based work in the regional market. And also some of the programs we do here the deliveries tend to be lumpy. So you will always see some volatility in regional. That's the reason we call the regional market separately out. And on Q3, so far from what we have seen, the furlough will be very similar to the previous years. We don't see any major change.
So Nitin, on the margins. For the past 2 quarters, we have been prioritizing -- we have been talking about triaging the investments and focusing on growth at the same time, maintaining the margin discipline. And yes, right now, also, we are saying we want to end up, but the primary near-term focus has been on prioritizing the investments. And that's why we have called out part investments that we are making. No specific immediate time line, I have called out what are the next phase of investments in the coming few quarters, will let pick up. I would expect some of them to start delivering results and growth being an important margin lever should help out per se.
The next question is from the line of Vibhor Single with Nuvama Equities.
Two questions from my side. First question on Krithi, so I think at the last conference call we had mentioned and many other companies have also mentioned that with the event of these MM platforms, clients are now increasingly coming to us and asking us to build an application layer underneath, which the LLM kind of sits. So that provides these clients or flexibility to sit within LLM, help them optimize the total cost, et cetera, et cetera. Have you seen that trend continue in this quarter as well? Any new things that you might have picked up. Are the clients also kind of moving away from the midstream elements to some sort of small language models where our expertise becomes siding factors? Any color on that would be helpful.
We were, like what you said definitely is playing off. we last time also we laid out our infrastructure to intelligence, where minor infrastructure layer in in the reserve model and data layer on top of that is an agent player. And on the agent layer, we are building the agent control plans. And on the model and data layer, we are building applicable model hardness, so that customers can use, either SLM or LLM or open source, open rate model based on the need and criticality and what is application. So that discussions continue. Particularly this quarter, we've seen strong success in the agent control plane. I'll request Aarthi to provide more color on this
Thank you, Krithi. So we bought absolutely, yes. I think as the enterprises are focused on safe, secure and responsible deployment of agentic AI. They need a strong foundation to scale. So building the AI platform and more so this year at control plane is becoming the key layer, not just in terms of governance, but in terms of cost management, really looking at agent performance and the full end-to-end agentic life signal, like Krithi said, this quarter, we saw some very good wins where we are building a control plane for our customers.
And Aarthi, if I can just dwell a bit more on that. Are there any specific pockets or, let's say, verticals, maybe banking or high-tech, some other verticals where we are seeing more of this at this point of time and some other key segments will be lagging behind it and need to catch up.
Sure. I think that's a great question, Vibhor.What we are seeing is, first of all, when we look at the $3.1 million annualized revenues, right, it is AI revenue is growing across every vertical. I think that's very positive. Now there are 3 verticals which are leading in terms of growth rates and the top 3 verticals are BFSI, manufacturing and licensed health care. And in these 3 verticals, we are seeing the whole agentic control play AI governance, these are all evolving things, right? So while the technology is rapidly developing, then you see customers who are leading actually create proof point and create the playbook for enterprises to follow. So I think those verticals are leading. But I would say that consumer, technology, energy resources utilities are also following pretty closely in terms of very active adoption of these strips.
Just 1 last question for some on the margin part. Samir, just on the margin part, the margin trajectory that we are seeing at this point of time. is majorly because of the higher contracting expenses and the investments that we are doing. There is no pricing pressure that we are seeing across any of the pockets. Is that the right assumption?
Broadly and I'll give you some color. There would be some frontloading of productivity benefits that could happen. But at the same time, we are seeing better pricing on the revenues, which we are generating. And if you take the revenue per employee, you would see there's a slight reduction, not a significant one. So at an overall portfolio level, the pricing is broadly stable.
And just to wrap it up, given that we are at 24% at this point of time, you mentioned around 50 basis point headwind from the NHB, there would be some -- at some point of time, the BSNL project would also come in I mean, do we have a target in mind that we are looking in terms of -- I know I probably was asked before in terms of exit for this year, Will we be able to get closer to 25%? Or that looks difficult from the vantage point that we are at this point of from?
