Urban One, Inc. (UONEK) Earnings Call Transcript
August 4, 2026
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Urban One 2026 Second Quarter Earnings Call. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. We will begin this call with the following safe harbor statement. During this conference call, Urban One will be sharing with you certain projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events or its future performance. Urban One cautions you that certain factors, including risks and uncertainties referred to in the 10-Ks, 10-Qs and other reports periodically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission could cause the company's actual results to differ materially from those indicated by its projections or forward-looking statements. This call will present information as of August 4, 2026. Please note that Urban One disclaims any duty to update any forward-looking statements made in the presentation. In this call, Urban One may also discuss some non-GAAP financial measures in talking about its performance. These measures will be reconciled to GAAP either during the course of this call or in the company's press release, which can be found on its website at www.urban1.com. A replay of the conference call will be available from 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time, August 4, 2026, until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, August 11, 2026. Callers may access the replay by calling 1 (800) 770-2030. International callers may dial direct 1 (609) 800-9909. The replay access code is 3701023. Access to live audio and the replay of the conference will also be available on Urban One's corporate website at www.urban1.com. The replay will be made available on the website for 7 days after the call. No other recordings or copies of this call are authorized or may be relied upon. I will now turn the call over to Alfred C. Liggins, Chief Executive Officer of Urban One, who is joined by Peter Thompson, Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Liggins, please go ahead.
[Audio Gap] Also joining us as usual is Jody Drewer, our Chief Financial Officer of TV One; Chris Simpson, our General Counsel; and Karen Wishart, Administrative Officer. As you've seen in the press release and the results that have come out, we have seen sequential improvements over Q1, but still we are in a rate of decline, less decline than Q1, but however, still a tough first half of the year. We are expecting things to pick up as we go into -- move into Q3 as political starts to become more and more of a factor in our numbers. We -- even though it's an unknown, we're hopeful because of competitive races in Ohio, Texas, Georgia, North Carolina, and Indiana. During the quarter, we have continued to reduce our leverage with market repurchases of our debt. We spent about $23.5 million purchasing our 2031 second lien notes at an average price of approximately 42 cents on the dollar. That's about a $60.2 million long-term debt reduction and an annual interest savings of $4.6 million. However, because of the weak first half of the year, we have decided to adjust our guidance down from 60 to the mid-50s, even though we still don't know exactly where political is going to come out. And also, we closed on our Dallas acquisition. I believe that was on August 17. And that's off to a good start. That's going to contribute significantly to the last 5.5 months. There's potential upside there, but still out of an abundance of caution and trying to be more accurate, we elected to bring the guide down. That could change. But at this point in time, we're seeing mid-50s. I'm going to turn it over to Peter to go into the details of the numbers, and then we can open it up for Q&A. Peter?
Thanks, Alfred. So consolidated net revenues for the 3 months ended June 30, '26, was approximately $85.8 million, which was a 6.4% decrease year-over-year. Net revenue for the Radio Broadcasting segment was $35.3 million, a decrease of 3.9% year-over-year. Excluding political, net revenue for Radio was down 6.6% year-over-year. According to Miller Kaplan, our local ad sales were down 10.1% if the market was down 7.8% and our national advertising sales were down 1.5% against the market that was down 4.6%. So we outperformed on national and underperformed a little on local. Our largest ad category was services, which was down approximately 0.7%, primarily due to legal services. Government public category was up 14.5% as a result of political spending and telecommunications category was up 16.9%. All the other major categories were down in the quarter. Net revenue for Reach Media was $4.8 million in the second quarter, a decline of 10.6% from the prior year. Adjusted EBITDA Reach was a loss of $1 million. And we just continue to see declines in network revenue available for us to participate in. Net revenue for Digital segment was down 8.4% at $9.4 million. The decrease was driven by a decrease in national direct revenue streams as a result of reductions in DEI-focused spending and lower client spending in general due to macroeconomic concerns. We recognized approximately $37.1 million of revenue from our Cable Television segment during the quarter, a decrease of 7.4%. Cable Television advertising sales were down 9.6% against strong competition from the NBA playoffs and that contributed to Prime delivery declines of 21% year-over-year versus 25-54. And this, along with a continued weak scatter market led to more commercial units continuing to be allocated to direct response at lower average unit rate. Cable Television affiliate revenue was down by 4.5%, driven by subscriber churn as linear cable continues to decline, and that