Home / Transcripts / HD Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (A329180) · October 28, 2026

HD Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (A329180) Earnings Call Transcript

October 28, 2026

KOSE KR Industrials Machinery earnings 94 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Hee-jun Song executive
#1

[Interpreted] Good afternoon. First of all, thank you all for joining this conference call. And now we will begin the conference of the fiscal year 2026 Third Quarter Earnings results by HD Korea Shipbuilding and Offshore Engineering. This conference will start with a presentation followed by a divisional Q&A session. Now we shall begin the conference of the fiscal year 2026 third quarter earnings results by HD Korea Shipbuilding and Offshore Engineering.

Unknown Executive executive
#2

[Interpreted] Good afternoon. I am Song, Executive Director, overseeing IR for HD Hyundai Group. As in the previous quarter, we will keep today's earnings presentation as brief as possible and allow more time for Q&A. English interpretation will be provided consecutively. After the earnings presentation, I will comment on the shipbuilding market before moving on to Q&A. Let me begin with the key highlights for the third quarter, followed by our operating results. First, the FX impact. The average exchange rate in the third quarter fell by approximately 6% or by KRW 79 from the previous quarter, resulting in an operating loss impact of approximately KRW 70 billion, which includes KRW 45 billion for Hyundai Industries. Second, one-off costs, Hyundai Heavy Industries recorded 47 working days in the third quarter, a decrease of approximately 14 days quarter-on-quarter, and this represents about 4 more days than the typical seasonal decline, and the additional reduction lowered operating profit by approximately KRW 50 billion. Regarding wage and collective banking agreement, which we successfully concluded yesterday we recognized 70% in the third quarter call, this amount in any relevant for the interest. [Technical Difficulty] We apologize for the inconveniences caused by the technical issues that interpreted the conference call. Investigators, understanding for this, the conference will be very appreciated. Apologies for the technical glitch. Let me resume and second, one-off costs. Hyundai Heavy Industries recorded 47 working days in the third quarter, a decrease of approximately 14 days quarter-on-quarter, and this represents about 4 more days than the typical seasonal decline and the additional reduction lowered operating profit by approximately KRW 50 billion. Regarding the wage and collective bargaining agreement through which we produce the desirable outcomes yesterday, we recognized approximately 75% of the related additional costs in the third quarter with the remainder to be reflected in the fourth quarter. We are unable to disclose the specific amount, and we kindly ask that you refer to relevant press reports for further information. Finally, our third quarter revenue mix by vessel type, HD Hyundai Heavy Industries large-sized ships, LNG carriers, 42%, LPG carriers and real EVs, 23%; containerships 24%, tankers 9%. For the midsized ship segment, container ships accounted for 24%, product carriers 32%; LPG carriers 26% and bunkering vessels, 8%. HD Hyundai Samho LNG carriers 40%, container ships 32%, tankers 14%, LPG carriers and real EVs 10%, with no significant change from the previous quarter. Moving to Page 4. Here are the consolidated results for HD KSOE. Consolidated revenue decreased 7.2% quarter-over-quarter and increased 9.3% year-over-year. Despite the continued rise in vessel prices, revenue declined slightly from the previous quarter due to seasonal factors, fewer working days and the lower exchange rate. Operating profit decreased 12% quarter-over-quarter and increased to 37% year-over-year, reflecting the lower exchange rate, fewer working days and higher one-off costs. I will cover the nonoperating items later in the presentation. Please refer to the table on Page 5, and let me move on to Page 6. Consolidated revenue in the Shipbuilding division decreased 8.2% quarter-over-quarter and