As I mentioned, we look towards inching up some where we have and corporate investments.
Our next question comes from the line of Sandeep Shah with Equirus Securities.
The first question is one of your large peers who gave the guidance for the next year, this time, they clearly notified that the growth in consulting and managed services would be almost similar. And this could be because of clients now spending beyond AI Infra into AI-led services. So is your client conversation actually implying that. And once the macro led issue subside, this could be a trigger, which one can expect in the next calendar year?
So Sandeep, when Aarthi spoke also offline few types of projects that we are doing in , right? That will be a solution to business outcome. A transformation of interface systems, autonomous GBS, and AI coming up in technology modernization, moderation, data estate, all these actually, at this time, we see increasing in volume, increasing recurring frequency. So definitely, clients are moving, while they are continuing to invest and explore, I would say, option on optimizing the token costs. But there's a greater interest in leveraging AI for a business outcome and technology modernization, and we believe that will continue.
Okay. Okay. And just next question for the CFO, Samir, sir. Sir, on an organic basis, is it fair to assume that the guidance is still in for reaching 25% by 4Q, if I exclude the 50 bps kind of orders impact from NHP consolidation.
There would be less than no minute point looking at only organic on the margin side, right? -- there would be macro factors impacting seasonality. So I would say, on an overall basis, we will balance our investment priorities and our disciplined distribution. And we will work towards working higher from here. But right now, the near-term priorities on investment continue.
Okay. And Samir, just a related question, if I look at absolute employee cost, there has been absolute decline 6% Q-on-Q despite increasing base in employees this quarter as well as last quarter. So is it the lower variable pay or incremental offshoring are the factors? And you believe incremental offshoring in the AI world could continue as a going forward method of delivery.
Sandeep, as you rightly called out, the employee expenses will reflect a combined effect of cost mix, location mix, still composition, adding patterns, et cetera. Having said that, given our performance against internal targets, we have had a lower outlay of performance [indiscernible] this time.
The next question is from the line of Gaurav Rateria with Morgan Stanley.
I have a couple of questions. My first question is on your AI revenues. Is that accretive to the gross margins at the company level? And if not, what will change over time? Is it more on the revenue productive side or the cost side that will drive margin accretion from the new business? The second question is on the comments, Samir, that you made on the capacity creation on the bench side on the investment that you're making. Is it to reflect the improving demand or broad basing of the demand in the coming quarters? Or is it again the issue of supply-demand mismatch that is leading to the bench creation that you spoke about? And the last question is on your data center business. At what point in time we can see some capacity getting operational and start contributing to the revenues?
Sure. I'll take all 3 of them, Gaurav. On the first one, the $ 3.1 billion AI revenues, which we have are coming in at a much higher margin than our company average. On the data center business. As we have consistently called out, we will plan our expansion on the capacity creation on the data centers, while the initial things lay plans and layout are in place. Once the contract comes in, and it will take about 18 to 24 months before the revenues start kicking in. On the capacity creation, Gaurav, if you can repeat it again, sorry.
Yes. The question is on your comment that you made that created more bench capacity this quarter. So was it to reflect the improving and broad-basing of demand that you're seeing in coming quarters? Or was it led by more supply-demand mismatch that you talked about?
I think if you look at some of the newer skills which we are hiring, first, we need to get them, and then the deployment has happened with the land. So that's a capacity creation. So it is the prior 1 that you talked about on the demand.
The next question is from the line of Dipesh Mehta with Emkay Global.
Two questions. Just want to be strength about the North America. North America growth is lagging company average and Y-o-Y basis is almost of companies. Can you provide some sense how you are expecting North America to growth to play out sensing overall in the shape. Second question is about 2 vertical particularly. One is the ERU, Energy, Resource and Equility and the consumer, a bit softer this quarter, but how do you expect it to play out into H2?
Dipesh, a fast vertical? I understood.
