Home / Transcripts / XAI Floating Rate & Alternative Income Trust (XFLT) · June 30, 2026

XAI Floating Rate & Alternative Income Trust (XFLT) Earnings Call Transcript

June 30, 2026

NYSE US Financials Capital Markets shareholder_meeting 40 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Kevin Davis executive
#1

Good morning and welcome. Thank you for joining us today. Today, we plan to address proposed changes to both XFLT and OCTIX that we believe will position the funds for potential improved performance and distributions over time and provide other potential shareholder benefits. These changes do require shareholders to vote. Your vote matters, so we appreciate you joining us today. I'm joined today by my colleague, Kim Flynn, who will discuss each fund's proposal for shareholders to consider. I'm also pleased to introduce Young Choi, who is the proposed portfolio manager from King Street for both of the funds. We are excited to be partnering with King Street as we work to improve the fund's performance going forward. Now for some brief housekeeping matters, I do want to note the following. Shareholders of record as of the record date for the funds' special meetings are expected to receive a proxy statement, notice of special meetings of shareholders and proxy card containing detailed information regarding King Street Sub-Advisor and the King Street Sub-Advisory Agreement. Shareholders are encouraged to read the proxy statement and accompanying materials carefully when they receive them. The proxy statement is available free of charge at SEC's website, www.sec.gov. The report is not a solicitation of any proxy. In order to keep this discussion focused on the matters related to the proxy statements and shareholder meetings, we are not able to take audience questions on this webinar. We want to have an open dialogue like our normally scheduled quarterly webinars, so we're planning another webinar with King Street on August 4, where we do plan to address audience questions. Please contact us by e-mail at info@xainvestments.com at any point if you'd like to speak with members of the XA Investments team. I'd like to begin and bring in my partner, Kim Flynn, to the conversation. Kim, shareholder proxy statements were recently sent by mail. Can you please give us a summary of the proposals and why the funds' Board elected to recommend the proposals to shareholders?

Kimberly Flynn executive
#2

Sure, Kevin. Let's start with why the Board determined based on the factors described in the proxy, that a change in the sub-adviser to the funds was appropriate in seeking to improve performance. That change involves replacing Octagon Credit with Rockford Tower Asset Management LLC, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of King Street Capital Management. Our independent Board has thoughtfully considered the proposal, and the Board has unanimously approved this change. The Board is recommending that shareholders also approve the change. Rockford Tower Asset Management will serve as investment sub-adviser for the funds. As we discuss proposals today, I want to note that any references to King Street include Rockford Tower Asset Management, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of King Street, employing the same individuals, the same people, and namely, convention largely identifies the firm's credit and CLO investment business. King Street is a leading global alternative asset manager. They have over 30 years of history. And they manage over $30 billion in assets. Young Choi who we have with us here today on the webinar is a senior leader at King Street and has spent the last 20 years at the firm. Young will speak with you today about King Street and his colleagues and the team that he manages and what makes them prepared to take on the mandate and the portfolio management of these funds. When our fund Board made its decision, it considered, obviously, current market conditions in the economy and specifically in the credit market, but it also factored in a number of important considerations that shareholders should think about. One is each fund's core investment performance on an absolute basis and on a relative basis with respect to the benchmark of that fund. Also, we thought about performance relative to peers while these funds were being managed by Octagon Credit Investors. We also had the Board think about the expanded investment capabilities of King Street as compared to Octagon in making their decision. We mailed proxies to shareholders that outline what we believe will be significant positive changes to the funds that should be considered by shareholders. It's really important that we want to note all costs associated with these shareholder meetings, mailings and the efforts to seek shareholder approval and to seek shareholder vote will be borne by XA Investments and King Street, and importantly, not the funds and not shareholders. The funds are now seeking shareholder approval of the new sub-advisory agreement, and shareholders of the funds at the close of business on the record date, which is June 2, 2026, are entitled to vote at the special meeting. That special meeting is coming up July 30. Your vote is important. As Kevin mentioned, every vote counts. The fund Board has voted for these proposals. Glass Lewis, a leading independent governance and proxy analyst firm recommended a vote for the proposals. The XAI senior leadership team, our shareholders and the funds, and we will also vote for the proposals. We ask that you consider the information in the proxy and that you vote for the proposals as well.

