Home / Transcripts / Vistry Group PLC (VTY) · January 12, 2024

Vistry Group PLC (VTY) Earnings Call Transcript

January 12, 2024

London Stock Exchange GB Consumer Discretionary Household Durables trading_statement 37 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator operator
#1

Hello, everyone, and welcome to the Vistry Trading Update. My name is Harry, and I'll be your operator today. [Operator Instructions] I'd now like to turn the call over to Greg Fitzgerald, Chief Executive. Please go ahead.

Gerald Fitzgerald executive
#2

Thank you. Thank you, Harry. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. With me today, I've got Tim Lawlor and Susie Bell. And there's certainly a lot to go through, so I get cracking. So it's been another milestone year for Vistry Group with the integration of Countryside and the update to our strategy announced in September last year. I'm pleased to say that the integration has gone very well, and the transition to our new strategy is also making very good progress. We start 2024 fully focused on our high-return asset-light partnerships model with Vistry firmly established as the leading provider of affordable homes in the country. Looking at the year, the group's financial performance is expected to be ahead of guidance, with adjusted profit before tax in line with the prior year reported number of GBP 418.4 million. Total completions were down only 5.4% to 16,124 units with revenue expected to be down circa 10% at around GBP 4 billion. The former partnerships business actually grew completions and grew by about 3.3%. So this is, we feel, a relatively strong performance and reflects the resilience of our unique partnership model with the group significantly outperforming a number of our peers, as can be seen in trading updates during the course of this week, and I'm sure more to come next week. And of course, when we talk about the resilience of our trading model with regards to that, you need a difficult market to explain that. And I think these results -- because last year was undoubtedly a difficult market, these results probably demonstrate that. In the presale market, working with our partners, we have seen good levels of demand from RPs and local authorities throughout the year, with demand from PRS providers notably increasing in quarter 4. We are currently working at 93 RPs and 37 local authorities. And looking ahead, we see good opportunity to increase our delivery to existing partners, as has been the case this year as well as increasing the number of people that we are working with in new partnerships. The open market remains suppressed throughout the year, reflecting higher mortgage rates, cost inflation pressures and general uncertainty. Half 1, open market prices held firm with sales supported by incentives of around 3% to 5%. In the second half, we saw a small price reduction of around 2% with an ongoing use of incentives. Pressure on prices, I have to say, and I'm pleased to say, it seems to be easing in the runup to Christmas and in the first week of this year. On costs, the group has continued to take a very proactive approach to managing costs, working closely with our valued supply chain partners. In half 1, we offset build cost increases of around 5% with the benefits of synergies from the combination of Vistry and Countryside. In the second half, we were appreciated of the productive engagement we have with our supply chain agreeing cost reduction for all existing and future contracts. So just to be clear, we have seen build deflation during the year because of our model. Subcontractors, like no doubt, you guys completely get where we are within our model. And if there is a road and the subcontractors is driving down it and they're looking for work, as they always are, and on the right-hand side of the road, there's a Vistry scheme. And on the left-hand side, there is the scheme of a similar number of units but by a private developer. They are going to be turning right because what they're looking for all the time is certainty. So while we're up there looking for savings, we can say we will be building 100, 500 or 1,000 units. The question comes back with, well, what about market conditions? It doesn't the matter about market additions. We will be building them. We're under contract, and we'll be building as quick as possible. That has enabled us to get some favorable and sizable discounts. Overall, cost savings and synergies have gone a long way to mitigate price reductions and cost increases, and we expect our operating margin for the full year to be at a similar level to map up the combined group in 2022. Vistry works, our timber frame operation has made significant progress this year. We reopened our factory in the East Midlands and have driven standardization through the production process. In the year, we delivered around 2,500 units, which is our planned output and expect output to double in this year heading towards our capacity of around 7,000 units [indiscernible] operating as 1 business with 6 divisions and 26 regions. Within this structure, we have the capacity to significantly step up our output to 20,000 units per annum and beyond. The transitioning of our housebuilding land bank to our partnership model is also well underway, and we were pleased to announce our agreement with Leaf Living and Sage in November for the presale of over 2,800 units, which is, if not the largest deal ever done in that area, definitely one of the largest. As expected, we saw a significant reduction in net debt from the half year position with year-end debt at around GBP 90 million, but average net debt was in line with guidance through the year at about GBP 450 million. Turning now to the outlook. There is still a lot of uncertainty out there, and there is a lot for us to do, but we are definitely seeing some encouraging signs, both at the back end of 2023 and at the start of this year. The group has a very strong forward sales position, up 12% on the prior year at GBP 4.5 billion, positioning us well to deliver a step-up in total completions in this year. In the presell market, we continue to see good demand from RPs and local authorities and are securing new partnerships that meet our target hurdle rates. As said, the PRS market continues to pick up. In all my 43 years of experience in the housebuilding sector, there were 2 things for sure. As interest rates go up, it's harder to sell houses. As interest rates come down, it's easier to sell houses -- it's not easy, but easier. I mean it's early days, but this is what we are starting to see, and we expect to see this trend to continue through 2024. Importantly, there is really positive momentum in the political arena about the need to solve Britain's embarrassing housing crisis. Commentary about the shortage of housing and levels of home business and the cost to local authorities of this is everywhere, and I'm confident that the stimulation of house building will be one of the biggest, if not the biggest, elements of debate in the general election. Affordable and PRS will be -- housing will be right at the top of the agenda. In my view, the government will have to put more money into housing and Vistry is by far and away the best place to work with the government to deliver on their aims. We increased our level of Homes England grant funding in the second half and are spending it faster than we thought. This is all a positive for increasing affordable housing supply and addressing the country's desperate housing crisis. And I'll reiterate again, we're the only private developer that gets grant from Homes England. We had a one-off adjustment to our margins arising in 2023 as a result of our changing strategy, which we announced in September. This gave rise to a GBP 40 million reduction in adjusted profit before tax as disclosed in October. We are comfortable that consensus estimates going forward reflect the revised margins for the business and there are no further adjustments of this nature required going forward. We will give full year guidance with our full year results announcement in March. We also announced a number of board changes this morning, and I would like to take a moment to discuss these. The last 12 months have seen an unprecedented change within the organization, including a major acquisition and that's off the back of the previous major acquisition 2 years earlier, a subsequent integration and the announcement of an ambitious new strategy. The Board, too, has seen a large number of changes in this time. So firstly, I would like to thank Ralph Findlay on behalf of the Board for his significant contribution to Vistry over the last 9 years. Regarding my appointment as Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the Board acknowledges. Of course, this is not a conventional move and does not align with the corporate governance code. It believes, however, it is in the best interest of all stakeholders and is aimed at providing continuity and maintaining momentum in the execution of the group strategy and the delivery of its medium-term targets. Furthermore, the Board has started a search for an experienced Senior Independent Director, alongside a number of other board appointments, and we hope to have everyone in place by the time of our AGM in May. So to conclude, I am very excited about Vistry's future and fully committed to executing our focused partnership strategy. Working alongside my excellent management team, I'm looking forward to ensuring we achieve our medium-term targets and deliver outstanding returns for our shareholders. That's me done. Harry, we will now take questions.