was partially offset by an increase in subscriber rates. Traditional linear cable TV subscribers at TV One, as measured by Nielsen, finished Q2 at 27.3 million compared to 34.3 million at the end of Q2 '25. Inclusive of virtual subscribers, TV One finished with 30.5 million Nielsen subscribers compared to 35.4 million in the second quarter of 2025, decline obviously being driven by linear churn. CLEO TV had 27.2 million traditional linear Nielsen subs and 31.1 million inclusive of virtual subscribers. Through the first 4 weeks of Q3 2026, TV One is up by 4% in Prime versus 25-54 delivery compared to Q2 2026 and only down 3% compared to Q3 2025. Operating expenses, excluding depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation and impairment charges were approximately $75 million for the few months, compared to approximately $78.1 million for the comparable period in 2025. This decrease was mainly driven by sales and marketing expense decreases in the operating segments. Radio expenses were down by 1.6% or $0.5 million, driven primarily by lower revenue and lower bad debt reserves, so lower expenses that connected to revenue, sales commission, et cetera. Reach operating expenses were down 17% or $1.2 million, primarily due to lower bad debt reserves. Operating expenses in the Digital segment were down 8.7%, driven by a decrease in traffic acquisition costs, commissions, headcount savings and bad debt reserves. Operating expenses in the Cable Television segment were up 4.1%, driven by a combination of programming expenses and accounting for new executive agreements at TV One. Operating expenses in corporate down by approximately 16.7%, driven by lower professional service fees and other compensation-related costs. Consolidated adjusted EBITDA was $11.7 million, down 16%. Consolidated broadcast and digital operating income was approximately $22.2 million, a decrease of 13.7% year-over-year. Interest expense in the P&L was down to approximately $2.1 million, down from $9.7 million last year, reflecting the debt repurchase accounting and lower effective interest rates under the Troubled Debt Restructuring laws. We made cash interest payments of approximately $5 million during the quarter. Semiannual cash interest payment for the 2030 and 2031 notes was made on April 1. And the next payment is due on October 1 for the full 180 days of accrued interest, which is approximately $12.1 million. During the 3 months ended June 30, we repurchased approximately $23.5 million of our 2031 second lien notes at a weighted average price of 42% of par debt repurchase of the 2031 second lien notes in the second quarter reduced the outstanding long-term debt balance to $303.2 million. Year-to-date, it's a total reduction in long-term debt of $60.2 million and an annualized interest saving of $4.6 million. Under the troubled debt restructuring accounting and the long-term debt on the balance sheet includes a premium, which amortizes over the remaining term, and we separated that out in the press release, so you can see what that is. We drew an additional $10 million in the second quarter under the asset-backed facility, which resulted in total outstanding balance there of $20 million. We made a further additional draw of $7 million and then during the quarter, and then we just repaid this week $5 million in the third quarter. So we're at $22 million drawn there, and we have current borrowing capacity of an incremental $24.1 million. We recognized approximately $13.9 million of goodwill impairment charge and approximately $300,000 of long-lived asset impairment charges related to Reach Media. We recorded depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $6.2 million, which includes $4.4 million of amortization for the Radio Broadcasting license and TV One trade name. Benefit from income taxes was approximately $1.7 million. We paid cash taxes net of refunds in the amount of approximately $500,000 and capital expenditures for the quarter were approximately $1.7 million. Net loss was approximately $7 million or $1.58 per share compared to a net loss of $77.9 million or $17.41 per share for the second quarter of 2025. During the 3 months, we did not repurchase any shares of Class A common stock, and we repurchased 129,543 shares of Class D common stock for approximately $600,000 at an average price of $4.50. That was under the annual repurchase program for employee stock. We also executed stock vest tax repurchase of 145,513 shares of Class B common stock, which was approximately $700,000 at an average price of $4.52 during the quarter. As of June 30, the current contracted outstanding debt balance was approximately $323.2 million, including the ABL draw. Ended unrestricted cash -- ending unrestricted cash was $15.4 million, resulting in net debt of approximately $307.9 million compared to $46.2 million of LTM reported adjusted EBITDA for a total leverage ratio of 6.66x. As we previously announced in March, we agreed to sell WMXG and WLNK Radio broadcast licenses in Charlotte, North Carolina, to unrelated third parties for approximately $0.7 million and $4.2 million, respectively. We completed both sales on June 1, 2026, and recognized a gain of $4.7 million. In April, we entered into an agreement to acquire Service Broadcasting Group in Dallas, Texas, including radio stations KKDA and KRNB for $22 million. At the same time, we also entered into agreement to sell radio station KZMJ to Fusion Dallas LLC for $6 million. We completed on the sale of KZMJ on July 6 and recognized a gain of $3.2 million in the third quarter. We also completed the acquisition of Service Broadcasting Group on July 17, 2026. With that, I'll hand back to Alfred.