Kevin Davis executive
#3

Thank you, Kim. So investors in XFLT and OCTIX have experienced total return underperformance and erosion of NAV. Kim, can you speak to the performance of the funds and why management is now recommending a change to the sub-adviser?

Kimberly Flynn executive
#4

So in the chart here, we show Octagon's historical performance in both XFLT and OCTIX. Let's talk about XFLT first. That fund has a long track record dating back to September of 2017, and the fund has meaningfully underperformed its benchmark in all time periods shown. And if you take a look specifically at the inception-to-date total return of 3.28 on NAV, that compares to the benchmark return of 5.19. Now the benchmark for XFLT is the Morningstar LSTA 100 Index and has been the benchmark for the fund since inception. And so this underperformance in several different time periods has led us to make the change or the proposed change here. Now OCTIX only has about 1.5 years track record. The fund still demonstrated underperformance and relative to its benchmark. Let's look at the inception to date annualized total returns. For the Class I, that represented 3.15%; for Class A, it represented 2.19%, relative to the benchmark, which is a blended benchmark selected by the portfolio managers at 5.40, resulting in significant negative relative return to the benchmark. If we can move to the next slide, this illustrates the NAV for the funds. And since inception, September of 2017, XFLT has seen a 54.4% decrease in the NAV over the reported period. Now some of this NAV erosion is realized losses. Some of it is unrealized losses due to marks down in the portfolio. And the Board considered NAV erosion in XFLT in deciding to take proactive measures in working to create a better experience for shareholders. We also wanted to share with you the same NAV analysis for OCTIX, while over a shorter period of time, from December 2024, and the NAV decline over this period was about 6.99% decrease in NAV. And OCTIX, this fund is focused on the CLO debt part of the market. And so this was a significant NAV decline that the Board also considered in their determinations.

Kevin Davis executive
#5

So Kim, what is the timetable that shareholders should be aware of for the proposed changes?

Kimberly Flynn executive
#6

Sure. So the upcoming special meetings will be held beginning at 10:00 a.m. on July 30 at the XA Investments office in Chicago. At that time, King Street will become the new sub-adviser of the funds and take over portfolio manager responsibilities on the 30th.

Kevin Davis executive
#7

And what would you say are the main benefits that the Board believes the funds will receive via these proposed changes?

Kimberly Flynn executive
#8

Sure. I mean, I think there's a number of different benefits, but I'll focus on what the Board considered. And we're really happy to talk about the potential positive benefits resulting from a change. Our XA Investment management team and the fund Board believes that King Street will benefit the fund in 3 main ways. First, it's a potential increase in distributions and a potential for improved performance over time. Second, King Street, their institutional quality investment management track record is significant, and King Street's rigorous research and credit analysis, tactical trading capabilities, adaptive approach so that they can tailor their management to meet each of the funds' investment objectives is what we thought was important in terms of improving the outcomes for shareholders.

Kevin Davis executive
#9

So today, we plan to cover most of the key questions outlined in the proxy statements. We encourage you to review the proxy statements for more information. What I would like to do next is bring in Young Choi to the conversation. Young, thank you so much for joining us. Mr. Choi is a partner and the Global Head of Trading at King Street and the Portfolio Manager of Rockford Tower Management. He's based in New York and he's a member of the Management Committee, the Global Investment Committee, U.S. and European CLO Investment Committees, Risk Committee and the Pricing Committee. Prior to joining King Street in 2006, Mr. Choi worked at Citadel Investment Group as a credit analyst in the distressed high-yield group and was a portfolio manager of the firm's $2 billion U.S. leveraged loan and CLO portfolio. Prior to that, Mr. Choi consulted at Bain. He received his BA summa cum laude in Economics and B.S.E. in Electrical Engineering from Duke University. Young, thank you so much for joining us.

Young Choi attendee
#10

Well, thank you, Kevin. I'm very excited to be here today.

Kevin Davis executive
#11

So we're happy to introduce you to the XFLT and OCTIX shareholders. We're looking forward to working closely in the years to come. Could you give us a brief introduction to King Street and your role specifically in the leadership at the firm?

