Famous Brands Limited (FBR) Earnings Call Transcript

Welcome on behalf of myself and Neli to our F '27 interim results presentation hosted from our Midrand offices. We value the interest that you've shown to register for this live audio webcast. Welcome to the Famous Brands family from our various offices. We've all worked harder and smarter to produce these interim results in a very difficult trading environment. They are a solid set of results. Definitely not where we would expect it to be on 28 February with a little doubt that fuel price and associated effects of constrained consumer spend and hampered our top line performance expectations from day 1 of the reporting period. . We still [indiscernible] that are work in progress or actions that we are taking that are being closed out and are aligned to our strategic plans. So no surprises there. Definitely less of it to do list than this time last year, and no distraction creeping into the business. I always take the opportunity at this point to remind everybody about the driving force in our business that nothing happens in our business unless the sale is made at a restaurant. The agenda will be very simple, roughly 50 minutes of presentations with allocating 10 minutes to Q&A. The presentation together with the supplementary slides, will hopefully assist you to answer some obvious questions about our business. The agenda will be split between Neli and I, I will start off and then hand over to Neli and then our colleague, Ntando Ndaba, who is our Group Risk Executive will handle Q&A. For those of you who may not have used this before, please log your questions via the portal, on the top left of your screen. You can also make your screen a full screen. It is a button at the bottom right-hand side of your screen that you can use. So please feel free to put those questions in, and Ntando will put them through to us later. From a performance perspective, we're definitely a focused performance and has resulted in increased cash flow, which has really been good. So from our perspective, definitely a highlight for the year and very, very important as we head into to H2. But really leading brands has led the performance, which underpins the resilient model of our leading brands, supported by supply chain, which has been underpinned by a multiyear investment, and it's proven itself through these difficult times. And we've invested through the difficult times, and it definitely bodes well for the future. We are, however, robustly addressing underperformance in some segments where we need to reduce cost distractions on the business. We have some good news and we've returned retail to a profitable level. The retail was a distraction this time last year, if you may recall, we've made good progress to claw back to a solid margin despite the tough trading environment. And really, out of the last of our 6 highlights for the interims is that we remain a significant contributor to the South African economy and society as a prior BBB Level 1 contributor. And this, as the saying goes, reflects our work both on and off the field. As you may have seen in the announcements already, we have some very, very strong numbers that we've put through. One would always like to be driving the arrows up on all 6 metrics. We're very proud of the 3 metrics that we focused on here where we've generated strong free cash flow, strong revenue growth contextually, given the environmental challenges, particularly and the pressure on the consumer. And as our cash flow cycle has improved, post some of our investments, we've been able to focus on the dividend. Neli will obviously elaborate on some of these numbers a bit later. There's obviously been pressure on our headline earnings as is obvious, and some pressure on our operating margin. And I think after her presentation, you'll be able to get some absolute clarity on those areas of pressure. They are related to the areas that we need to improve in the business. And again, as I said in the opening, our work in progress. So there should be no surprises on some of these metrics. We would have loved a more conducive environment to be able to drive volume better which would reflect through to the bottom line. But we think given the circumstances, the driving the right metrics has worked and certainly, the revenue growth has been very encouraging in tough times. Our franchise brand footprints remain relevant for new and even more importantly, with our consumers. QSR is leading the way in terms of our business and further underpinning our relevance in consumers' lives and continue to get closer to where the consumers live, work and play as can be seen on the chart in terms of our net restaurant growth and the size of the relevant networks in QSR. Our casual dining portfolio in leading brands has had acquired the time relative to the QSR colleagues, but Mugg & Bean and Milky Lane benefited from format led growth. Wimpy remains a key part of our brand portfolio giving consumers easy access to an affordable and pleasurable casual dining experience, and in some cases, may be their first casual dining experience. The story of signature brands is not as rosy as leading brands, and this remains work in progress in our business. Signature brands have experienced some closures in the fun dine-in area and a deliberately slower period as we work on the model. Admittedly slower pace than we had aimed for, but nothing we're concerned about, and we're marginally behind our targets for the period. We're very, very excited about H2 activity, and we forecast to open additional 80 stores in the second half and the pipeline looking forward beyond H2 remains buoyant with interested franchise partners and lots of pipeline opportunities the property market seems pretty [indiscernible]. With 3,070 restaurants under umbrella right now, we're very confident about our ability to open the restaurants in H2 and beyond. South Africa remains our home. It remains the driving