Operator operator
#3

[Operator Instructions] Our first question of the day is from the line of Chris Millington of Numis.

Chris Millington analyst
#4

A few of -- firstly, could just talk about land. You've obviously been a bit more active than the others so I appreciate that you obviously approach this differently. But how have you found land pricing and the ability to kind of hit your hurdle rate? And perhaps just an additional one on that is just how you're set for planning for 2024? The other ones are a bit more straightforward. So just expectations on -- sorry, let's go one at a time then. No problem.

Gerald Fitzgerald executive
#5

Yes. I'll do that one first. And so we've got 90%, which is a very strong position of all the land we required for this year and 80% of everything we require with regards to planning. So planning undoubtedly remains incredibly difficult. But that said, we're not really that affected by the nutrient issues around the country. That's a lot of judgment. So we're in a very good place starting the year with 80% everything we need for planning and 90% of all the land. The land market is soft, and we've taken advantage of that with our new models through the year to buy 13,000 or so plots, and we're getting them very much on our terms, which includes very favorable deferred payment terms. And we don't see that changing for the next -- for the first half of this year at the very least, Chris.

Chris Millington analyst
#6

That's helpful. Next one is a little bit more straightforward. So just curious about the scale of the build cost savings you think you achieved towards the back end of the year. Greg, you mentioned some material moves there.

