Flagship Communities Real Estate Investment Trust (MHCUN) Earnings Call Transcript
May 5, 2026
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Good day, everyone, and thanks for joining us. You're listening to the Flagship Communities REIT call covering first-quarter 2026 results. Right now, everyone is in listen-only mode. After the presentation, there will be a short Q&A period for analysts and institutional investors. Please be aware that this call is being recorded. Kurt Keeney, Flagship's President and Chief Executive Officer, is with us today, along with Nathan Smith, Chief Investment Officer, and Eddie Carlisle, Chief Financial Officer. I'd note that remarks on this call might include forward-looking information, which by nature carries risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from the views expressed today. For more detail on those risks and uncertainties, please see the company's relevant filings on SEDAR+. Those documents can also be found on Flagship's website at flagshipcommunities.com. Flagship has also put together a corresponding PowerPoint presentation, and it encourages you to follow along during this call. With that, I'll hand things over to Kurt Keeney. Kurt?
Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for being with us today. We've had a strong beginning to 2026 as we keep executing our strategy of generating growth through organic initiatives as well as disciplined expansion in our core markets. Results for the first quarter show solid growth throughout our portfolio and ongoing progress under our long-term value creation plan. Rental revenue rose 20.6% compared with the same period a year earlier, NOI improved 17.4% over last year, and FFO adjusted and AFFO adjusted were up 12% and 10.4%, respectively, versus last year. We also kept seeing strong growth in same community metrics for the quarter. Same community revenue grew 8.6% over last year, while same community NOI rose 5.3% compared with the first quarter of 2025. Beyond our strong organic performance, we closed a strategic acquisition during the quarter in Cleves, Ohio, which further extends our presence in one of our core markets. That acquisition aligns with our approach of targeting markets we know well and communities that offer occupancy upside potential. Nathan will go into more detail on this transaction and how it fits our broader growth strategy in his remarks.
These financial results give you a picture of the solid fundamentals in our industry and how far we've come on our growth strategy. Performance matters, sure, but our mission stays front and center: delivering affordable housing and outstanding residential living experiences in our adult and family-oriented manufactured housing communities, all while creating value for shareholders. Sustainability is part of who we are, and our sixth annual ESG report lays out our ESG practices and performance — you can find it on our website. We're encouraged by the strides we've made across many areas, including environmental stewardship, community reinvestment, and corporate governance. With that, I'll hand things over to Nathan for his remarks. Nathan?
Thanks, Kurt. Good morning, everyone. We're still seeing robust results throughout our current communities, and we've also been finishing up strategic acquisitions. For us, strong performance starts at the community level. Our core initiatives keep delivering positive outcomes, including gains in occupancy, lot rent, and other revenue streams throughout the portfolio. We're also staying focused on improving the resident experience at our communities. We take real pride in our ongoing investment in amenities, infrastructure upgrades, and community engagement efforts — all of which bolster resident satisfaction and long-term retention. Alongside our emphasis on operational performance, we keep pursuing strategic acquisitions in key markets where we already operate. During the past quarter, we acquired a community with 96 lots in Cleves, Ohio, which further extends our bolt-on strategy and our presence in that market. That deal follows our recent purchase of three communities in the greater Cincinnati area and shows our ongoing emphasis on core markets where we can achieve operational efficiencies and build long-term value. As is true with many of our acquisitions, we see potential to boost performance via future community expansion capable of supporting another 12 lots. The community has also gained from substantial infrastructure improvements, including newly paved streets and solar lot projects.
The property also features upgraded amenities — a big clubhouse, a playground, a ballfield, and basketball courts. Broadly speaking, our attention stays on the operating approach that pairs robust organic expansion with carefully disciplined acquisitions. On that note, I'll hand things to Eddie so he can walk through the financial results in greater detail. Eddie?
