Landis+Gyr Group AG (LAND) Earnings Call Transcript
October 29, 2026
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Welcome to the Landis+Gyr Half Year 2026 Results Presentation. Please note that the call will be recorded. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the call over to Christian Waelti, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, good evening, everyone. I'm Christian Waelti, Head of Investor Relations. I'm joined today by Peter Mainz, our CEO; and by Davinder Athwal, our CFO. Today, we will review Landis+Gyr's results for the second quarter and first half of fiscal year 2026. We will follow the structure of the presentation and conclude with Q&A. Before I hand it over, please take a moment to review the disclaimer on Slide 2. Peter, over to you.
Thank you, Christian. Good afternoon, and good evening, everyone. I'm here with Davinder, our Chief Financial Officer, and we are pleased to provide you with an update on our first half performance. With that said, let's now start with a review of the strategic developments over the past months. Move to Slide 3. We made important strategic progress during the first half. We closed the EMEA divestiture in April and hosted our Capital Markets Day in New York in June introducing our new segment structure around connected platforms and grid intelligence and our midterm targets through fiscal 2028. We also strengthened the leadership team with seasoned executives. Rocky Martin for Connected Platform segment and Eugene Masso for Grid Intelligence. And our teams continued the preparations toward a potential U.S. listing while retaining the Swiss listing as we aim to better align our capital markets presence with the majority of up our operational business activity. In the first half, we also returned $162 million to shareholders through buyback and dividends. Just this week, we concluded the share buyback ahead of schedule repurchasing 10% of our share capital over the last 12 months as promised with the announcement of the EMEA divestment in October 2025. Move on to Slide 4. Let's start with the highlight of the week. On Monday, we announced a $509 million contract with a major U.S. investor-owned utility. The timing of large project awards like this is inherently difficult to predict. And while we would, of course, have welcomed the order in the first half. What matters most is that we are winning significant business demonstrating customers' confidence in Landis+Gyr and in particular, in our leading grid edge technology. Our order backlog stood at $3.7 billion on September 30, and as of now, surpassed $4.2 billion, reaching another record level. This validates the record pipeline we previously discussed and shows its continued conversion through order intake into backlog. Turning to our first half performance. Net revenue of $501.4 million was in line with our expectations and driven by project transitioning timing as guided earlier in the year in May. Adjusted gross profit was $189.2 million and adjusted gross margin reached a record 37.7%, driven by operating efficiencies. Adjusted EBITDA also grew and was $73.9 million, representing a margin of 14.7%, a significant improvement over previous year. Operating cash flow was $74 million, up 220% year-over-year, while diluted EPS from continued operations was $1.84, up 263%. With our first half performance, progressing exactly in line with the anticipated revenue profile, we're confirming our midterm revenue guidance for the year while also narrowing fiscal year 2026 guidance range. In light of our first half performance and the strength of our order backlog, we are also raising our adjusted EBITDA margin guidance. With that, I'll hand it over to Davinder for the financial details. Let's move to Slide 5.
Thanks, Peter. Hello, everyone, and thanks for joining us today. In my remarks today, I'll be covering order entry and backlog. The results of operations for the second quarter and first half of fiscal year 2026 as well as liquidity and leverage. Starting with order intake and backlog on Slide 5. First half order intake was $337 million, including $221 million in connected platforms and $116 million of in Grid Intelligence. Following the September close, we secured a $509 million contract award in October. Including that award, order intake for the year-to-date period was $846 million or 42% above the first half and fiscal 2026 comparison shown in the presentation. Backlog at September were $3.7 billion comprising $2.1 billion in connected platforms and $1.6 billion of Grid Intelligence, including the October award, backlog would have been approximately $4.2 billion or 6% above September 30, 2025. As Peter mentioned, we continue to see strong pipeline activity, which have reached record levels. Turning to our second quarter results on Slide 6. Order intake was $170.3 million, and the trailing 12-month book-to-bill ratio was 0.8x. Revenue was $269.2 million, down 6% year-over-year as expected due to deployment timing. Importantly, profitability continued to improve. Adjusted gross margin reached 38%, up 460 basis points from the prior year quarter, driving adjusted growth profit 