Thank you, Peter. Operator, can you go to the lines for Q&A, please?
[Operator Instructions] Our first question will come from the line of Ben Briggs with StoneX Financial.
So I've got a couple here. So a lot of puts and takes here, but obviously, we've got midterms coming up. I know that you mentioned political is going to be a tailwind. Is there any way you can quantify that or even give some, I guess, relative guidance versus what it was like previously? I know that with the Dallas acquisition, there may be some changes as far as what the political demand looks like...
Yes. That's difficult. That's like -- we don't know yet how much money people are going to spend. I mean, that's -- we won't know until we actually get into the negotiation of it. It's also going to depend on exactly how competitive people think it's going to be. I do know that we've got Radio budgeted at about $11.1 million. And in '22, we did 12 -- basically 13. And so not quite as -- we're not -- we're saying that we're not going to be quite as robust as '22, but...
There was a big...
There was a big Georgia runoff, right? So -- and it was a runoff. So you kind of got 2 bites of the apple. Georgia is expected to be competitive again, right, in the Ossoff race. But there won't be a runoff. And so you just don't know. It's like it's hard to tell. I mean, it feels like it's going to be -- I mean, fortunately, what we can tell -- we can look at polls and see where the races are close, right? Like close in Georgia. They're also -- the governor's race looks close there. Keisha Lance Bottoms, again, I forgot the Republican candidate's name. That looks close. She's supposedly kind of behind the curve on fundraising, which I don't really understand given a competitive race like that, why wouldn't people be throwing money at it. So there's all these wildcards. But anyway, let's just say it's going to be competitive. Indiana is going to be competitive on a -- I think it's a state attorney general's race. Ohio is supposedly competitive with Sherrod Brown trying to reclaim a seat in the Senate. And everybody in the country has been talking about Texas and [ Palo Rico ] versus Paxton. Anything could change, right? The gap could widen and people feel like it's less competitive. I hope that doesn't happen. And then also the other wildcard is how much do advertisers spend with radio versus spending with digital and TV, et cetera. So suffice it to say, it feels like that they're multiple competitive races in places that we have stations. And you're right, Dallas should be different for us because we've got a very strong position against the African-American audience, the Democrats looking more competitive. And so that should bode well for us. But exactly how well for it, I can't -- I can't tell you. And you can find somebody who can actually really predict what the ad dollar market is going to be in this industry. You probably can make money with them on tally sheet.
I will keep that in mind. I will keep that in mind.
But -- so those are the races that we build right now that we feel will help us, right? Yes.
Yes. Yes. I think you said you've got about $11.1 million budgeted for political in fiscal '23 --
Correct.
-- in Radio. Will anything flow through to TV from political?
Yes. I mean TV usually only gets political in a presidential. So digital should see some, but TV, no.
Got it.
That's right.
Are you expecting much in Digital?
I don't remember what the budget is. I think it's maybe a couple of $1 million or something like that or maybe $1 million. Yes, maybe it's $1 million. And so -- and Digital can obviously be geo-targeted, right, so.
Yes, yes. Okay. And then kind of moving along, so I know on the last call, you guys discussed some AM towers that might get sold. Is there anything to report there?