Gerald Fitzgerald executive
#7

Yes. I'd rather not, Chris, other than to say they're large, but I think that's commercially sensitive. If you look at the number of units that we just done 16,000, I suspect if you're a subcontractor or you're a supplier who don't really worry about whether you're selling a house to Mr. and Mrs. Smith or passing it on to a PRS local authority or Housing Association, I suspect we will be the largest house builder in the country. And we have certainly taken advantage of that. And when you can say to a supplier and/or a subcontractor, whether they're a bricklayer or a ground worker, here you go, we're definitely going to do this. And not only that, we want to do it as quickly as we absolutely can, we are getting some eye-watering savings coming through. Yes, this is as much as I want to say on that, Chris.

Chris Millington analyst
#8

Understood. Last one then from me guys, please, is just how you see the average net debt trending through '24? You've obviously got this target to delever over the next few years. I mean, are we going to see much progress in '24 on average?

Timothy Lawlor executive
#9

Chris, this is Tim. Yes, we expect to see the average net debt start to trend down during '24. We said already, as you know, that we are targeting getting to a net cash position at the end of '24 and confident that we are slightly ahead of expectations at the end of '23. So a better position to go into '24.

Operator operator
#10

Our next question today is from the line of Aynsley Lammin of Investec.

Aynsley Lammin analyst
#11

Two for me. Obviously, you've seen good demand still from the kind of RPs and the PRS side. I just wondered if you could provide a bit more color what's driving that, particularly on the PRS. Is that still at good margins, good pricing? So a bit more color on what's driving that good demand. And then secondly, I just wondered if you had the land creditor balance as at end of the year?

Gerald Fitzgerald executive
#12

Okay. Do you want to take the land creditor one first, Tim?

Timothy Lawlor executive
#13

Yes. We don't have a land creditor number yet, and I wouldn't want to disclose balance sheet details. It's still too early in the close process, online creditor. So we'll have to defer to the results in March for that.

Gerald Fitzgerald executive
#14

Okay. And thanks for that answer, Tim. And then with regards to PRS, yes, I mean, the appetite for PRS has grown through the year that we're finding that the PRS providers are looking at the market as I am at the first moment in time, which I think is encouraging. I'm sure the housing market will not go flying off the handle, but I think it will gradually improve as interest rates come down and certainly over inflation comes down during the course of this year. So we are achieving. We achieved the hurdle rates we required on the deal we announced in October with Leaf and Sage and we fully expect that to continue. But we have done an enormous amount of deals through the year. And we will continue to do that as we go through 2024. If it's helpful to you, I would be -- I'm going to be tougher on approvals with regards to discount levels today than I would have been a month ago. Whether that's right or wrong, we'll see, but that's where I am with my confidence in the market.

Operator operator
#15

Our next question is from the line of Gregor Kuglitsch of UBS.

Gregor Kuglitsch analyst
#16

I've got a question on the margins. Just working backwards from what you said. I think we're kind of implying a 12% operating margin, if I'm not mistaken. You said GBP 4 billion of revenues. And I guess, I don't know if you had GBP 65 million of interest expense or something like that [indiscernible]. So that's question one, whether that's correct. And then maybe your comment that your comfortable consensus factors in the sort of the new margin level. Is that what you're talking about 12% that you think you could kind of hold that? And then maybe related to that, I know you're not formally guiding, but are you basically suggesting you're kind of comfortable with people at 440, so a bit of a step up to '24 versus '23, I guess it's early days. And then maybe a third question on -- so you couldn't answer the land creditor a bit. But in terms of the provisions on fire safety, how much has that been cashed out? And I guess, what's your expectation for that going forward?

Gerald Fitzgerald executive
#17

Okay. Well, I'll take the build safety one, but Tim will take the rest, yes. We're very comfortable with the provision for build safety and have been for some time. We never included in our build safety provision for getting -- or recuperating any of the money back from contractors, subcontractors, and warranty providers, et cetera, et cetera. And we're starting to see that come back. So yes, we are comfortable and have been for some time with the provision and are making, I would say, very good progress in line with the pledge that we gave to the government with regards to remediating the 300 or so buildings that we have to look at. On the other points, Tim, do you want to take those?

Timothy Lawlor executive
#18

Yes. So more specifically on the fire safety in terms of numbers, we talked about sort of GBP 30 million-ish of cash going out in the second half of the year, and we're expecting somewhere around high GBP 50 million, GBP 60 million of cash out next year. In terms of the margins...

Gerald Fitzgerald executive
#19

This year, Tim.