force in our business and the distinction in our business is important because leading brands is driving the growth in the SA context, and that's supported by supply chain, which is driving our operating profit. We continue to grow our SA footprint, and we continue to be a strong player in the SA market. We remain excited about SADC. However, it has come under significant pressure in the last 6 months, particularly Botswana, which has been challenging, and Neli will expand on some of that later. However, Southern African development community remains a key growth lever for us despite some of the challenges in these results. We have actively and deliberately slowed down in the AME region while we've been refocusing. The loss-making has been clawed back in this period versus prior year, and that recovery will definitely accelerate in H2. Signature brands remains work in progress, and we have lots to do to claw back that to profitability. The U.K. market is challenging at present, with no eminent relief in sight in that particular market. As I said earlier, leading brands is a driving force of our business. It's maintained momentum and delivered growth despite the challenging market conditions. Distinction between casual dining restaurants and QSR restaurants remains important in the Leading brands business. Neither is less important, but they are different in the consumer's life, which we respect and we work towards servicing the needs of those consumers. The new store restaurants have -- and revamped restaurants have shown strong growth in the marketplace, and our increasing competitive presence in the right places is important to us. That growth that we talk about and the ability to open new restaurants is format led and that growth continues to create opportunities. And we focus on drive-thrus, smaller restaurant formats that meet consumer needs and consumer demands. But consumers are not always just going out. So from our perspective, pin drop delivery or home delivery, as some people call it, continues to be a channel where we work well in and not just leave to third-party aggregators to take product to the consumer. Our franchise partners remain committed to our business. They continue to show interest and they like our business model, and they continue to underpin and invest in our brands. And nowadays, as the tech world expands, it's not just about selling hamburgers. Our investment in Munch and the Rollout is simplifying our technology program and ultimately leading to an easier tech stack at store level for our franchise partners. Last year, this time, that number was sitting at 453. So we have made good progress over the reporting period. Now getting down to the stuff that really matters in that growth. In terms of our leading brands portfolio, we've again distinguished there between casual dining in the purple and quick service restaurants in the yellow. We've provided the quarter-on-quarter performance given the nature of the trading environment in, we don't report on quarters. But I think given the context of around Easter and of course, the fuel price that has been biting with fuel prices only kicking in from April, there's been some serious pressure building on the consumer. So even then, I think the context of what we've done at system-wide level, which reflects the growth in the restaurants is important. And that's really brought us through to a 2.7% average, and again, you can see some more pressure on casual dining than on QSR. The QSR team have delivered particularly well over this reporting period. The like-for-like picture is not as impressive for casual dining, and there's a strong performance that has remained in tough times for QSR. Casual dining has come under pressure, particularly under Q2, and that has put our like-for-like at a lower number of 0.8% for the reporting period. Again, given the context of the consumer, the pressures in Q2, we're very comfortable with this number at this point in time, and we believe there's obviously a runway to recover and improve. So it reflects the environment and it does reflect the nature of QSR versus CDR and again, around the affordability gap particularly. Our supply chain business, as you saw in the earlier graph, which is a key driver of operational profit is important. And owning our physical supply chain remains an integral part of [indiscernible] and our business model. And it's really about the back end in service of the front-end franchisee and front-end retail. We've reinvested capital in our platform to modernize it during tough economic cycles and really started to see that benefit flowing through in these particular results. We've integrated more third-party products into our logistics platform such as Coca-Cola, which services franchisees in the part, and in some cases, we've added to our basket to service retailers better just to clarify, not the Coca-Cola basket for retailers. This is strategically important, given the value of owning the supply chain in our particular business. We've been growing the basket to the manufacturing basket when appropriate, and the manufacturing team have been focused on where appropriate in sourcing volumes that we can put through to our franchise partners at same or better quality, price and service. We had faced challenges in the retail sector as we reported. Subs and the team have done a great job of clawing back some of the challenges that we've had. We've had significantly better economics in the retail mix and volume recovery is expected in H2. Most of the clawback had happened in Q2. So we think we could -- would certainly show some better recovery in H2 with volume growth. We continue to invest in manufacturing, which has been moderated with capital and focused on value projects, which actually create value within our business. The manufacturing team is very focused on how they deploy capital and working hard at moving the needle. Of course, the big shadow, I think, in the SA context and