Nothing to report now. It's a process that's ongoing right this second. And we feel good that we're going to have a positive outcome, and we think there'll be a positive outcome this year.
Got it. Okay. And then last one for me is -- so I know you moved guidance from $60 million to mid-50s. I think on the last call, there had been a discussion of about $40 million of free cash flow expectation in 2026. Is it safe to say using the mid-50s EBITDA that it would be about $35 million of free cash flow expectation now? Am I thinking about that the right way?
Yes. There's some more puts and takes on non-cash stuff like ADU burning through that, writing off ADU balances. It's probably lower than that now just because of the composition of how we're getting to the revenue and to the EBITDA number.
Our next question will come from the line of Aaron Watts with Deutsche Bank.
I've got a couple, if I may, around the ad environment. I'll start on the radio side. I see the sequential improvement from first quarter, but I think 2Q came in a little weaker than you had guided us last quarter. I appreciate it's difficult to be around 1 percentage point smart in advance on radio ads. But any factors you'd call out that maybe pushed 2Q a little softer than you had originally anticipated back in May on your last call?
Yes. I mean I think local came in lighter than we thought and we underperformed the market locally. Within that, obviously, there's a whole -- it's not really one category. It was just across the board. And so yes, the pacing that we gave on the last call, we did miss those a little bit. And I think almost all of that was in local.
Anything you'd call out that is right now pushing national to be a bit firmer than local?
Not really. We've been underperforming the marketplace nationally. So I think we just righted that ship a little bit.
Okay. If I look ahead to your 3Q Radio guide down 2.8%, does that compare to the minus 3.9% you just reported in 2Q? And does that imply some firming in the underlying core ad market? Or is that purely the political lift you were -- Alfred, you were kind of talking about a minute ago?
You've got political starting to sweep in there. You've got improvements in our Washington, D.C. market over what it was a year ago based on some format changes. Atlanta is doing better than we thought it in Q3, and that's before political jumped in there. I think I looked at that Atlanta forecast for political, it's not a huge number.
Yes, we don't have a lot of political on the books yet. We've only got $100 million. So the pace in that was more or roughly the same.
Yes. We're struggling in Indianapolis, which has been a struggle all year long. Houston had a great Q1, tough Q2, starting to do better again in Q3 and Q4. We think we took -- we lost the momentum because of World Cup, believe it or not, because so many people, like, took money and put it against that, that we felt like it really hurt us, particularly in Houston.
Okay. That is helpful context. And I guess one last one for me. Shifting over to the TV side. Was it many of those same factors kind of weighing on TV advertising or anything in particular to the TV side that you would call out that pushing that advertising?
TV is more of an inventory problem, more CTV impressions out there, weaker scatter market means that dollars start to default. We're going into upfront now, right? So upfront shows that you've got less advertisers coming for linear. And then when you look at CTV, you've got more impressions because of Netflix and Amazon and then you've got a weaker scatter market. Long story short, it's putting pricing pressure on ad rates, particularly as ad rates start to default to direct response. I mean, I think those are the same kind of macro trends that folks are seeing in the linear cable business. I haven't been following everybody's numbers. But when I see Warner Bros. Discovery report, et cetera, it's kind of similar factors.
Our next question will come from the line of Dennis Pannullo with Lapan Partners.
Most of my questions are actually already answered. I just have one last question. You guys had what about $14.1 million -- this question is for Mr. Thompson, $14.1 million in noncash goodwill and intangibles write-downs. Is that about right?
Yes. That was all in Reach Media. That was all other networks.
Just because of the way you guys word your press releases and don't actually mention or specifically talk about that, what would the bottom line have looked like without that $14.1 million noncash write-down?
Well, look, we added back in adjusted EBITDA because it is noncash. So in the numbers -- in the headline numbers that we look at when we talk about the $11.7 million of adjusted EBITDA, it's already added back there. Obviously, on net loss and EPS and stuff, it's in there, and you would add that back.
Of course, being a -- because a lot of people don't -- some investors probably don't get what EBITDA means. And I think if you broke it down just a little bit clearer for some of the investors, I think it would be helpful. Just my two cents. Again, it's only worth $0.01. We have this noncash issue pretty much every quarter, and it just beats the hell and makes the top line number. When people look at the top line number, they see a loss of like $11 million. And kind of...