increased 10.3% year-over-year. The quarter-over-quarter decline reflected fewer working days and the lower exchange rate despite higher vessel prices. On an HD Hyundai Heavy Industry basis, consolidated revenue in the naval and special vessels segment decreased 14.6% quarter-over-quarter and 30.8% year-over-year. The decline was mainly attributable to fewer working days and a change in project mix. In the offshore segment the project continued to ramp up, while the Trian project entered its final stage. As a result, revenue increased 1% quarter-over-quarter and 35% year-over-year. Next, Engine & Machinery revenue was quarter-over-quarter and decreased 10.3% year-over-year, mainly due to fewer production days and the lower exchange rate. Moving to Page 7. I will now cover operating profit by business segment. Shipbuilding operating profit decreased 18.1% quarter-over-quarter due to the lower exchange rate and one-off costs, but increased 32.3% year-over-year. The operating margin was 16.7%, slightly lower quarter-over-quarter, but continuing to improve year-over-year. Operating profit in the Naval Vessel business increased sharply 114% quarter-over-quarter despite lower revenue, supported by higher export mix but decreased 24.5% year-over-year. Offshore operating profit surged 110% quarter-over-quarter and turned profitable year-over-year, supported by the full scale recognition of revenue from the project and KRW 18 billion in change order. Engine & Machinery operating profit continued to grow, increasing 8% quarter-over-quarter and 19% year-over-year. Higher selling prices and a greater share of dual fuel engines more than offset the lower exchange rate and reduce the revenue, and it is for the first time that we disclosed our revenue from onshore power engines, which is approximately KRW 11.4 billion this quarter. Please refer to Page 8 for the operating results of the consolidated subsidiaries, and I will provide more detail on Page 9. First of all, HDK SOE on a stand-alone basis. Higher revenue from the SD business division and overseas yards helped the company return to profit, while dividend income also contributed to a significant increase in operating profit. HD Hyundai Heavy Industries, its revenue decreased 9.1% quarter-over-quarter, and operating profit declined 13.5% quarter-over-quarter due to fewer working days, the lower exchange rate, one-off costs and a change in vessel mix, including a lower share of LNG carriers. The Engine & Machinery, Offshore and Naval and Special Vessels businesses nevertheless delivered stable operating results. Now HD Hyundai Samho, despite fewer production days, which were around 10 days lower from the previous quarter and the lower exchange rate in the third quarter, the company continued to deliver solid operating results, supported by a higher share of LNG carriers and continued productivity improvements. Revenue remained at the previous quarter's level, while operating profit decreased to 10.3%. The operating margin was 20.2%. Now let us move on to Page 10. HD Hyundai Marine Engine despite the lower exchange rate, revenues surged 55% quarter-over-quarter, and operating profit increased 92% quarter-over-quarter, driven by effective FX hedging, higher selling prices and increased share of dual fuel engines and higher delivery volumes. The operating margin came in at 28.5%, which is the highest in its history. And next is HD Hyundai Energy Solutions, despite the seasonal slowdown and the lower exchange rate, revenue increased year-over-year and operating profit rose 38.8% year-over-year, supported by higher selling prices and increased exports to the United States. On Page 11, nonoperating results included approximately KRW 610 billion in foreign currency-related losses following the sharp decline in the USD Korean won exchange rate as well as KRW 307.8 billion in gains on financial instruments. On Page 11, all subsidiaries remain in net cash position with consolidated net cash of approximately KRW 11 trillion. And that concludes our presentation of results for HD KSOE and its subsidiaries, and then we will walk you through the outlook for the commercial shipbuilding market.