Timothy Lawlor executive
#20

Yes. So I'm sitting '23 world here. So...

Gerald Fitzgerald executive
#21

[indiscernible] we need to come up where we're at.

Timothy Lawlor executive
#22

Thanks, Greg, much appreciate it. Yes, just to be clear, FY '24 of high GBP 50 million to GBP 60 million. FY '23, second half, around GBP 30 million of cash went out. In terms of the margins, you're right, Gregor, we're talking around 12% for FY '23, holding up at that sort of level in '24. There may be a slight reduction in margin as the mix develops towards the more partnership business. So maybe we're talking about between 11% and 12% in '24. We'll come back with more specifics on that when we get to March. In terms of the consensus piece, consensus is quite difficult because there's a big way into numbers, and I think quite a few perhaps not the ones in the quarter, haven't updated their numbers recently. But the sort of range that we're looking at is from anywhere -- Bloomberg was saying 423 for this year. Two others saying low 430. So I think sort of high 420s is sort of the consensus number, and we're not looking to move people from that today.

Operator operator
#23

Our next question today is from the line of Clyde Lewis of Peel Hunt.

Clyde Lewis analyst
#24

I think I've got 3. So I'll do them one at a time, I think. Greg, you talked about your sort of view that you're going to be a bit firmer around sort of discount levels on the bulk sales. Are you at the point where also on private sales that maybe you're starting to think about cutting incentive levels as well?

Gerald Fitzgerald executive
#25

Yes. We're already seeing that in the -- I'd say, from the beginning of December, particularly during the course of last week and what we're expecting this week. I think headline prices, I'm very confident of saying are currently stable. And yes, we will be looking at the incentive levels that we are giving away. Still very early days, but interest levels, reservation levels over Christmas and during the course of this first week are not too bad at all. And yes, we're looking at interest rates helping that situation, Clyde. I mean we've seen some -- you have definitely seen some substantial falls in the 2-year and 5-year interest rate terms.

Clyde Lewis analyst
#26

Yes, yes, yes. The second one is on land and not about how much you've been buying, but more about where have you been buying it from in terms of the sources, again, given the focus now in Partnership Housing and the deals you're doing with the allies and the housing associations in particular. How is that source of land changing? .

Gerald Fitzgerald executive
#27

It's not really, I mean, because we've been doing this for a while. So it's through land agent promoters, which is from private landowners, but we also -- a great source of land for us is Homes England, where we are -- and we're not the only one, of course, but where we are in a framework over a 5-year period. And you have to be on that framework to actually bid for the land. So we've got an excellent team that -- and it's not just price with regards to housing and there are other factors to take into consideration as well, which plays to our strengths. So the makeup of the land is Homes England and then the same as other housebuilder, sorry. What I would say, Clyde, if look at -- particularly since the acquisition of Countryside, the average size of site that we are looking at has moved dramatically now. So whereas a scheme of 1,000 or 2,000 units would have been seen as unusually high for us as we were in 2022, that's becoming far more of the norm now. So the average size of site that we are buying is absolutely going up. What I would say for that, though, is that if you're a pure housebuilder would mean you would be -- your land portfolio would be quite high because, as you know, Clyde, no matter how big the site is, you're only going to go through it as quickly as you can then sell but with our model, of course, and the way we're looking at presale. If we were buying 1,000 unit site now, we would be absolutely at least 500, hopefully, 650 of those would be presold and we would be looking at numerous phases and we'll be looking at driving through that site at a far greater rate than a pure housebuilder, which would have included us prior to the change in strategy. So the only change, I would say, for us on land is basically the average size of site we're buying is larger.

Clyde Lewis analyst
#28

Okay. Perfect. And that sort of brings me on the third question around sort of big contracts. I mean, obviously, the Sage and Leaf Living are one you announced in November, I think, wasn't it? But have you got any more big deals like that, that are due to come through in the next 6 months?

Gerald Fitzgerald executive
#29

We're always -- that's again commercial. So again, Clyde, we're looking at that, not as much as I'll say on that. But we are definitely seeing good levels of public sector land releases. And of course, the other thing they like -- and again, we're not alone, if they like our ability to incorporate MMC and place making within our bids.

Clyde Lewis analyst
#30

And if I can have one last one on to the timber frame, the plan to double output, the 2,500 to 5,000 this year. What are the big challenges behind that? I mean you've got the third factory up and running now, I think, isn't it?