Thanks, Nathan, and good morning, everyone. The results we posted for the first quarter show sustained strength throughout the portfolio, powered by organic growth and the contributions of acquisitions completed recently, while we kept the balance sheet conservative. For the quarter, revenue rose 20.6% versus the same period a year earlier, reflecting acquisitions along with lot rent increases across the portfolio. Same community revenue came to $26.9 million in the first quarter, up roughly 8.6% from the comparable period last year. That gain came from higher monthly lot rents and ancillary revenues, together with an increase in same community occupancy. Net operating income was $19.3 million and the NOI margin was 64.5%, versus $16.4 million and 66.2% in the same period last year. Same community NOI margin in the first quarter was 64.2%, down 2% from last year. Although NOI rose on amenity fees, NOI margins took a negative hit because those services carry a lower margin than we have historically achieved. Winter storms in the quarter also weighed significantly on costs and reduced margins. FFO adjusted was $9.6 million and FFO adjusted per unit was 38.1 cents for the quarter, increases of 12% and 11.4% respectively compared with last year.
For the quarter, adjusted AFFO came to $8.6 million, and adjusted AFFO per unit was 34.1 cents — gains of 10.4% and 10%, respectively, versus last year. Same community occupancy reached 84.8%, up 1.4% from the same period a year earlier, which continues to show how committed we are to resident satisfaction and to making sure our communities sit in desirable locations. Rent collections came in at 99.8% for the quarter, which shows the strength and consistency of the MHC sector. As of March 31, total lot occupancy stood at 84.1%, and average monthly lot rent was $516. We stay focused on keeping a conservative balance sheet, with emphasis on long-dated fixed-rate debt. Weighted average mortgage interest rate was 4.54%, and weighted average mortgage term to maturity was eight years. No substantial debt maturities come due before 2030. Total liquidity was $13.2 million. As at March 31, 2026, the REIT holds 21 unencumbered investment properties, with total fair value of $130.7 million. With that, I'll hand things back to Kurt for some closing remarks. Kurt?
Thanks, Eddie. Looking forward, our attention stays on carrying out the strategy and keeping up delivery of long-term value to our unitholders. In the quarter, we took pride in being honored by the Manufactured Housing Institute with the 2026 Manufactured Home Community Operator of the Year Award. That gives Flagship its second Operator of the Year Award in a row and our fifth national Community Operator of the Year recognition from MHI. Such recognition stems directly from how dedicated our team is and how they concentrate on building safe communities that are amenity-driven and vibrant throughout our portfolio. We believe this ongoing emphasis on operational excellence, together with our disciplined growth strategy, puts us in a strong position for a year ahead. Thank you for your time today, and I will now open the line for questions.
Thank you. If you'd like to pose a question, simply press star one one on your phone and hold until your name is called. Should you wish to cancel your question, just press star one one once more. Kindly remain on the line while we put together the Q&A roster. Our opening question is from Tom Callaghan of BMO Capital Markets. Your line is now open.
Appreciate it. Good morning, everyone.
Good morning there, Tom.
Good morning. Perhaps we could begin with occupancy. Compared with Q4 of last year, Q1 came in fairly strong. Is there anything particular worth highlighting regarding what drove that? I know you generally point to growth of 200 to 200 basis points annually, but given how Q1 turned out, would it be fair to think there might be some upside this year?
I believe there's still some runway left on occupancy this year. We saw a bit of seasonality kick in at the end of last year. Sometimes with your home rental fleet you just get a little turnover, and we had a little bit of that at the end of last year. We've re-leased those units. Again, I'm fairly optimistic. Across all of our markets, our occupancy is going to grow within our forecasted range.
Okay, let's shift over to expenses for Eddie. You mentioned that the winter storm affected Q1 to some degree. Is there a way to put a number on how much it pushed expense growth, or to put it another way, how should we view same property expense growth for the rest of this year compared with that Q1 figure in the 15% range?
The first quarter was somewhat unusual in a few respects, mainly involving snow removal along with the labor, repairs, and maintenance tied to it. From my perspective, that came to roughly half a penny to a penny of FFO per unit. The effect was around $250,000, give or take, in added cost year over year. When you look at expenses going forward and want to take that effect out, I'd say that range is probably about right.
Appreciate it. I'll hand it back over and get in line. Thank you all.
Thanks, Tom.
Mark Rothschild from Canaccord has our next question. Your line is open now.
Appreciate it, and morning to everyone.
Good morning there, Mark.
Hey, could you just say a bit about the homes you've been purchasing? How is this going to affect your growth over the next year? I think you bought roughly 150 homes in the quarter. Do you expect to do much more of this, and how should we think about that?