Unknown Executive executive
#3

[Interpreted] Good afternoon. I am Tim Bangu, Senior Executive Director, in charge of HD KSOE's Strategic Marketing Division. I will now walk you through global newbuilding market trends for the third quarter of 2026, and the order intake of HD KSOE Shipbuilding division. And first of all, market trends. From January to September this year, the global newbuilding market saw very strong ordering activities across all vessel types, reaching a record high that surpassed the same period of 2007, the previous peak in terms of GT. In the third quarter, containership led the market, while solid ordering momentum continued across major types, including tankers, which has been strong since the start of the year as well as LNGC, LPGC, bulk carrier and car carriers. Geopolitical risk including the wars in the Middle East and Ukraine persists and disruption to shipping logistics caused by factors such as transit restrictions in the Panama Canal are deepening the supply-demand imbalance in the shipping market. Against this backdrop a combination of factors, including unprecedented shipping market conditions, a growing focus on energy security, response to environmental regulations and demand for replacing aging fleet is having a significant impact on the new building market as well. Global newbuilding investment this year has already approached last year's full year level as of the third quarter, reflecting unexpectedly strong demand for new building investments. Newbuilding prices has also continued to rise, driven by sustained ordering from ship owners who have secured substantial profit and by shipyard accumulated backlog. And lastly, our new order trend. The group's shipbuilding subsidiaries secured a total of 176 vessels with $19.1 billion on a cumulative basis during the third quarter exceeding our annual order target. These results reflect the success of our selective order taking strategy and our sales efforts focused on high value-added vessels, and once again demonstrates the group's competitiveness in winning orders in the global market. In terms of our new order portfolio, we secured a number of high value-added large gas carriers. In particular, we won a total of 45 VLGCs, including real ICs and a cumulative basis through the third quarter, capturing more than 50% of global orders. In the midsize segment, we diversified our order portfolio by winning orders across wide range of vessel types, including not only medium range and long range tube tankers, but also midsized and large LPG carriers, liquefied CO2 carriers, PCTCs and roll on and roll off vessels. Last but not least, the market outlook. Going forward, the shipbuilding market has favorable factors, including limited capacity and major shipyards, steady growth in seaborne trade volumes and demand for replacement with eco-friendly vessels. At the same time, risks remain, such as geopolitical tensions, uncertainty in the global economy and expansion of shipbuilding capacity worldwide. In this environment, the group will continue its order strategy focused on high value-added vessels, leveraging our extensive shipbuilding experience, technological capabilities and stable supply chain. We will also respond more flexibly to make changes in customer needs, striking a balance between profitability and growth, and this concludes our presentation of HD Korea Shipbuilding and Offshore Engineering Third Quarter 2026 results. Thank you for your attention.

Operator operator
#4

[Foreign Language] [Operator Instructions] The first question will be presented by Korea Investment Securities.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#5

[Interpreted] I have 3 questions about your engine business. The first question is, you mentioned that your engine business revenue for this quarter is KRW 951.1 billion. And can you clarify, can you give us a breakdown of this revenue by low speed, mid-speed engines and then piping components? The second question is about your onshore power generation engine. As you said, the so we have 2 cases of H54GV and H3540GV. So is it for large output power generation engine? Or is it an engine that is used for usual onshore power generation? Can you also give us the classification or distinction? Lastly, out of the inquiries that you have received this year, are there anything that would give you visibility in terms of actually being awarded any contracts? It's because we need to ensure a bit of visibility about the 4 gigawatt facility utilization that you mentioned.

Unknown Executive executive
#6

[Interpreted] For your first question, give you our revenue breakdown. The large size engine will be 50% and midsized engine, which also includes power generation one, 35%; and the other category, 15%.

Unknown Executive executive
#7

[Interpreted] To answer your second question, I am from the engine business. As to the power generation engine project, we have been quite steady in undertaking existing projects which amounts to 100 to 300 mega project. So these orders were given 2 to 3 years ago, and this is ongoing. As for now, as to the ones that you mentioned, I mean, H54 GV and 15 H54GV, we cannot produce these engines with our factory alone. So there would be a split of production between our -- so the production will be made feasible when we have a new plant ongoing. So there's going to be a split of production between our existing plants and our plant.