6.8% higher despite the decline in revenue. The improvement reflects continued operational efficiencies and a favorable product mix within connected platforms. Looking now at our first half results on Slide 7. For the first half, revenue was $501.4 million, down 6.3% from $535.3 million in the prior year period. Despite the lower revenue, adjusted gross margin increased 370 basis points to 37.7%, driving adjusted gross profit up 4%. That improvement also carried through to EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA margin increased 140 basis points to 14.7%, with adjusted EBITDA increasing 3.5% to $73.9 million. So while revenue was lower in the first half, the underlying profitability of the business improved meaningfully. Looking now at segment performance and starting with connected platforms on Slide 8. Order intake was $220.9 million, with trading 12-month book-to-bill ratio of 0.6x. Revenue was $363.7 million, down 9.3%, primarily reflecting the timing of project deployments. At the same time, adjusted gross margin improved significantly, increasing 810 basis points to 36.9%, driven by operational efficiencies and a favorable customer mix. Moving on Slide 9 in Grid Intelligence, order intake was $116.4 million, with trailing 12-month book-to-bill ratio of 0.8x. Revenue increased 2.6% to $137.7 million driven primarily by the growing installed base of Revelo annual recurring revenue reached $223 million, representing 8% annualized growth. Adjusted gross margin was 40%, down 600 basis points, primarily reflecting onetime revenue mix effects in the second quarter. Finally, let's take a look at cash flow, net debt and leverage on Slide 10. We started the fiscal year with net debt of $198.9 million, a leverage of 0.9x the trading call month adjusted EBITDA. During the first half, we generated $74 million of operating cash flow and invested $13.7 million in capital expenditures. We also returned $162.7 million to shareholders comprising $41.5 million of dividends and $121.2 million of share repurchases. Net proceeds from the EMEA divestment were $97.5 million, while other net changes were $54.3 million. As a result, net debt at September 30 was $258.1 million with leverage of 1.5x. As a reminder, the leverage calculation continues to include adjusted EBITDA from divested EMEA business. That concludes my prepared remarks. Thank you again for joining us today and for your continued interest in Landis+Gyr. I'll now hand it back to Peter to take you through our fiscal 2026 guidance and midterm targets.
Thank you, Davinder. And let's move on to Slide 11. Based on our solid first half performance, we are narrowing fiscal 2026 net revenue guidance to $1.085 billion to $1.115 billion from the previous range of $1.075 billion to $1.125 billion. The midpoint of the range remains unchanged at $1.1 billion, supported by the ramp-up of large contracts we see a significant acceleration in revenue in second half. Based on the continued progress in operating efficiency, we are raising our fiscal 2026 adjusted EBITDA margin guidance to 15% to 16% and from previously 14.5% to 15.5%. Moving to Slide 12. As a reminder, our midterm target through fiscal 2028 remain unchanged, and as presented at the Capital Markets Day back in June. From fiscal 2025 through fiscal 2028, we target a mid-single-digit revenue CAGR and a group gross margin of approximately 35% or higher. We target adjusted EBITDA CAGR at 2x revenue CAGR and adjusted EPS CAGR at more than 5x revenue CAGR. This concludes my prepared remarks, and we are now very happy to answer your questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Akash Gupta with JPMorgan.
I got a few and I'll ask one at a time. My first one is on pipeline for orders and large ones, especially after this booking this exceptionally large orders early in the week. I mean we have still 5 more months to go in current fiscal year. And again, I appreciate these large orders are quite lumpy, maybe if you have to assign a likelihood of probability, I mean, curious to hear your thoughts on how does the pipeline look like? And could we see something more in the remaining course of the year? Or do you expect more in the next fiscal year?
Akash, thank you. Obviously, as we try to explain some of those large -- especially larger orders are very difficult to predict at what time they come, but we still -- no matter what, we really like them. But when you look at the order intake of the $509 million and what we had achieved in the first half you can assume that we're clearly on the path to have a book-to-bill ratio for the year that is substantially in excess of one and consistently, what I say in -- after the first quarter at the end of July, we continue to look at the record pipeline and what I really liked about this win, it's not just talking about a record pipeline. It's about orders coming out of the record pipeline going into our backlog. So I really look at that as a validation and a record pipeline that we are looking at is still in place, and there is still a tremendous amount of activity that really validates, I think, the tailwinds that we're finally seeing in our industry.