Young Choi attendee
#12

Sure. So King Street is a global alternative asset management firm that was founded in 1995. We manage approximately $30 billion in AUM. And we invest opportunistically across both the public and the private markets in corporate credit, so investment grade, high yield, leveraged loans, structured credit and real estate. And across our $30 billion in AUM, we manage roughly $12 billion of CLO AUM across 20 U.S. CLOs as well as 9 European CLOs. However, we just printed our 10th European deal last month. And we also have one CBO transaction. We have approximately 270 employees with 99 on the investment professional side, with 8 offices globally. In terms of my role on the leadership team. So as mentioned previously, I joined King Street in 2006. So this is my 20th year at the firm. And while I started as a credit analyst, today, I am one of the firm's 7 partners and serve as a portfolio manager on our global CLO management platform, Rockford Tower, as well as our opportunistic credit strategy. I also serve on several investment committees, including the firm's Global Investment Committee, the Management Committee and our CLO committees as well as our risk and pricing committees.

Kevin Davis executive
#13

Young, you mentioned Rockford Tower. Rockford Tower is a division of King Street. Can you describe your focus at Rockford Tower, please?

Young Choi attendee
#14

Sure. So I am the portfolio management -- portfolio manager for our CLO management business, Rockford Tower Capital Management. As mentioned earlier, Rockford Tower manages approximately $12 billion in CLO AUM. We launched Rockford Tower in 2017, given that King Street has a long history of investing in CLOs and structured credit, going back to 2008. In addition to investing in leveraged loans since the founding of our firm, so over 30 years of investing in leveraged loans. Now we like the idea of creating CLO equity exposure that we managed for our firm's flagship hedge funds and we've retained all of the equity in a number of our first outstanding U.S. and European CLO transactions. And as we have expanded the platform and built up our track record, we have been able to syndicate third-party equity in a number of our transactions going back to 2021. However, we also have the ability to opportunistically take exposure in the equity of our CLOs as we see opportunities in the market. As far as my focus at Rockford Tower, I am on the CLO Investment Committee for both our U.S. and our European platforms, where we are focused on credit selection. So proving and declining assets and assessing relative value opportunities across both the primary and secondary loan markets. From a portfolio management perspective, we strive to maintain active trading across our deals as we believe that there is always a trade that can be done that can improve the credit quality and the risk portfolio -- the risk of a portfolio, maintain or improve the portfolio ratings, maintain or improve the portfolio spread, and hopefully, maintain and build portfolio value over time. We'll likely cover this later on, but we think one of the benefits that we can bring to XFLT and OCTIX will be dynamically allocating within the funds' investment strategy. So between both the U.S. and European leveraged loan and CLO mezz and equity tranches as the opportunity set and relative value between the 2 markets evolve over time.

Kevin Davis executive
#15

So let's drill down further on the funds themselves. Can you please describe your role specifically for both XFLT and for OCTIX?

Young Choi attendee
#16

Sure. So for XFLT and OCTIX, I will serve as the portfolio manager and will be supported by Terry Ing. And for the audience's benefit, I would like to provide some additional information on Terry. So Terry is a partner at King Street and the portfolio manager for Rockford Tower's long-only credit SMA platform and the Head of U.S. Research at King Street. And so while Terry joined King Street in 2024, he has been a portfolio manager and leveraged credit research and investor for over 20 years across a number of very well-respected firms, including KKR and PIMCO. So Terry also serves on the firm's Management Committee, the Conflicts Committee and Responsible Investment Committee. Now we believe that our firm has the potential to enhance return profile for both XFLT and OCTIX given a larger opportunity set to invest across both the U.S. and European markets up and down the capital structure. And two, as we look to apply rigorous research and credit analysis, tactical trading and an adaptive investment approach across these various markets.

Kevin Davis executive
#17

Thank you. So everyone loves an origin story, Young. Could you please describe King Street's firm history, the unique aspects to your business? Maybe touch on the people and the ownership structure, the expertise, et cetera?