Unknown Executive executive
#8

[Interpreted] And to answer your third question, which was about inquiries we have both PPPs and project, 1.6 giga which were already close, but we have 1.4 gigawatt project, which we are undertaking but we have disclosed targets because they did not meet disclosure criteria. And by year, we would be operating at our full capacity by 2028 and 2029. So as to additional order awards, we need to see what's going to be happening. And as I mentioned last year, we have continuing demand in the AI data set of sectors and as well as national electricity grid development. And as you know, electrification is a global trend. So we continue to receive inquiries about national redevelopment as well as AI data centers. What's different is previously, AI data center project has been undertaken with us serving as an intermediary kind of intermediary. So there would be demand, but they will not be coming directly to us. But these days, hyperscalers tend to come to us directly and contacting us directly. That's 1 difference. Our strategy will lead to striking the right balance between our capacity and projected revenue and our order taking capabilities.

Unknown Executive executive
#9

[Interpreted] And as to the power generation volume that have -- that are quite firm or that are projected, it's going to be 1.5 giga in 2028 and 3 giga in 2029.

Operator operator
#10

[Interpreted] The next question will be presented by Jeong Dongik from KB Securities.

Dongik Jeong analyst
#11

[Interpreted] I have 2 questions. The first question is about our offshore plant. You mentioned there's a one-off gains of KRW 80 billion, and that's very high because that's almost a 30% increase in operating profit. And in the previous quarter, your OP margin in offshore plant was also 16%. I think these are unsustainably high levels of operating profit. So I'd like to know the background or logic behind these 2 consecutive very high margins were made available. And what you -- what's your view on the following quarter or next year in your offshore plant? My second question is about your commercial vessel market outlook. As you mentioned, ordering activity was the highest ever, maybe better than what was recorded back in 2007. Then how do you view the 2027 next year? Because estimated and forecast that there's going to be around 30% decline in the overall market. So I wonder what your internal view is about the commercial ship market next year.

Unknown Executive executive
#12

[Interpreted] To answer your first question, yes, that's KRW 18 billion in change order and that's recognized as revenue. We have the and project and the Rua project specifically is proceeding at its full capacity. So these 2 projects are very high margin ones. And aside from this, there is nothing specifically -- nothing specific that I'd like to mention. But in the following quarter, on the projects, revenue may decline a bit, but the project will be making good progress. And again, in the following quarter, we believe we can produce profits with high margin. And in the offshore sector, we don't believe we will be suffering losses or any sudden drop in our revenue. It's because revenue may decline slightly in 2027, but I think we will be able to produce the profit because we would be considering block construction as well as the LNG inputs as well in preparation for any possible decline in our offshore business.

Unknown Executive executive
#13

[Interpreted] Let me give you my answer to your second question as to the market prospects especially new build orders for 2027, while we expect for this year was around 190 million. So that was above the 176 million that was recorded before. And as just said, Clarkson is expecting around 30% reduction, and that would be amounting to 125 million or 130 million tonnes in 2027, but still the level is quite high compared to usual years. So beyond 2027, yes, new build orders may decline compared to 2026, which was the highest ever in history. But still, we expect a solid market outlook in this new build -- new build activities. There are ever reasons why. First of all, we are experiencing supply chain disruptions because of transit restrictions on the Strait of Hormuz, the Panama Canal and the Swiss Canal, and this leads to increases in tonne mile, the overall tonne mile, which respite demand for new builds as well. And now ship owners have the financial capability and they can afford investing in new vessels as well. So that increases demand for new builds. And even though this war in the Middle East comes to an end, we believe supply chain disruption will be established as a new normal, which means there won't be big changes in seaborne trade volumes. So in 2027, yes, there could be a slight reduction, but still, we believe that we're going to have solid performance in the new build market.

Unknown Executive executive
#14

[Interepreted] I'd like to make some additional comments about our offshore plant business, both the and projects are increasing their contribution to our overall revenue, and these 2 projects are highly profitable, and that's our expectation. So until they are fully delivered in 2027, these 2 projects will be producing desirable outcomes with improvement in our overall profitability. But as to additional orders and additional projects after beyond these 2 projects, in fact, earlier this year, we were working in a project in the Middle East, which did not lead to successful outcomes. But there are some new projects that we haven't disclosed yet, but are ongoing. For instance, there's an offshore substation project and only work has already been done, but due to contractual reasons, we're not disclosing this project. And we also have a gas production facility project for which early work is ongoing as well. So we believe early 2027, we will be able to disclose relevant information about the subsequent projects. And as to our offshore energy business, I think all projects would be and are being undertaken just as planned. So they would be producing profits just as planned as well. And behind this stellar performance lies our selective order-taking strategy, which focuses on profitability and as well as our excellent execution, which ensures that these projects are undertaken just as planned.