globally is the increase in fuel pricing. We are comfortable in that we have been able to partially recover some of that through agreement with our franchise partners on a special levy, which is quite unique to obviously our closed-loop system. So we haven't necessarily taken the full hit of the pricing. We have quite a unique model, and there was some margin recovery that we were able to do, not necessarily the full amount. And of course, the fuel price fluctuates dramatically from month to month. And as reported previously, beef and coffee had been putting significant pressure on the business. It is good to report that these key commodities are showing less pressure on the business and have eased some of the pressure at the front end around menu pricing for us. There's still pressure on beef, but definitely not the levels that we spoke about when we last reported to you. So I'm going to take a little bit of time around this particular graph. But really what it does is explain the benign overall price/mix effect that's supporting our focus on containing inflation through the supply chain. And that's really what we're trying to do is manage that inflation through to franchisees, and we think we're doing a pretty good job of understanding it, given the dynamic basket. We are, however, suffering with some mix challenges and that's a variety of factors that work through that. So if you focus on the graph, you can see that volume was definitely led by the retail recovery and, of course, growing a basket, as I spoke about. Volumes are definitely starting to pick up because of the different channels that we have. And this indicates that the overall revenue per unit and mix is lower year-on-year and suggest that the supply chain is helping to moderate inflationary pressures across the basket. Now that does sound like a bit of a mouthful. But really, what it's indicating in our business and the numbers that we look at is that we're starting to become more efficient in the supply chain as a result of the investment. The challenge is the mix, and we need to work through that. The higher inflation in the prior period has driven key commodity pressures, and those are now easing as you can see in the inflation number that is there. And that's obviously primarily a food inflation, but there is packaging in that, too. Now let me just talk about the complexity of the mix because that's the negative number. I think volume can easily be explained and inflation can easily be explained and there's been some good work there. The mix has not been favorable, and it continues to move around as the brand portfolio performance changes and menus evolve. As an example, at a ratio, 53% of line items were brought in versus 57% last year. So we brought in less line items and 41% on value versus 50% last year, which is really indicating that the manufacturing volumes now represent 47% of our volumes. The increased utilization of our manufacturing capability, together with the changing external purchase mix is helping contain the overall price carried through the logistics basket and ultimately to the franchisees. Some of the challenge within this is the introduction of a strong beverages category into our logistics network. And beverages with a major volume driver, but their GP margin was lower, illustrating the mix margin challenge that I've spoken about. We ultimately believe that we're well positioned to convert the volume growth into margin growth, and that's the most important thing, particularly given the low retail sales this year, and we can do that through better mix, better distribution economics and tighter transport control. So moving to some of the more challenging parts of the business. I've spoken about leading brands, and I've spoken about supply chain. But the South African development community area, as I've spoken about, is a key part of our growth and an area that we're driving hard to perform in. And it is a key part of the leading brands, and it's an exciting growth prospect for us despite Botswana been a detractor at present. And unfortunately, the decline in like-for-like sales in Botswana has continued. And Botswana is a key detractor of performance given the number of company-owned operations, and we are seeing a decline in these like-for-like sales in that particular market. As an example, we saw a 13.5% decline in like-for-like sales in pullet terms in the market for the reporting period. The transaction counts in that market remain under pressure with pricing and mix unable to compensate fully for the lower customer frequency. The cost base is being managed, reflected in lower operating expenses and store level labor savings. But the benefits are not yet sufficient to offset the impact of lower revenue productivity. We're absolutely confident that our partner and the team are digging deep, doing the right things to navigate these challenging times and with an outlook that is more uncertain than any time in the 30 years that we've traded there. Neli will elaborate a bit more around some of the dynamics of the transaction that we've announced on this particular market. But be that as it may, this shouldn't detract from our optimism around the SADC market. The team have really focused the operational discipline and continued to improve operations in the region, focusing on the basics in business around product availability, service, cost management, and network optimization. So we have really dug deep in this particular region and working harder and smarter. On the positive side, we've continued to grow our footprint with 7 new restaurants opened, and those restaurants, we're optimistic about and they've opened across Zimbabwe, Zambia, Namibia and Eswatini. Several markets, however, continue to experience growth. So the number that is really reflecting there is the size of Botswana is pulling the market down. However, those markets too are suffering with fuel pricing and with some of the dynamics that we're seeing