Young Choi attendee
#18

Right. While I provided some brief background earlier, given that everyone loves an origin story, I'll share some more details around the firm's history and unique aspects of our business. So as mentioned, King Street was founded in 1995, but it was founded in a windowless office in Midtown Manhattan with roughly $4 million of AUM. So relatively modest beginnings. But if you fast-forward the clock 31 years, King Street is now a global alternative asset management firm, managing $30 billion across a number of funds and strategies, from our flagship hedge fund, opportunistic credit strategies, our stressed/distressed focused global drawdown funds, real estate and then our Rockford Tower CLO management business. So the firm has remained 100% partner-owned since the firm's inception, and we've strived to maintain an alignment of interest with our investors as the firm's partners are one of the largest investors across the funds and strategies that we manage. We have 270 employees, 99 of which are on the investment side, with 8 offices globally from the U.S., Europe and Asia. We are highly research-intensive -- we are a highly research-intensive organization where we look to marry rigorous research with tactical trading and an active presence across the global capital markets. While many investors may think of King Street as a stressed and distressed investor across the firm's history and multiple cycles, we also invest opportunistically across both the public and private credit markets across all of corporate credit. So again, investment grade, high yield, leveraged loans, structured credit and real estate. And from an investment perspective, we are generally agnostic with regards to geography, sector and part of the company's capital structure. We are opportunistic in that we look to dynamically shift capital to find the best risk/reward investment across the global credit markets. We are also objective in that we evaluate every investment to determine if it is a good long investment, a good short investment or if we need to maintain price discipline and monitor instead of actively investing at that time. We're also -- we also look directionally, meaning in certain funds such as the firm's flagship funds, we have the ability to go both long and short. And so when you tie in a 30-plus year track record, a large global team that can invest opportunistically with expertise across the global credit markets, I think this is one of the most unique aspects of the firm.

Kevin Davis executive
#19

King Street has offices in New York, London, Singapore, Tokyo and others. Can you describe for us the benefits of being a global firm?

Young Choi attendee
#20

Absolutely. I mean we think that being a global firm has been one of our competitive advantages over our history, particularly in light of some of the recent market environments that we've experienced. So if you think about how the markets have evolved over the past 20 years from a global perspective, we had the global financial crisis, which was primarily a U.S. phenomenon, but then quickly spilled over into global markets, followed by the European sovereign debt crisis, we had Brexit, we had COVID-19, then you had global inflationary pressures in a coordinated hiking cycle across the developed markets. In 2022, you had the liability-driven investment crisis in the U.K. You had Russia-Ukraine. You had Japan raising rates for the first time in nearly 3 decades. And now you have artificial intelligence and corresponding disruptions across several industries and sectors. And I'm sure I missed several global events in there, but the point is having a global footprint provides several distinct advantages. Specifically, the ability to leverage any underwriting and credit analysis done on certain sectors and names in one region to quickly react to opportunities that may come across the globe for various reasons. Example of this may be investing in companies disrupted by COVID-19. We were very active in the U.S. and then applying this to certain sectors and companies within Europe, whether it was in the leisure space, the rental car space or cruise -- the cruise space, being able to quickly deploy capital into other areas. Another phenomenon where this has been particularly relevant has been within the leveraged loan space, given the prevalence of weak loan documentation and liability management exercises and distressed debt exchanges. What initially started out and has been largely isolated to the U.S. leveraged loan market started to make its way across the Atlantic to the European markets in 2023. And that institutional knowledge of how this has evolved in the U.S., we believe, has positioned us well for future restructurings and LMEs within the European space. And so our global research and investment team are in regular dialogue and communication to ensure that we are coordinated on these types of opportunities. And having that type of scale and reach is certainly a benefit of being a global firm.

Kevin Davis executive
#21

That's great. So Young, can you please describe some of the different areas of the credit market that you do invest in at the firm?

Young Choi attendee
#22

Sure. And we covered some of this earlier, but to go into greater detail, we operate across the global credit markets, both public and private, generally with an opportunistic investment approach as the market opportunity set evolves. And we have -- we may invest in investment-grade, high-yield leveraged loans, structured credit from CLO tranches, ABS and CMBS and real estate, with a global focus. Specifically within CLOs, we have been a third-party CLO tranche investor since 2008, with an opportunistic focus from senior mezz and equity in both the U.S. and the European markets. Given the firm's funds and strategy return profile, in general, this has led us to invest in CLO mezz and equity. However, there have been times we've been opportunistic in purchasing senior tranches as well. And this will include the 2008 GFC, the U.K. LDI in 2022, and in the fourth quarter of '22 to the second quarter of '23 when CLO AAAs for instance were trading north of 200 basis points.

Kevin Davis executive
#23

So Young, how do you expect to manage XFLT? And what differences can shareholders expect? And if you could also touch same topic for OCTIX as well, please?