Mark, we had a bit of trouble hearing you, but I believe your question was about the rental home fleet we added during the first quarter. Each year, our goal is to work toward reducing that rental home fleet as a share of total occupancy. We see it as a necessary tool in the shed, though we view homeownership as the better tool. In the first quarter, we increased occupancy both by releasing rental homes and through home sales. What we've done with that rental fleet is high-grade the existing fleet, and we're looking to sell off the older units. Again, I'm not sure we'd add a lot more to the fleet this year, but I'm certain we will as we manage the individual sites. Sometimes, when you bring these sites up to 98% occupied — right now about 40 of our communities sit at historically high occupancy standards, if not 98% to 100% — when you look at that, for those last 2%, sometimes a rental home has to go in to bring them up to full occupancy.
Great, thank you. Perhaps just one more question building on what we discussed regarding expenses. Given how heavily Q1 was affected by weather, should we anticipate, with everything else held constant, a stronger same property NOI growth rate over the remainder of 2026?
I've always believed we can reach upper single-digit to low double-digit growth in property NOI on that same base. Part of the slowdown is clearly because the year-over-year rollout of our cable agreements is now catching up with itself, right? As we sit here for 2026, there aren't any further agreements going into effect. We'll keep pushing on that, and it could provide some support. I definitely think we can return to upper single-digit figures going forward.
Perfect — I really appreciate it.
Appreciate it.
We move on to a question from Kyle Stanley at Desjardins. Your line is open now.
Appreciate it. Morning, everyone.
Good morning, everyone.
Kyle.
I'd like to turn now to the home sales side. How have home sales been in the early part of this year? I know there's usually some seasonality and strength early in the year, especially after tax time. I'm just curious how that's played out so far this year and perhaps how it stacks up against prior years.
Home sales came in strong during the first quarter, and that momentum has carried over into April as well. What you did notice, however, is that weather affected our ability to get homes shipped out. Honestly, I believe first-quarter home sales would have been even better had we been able to get the houses onto the lot. Kyle, there were many occasions when they went 10 days without shipping a single home, because you simply can't ship homes when there's snow on the ground in the Midwest. This isn't Canada, where you're used to doing that regularly. Kentucky has three snow plows, and Tennessee has zero. That does create a bit of a problem. I felt very good about the first-quarter home sales given the comparison we were up against.
All right, thanks for taking that. I might circle back to the rental fleet for one more point. I noticed a rental fleet maintenance technician team has been set up. I'm just curious — could you say a bit more about it? Did that need simply arise because the rental fleet is larger? I'd like to understand how we should think about it.
We're simply aiming to operate with greater efficiency. Once more, when we own a rental home, the goal is to deliver a solid product, and we've dedicated team members specifically to ensure that happens and to get those units turned around more quickly. On the CapEx side, it's more efficient with them. That's one of the advantages we enjoy because, once again, we follow this bolt-on spoke-and-wheel type of approach, correct? In Louisville, there are 15 locations. You can have them all situated within 30 minutes of downtown Louisville, and that pattern repeats across many of our markets. You're able to capture these moments of efficiency, which improves our margins, and again, that comes down to us overseeing it and being the operators we are.
I just want to get some clarity — previously, when a rental unit changed over, how was that handled? Did you outsource it to another party, or what?
In the past, we would typically bring in a subcontractor to handle whatever work was required to turn that unit. What we've attempted to do—and this ties to Kurt's point—is for two reasons: first, for timeliness, it can sometimes be difficult to get the contractor out there and get that turned in a timely manner, which leaves us with a vacant rental for a longer stretch; having our own crew means it can be completed faster, and it also means it can be done in a more cost-efficient way.
Great, that covers everything on my end. I'll hand it back over. Thanks, everyone.
Himanshu Gupta from Scotiabank has our next question. Your line is open now.
Thanks — and good morning, everyone.
Good morning there, Himanshu.
Regarding same-community NOI, Q1 came in at a mid single digit rate, and Eddie, I believe you cited high single digit. I'd like some clarity here: does that reflect what you expect across the entire year, or does it describe what you're observing from Q2 through Q4 going forward, in that high single digit ballpark?