Gerald Fitzgerald executive
#31

Yes, we have. I mean on top of that, we'll be looking at floor cassettes and roof trusses, which are a high-margin thing. So the barriers to that would be basically weak management, and we don't have that here. So we've mandated the use of timber frame, and we'll continue to do that. So we are now a standard house builder, and we're driving that culture through the organization. So when we say this is what we want you to do the business unit in wherever it might be. That is what that business unit is doing. And probably, up until the acquisition of the Countryside, we weren't so forceful in driving through our wishes on that. But with the capital employed within the timber frame, 3 factories that we've now got and the people that we've got there, we really need to drive that through, and we are. So I don't think there's -- I mean, there's risk with everything, of course, but that wouldn't be anywhere near the top of my list of driving that through to 5,000, and we're looking at shift patterns, et cetera, et cetera, now to move that on as quick as we can to 7,000 and beyond.

Operator operator
#32

Next question today is from the line of Will Jones of Redburn Limited.

William Jones analyst
#33

I'll try 3 as well, please, if I can. Firstly, just wonder if you can help us understand that the 217 open market sales outlets and the 350 of build just the gap between the 2, whether that's normal and linked to that suppose. How you expect the 217 to fair?

Gerald Fitzgerald executive
#34

Do you want to take that, Tim?

Timothy Lawlor executive
#35

Yes, I can try and reconcile the 2. So within the 350 -- a part of this is around the presale model. So obviously, with 100% presale contracts, we don't need to have sales outlet. So that's probably close to half of the reconciliation between the 2. And then the other bid is stuff where we're building the -- where it's too early to open the sales outlets. So that sort of gap I would expect will continue. That's reasonable. And in terms of the sales outlet, we may see some growth this year, but it's too early to give a sales outlet expectation for the year.

William Jones analyst
#36

And the second was just with the pickup in interest in PRS later in the year. Did you see any change on discount to bulk sales. Where are we willing to give broad percentages on that?

Gerald Fitzgerald executive
#37

What I would say, Will, is that the interest was there. The discount levels that the PRS providers were looking for were at the same sort of level as they were at the start of the year. As we went into the last quarter, we just became a little bit more robust with what we were prepared to accept and have been -- and are still doing deals, let's put it that .

William Jones analyst
#38

Okay. And the last one was sort of probably too early for this, but by targeting a net cash at the end of the year, presumably there's an input in there for the shareholder distributions. Any context on what that number or range might be?

Gerald Fitzgerald executive
#39

I'm going to pass. Tim's making terrible face at me. So over to you, Tim on that one.

Timothy Lawlor executive
#40

I don't want to over commit too soon, Greg. In terms of the buybacks, obviously, we've got the commitments from our capital allocation policy, which is that 50% of our net earnings would be distributed. So absolutely no deviation from that. So we'll announce the next set based on the year-end results we announced in March. You can expect that we'll announce the next bunch of buybacks. We're continuing with the buyback program of the GBP 55 million we announced in -- back in September last year. It's getting a bit slower than we expected, partly due to the volatility of the market prices and share prices, which constrain the speed of buyback processes, but that will continue. And then the question will be, is there any discretionary additional buyback on top of that -- on top of the standard distribution? And that one, it is too early to say as you suggested it might be that we want to just do a little bit more analysis of alternative investments per our capital allocation policy. We said we want to make sure that we are investing adequately in land and in the business first. So we need to conclude that process before determining any discretionary buyback over and above what we'll distribute to our former policy.

William Jones analyst
#41

And it's base case at the moment that all distributions are buyback with no dividend? Or is that still on progress?

Timothy Lawlor executive
#42

So we haven't formally declared that. And the share price has obviously moved quite a lot in the last couple of months, but I think since we gave in September, we've continued to give the buybacks at the moment. It look compelling at our current share price.

Operator operator
#43

Our next question say is from the line of Ami Galla of Citigroup.

Ami Galla analyst
#44

Two questions from me, please. One was on forward sales. If you could give us some color in terms of the mix between open market and contracted within that? And do you have a sense by the year-end, how would that mix shift between the 2 elements? And my second question was just on your sales to RPs and the local authorities. Is there any behavioral shift that you would expect from them ahead of the election? Or is it really business as usual into the sort of election season?