Young Choi attendee
#24

I think one of the main differences that shareholders can expect is an expanded opportunity set from an investment perspective. We covered this already a bit, but we believe that the ability to invest opportunistically and from a relative value across both the European and the U.S. markets on both the leveraged loan and the CLO space has the potential to benefit shareholders over time. In general, in both leveraged loans and CLOs, there are a number of market dynamics that tend to shift the relative value proposition from the U.S. to Europe and vice versa. In the loan market, for the same company that is marketing both a U.S. and a European leveraged loan in the primary markets, in general, the spread is usually wider for the European loan versus the U.S. loan. And if you're looking at CLO equity, for instance, in general, the arbitrage has been better in the European markets versus the U.S. market, at least over the past several years. When you also include the dynamic between where CLO mezz levels may clear between primary deals, resets, one can potentially purchase CLO mezz tranches wider opportunistically due to market technicals. And so we believe that this type of dynamic management within the firm's investment strategy between different and potentially new opportunities in the credit markets, including European CLO, debt and equity, asset-backed securities and European loans, all has the potential to improve and enhance performance over time. And for OCTIX, as a CLO structured credit income fund, as mentioned earlier, within the CLO universe, depending on the market environment, there are a number of market dynamics that tend to shift the relative value proposition between the geographies. And so having a more opportunistic mandate across U.S. and European CLO debt and equity as well as warehouse first loss has the potential to improve and enhance performance as well over time.

Kevin Davis executive
#25

So over time, how can XFLT and OCTIX benefit from this expanded opportunity set as described in the proxy statement? And maybe can you give us an example of when a move or a shift might occur?

Young Choi attendee
#26

What I find interesting about the global markets is that while they are certainly correlated, there are distinct periods where relative value shifts from one geography to another. It is most evident in periods where there is a shock that impacts one region, but not the other. And so we've already mentioned one example, the U.K. LDI crisis in 2022. As the events unfolded, the opportunities were most pronounced in the European markets. So having the flexibility of rotating out of U.S. tranches that were largely unaffected and into European tranches, which were experiencing severe pricing pressure, would have led to improved outcomes. Now King Street has been -- has seen over our 31 years of investing that relative value is constantly changing. Sometimes it will be dramatic as in the previous example, and other times it will be subtle changes that compound over an extended period. Now this shift in relative value occurs not just across geographies, but across asset classes, across sectors and across capital structures. And so the market is infinitely dynamic from that standpoint.

Kevin Davis executive
#27

Thank you, Young, for that. Kim, I'd like to bring you back in the conversation. Can you please provide some context for investors on why a sub-adviser change is proposed for both funds?

Kimberly Flynn executive
#28

Sure. So we prepared a historical overview just to give you some additional context and information. XFLT was brought to market in September of 2017. And since the fund's launch, the portfolio allocations have been fairly static and the asset mix between loans, CLO debt, CLO equity has also been fairly static. The portfolio turnover has been declining. The current portfolio size right now, as of 3/31, was about 509 positions. This is just quite a few positions in terms of number of holdings in the fund. The fund has experienced a NAV reduction of about 26.6 of NAV losses. And during this time, in the last -- actually, it's been in the last 6 years that we've had 3 different portfolio manager changes, and the NAV performance, as we've already covered, since inception, the absolute performance is 3.28. Relative to the benchmark, it's negative 1.91. And recent price performance, the fund has been trading at a discount and has continued with -- it's been a 56.64% price decline in the last 15 months. Annualized, that's a negative 47.7%. OCTIX has a shorter history. The fund was launched in November of 2024. For the 2025 calendar year, which was the first full calendar year, the net performance was 5.87. And that NAV performance since inception was about 3.15 net, that's an annualized figure. And relative to the benchmark, it was negative 2.25%. So we also reached the conclusion that a sub-adviser change would be recommended to potentially improve fund performance.

Kevin Davis executive
#29

Kim, let's go back to XFLT allocations. And if you could, can you describe XFLT's historic asset allocation and discuss the fund's investment portfolio at large?

Kimberly Flynn executive
#30

Sure. So you can see from the pie chart, we're showing snapshots over the last 3 calendar year-ends, from 2023 on the left to 2025. And you'll note that the asset mix has largely remained unchanged. The portfolio is about half broadly syndicated loans and then half CLO debt, CLO equity exposure. The CLO equity exposure has ranged between about 35% to 40%, with CLO debt ranging from about 12% to about 17%. So those pie pieces have remained fairly consistent since the inception of the fund in 2017. And what's being proposed for the future, as Young alluded to, is the ability to open this pie up for opportunities in other parts of the credit market, potentially European CLO equity, European CLO debt and asset-backed securities where there is a relative value opportunity.