My expectation is roughly that from Q2 through Q4, that momentum will begin building again and opex will look closer to historical levels. Since we now have fuller seats on the manager side, payroll and benefits will push opex somewhat higher, as more of those seats are filled. It raises your opex figures, yes, but it also lets us drive occupancy, correct? Part of why you struggle at times to hold or grow occupancies is lacking managers in seats to assist with home sales or unit rentals. I believe we'll keep seeing the payoff, yet on the opex side you'll see it a bit elevated in payroll and benefits since those seats are full. From Q2 through Q4, I think we can return to the higher single digits. For the full year, probably around the mid single digits.
Understood — that’s quite impressive. Thanks. For my final question: you received the Operator of the Year Award. On the operations side, what are you doing that sets you apart from everyone else? What do you believe earned you that recognition?
That's something we're keeping to ourselves on this call. If we revealed it, our competitors would learn what they're getting wrong. One thing I'd point to is that the industry watches how we've brought home sales into our communities, since we're a one-stop shop — and that only works when your communities sit very close to each other. As I often put it, having one in Houston, Texas, one in San Francisco, and one in Baltimore won't get you truly strong home sales. What you actually need is 12, 15 in Louisville and 12 in Evansville and seven in Paducah. That's what you really have to have.
I believe the dedication we show toward putting money into our amenities is genuinely strong, and it's something the industry views favorably, correct? Kurt mentions it constantly, yet residents come in because the rent is affordable, and they remain because they enjoy it. I think that's the crucial piece. That latter part matters more than the earlier one, correct? When we put capital into the communities, we're installing playgrounds and basketball courts and dog parks and walking trails and fishing lakes. Every one of those items builds the quality of the community, and gives it the feeling of a community, correct? It isn't merely somewhere to live. It's a community, and I think that is what people notice when they examine how our company operates.
Understood. Appreciate it, and thanks for sharing a bit of your secret sauce. Thank you. Have a
Hello there, and thanks for joining us today.
Matt Kornack from National Bank Capital Markets is our next questioner. Your line is open now.
Hello, everyone.
Matt.
Eddie, real quick on R&M — that extra $250,000 in cost, does it sit in your R&M line? I just want to know where that lands.
Most of that. All told, we spent roughly $250, $50,000 just on snow removal in general. On a year-over-year basis, that's only up around $150,000. The rest of it, yes, sits in the R&M line and in the payroll increase. We had a fair amount of overtime in that stretch, helping plow snow and helping with any repairs to water lines and those sorts of things. Most of it — I'd say $200,000 — will show up in repairs and maintenance, and another $50 in the payroll and benefits line.
A key action our team took involved stepping in to assist residents, and that inevitably leads to overtime. You dispatch that maintenance worker to aid Mrs. Jones with thawing her frozen water line, since that is simply the correct thing to do.
I'd say the notable thing here is that I'm genuinely happy with how the first quarter turned out, since we got hit by several winter storms — and I'm not offering excuses, but when one storm impacts 89 locations, our home sales operations were closed for weeks. We were truly shut down because, as Nathan mentioned, we were out helping residents clear the streets and their driveways, thaw their water lines, and simply trying to be good neighbors. So I'm quite pleased, given that our home sales rose even though we essentially lost three weeks to snow and winter weather problems.
From what I understand, January and February were especially tough for us. Would that also have affected the pace at which your occupancy improved? Was the occupancy gain mostly concentrated in March, or did you manage to gain occupancy—
Actually, we saw gains during February and March. The interesting part is that there were a few short windows, and I believe folks had been holding back quite a bit. Once they got out there, they really showed up. Given how strong an affordability option this is for us at the moment, they showed up, and it coincided with tax refund season, which got going in mid to late January, so they were prepared to commit to their new home. It wasn't the perfect selling season, yet we still got through it, and got through it nicely. I'm extremely proud of the team.
Great. No, I’m glad to hear that. One more from me, again for Eddie, on utilities and utility recoveries. You said there aren’t any new kinds of additive contracts, but the margin there came in quite a bit lower versus last year. Is that roughly the new normal, or is there anything one-time in nature in terms of how the expense versus the recovery will trend?
I wouldn't describe it as one-time. What I'd say is that in Q1 of last year, our actual water sewer recapture came in above 96%, which for us is kind of best in class. This year, it was closer to 90, 91%. Some of that was tied to the winter storm. I keep coming back to that, but part of it is related to that. Then, yes, there certainly is a new normal when it comes to the lower margins on the cable piece of it as well. We were slightly impacted by the winter weather, but for the most part, it is kind of a new norm there on that recapture.