in the SA market, really giving us more encouragement about being optimistic about this market. And the consumer in these markets is not fundamentally different to the SA consumer. They have the same -- suffering the same economic conditions, and they feel the same, and we are leading with value in these markets as we're doing in the South African context to make sure that we're relevant to the consumer, even though the consumer may have different nuances to what we're accustomed to. And of course, there's going to be some challenges. More recently, the fuel situation in Malawi has put pressure, and that would put pressure in H2. But it's a basket of countries, and you're going to have a basket of outcomes. We are, however, focused on where we're expanding, and we are very specific and deliberate about what we're doing and really focusing on the markets that demonstrate attractive growth potential. So targeted growth is happening in this particular region and the team is very focused on that. The challenge in the AME context is very different, and we are probably not as bullish as I would be coming across around SADC. We've absolutely narrowed our focus down to a focus on Africa, and I'll talk about that and really shaping the portfolio to create a platform for growth or a refocus on this platform of growth. And we still believe that growth outside of South Africa and outside of SADC remains an opportunity, which we are tackling cautiously. I need to just reiterate that. And this does read as a litany of challenges. Some are past, some are present, some are tackled and some are in process have been tackled. We have now permanently exited the UAE. Actually subsequent to this and to preparing the documentation, we have made some progress on our legal case, and we've got a strong outcome there in our favor. And that was really as a result of some challenges with the multi-restaurant franchise partner. However, the ultimate end is that we've exited the market in totality, and we have no imminent plan to return to that particular market. So the focus then would be remaining on Africa. The portfolio does remain subscale. We have limited activity in the period. We opened a single store in [indiscernible] but you are likely to see more activity in H2, particularly coming out of our Kenya market where there's been quite a lot of activity. There are, however, several markets experiencing significant inflation and supply chain challenges. So it's not all easy. Thankfully, the markets that we're in are typically easier to navigate and generally are English markets for us. We have one [indiscernible] market. But generally, we are struggling with some challenges with supply chain and the team are working hard around working through those and making good progress. The revenue due decline, as Neli will talk about, is not necessarily a reflection of performance. We have had a significant change in the business model, moving Kenya and Mauritius from company-owned to a franchise model, so you have the revenue that then disappears and converts to a royalty revenue. Mauritius only happened in Q1, so there are some drag on these results as well as restructuring costs which have been now managed and is now being managed as part of SADC. So the clawback in AME that I referred to in H2 is also as a result of some of that activity in H1. We've got a new operating structure, which we've been working on, and that structure has been aligned to a licensed or franchise model and has been led and driven by the leading brands team out of South Africa. So we will be fully out of our Dubai operations and where we were servicing some of the AME markets from. We've opened, in fact, this past weekend, our second steers and second [indiscernible] in Malaysia. So our partner -- licensed partner is focused on that second restaurant and really a great QoS for us and the work that's been done by the team, again, in this reporting period. So very exciting for us and a nice growth story, which we've spoken about before. So the team will be watching that, and we hope to be opening further restaurants over the next couple of years. So again, some more challenges in the business and I assure you that corrective actions are underway to restore portfolio profitability. We're definitely feeling a different trend to leading brands in this particular market. We're seeing a constrained consumer spend with feeling a bigger pinch on the consumer in luxury and fun dining versus what leading brands has particularly seen. And I suppose that really does talk to ticket size and frequency versus the higher ticket size in the funding and luxury space. The [indiscernible] brand, particularly which sits as a unique model inside Signature brands, which is our licensed company store arrangement, has continued to put pressure on the profitability with no improvement in losses versus prior year. So that really is a challenge, and we're working hard on addressing that, and there's been lots of change and adjustment in that particular business model. The team continued to focus on the levers that they can pull probably not as simple as in leading brands, but focusing on value-led menu offerings, which again does reduce spend per head as much tactical and local marketing as possible and occasion-based promotion. So again, trying to focus on what the consumer needs, but it is a smaller and niche part of the business, and does require a different mindset in certain parts. The captive market brands continued to perform well within that market. So it's not a challenge in Signature brands in its entirety. It's around some of the parts that make up the whole. We have commenced the revamp program in some parts of that business. So it's not all doom and gloom, and we have franchisees that are willing to reinvest in their businesses, and see value in that particular model. So comfortable again that you'll start to see some clawback in H2. And the Munch tech stack that I spoke about