Kevin Davis executive
#31

Kim, Young touched on a number of the capabilities that King Street has available. What does XA Investments expect going forward? And then will the fund be managed more dynamically?

Kimberly Flynn executive
#32

I think that we do expect that XFLT is going to be more dynamic, being more nimble and able to move into different credit opportunities as the King Street research and team is set up to do. This is all within the mandate for XFLT in terms of its investment strategy. It has the ability to be dynamic and to move between these different opportunities where King Street judges that it makes sense to move. So going forward, the fund will be more able to take advantage of these types of opportunities both in the U.S. and in the European CLO markets. And we think that King Street's execution of XFLT's strategy will potentially be more dynamic, more opportunistic.

Kevin Davis executive
#33

So let's shift back to OCTIX for a quick minute and discuss some of the portfolio changes. Kim, what are the benefits of an expanded opportunity set as described in the proxy statement in an evergreen, continuously offered fund? And why would an expanded set of opportunities be important in deploying the capital?

Kimberly Flynn executive
#34

Yes. So I mean, OCTIX as an interval fund is taking in capital on an ongoing basis. And so it's always going to have potentially fresh capital to put to work and deploy. And that allows King Street to have the opportunity to seek these opportunities. And it's a little bit different for OCTIX given the way that an interval fund is managed relative to a listed closed-end fund, XFLT being a listed closed-end fund. And so as we described in the proxy, we think that King Street's ability to allocate and shift where they see the best opportunities in the credit market is going to allow OCTIX to compete with other income-focused interval funds in the space. And I think Young can speak directly to some of the opportunities that he is seeing in the market today and maybe how that might change over time.

Kevin Davis executive
#35

Yes, Young, I'd like to bring you back in the conversation. So you had mentioned some of the European capabilities that King Street has. The European market has certainly expanded in recent years. What kind of opportunity in the future does that afford your team at King Street?

Young Choi attendee
#36

As we've mentioned a few times already, the main benefit will be a large opportunity set from an investment perspective, when you include European loans, European CLO investments. We believe that allocating to the European market, you have the potential to improve portfolio diversification and risk-adjusted returns above and beyond just having a U.S. leveraged loan portfolio with U.S. CLO investments. Now we see the European leveraged loans and CLOs as a complement to U.S. exposures due to differences in loan structure, size and type of the market participants; the loan issuer and sponsor behavior that you see over in Europe; the sector mix and the volatility patterns. And furthermore, a key benefit of geographic diversification is meaningful sector differences between U.S. CLOs and European CLOs. We believe that this could further reduce the fund cyclicality and downside risk, particularly in periods of economic stress or tighter financial conditions. In particular, U.S. CLOs have greater exposure to cyclicals, like technology, transportation and financials, and European CLOs are more heavily weighted towards defensive sectors such as health care, defense and business services. Lastly, one item to note is that we have also seen increased issuance across both the European leveraged loan and the European CLO markets. So primary issuance has picked up materially over the past several years, with 2025 being a record issuance year. And when you couple the amount of CLO resets that have occurred in the European CLO markets over the past few years, outstanding deals are being extended. And so you have a quickly growing market, in addition to a number of new European CLO managers. And so with dispersion and tiering picking up across vintages and management performance -- manager performance, in general, all of these factors tend to lead to a fairly ripe opportunity set over time.

Kevin Davis executive
#37

So you've touched on some of this, but can you describe the differences between the U.S. and European CLO markets?