Energy resource and consumer.
Dipesh, North America, we expect -- see more of our discussions with the customers and the TCV, they are all looking good. And we expect North America revenue to recover and become a healthy one. And in some consumer business, definitely, we are expecting next quarter to be a better quarter because it's not all again for them seasonally, Q3 is an important quarter for the consumer business. And here, you also -- I mean, 1 of the comments I tell you should be taken for the immediate quarter. You look at that in the medium term, okay, where we see structurally also, we are looking at the client we believe it will also record. Like as I said, more all across all as a multiple industry segments. Looking at the TCV, looking at the client conversation, we are positive that medium-term growth return.
Understood. And last question on the margin. I think we've covered it to some extent, but please let one look at it from gross margin to a conversion perspective and some of the AI business is sort of better margin than company average. There could be -- by when do you expect our normal margin range to return considering the mix stage as well as some of the growth uptick we cure emphasizing currently?
So one, on the gross margin, as we said, coutursome of the M&A initiatives reflecting on it. I will, sorry, repeat the same thing that if now we are prioritizing further growth. We do expect the growth like we talked about on the capacity creation should reflect into the revenue or will reflect into the revenue in the coming quarters whereas we'll have incremental headwinds. And we are looking towards inching up from here.
Our next question is from the line of Rishi Jhunjhunwala with IIFL Institutional Equities.
I have 2 questions. First one is, so you've recently announced deals like taking over the CC of Best Buy and this MHP deal as well. It seems like customers are willing to transfer their IT operations or workload to you? In an environment where AI is bringing significant productivity, what is the thought process behind some of these customer deals that you've been able to win? And are they expecting significant amount of that productivity to be driven through you? And as a result, are these deals while strategic in nature may also be dilutive on the margin signs to begin with?
So Rishi, let's talk about the MSP. It's probably similar to other classes also. This has got nothing to do with productivity. This is about how they transform themselves as an organization. And they bring in a steep capability in automotive sector. And what we are doing with them is working with them and establishing a AI central or mobility. That would transform the product engineering, maintenance, engineering, develop, design and supply chain, all of them leveraging AI and in the process, helping Orsa to become a AI first organization. So you have to look at this not productivity angle, but how do we transform the organization to become AI. And that would be a very similar playbook. We'll be using the other Best May deal also. Wherever we are doing this, the organizations are coming to us to accelerate their own transformation. And we can use -- leverage the domain capability and industry knowledge to bring in, with the customer context and with the AI capability to help in the transformation.
Understood, sir. The second question is -- and maybe some parts of this has been asked earlier as well. There are 3 cost line items that if I aggregate, which is fee to external consultants, cost of equipment and licenses and project expenses and software for service delivery, these 3 put together seem to be in the nature of the cost that you incur on providing delivery. For the past 2, 3 quarters, these costs have been growing at almost 40% on a year-on-year terms versus your revenues growing at 11%, 12% in rupee terms. So just wanted to understand how do we look at this significant increase in these costs? Are these upfront investments being done. And as a result, will actually sweat out a lot better in the next 4 to 8 quarters? Or -- this is how the nature of deals or the nature of delivery is now happening? If you can give some color on that?
Rishi, as you called out, the piece to external contract ex business went subcontracts -- on the project expenses is where the partnership cost is primarily setting. Cost of equipment, the third-party pass-through expenses have broadly been remaining flattish for the last to 3 quarters. Now in terms of how do we see it what you said, it's a combination of both. It is investing into the capacity for the growth that will come with that. And we -- if you look at my commentary in the previous quarters also, we have been calling that out. So -- and we expect some of that to continue. On the partnerships, we are are accelerating on the 36 [indiscernible].
So safe to assume these will be -- some of these will be levers for your margin target that you've been talking about over the next 2 to 4 quarters?
So safe to assume that we will continue the investment safe to assume that we will be looking at the traditional levers and some of it, like the subcontractor costs definitely is an opportunity to optimize safe to assume on the driving better productivity, driving better utilization would be on our radar.