Thanks for that. Spring has been chilly around here, though I hope you folks won't be getting any further snowfall—we'll speak again before long.
Okay, thank you.
Appreciate it.
Matt.
The next person to ask a question is Jimmy Shan of RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open now.
Thanks. I have just a couple of questions. Lot rent growth went up roughly 6.8% quarter over quarter. I remember you mentioning an increase of 5.7%. I was wondering what shifted there. And then I'd like to know if you could say more about what's happening in the investment market — what it looks like, and whether there's any incremental change when it comes to opportunity and pricing?
I'll handle the lot rent growth portion first, and then Nathan can cover the investment opportunities. On lot rent, there are a couple of factors at play. Again, this is another situation where you see property taxes rising, right, and those increases have to be passed along. Part of what we mean when we refer to lot rent growth is simply the lot rent increases we send out in November that go into effect on January 1st. Some extra property tax increases were added during the first quarter. Another thing is the acquisitions we took over in Q4 of last year — the large acquisition in Seymour, Indiana, and then the three in the Cincinnati markets — those weren't counted as part of the 5.7% growth. All of those assets carried higher lot rent than our overall average, which pushed up that average when you look at it quarter-over-quarter. I'll let Nathan talk to the-
Right. Acquisitions activity has been fairly thin during last year’s fourth quarter and also this year’s first quarter. On the deals that are available, I haven’t observed any movement in cap rates. As we’ve said, we keep reviewing opportunities. Our focus will be on deals inside our footprint. Should a deal fall outside that footprint, expanding into additional markets isn’t something we’re truly interested in at the moment.
One quick follow-up question about the lot rent. When you quote that lot rent, would it include any recoveries of property tax that you'd have?
You've got it right, yes. That is accurate.
Our guidance noted an average rent increase of 5.7%, with the bulk of it taking effect on January 1st, yet those additional factors ended up pushing it higher.
When you look at it compared with the prior quarter.
That's clear to me. I appreciate it.
I appreciate that.
Just a quick reminder — if you'd like to ask a question right now, hit star one one on your touchtone phone. We have Dean Wilkinson from CIBC up next. Your line is open.
Good morning, everyone.
Good morning there, Dean.
I'd like to return to the discussion about acquisitions. Consider a market such as Nashville, where you're seeing fairly substantial corporate commitments to enter that market. Do you see this as an area with a lot of growth potential? Historically, I think it's been a rather tight rental market in MHCs, and there are some occupancy gains you could achieve there, but what are your thoughts on that market, or the submarkets around Nashville, as you look to build more scale there?
We constantly evaluate markets where we already have a presence, and Nashville is a particular focus. We entered Nashville with two properties, and we're still repositioning one of them — things are going very well there. Would we want to acquire additional assets in Nashville? Absolutely. Would we also like to have a presence in other parts of Tennessee? We're actively scouting at all times across the eight states where we operate. To be clear, we won't purchase at a 3-cap — that's simply not something we'll do. Nor have we observed cap rates widening; they've remained in the 4.5% to 7% range and have barely moved. We continue searching daily. It has been — the environment does appear competitive. Some sellers, it seems, may be beginning to run into difficulties here and there.
I'd add that when it comes to selling opportunities, Dean — whether in Nashville or any other market — a big driver, I believe, is this: around COVID, a lot of people had really favorable rates and were putting 5-year debt on those assets. That debt is now starting to reach maturity. So I do believe some opportunities will begin emerging before long, not specifically in Nashville but broadly across our business.
Excellent, thank you so much. I really appreciate that, everyone.
Appreciate it, Dean.
Thank you. At this moment, I see no additional questions. I would like to return the call to Kurt Keeney now so he can offer closing remarks.
Thanks, operator. And thanks to all of you for joining us today. If anything else comes up, don't hesitate to contact our investor relations team at <<email_hidden>>. Have a wonderful day.
That brings us to the end of today's conference. We appreciate everyone for joining in. You're welcome to disconnect at this time.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Flagship Communities Real Estate Investment Trust transcript - plus 133,000+ transcripts from 7,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.
Get an API key View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Flagship Communities Real Estate Investment Trust earnings transcripts and 133,000+ others is available through the
EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server.
Quarterly plans from $162 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search,
and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.