Operator operator
#15

[Interpreted] The following question will be presented by Investment Securities.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#16

[Interpreted] My first question is, please give us an update in each year for your order taking activities for the third quarter. That's -- and then the question is about your projected joint venture in the United States with. So your company has been rather conservative. So you are now pursuing this block manufacturing operation, we're a joint venture with the U.S. counterpart, which is Kirit. And without amendment being made to the Jones Act or Act, many people concerned that such projects or business may entail greater risk. So I'd like to know more about the background behind making this rather bold investment decision. And who are the major players in this joint venture or future U.S. operations. It's going to be 6 subsidiaries of your group.

Unknown Executive executive
#17

[Interpreted] If I give you updated vintage year data, first of all, Samho, 28% for 2023, 48% for 2024, then 24% for 2025. Now Hyundai Heavy Industries midsize ships first, 9.6% for 2023, 55% for 2024, then 25% for 2025. The large size ships for Hyundai Heavy Industries, 4% for 2022, 45% for 2023, 31% for 2024 and 20% for 2025.

Unknown Executive executive
#18

[Interpreted] To answer your second question, as covered by media press, yes, we have established a joint venture with the U.S. company, and the intention is to establish a local manufacturing footprint in the United States. The MOU was signed back in July and as a subsequent step, the joint venture was established. And our goal is, as to combat ships that would require further discussions but we're making preparations so that we can receive orders for logistics support ships from the U.S. Navy or Marat that would include console tankers, for instance. As to the background behind this investment decision, back in August through the presidential memo published by the U.S. government, foreign shipyards who will be making investments on U.S. soil, U.S. territory would be subject to bridge stretch provisions, which should make investment in the U.S. possible, so we believe that without establishing a local manufacturing footprint, we won't be able to have business opportunities for the United States market. And they prompted our investment decision. But as to who's going to own this project, whether that's going to be 6 to 4, nothing is decided yet. But according to the Wall Street article which covered shipyard, the investment volume or the production volume should be secured first before we finalize any level of investment to be made in the United States. Internally, we have looked at several scenarios, and we have our own calculations made internally, and be the U.S. Navy and with the U.S. government, we are currently making discussions on detail -- on detail to volume. And if that's determined that will determine the level of investment they will be making and who's going to be owning these businesses as well. And internally, our plan is to finalize this by the end of '26. And then after that, we will be able to make official disclosures or announcements about our U.S. business.

Operator operator
#19

[Interpreted] The following question will be presented by Investment and Securities.

Unknown Analyst analyst
#20

[Interpreted] We have 3 questions. Basically, the first question is we saw a surge in operating profit for Hyundai Marine engine. And I wonder whether this is sustainable or not. That's my first question. The second question is about your new venture, joint venture in the United States. As far as I know, doesn't have any track record in building naval ships. So in association with new partnership with Huntington Ingalls Industries, what's going to be the role of? And what's the division of growth among these companies? The third question is about your floating data center project. I heard that there are some delays. And in your discussion, we speak to companies as to onshore engine business. So any update on about your floating data center projects?