And maybe just a follow-up on this order. Are you going to book it entirely in connected platforms or it will be split between the 2 segments just for housekeeping purposes to put that into our numbers?
Like every order, it will be split in both segments. This specific one as probably not the percentage ratio of grid intelligence as some of the other orders, but it will -- it will go in the backlog for both segments.
And my second one is on input cost dynamics. I think it is a bit increasing your raising guidance at a time when we hear some concerns in the market on input cost and also some potential supply chain bottlenecks given the big AI investments creating bottleneck for other industries. So maybe if you can talk about what do you see on raw materials, supply chain and input cost. And when we look at this margin upgrade today, where is it coming from compared to your prior expectations?
So obviously, a big driver for us when we give guidance for 6 months, all of that is in our backlog. So we have very good visibility on the profitability over the next 6 months. So that is really the driver for increasing our guidance to be very clear here. Obviously, when you look at our Grid Intelligence product, it is really a product that contains a memory and contains processing power and those components have gone up over the last couple of months substantially and some of those costs in the second half starts to hit. And like every other industry, we've been working diligently from the month of April, the beginning of our fiscal year when we understood that this was coming, that we need to continue to work with customers and increase our prices to get compensated for the value increase that is coming from memory chips and coming from processing costs as well. The availability -- sorry, just on the -- you also had a point, sorry for interrupting you. You had a point on the availability of parts and comment. I can clearly say that but the people in supply chain, they had to work more diligently and providing the supply in the first 6 months. So it didn't impact us with any issues in the first half. I expect them to continue to work diligently in the second half but we have really good visibility on what we're executing in the second half to have that available.
And the last one is just more on the phasing of revenues in second half. So again, if you look at implied second half revenues, you're guiding for $600 million in second half, which is down 5% year-on-year. And maybe any commentary between Q3 and Q4, the phasing of this revenue, like should we expect Q4 to be more like flattish and Q3 down given the phasing effect? Or do you expect similar growth in Q3, Q4?
So I think the pattern -- that pattern described is actually the pattern we laid out at the very beginning of the year. We said we were transitioning to a contract in Canada, transitioning is starting in this quarter, Q3. And in the fourth quarter, it will ramp up to a full deployment scale. So what you have laid out is very consistent how we depicted the revenue profile throughout the year. And obviously, also Q3 is always the shortest quarter in any given year. But that profile matches with what we've laid out and with our expectations. .
So you mean similar 5% decline in Q3, Q4 revenues?
Sorry, you depicted the 2 different profile, I'm not referring to the first one.
Our next question comes from Patrick Rafaisz at UBS.
Two or three questions from me as well. The first one would be sort of follow-up specifically to the connected platforms and the strong margin performance there. You talked about operating efficiency and mix as you mix means more in the revenue. But can you maybe elaborate a bit and also give more color on these individual components, how much they contributed.
So a couple of things. On the price increases hitting the first half results, price increases being on the components in the first half that included very little of that. As I said, it's really starting to hit our canal and hit our cost base in actually this quarter, beginning this quarter, middle of this quarter and then in the fourth quarter. So that is what we see on the material cost side. On the mix side, I would probably more say as we articulated on the Rebel, as you alluded, we are clearly going down the learning curve as this product that was early on in the cost curve, we continue to go down this cost curve dramatically and perhaps a bit faster than we had anticipated. It is an electronic product. Volume is the name of the game. And as it continues to raise, it replace other products that continues to show also consistent in how we have anticipated it so that it continues to be a big driver for us. a new product early on in the cost down curve and we'll continue to execute on that curve and perhaps a bit faster than we anticipated at the beginning of the year.
Okay. Great. And then the same question for Grid Intelligence. You mentioned here, I think, Davinder, you mentioned the onetime mix effect here that impacted the gross profit margin. Can you explain that as well, please? .
Patrick, good to hear from you. Yes, it's actually, I would think about it like this, Patrick. So this is an anomalous quarter right, where we just happen to have a mix that's not representative of our typical business profile in that segment. So we saw that in this quarter, but we expect that going to kind of normalize over the balance of the year.
Okay. So really an isolated quarterly.
That we had early exactly. Yes. And in our Capital Markets Day, we laid out a 50% gross margin goal for that segment, and we continue to remain on the journey to the 50% margin over the...
Over the 3-year period, correct.