earlier, which I won't elaborate also is getting a benefit in Signature brands, and we're starting to see that roll out assisting franchisees in the space and helping them to better control their operations. The sales picture at Signature Brands is definitely not as rosy as leading brands. And as you can see on the chart there, the burgundy being the like-for-like and the orange being the system-wide, and we've had a very, very tough reporting period for H1 in this particular year. So work to do there. Some of that definitely driven by the company -- comes straight through on to this revenue line. So you'll be seeing the numbers proportionately in the financials is quite a significant drop off because it's company store revenue and not franchise revenue. There are some closures, which is why you're seeing a growth in -- or a decline in the system-wide number and hence, the difference to like-for-like and system-wide, which really accounts for some of the closures, particularly in the fun dining portfolio, and that's why you see that difference. So the like-for-like number, not far off the casual dining portfolio with the mix, but definitely system-wide filling some of those store closures. The U.K. restaurant sector is very interesting, and it's probably more of a challenge for us as a South African business. And the cost pressures in the U.K. continued to erode sales performance. The consumer is very, very stretched and struggling in terms of how they prioritize their spending and the eating out and eating out has become an expensive conversation, and those conversations are starting to be held at home or using online platforms a lot more. And the consumer patterns have definitely changed, and the market is always highly competitive and that part hasn't changed but we are seeing a definite drop-off in frequency in eating out as a broader market. We're a small player in the market, and those trends haven't been any different for us. The cost base in restaurants is a challenge. The fuel model works differently to SA. So those higher costs come through a lot quicker, and they're not staged, they're not once a month. So you're feeling this constant climbing of prices, and of course, as they head to winter, the consumer is going to be feeling that a lot more. Labor is a significant cost, and that is a knock-on effect of a whole lot of things that have happened in prior years, but government continues to prioritize wages and particularly the new government. So running restaurants, it becomes particularly challenging with the cost on labor and our franchisees are feeling that. And of course, that will have a knock-on effect onto pricing, which is higher than what the consumer is willing to pay. We have worked hard as at the reporting period to rationalize our own cost base, put in a new support structure. So we have taken some of the support services, and we've centralized them. We are doing some other activities around cost control. We still have a need to support the market. So we haven't been able to be overly radical in what we do. We need to continue to service our franchise network, but definitely have rationalized the cost base and working hard on that. And as always, we have to put the consumer at the center of any market that we're in, and the team is very focused around value, convenience and how they talk to the consumer, putting in promotions that are differentiated and experienced -- experience driven, sorry. So that work is continuing in the market and making sure we deliver on value. And the convenience aspect is really driven by a high reliance on delivery aggregators. So we don't have our own delivery platform there. We are reliant on the delivery aggregators as are most of the market players, and that is a particularly high-growth area or remains a high-growth area in that particular market. So really, the cost pressures in the U.K. overall continue to put pressure on the sales performance overall. So before I hand over to Neli, I think really just to summarize, is that we remain absolutely confident that we can remove the drag that Signature Brands is posing from a specific part of the business. U.K. is likely to be challenging in H2 and progress has already been made in AME with notable change likely in H2. So I'm going to hand over to Neli, who will give you a little bit more color on the numbers behind some of the statements. Thanks, Neli.

Thank you, Darren. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. So just to say, our interim results reflect the resilience of our brand portfolio. We're very proud of the strong increase in our free cash flow, and you'll see that there's also improved supply chain profitability. Revenue is under pressure. However, we maintained discipline in managing costs. operating cost increase was below inflation. During this interim reporting period, as Darren has also mentioned, the consumer disposable income was under immense pressure because of the rise in fuel cost as well as the interest rate increase. And beyond South Africa, the persistent cost in the high cost in the U.K. and the economic challenges in Botswana continue to weigh on performance. Although our group results under pressure, they remain resilient, and we executed on our strategy. Now if we take a look at our income statement for the 6 months ended August 2026, revenue increased by 2.3% to ZAR 4.3 billion, and this was mainly supported by the supply chain growth of 5.5%. Our group operating profit, nevertheless, declined by 4.7% to ZAR [ 375 million ] and operating profit margin declined to 8.6%. A significant moderation in our beef and coffee bean prices also provided some relief in terms of our cost of sales. Supply chain operating profit increased by 13.3% to ZAR 230 million. However, this improvement did not necessarily offset operating results from other areas which are underperforming. We maintained tight cost control, where we held our combined administration, marketing and