Unknown Executive executive
#21

[Interpreted] To answer your first question, yes, Hyundai Marine Engine demonstrated stellar performance this quarter. And as I mentioned in the previous quarter, there were 2 units that were not delivered, which were supposed to be delivered in Q2, and these were recognized in this quarter that . And there are some deliveries that have been recognized in Q3, which are supposed to be recognized in Q4, the following quarter. And foreign exchange rate will be -- the Korean won will be depreciating further, we believe, and we have an increasing share of dual-fuel engines as well. So overall, we expect excellent performance from Hyundai Marine Engine. And our goal was to achieve 100% utilization rate but utilization rate already exceeded 110%. But again, we need to consider a weaker Korean won in the following quarter. So given all these, improving productivity, increasing orders and increasing share of dual fuel engines and increasing ASP, you may guess how Hyundai Marine Engines performance, which we believe will be improving further.

Unknown Executive executive
#22

[Interpreted] To answer your second question, yes, the company has not been involved in the ship building sector previously, but is a leading EPC company in the United States. It's a sizable company, and it has excellent track record in the EPC business, and the company has long been involved in offshore plant business as well. In general, wanted to expand its business from offshore plan to ship building. So the willingness of the company and it's very natural fit with our company, a combination of factors work behind this investment decision. And previously, we looked at several shipyards in the United States as a target of acquisition, but we realized that their facilities were aging, and we needed to optimize our logistics operations as well. So acquiring an existing shipyard was almost tantamount to building a new one in terms of CapEx. And as a result, those U.S.-based shipyards were demanding higher price for acquisition.

Unknown Executive executive
#23

[Interpreted] And in addition to that, offshore plant companies share many foundational technologies shipbuilding companies. In that sense, we share technological capabilities between our 2 companies. And that makes a very good partner in terms of producing synergy, both in terms of staffing and talent development and training as well. So with, we're going to be focusing on basic naval vessels first. For example, we're building 2 vessels here in Korea as the initial delivery, we would be making CapEx investments in the United States to build the necessary facilities. And with Industries we're having discussions with the company to look at the possibility of block construction. And as to combat ships, we would be -- I think there is a need for further discussion.

Unknown Executive executive
#24

[Interpreted] Your third question is about nuclear business. Currently, there's a special bill, which is pending at the national assembly of Korea. So discussions are ongoing at the national assembly level. And for the first time, nuclear submarine budget has been allocated for the year 2027. It means starting from next year, the nuclear-powered submarine project will begin here in Korea, and we're making necessary preparations for that. But given the duration and the scale of constructing nuclear submarines, it cannot be done by any single company alone. It requires that there are national level capabilities mobilized. So we are planning to propose to the Korean government and not just the shipbuilding companies, but there should be other adjacent industry companies that come together to make this project possible.

Unknown Executive executive
#25

[Interepreted] To answer your question about floating data centers between KSOE and HD Hyundai Heavy Industries, discussions are ongoing between among our group affiliates, and not just the data centers themselves, but we believe we have the potential to produce synergy as to data center equipment and facilities as well. And at the group level, we believe we have the capability to supply these equipment pieces as well. But as to ship level capability for FDCs, we are internally discussing which yard will be responsible for building such FDC vessel. And it requires GMPP, and we have currently available technology, GMPP technology already in the market, which means we are capable of supplying necessary engines. But it concerns large-scaled engines, for example, 21 inch 35GV or 50-inch 54GFV, so we have the technology to supply this engine. That's what I can tell you. And about whether the maturity of floating data centers themselves, we are not 100% for sure. But we have ongoing discussions with hyperscalers, and it's for sure the demand is growing for floating data centers. One of our concerns will be about power source because it may vary compared to what our industry peers have in mind. But for FDC, we need GMPP. And here, we believe we have a room to apply our Hyundai engine.

Unknown Executive executive
#26

[Interpreted] The following question will be presented by Choi Kwang-Sik from DAOL Investment & Securities.