Gerald Fitzgerald executive
#45

I think it's going to be pretty much business as usual into the election season and haven't been caught many times before. The only thing we're absolutely prepared for is a thing called [indiscernible], which is a period where local authorities and housing associations can't enter into contracts with you. I think it's a month where basically from the announcement of the election date. So whether it's May, that would basically -- April and May will be difficult to enter into this or whether it's more likely October, November, it's a similar thing. So we've built that into our programs. With regards to the first part of your question, Ami, are you taking that, Tim?

Timothy Lawlor executive
#46

It sounds like, yes. So in terms of the mix between pretty sold and open market, we're not disclosing that on a basis that it's very heavily into presold, and we tend not to think about the forward order booking quite that way in our model now. But to give you a sense, as you asked the question, I think, clearly, the vast majority of our forward order book is within presold and was boosted by a significant amount of presold including the Sage deal in the fourth quarter. Open market down slightly from where we were last year, which is partly due to the change in the business model and the focus of the business, but also because as we know that conditions were a bit tougher in '24 -- sorry in '23 than they were in '22 as a whole.

Operator operator
#47

Our next question today is from the line of Harry Goad of Berenberg.

Harry Goad analyst
#48

I guess I'm just thinking a little bit more midterm, and you've obviously talked about the ambitions for the volume growth in the business. How does the -- as you think about sort of overhead investment staffing levels, I mean I'm thinking site managers, sales execs, commercial teams, things like that, how much can the business grow at? On what much capacity do you have for growth in the business before you need to be reinvesting in those sort of overhead sort of head office type roles?

Gerald Fitzgerald executive
#49

Yes. So what we would say is the 26 business units that we've currently got are more than capable of doing in excess of 20,000, 22,000, 23,000 units. So that's the most important point. So there's no new geography, no new offices to be opened. But yes, within those business units, they will require, without any shadow without site managers, surveyors, buyers and the like. So we are confident that with our business model similar to where subcontractors are coming with the certainties of work for people. And what we're finding, particularly with younger people as well being a responsible developer and doing the right thing, helping solve the housing crisis in this country. We're finding -- yes, paying rations is very important in attracting people to the business. But we're also seeing, as I say, particularly with younger people and people like what we are doing within the housing market sector, and we are attracting people accordingly. So I would have more concerns, if our growth targets included new offices and new geographies, and I'm delighted to say they don't. But they do include, obviously, for taking on further people within those business units, but we're confident we can do that.

Operator operator
#50

[Operator Instructions] And the next is from the line of Glynis Johnson with Jefferies.

Glynis Johnson analyst
#51

Just -- actually it's sort of a strategic one, more than anything else. You talked about the increased size of site [indiscernible] of the average. How do we think about your land bank side in terms of the secured land? Does it need to be the 6, 7 years that we've improved in part of business. I mean historically, kind it be nearer 4 to 5. What is the right land bank yields for your model now?

Gerald Fitzgerald executive
#52

I think 3.5 to 4 because we will be driving through that land bank so much quicker. So I can still remember joining Bovis, who had a huge land bank at the time in 2017. But the majority of the land bank was on 2 sites, 1 in Bristol and 1 in [indiscernible] is still going very, very strong today. The difference is we can go through those schemes using other people's money, local authorities and housing associations that much quicker. So if you just take where we were we've got a 1000 unit scheme. We're going to do somewhere between 17 and 150 a year. That's the affordable Section 106 and private sales. It's as simple as that whereas today. There's nothing to stop us from giving that up into 5 phases of 200 units, putting 5 compounds, 5 different site manager teams -- management team, I should say, sorry. And actually drilling through that within a couple of years, which will be our intention, and that will be massively helped by the ability we've got with our timber frame, [indiscernible]. So yes, I would still say, Glynis, 3.5 to 4 years is more than adequate because all of our larger sites, they won't be tied or lazy assets. We will be able to drive through and build out very, very quickly, which again is incredibly appealing to our supply chain, as I mentioned earlier. Okay. Harry, I think that's all the questions, is it?

Operator operator
#53

That's right. We have no further questions in the queue at this time.

Gerald Fitzgerald executive
#54

Okay. Thanks very much for taking the time to go on to the call, everyone. And as normal, we've answered those questions as open and as honestly as we can, but thanks very much for your time, and no doubt, we'll see you soon. Thank you.

Operator operator
#55

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Vistry Group PLC transcript - plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.

Get an API key View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Vistry Group PLC earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server. Quarterly plans from $105 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.