operating expenses broadly flat at ZAR 1.4 billion. Operational efficiency initiatives across the business, lower depreciation and lower employee costs supported this outcome. However, we did experience some higher motor vehicle and fuel costs, which partially offset these savings. The expected credit loss charge increased by ZAR 3.3 million, mainly due to some of our export sales. We spoke to you about the new debt package, which we did in the prior financial year. And those gains have come through in terms of the capital repayments and the lower margins, which reduced our finance cost for our long-term borrowings. However, we -- the lower finance income offset these gains. We recognized a ZAR 41 million goodwill impairment relating to the retail group in Botswana due to the imminent sale of our shareholding interest from 51% to 30%. The transaction remains subject to conditions precedent, including regulatory approvals. I'll talk more about the details further on. The tax charge remained broadly stable at ZAR 96 million compared to the prior period. However, because of the lower profit before tax, it meant our effective tax rate increased due to some loss-making entities in the group. Our total profit for the period declined by 23.4% to ZAR 200 million from ZAR 260 million and headline earnings per share declined by 3.2% to ZAR 2.28 a from ZAR 2.36. If we look at our profit pools in terms of segment of our segment revenue, our revenue increase of the in was mainly driven by South African revenue increasing by 4.5% to ZAR 4.1 billion, and this reinforces that this is the group's primary revenue contributor. From a franchising perspective, leading brands remained resilient with revenue up 2.5% to ZAR 508 million, the turnover or the performance was driven by like-for-like and system-wide turnover. The brands are continuously rolling out new stores. They're innovating on new menus, enhancing loyalty programs, all in response to our consumers' changing preferences. For Signature brand portfolio, they reported a mixed results, and ultimately, the performance does reflect as well as the reduction in the network. Supply chain was the main contributor, increasing 5.5% to ZAR 3.1 billion, which was an uplift of ZAR 165 million, mainly driven by the volume and pricing. This does include the in-sourcing of the Coca-Cola products as well as the frozen retail basket which was not in our prior period volumes. Now for outside SA, the revenue does remain under pressure, where in SADC, revenue is 18% down to ZAR 183 million and this was negatively affected by the continued decline in Botswana, which is weighing down the performance of this segment. Similarly, U.K. revenue declined by 19% and to ZAR 53 million, mainly due to the subdued economy. And lastly, in line with our capital-light model outside South Africa, we have converted the Mauritius network from company-owned restaurants to a franchise model, and this is a continuation of what we did when we converted Kenya in the prior period. This was the main driver for the AME revenue declining from 78% to ZAR 7 million. In terms of our operating profit, the group operating profit declined by 4.7% to ZAR 375 million from ZAR 393 million with the core South African business operations supporting the profitability of the group. Operating profit improvement was driven by the top line operational efficiencies as well as cost management across the business. The leading brands remained resilient, slightly growing its operating profit by 1.2% to ZAR 241 million, driven by the revenue growth I spoke into earlier. And then in Signature brands, the operating loss widened from ZAR 7 million to ZAR 9 million, driven by the performance in some of the brand, particularly the company-owned restaurants. The Supply Chain business operating profit increased by 13.3% to ZAR 230 million, which was an increase of ZAR 27 million, mainly due to the operational efficiencies from the investments that we've made at higher volumes and operating profit margin was improved also by the reduction in overheads and also that our retail segment did reach breakeven point. Global pricing for beef and coffee beans moderating improved the margins -- the gross margins rather in manufacturing. And the infrastructure and technology investments in supply chain contributed to the improved yields, the warehousing and distribution capability under logistics. In terms of our corporate segment, that comprises of intercompany transactions, which also includes leasing arrangements within the group. SADC operating profit decline of 7.8% is mainly due to the ZAR 1.6 million operating loss in Botswana, which compared the business last year, it reported a profit in the same reporting period. AME remained below breakeven, however by this rationalizing and cost management for this division. The group operating profit margin declined by 70 basis points to 8.6% from 9.3% in the period. Leading brands maintained an operating profit of 47.4%, although this was marginally below 48% in the prior period. And supply chain improved its margin from 6.8% and to 7.3%. Our basic earnings per share declined by 23.4% to ZAR 1.81 from ZAR 2.36 per share in this period. Between basic earnings and headline earnings, we adjusted mainly for the retail group impairment of ZAR 41 million. And post the adjustment, our headline earnings per share declined is 3.2% to ZAR 2.28 from ZAR 2.36 per share. If we look at our free cash flow, I think for Famous Brands, just for a reminder, free cash flow for us is cash generated from operations less tax paid and net CapEx. The group presents a very strong cash generated, which underpins our disciplined capital allocation. The free cash flow more than doubled to ZAR 459 million from ZAR 221 million which is a 108% improvement. This level demonstrates a significant improvement in our cash available for capital allocation as well as our second half working capital requirements. Our capital expenditure was reduced