Kwang-Sik Choi analyst
#27

[Interpreted] I have 2 questions. The first question is about your LNG business. Your company share price has decreased recently and Chinese shipyards are increasing their market share, especially in the LNG sector. And the Chinese companies are 1 of the reasons why LNG better prices are going down, that's what some people say, and these Chinese shipyards are gaining orders not just from domestic clients, but from overseas clients, including MSP as well. So the LNG price for the price-wise, Chinese shipyards are not demanding as much as Korean shipyards. But still, the Chinese shipyards are increasing their influence in orders for LNG vessels. So can you give us an update about this market situation? And as well as I'd like to know what your take is on the decrease in LNG vessel prices as well as increasing China's shipyards influence in this market segment. My next question is about Shinhan Aging, which will be allocated for data center applications. You mentioned 1.4 gigawatt project. But according to the data and monthly engine on price data, I don't believe we have increases compared to previous year. So when you mentioned specific gigawatt numbers, does it reflect the orders that are already recognized in your book or orders that you're expecting as well?

Unknown Executive executive
#28

[Interpreted] If I answer your question in the LNG market, yes, it's true that Chinese shipyards are increasing their orders in the global LNG market. And YTD basis, these Chinese shipyards have secured 32 vessels, the 3 shipyards in China, and Hanif the side from are our direct competitors across the global market. And one of the reasons why they are successful is significantly lower price compared to our.

Unknown Executive executive
#29

[Interpreted] But in spite of that, you can deep dive into the orders this Chinese shipyards have taken this year then they are mostly coming from Chinese shipowners and Chinese projects. As to the 10 LNG vessels, they will already by MSIC. Its parent company is Petronas. Petronas builds with Chinese shipowners primarily, but it's rather inevitable that the shipping company chose a Chinese shipyards and awarding its LNG shipowners. But for us, Korean shipyards we are producing industrial-level LNG carriers, which means our clients want supply chain stability, reliability and unfettered access to any ports across the globe, whether it is U.S. or other countries. But these universal assets is critical. That's why our global company's clients would like to work with Korean shipyards, including our company. So on a life cycle perspective, I think Korean LNG ship builders are competitive across the global market. Yes, LNG prices have gone down, partly because of the impact from China and as well as decreasing orders themselves. But I don't think the prices to go down any further. It's because shipowners already recognize the current level at the bottom. So behind the scenes, they are very much interested in new LNG ships, and they are in discussion with Korean shipyards.

Unknown Executive executive
#30

[Intepreted] And as you know, LNG produced in has decreased which means shipowners are less active in making new investments in LNG. But there are ongoing very active LNG projects across the U.S. and Canada, and they are going on right now. And we believe said in 2027, that is the reason why LNG newbuild projects will begin starting from 2027. But I'd like to mention LPG as well, which had a record high year this year. So on a daily basis, it used to be USD 30,000 to USD 40,000. But currently, it's $240,000 even $250,000 on a daily basis. So shipowners are being interested at taking interest in LPG as well. And at our company, we're taking a proactive stance towards LPG, developing technology and putting the necessary effort into this market, and our efforts are being translated into actual outcomes. For next year, our progress in LNG and any resumed project on LNG, this would certainly contribute to our business.

Unknown Executive executive
#31

[Interpreted] If I make additional comments about our engine order activities, the 1.4 gigawatt project, so most of the projects that we have won are reflected in our disclosures that we make. But in 2024 and 2025, it was mostly vessel grade engines. And during those years, our performance was great. But it was back in 2023 that the vessel demand was at its highest, so as a result, in 2024, we had a record time year in terms of orders that were awarded. And that meant our backlog amounted to 3.5 years or even more. So our would be full by 2028 until 2028, and which means some of them would be fully operational -- be fully occupied by 2030 as well. So even though it seems that our order activity is not as strong as before, we have enough backlog to address, and if onshore engine demand increases, then it means that in our engine and business, both our order and activities and our revenues will be great.

Unknown Executive executive
#32

[Interpreted] So this concludes our earnings presentation. Thank you very much for your participation. [Portions of this transcript that are marked [Interpreted] were spoken by an interpreter present on the live call.]

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete HD Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. transcript - plus 257,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.

Get an API key View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to HD Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. earnings transcripts and 257,000+ others is available through the EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server. Quarterly plans from $145 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.