Yes. No, those impairments do swamp the numbers. I mean, hopefully, we're cycling through to get that.
And you guys are working hard to get your expenses down, you guys have done a great job with interest expense, obviously, you tweak your -- you become much more efficient in all your operations. And you get no benefit for it because this noncash stuff knocks the c*** out of you guys all the time.
Yes. Look, it's the way that GAAP tells us we do it, and that's what we stick to. What I was saying -- we're cycling through, hopefully, the end of that because we moved our Radio FCC licenses to be amortized. So we made the client [indiscernible] when we amortize them. And so we shouldn't see -- we won't see big impairments there. We've written down all of the goodwill at Reach. So there's not any more to go. So I think I'm hopeful that as we move forward, we shouldn't see nearly as many of the noncash [indiscernible].
And that's actually a great positive. And I'm glad you noted that. All I'm saying is you go into great detail, Radio down X%, TV down X%. You guys go into great detail in your PR, but nowhere in there does it state that there was a noncash charge that made you guys lose $14 million. And that's all I'm saying is that you maybe extrapolate that in your PR a little bit better.
Soon as we notice it. Got it. Yes.
[Operator Instructions] And our next question will come from the line of Adam Jacobson with rbr.com.
I wanted to dive in a little bit more regarding the impairment charges because if you look at the overall numbers and you look at the portrait of Urban One, your net loss was basically reflective of the impairment charge lowering to $14.16 million from $130.08 million. And as the last gentleman noted, the adjusted EBITDA here is certainly very important. And you've been talking a lot about political dollars. But let's move ahead to 2027. Political is cyclical. So what are you -- plans in terms of the overall portrait for Urban One past political? Are you going to be focusing and doubling down on the multicultural story? Are you going to be looking at some of the non-multicultural assets and questioning, well, is there opportunity there? Or is that a nonessential asset? Just wondering what the post-political portrait is for you? Or is that still a little too early to ask?
I think we have shown that we are open to expanding outside of our core African-American targeted demographic, particularly as it relates to our radio operation and in particular, as it relates to markets where we already operate and we're building scale. I think I've said that we believe that, that does give us more arrows in our quiver to help drive local ad solutions for our clients in those local markets, and we've seen success in that. So I think you'll see us continue to do that. Managing political versus nonpolitical years is something that we do like every 2 years. And so we know there won't be political next year like there was a political last year. And so we'll have an operating plan to deal with that. But yes, we believe that there will be further consolidation in the Radio business. We don't have any plans to go outside of our Urban footprint in television at this point. And we look at some digital businesses that would have taken that, but couldn't come to terms on price. So I think the most likely place that, that happens is in Radio because, look, you're in the business. So I'm assuming RBR's Radio Business Report, you know that there's going to be further consolidation. There's a lot of assets for sale. And the key is to be able to acquire something that is delevering, number one, and accretive. And you also got to be able to acquire it at a value level that takes into account that even if you own everything, there's probably still pressure on your top line in a market because there's just pressure against the medium in the advertising space, right? And so -- but look, that's been helpful to us. Houston is our largest market now, and our acquisition of the Cox stations was very beneficial to us there. Dallas was an Urban acquisition, but that was a market where we had -- neither them or us were making any real money. And I think the way we're configured now will actually fix that, right? So we're just trying to be smart about how we do it. By the way, the trail -- the radio consolidation trail is littered with companies that went bankrupt through consolidation just for the sake of consolidation. You have to be very deliberate about it.
This concludes the question-and-answer session. And I'll hand the call back over to Alfred for any closing comments.
Thank you, operator, and thank you for those folks that participated and asked questions. We look forward to speaking with you either offline if you have additional questions or next quarter, and we'll have a better handle on how the year shapes up on the next conference call. Thank you.
This concludes today's call. Thank you again for joining. You may now disconnect.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Urban One, Inc. transcript - plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.
Get an API key View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Urban One, Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the
EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server.
Quarterly plans from $105 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search,
and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.