by 73% to ZAR 38 million from ZAR 140 million in August 2025. The group adopted a more selective investment approach, thus contributing to the improved levels in our free cash flow. From a prior period, if you were to compare the results, our spend was higher, mainly due to the funds spent on the development of the Midrand Cold Storage facility. In this period, the investments remain focused for leading brands into consumer-facing technology as well as the network support and then supply chain into the infrastructure. Our investments are circumspect and they are channeled towards achieving our strategy. The historical trend of our dividends, you'd see that from -- for interim dividends, we're increasing from ZAR 1.30 in 2022 to ZAR 1.62 per share in 2025 with an average payout of about 66%, and this was supported by the group's financial performance and strong free cash flow generation. For these interim results, we grew our dividend by 4.9% to ZAR 1.17 per share with a total dividend growth of 6.9% over the last 5 years. Our cash generated from operations if we look at our cash flow increased by 19.5% to ZAR 564 million, supporting capital investments, the debt repayments as well as shareholder distributions. The net working capital movements that contributed to this increase include a ZAR 90 million reduction in levels of our inventory holding which also includes the in-sourced products. Our trade payables reduced in line with the supply chain procurement activity. And lastly, our trade and other receivables increase was mainly driven by prepayments as well as other receivables. We then proceeded to pay interest on our debt facility as well as our tax to our revenue authorities. With the cash available, we allocated capital to investing ZAR 38 million to capital projects for routine maintenance enhancements as well as risk management, and we paid ZAR 90 million for mandate debt repayments, including our right to use the assets in our operations. We distributed ZAR 57 million to shareholders through our repurchase program, which was the first one that we've done as Famous Brands. And lastly, ZAR 262 million cash dividend was distributed to Famous Brands and noncontrolling shareholders. After all cash movements, our closing cash balance is ZAR 351 million compared to an opening balance of ZAR 378 million. A part of the decline was mainly -- was partly attributed to the reclassification of retail group cash and cash equivalents to assets held for sale. In addition to our closing cash balance, we have access to ZAR 352 million in undrawn borrowing credit facilities, indicating that the business has sufficient liquidity and flexibility. The business has sufficient funding for investments. Darren also spoke earlier about the transaction that we are -- imminent transaction on Botswana so what we're doing here is in line with our capital-light expansion. We are reducing our equity shareholding in that market. So Famous Brands will reduce its shareholding in Retail Group from 51% to 30%. And our partners in Botswana will then acquire the 21% shareholding interest. The group will retain economic participation in Botswana through a 30% shareholding interest, and we will continue to receive a master license fee under the existing arrangement. From an accounting perspective, Retail Group is classified as a disposal group held for sale. Rest of Famous Brands recognized the ZAR 41 million goodwill impairment during this period. Following the completion of the transaction, we will seize consolidation and then equity account for the retained interest as an associate. We expect the completion date to be the 28th of February 2027. And as any transaction, it's subject to conditions precedent, including regulatory approvals. And in closing, the South African core business remains resilient and -- but the group is facing some pressure. We are very proud of the strong cash-generating position, which provides us with financial flexibility. The group is advancing its capital-light strategy while retaining access to opportunities in different growth markets. Thank you. And I will hand it back to you, Darren.

Great. Thank you, Neli. So as we head into Q&A, I'd like to just really recap around our business and really focus on our iconic brand portfolio, trusted and scalable business model. And if you put that into context, that underpins why we say we have a brand portfolio that's trusted and a business model is scalable, we opened 48 new restaurants in the reporting period. Our franchise partners invested 67 -- invested in revamps of 67 of their businesses. We opened 4 new drive-throughs in the period. We operate 3,070 restaurants in 21 markets. So our brand portfolio, particularly in those markets outside of SA is driven primarily by Debonairs Pizza, Steers and supplemented by Mugg & Bean. So a very focused portfolio outside of South Africa. Our franchise partners are becoming multiple operators. The market has changed out there. Our franchise partners are changing with that and the majority of them now own more than one restaurant, and that's that has evolved over time in line with market conditions. And our franchise partners are loyal and they stay with us and they invest with us. They often have other businesses, and we're very, very proud of the relationships that we have with them and the way they continue to see our business. They're an important part of our business nothing happens in our business unless the sale is made at a restaurant, and that really puts them in that spot where they're very, very important to us, and our business is focused around franchising and our franchise partners. So I'm going to head into Q&A. Our colleague Ntando is going to direct the questions at either Neli or I, and hopefully, we'll be able to answer them easily. And overlooking as there, sorry, is Victor, our franchise partner from the South Coast of Kasedin. So it's always good to be thinking about our franchise partners at this time.