The next question is from the line of Kumar Rakesh with BNP Paribas.
My first question was around the employee addition for the last couple of quarters have been running ahead of the revenue growth sequentially. And Samir also spoke about that subcontracting has increased in this quarter to match the scale requirements. Is this fair to say that this is a reflection of your confidence in growth going into the near term, December quarter or near term? Or this is just the timing thing which we are looking at?
Sudeep here. So we are seeing definitely the demand up and for -- especially for next-gen skills. So all our hiring are to fulfill and capture demand.
Got it. And my second question was around margins. So Samir you spoke about 26% plus 26% to 28% margin band. That seems like more of a north star now may not be realistic given all the investment requirement in the business and the current environment. So a band, which is -- which gives a sense of the floor of the margin where it can potentially fall to given all the investments which the business would mean?
We have [indiscernible] is a '28 as a guiding weaken, and we would not want to shift away from that. That is what values us to go towards it, and we're going to keep it at '26. And that's the long-term aspiration we'll work towards.
Sure. But from a medium-term perspective, part to that, would we see more of investments happening, some more softening in terms of margin be a reality? Or we should expect this to be a flow at now?
As we said, we are making those investments, and we are prioritizing them.
The next question is from the line of Ashwin Mehta with AMBIT Capital.
Two questions. So we've hoped for 2Q to be better when we talked in 1Q. So what were the areas of negative surprises this quarter, which kept the growth closer to the 1Q level? And second question.
Go ahead and complete the second question.
And the second question was in terms of the nature of defers in India deals. So Were these deals involving hardware purchases given the bump up in terms of prices there, was that the reason for the deferral -- and do we see that revenue materializing in 3Q? Or it could get pushed out for later. And the last one was in terms of fresher hiring this quarter, what did we have?
Ashwin, I would answer the first 2 questions, and Sudeep would answer the fresher riding. Okay. Q2 same as Q1. As we explained, Q2 has been good unless across all parameters, except in the regional markets. We explained like across all the reasons we said which is to compare Q2 and Q1 on international growth, Q1 was almost flattish on international growth. And there, Q2 is almost 1.2%. Only offset by the -- what we call about the headwind we had in the regional market. And what we talked about in India, it's not related to any third party or hardware pass-through and we expect it will come back because these are all -- those are different, but we are very confident to be back in the medium term. Like we don't want to put particular debt, but this is a revenue that most likely should come. And Sudeep.
Yes. And Ashwin, we onboarded 10,000 that's from the university this year only. And as we speak, we have the final stages of our campus hiring for the student to graduate in the coming financial year.
Sudeep, one follow-up. Given that we added 14,000 pressures last quarter, we've added 10,000 in this quarter -- and our net addition is just 130-odd people over the last 2 quarters, would it be fair to assume that the hiring momentum could actually continue in the second half for us to have the bench to service demand?
As I said, we are hiring to demand. And definitely, we have seen good demand in these niche technologies. So we will continue to hire to start those positions.
Thank you. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will take that as a last question for today. I now hand the conference over to the management for closing comments. Over to you.
Thank you, operator. In Q2, our revenue grew 0.5% to also in constant currency in national margin growing strongly at 1.2%. We delivered an operating margin of 24% margin and 19%. Annualized services revenue crossed $3.1 billion. We had a TCV of $9.6 billion in Q2. We remain confident that TCS is positioned well to convert the opportunities in our pipeline, in the growth of client spending improved and enterprise adoption scale. This concludes our call today. Thank you all for joining. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you, everyone.
Thank you, members of the management. On behalf of TCS, that concludes this conference call. Thank you all for joining us. You may now disconnect your lines.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Tata Consultancy Services Limited transcript - plus 256,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.
Get an API key View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Tata Consultancy Services Limited earnings transcripts and 256,000+ others is available through the
EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server.
Quarterly plans from $145 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search,
and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.