Young Choi attendee
#38

Yes. There are a number of key differences, some of which are as follows. One, in terms of the market size. So the European (sic) [ U.S. ] CLO market is roughly 4x the size of the European market. So $1.2 trillion versus $300 billion. The CLO manager universe. So the U.S. market has approximately 130 managers versus roughly 60 managers in Europe. Third, in terms of the loan collateral, there are differences in the loan collateral. So the U.S. market has more loan issuers, and generally, the portfolios have higher diversification, whereas the European CLO market tends to have fewer loan issuers with more concentrated positions and less diversification. Fourth, in terms of the CLO structures, the structures are slightly different between the 2 geographies. So in the U.S., the deals are slightly more levered. To achieve an enhanced European CLO structural leverage, what you find is that the capital structures in Europe tend to also have a single-B rated tranche, which enhances the CLO structural leverage. And so slight differences in structure between the U.S. and the European CLO markets. The loan collateral itself, in general, as I mentioned, the U.S. portfolios have greater diversification, but also have generally lower portfolio spread given the market dynamics versus European CLO portfolios. And maybe lastly, in terms of the actual CLO equity arbitrage, one could argue that over the past several years at least, that the dynamics have led to more attractive day 1 European CLO equity arbitrage relative to the U.S. CLO market.

Kevin Davis executive
#39

Young, maybe we can address BB CLO spreads in the Europe versus the U.S. In today's market, U.S. CLO debt market, is it more or less attractive than the European CLO debt market? And how or why does that change over time?

Young Choi attendee
#40

Sure. So it's challenging to paint a generic brush to say whether U.S. or Europe CLO debt market is more attractive. This will vary depending on what part of the capital structure that you're participating in, where the cross-currency basis is between the U.S. dollar and euro, structural considerations, among other factors. But in general, we think the following. So for primary equity, European CLO equity is more attractive versus the U.S. just given the day 1 arbitrage difference. For primary debt spreads, European CLO mezz tranches appears to be screening a little bit cheaper today relative to where Tier 1 U.S. CLO mezz debt trades. For reset spreads, there is likely more value and spread in lower-tier U.S. CLO manager debt spreads relative to Europe, because in the European markets, there is just simply less dispersion and manager tiering than what you find then in the U.S. markets. So I think you will see more attractive opportunity in European CLO debt spreads in the future given that we anticipate a couple of things. One, in terms of the economic backdrop, given a more challenging economic growth environment in Europe, it's likely that you will see more credit stress within European corporate credit, which will impact European CLO manager performance and, ultimately, portfolios. Within the U.S. markets -- within the U.S. CLO markets, amongst the 100-plus managers, there is fairly defined tiering and dispersion already in CLO manager debt spreads, and so depending on deal performance, which can become fairly pronounced further down in the CLO capital structure. And maybe lastly, in the European CLO market, there has been fairly limited CLO manager performance history just given that it's a smaller, newer market. And so tiering and pricing dispersion historically hasn't been as pronounced. However, we believe that that will likely change in the coming years. And so we think as this starts to occur across the European CLO markets, this will be a good opportunity to further increase exposure to European CLO debt and equity over time.

Kevin Davis executive
#41

So in practical terms, expanding on that a bit, what type of market scenarios might the funds shift from European CLO debt or CLO equity exposure to U.S.?

Young Choi attendee
#42

Right. And this is repeating some of what we had already said, but I think you will see more attractive opportunities in European CLO debt spreads in the future given, again, the economic backdrop. So as you see more stress, there will be more tiering. And as a result of that, you will be able to -- as you find more opportunities, be able to invest across managers at elevated spreads. And so we think that opportunity will exist. You already see that in the U.S. markets, and we think it's a matter of time before you see more of that kind of interject into the European markets. And as this happens and as it starts to occur, we think the opportunity set will increase in Europe over time.

Kevin Davis executive
#43

Thank you for that, Young. So for the audience, your vote is very important. Every vote counts. The fund Board has voted for the proposals. Glass Lewis, which is an independent governance and proxy analyst firm, recommends a vote for the proposals. Our senior leadership team were shareholders in the funds, we are voting for the proposals. We ask that you cast your vote for the proposals for the reasons that we've -- have been described here today and in the proxy statement and including some of the potential benefits that we've also outlined here on today's call. Please take time to vote your shares. There are a few easy ways to do so. You can do it online, you can vote over the phone, by mail and in person. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. We hope that you'll join us for our next webinar with King Street, and we do look forward to hearing from you. Lastly, I'll say that we've included risk disclosures for the funds at the end of this webinar. We encourage shareholders to fully review the proxy statements they received from the funds for more fulsome disclosure of the risks associated with investing in the funds. Thank you for your time today.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete XAI Floating Rate & Alternative Income Trust transcript - plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.

Get an API key View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to XAI Floating Rate & Alternative Income Trust earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server. Quarterly plans from $105 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.