Thanks, Darren and Neli. We do have a bit to go through. So I'll just jump straight into it. We have a question from [indiscernible] from Patient Securities. So there's a lot of related questions just for interest, Darren and Neli. So if you can provide some colors you expand because you'll be answering a lot of the questions. Neli, there is a bit of an interest on the corporate costs which actually rose to ZAR 75 million from ZAR 47 million. Probably if you can give us some color on how much of that is one-off? And how should we look at the corporate cost line in H2?

Thanks, Ntando. So what we've got in our corporate cost is, I would say, is part of intercompany transactions that I've mentioned, which also includes some of our leasing arrangements. So that is now coming through that we have finalized what the structure is because we had, as we mentioned, we built the coastal facility for efficiency in terms of our operations. And that benefit is now going to start coming through. And then also, there were some of the costs, which related to our share-based payments, which we've now also just working through all of that. And then lastly, I think there was also a GBK number that was in there. So that also just created a bit of a cushion in the prior reporting period.

Well, maybe I can just add that number that's in there is pretty much where the costs are -- have been historically. It's kind of a number that we're working on here.

Okay. So Neli, while you still have the mic, I'll probably give you 2 more questions. One from [indiscernible] from Laurium Capital. CapEx outlook, F '27, how is that looking?

So we still remain quite circumspect, Ntando, in terms of our investments. So the levels of which we would look at compared to prior period, we were mainly focusing on about 2% of revenue. So we're trying to make sure that we stay within that that range. And when we spoke to the market in H2 last year, we said we're looking at numbers of between ZAR 150 million and ZAR 180 million. And that's the range we still want to try and able to work in for the H2 period. So we're not anticipating being higher than ZAR 180 million.

Okay. And then another question from Anthony Clark, a small top daily research. I mean, with lower finance cost as debt, you're slowly reducing, improving your balance sheet. You did a ZAR 57 million share buyback in this period. So with the share price under pressure, will you be accelerating on share buybacks? .

So share buyback is one of our capital allocation levers, right? And we will also look at the opportunities of what is making sense at that point from a business perspective. And so where we -- what is the highest and best use in terms of cash that's available is one of those levers that we would look to pull with the funds that we've got access to.

Okay. Thanks for that. So probably, let's go to Nick Wilson, Use 24. Darren, probably this one is for you. In May this year, Famous Brands indicated that it was going to aggressively expand on drive-thrus. In today's results, only 4 have been added. There are consent that Famous Brands is losing traction to international. Can we expect Famous Brands to significantly ramp up drive-thru rollout? Is there anything that's holding you back, like retail space, if you can provide some color there?

Yes. I mean I'm not sure where those concerns would be coming from us. I think we've been very open on from the beginning around certainly post COVID that we were lagging behind in the drive-thru space. I mean we put it out there. We identified that. I think the market shifted quite significantly post COVID as well. So we know that we're underrepresented in the market, and we're working on closing that gap. I mean the progress has to be slow and steady because the opportunities are important to be the right ones. You can't just grab anything out there. I definitely don't agree with Nick that it's lack of retail space. In fact, the retail space market is very buoyant, really about choosing the right one, I suppose, because you can get it wrong. I'm starting to feel that there's probably more opportunities in terms of real estate, then actually, there are going to be consumers at this point, but that's just on the view that we have currently. So choosing the right ones are important, and we would absolutely like to continue to accelerate that growth. It's not where we want it to be yet. We're working hard at that. So the number of 4 is not necessarily an exciting number for us, but we're really pointing out that it's in support to the strategy. You have a big network like steers that already has presence. So you can't necessarily just say, well, I'm just going to open a drought. So you've got to consider what else you have in the area. And of course, competitors may be in the area. So Nick, probably the other way around is I would think competitors may be feeling a little bit more uncomfortable with the fact that we are targeting these spaces. But what one would obviously want and prefer is that the market is growing faster and big enough to make space for more people rather than creating competitive intensity. So yes, we're excited about it, and I think we are the aggressor in the market, so to speak.