Okay. Good. And then the third one would be, when you talked about strategic progress, you also mentioned the U.S. listing. Can you update us maybe on what you think about the time line here for going live?
I'd prefer to stay away from a time line, as you know, you always need a market that is opportune to continue to do that, and it's in best interest of every shareholder. But the preparation is progressing well, and I stay focused on progressing on the preparation for a listing in the U.S.
Okay. Good. Understood. And then I'll let slip in a last one. Just I realize right with the large order win you're ahead of last year and you already said book-to-bill will be well above 1 but still wondering on the strong decline year-on-year in orders. Is there anything we have to read into on the base business or the recurring business? Or is that also just quarterly volatility? .
There is a bit volatility. Again, in a very short quarter. There was a couple of hundred million dollar deals that can impact it one way or the other. And 3 weeks after close of the month, the picture looks completely different. So that is a bit the nature of the business. This is great news, regardless if it's 3 weeks earlier or 3 weeks or later. This is just quite great news with it. That's the volatility we are used to, if you want to call it volatility. That's why we look at order intake on a longer period of time than a quarter. So that is -- there is nothing but good news in that one.
Our next question comes from Sean Milligan at Needham & Co.
First, I wanted to focus on the gas meter side. I'd like to get your perspective on like where ultrasonic gas meter penetration stands today? And sort of how you see that market evolving over the next 1 to 2 years for you?
Sean, thank you for the question. Gas is for us an excellent opportunity that we have entered a couple of years ago. Also with our ultrasound gas meter offering. And again, as a reminder, nobody has sold more ultrasonic gas meters than we have, and we've done that predominantly in Europe, but we transitioned that offering now over to the U.S. We had already served gas utilities, in particular, in the shape of combination utilities, electric and gas is a very common one. A lot of those utilities have a communications umbrella that is provided by Landis+Gyr across electric and gas. So we're quite excited that we can also now fit the leading ultrasonic gas portfolio under our network and also provide a solution to other gas utilities. And gas, as I said, 2 years ago, it was not perceived. It was perceived as a transitory energy, resource and now it's really a destination energy resource, and we have seen a research and investment in gas and also on the gas side. So we quite like where we are positioned. And certainly from our starting point. We are quite excited where we can go in the gas business in North America. And as a reminder, in some of the APAC regions where we participate we are already and continue to be a leading player in gas there already today.
Okay, Peter. And then on the grid intelligence side. So as you continue scaling the connected device space, how should investors think about recurring revenue software per endpoint? Is that a good metric to use? Is that increasing is that going to increase over the next couple of years? Or is it more about just growing the number of connected endpoints for you to drive grid intelligence higher? .
So it's a combination of the both. Obviously, that's why we are running so fast to get Revelo into the ground because they are the basic foundation of the growth for grid intelligence. But then obviously, once that platform is in the ground, we also want to increase the value per end point in particular, if you think about the duration of our contracts 10, 15 years, if we have the platform in place, that should be the second lever. Platform in place, deploy grid intelligence and then grow also the value per end point around grid intelligence.
But we're still relatively early in the like Grid Intelligence revenue opportunity per endpoint. Is that the right way to think about it? Like it's still very early innings in that regard.
I think we make very nice revenue on the number of endpoints that we have deployed already today. I think we are well in excess. When I just stay with the Revalo product, we have well in excess of $5 million of those deployed and delivering value today that carries a substantial amount of great intelligence recurring revenue as we speak. So I would say a big driver for that to see it in our numbers is still converting the $15 million -- sorry, 15 million units of Revalo continue to swiftly deploy them and from the pipeline continue from the pipeline fill our backlog and get that out. So I think over the next couple of years, that will be the main growth driver that is visible and then we'll also start to see how the value pinpoint continues to grow around grid intelligence as well.
This concludes the Q&A session. I would now like to hand back to management for closing remarks.
Thank you again for joining us today. Very much appreciate the time and interest in Landis+Gyr. Look forward to meeting all of you soon, either virtually or in person. Goodbye, and have a great day. Thank you.
This concludes today's call. Thank you, everyone, for joining. You may now disconnect.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Landis+Gyr Group AG transcript - plus 258,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.
Get an API key View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Landis+Gyr Group AG earnings transcripts and 258,000+ others is available through the
EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server.
Quarterly plans from $145 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search,
and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.