HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering Co., Ltd. (A009540) Earnings Call Transcript
October 28, 2026
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
[Interpreted] Good afternoon. First of all, thank you all for joining this conference call. And now we will begin the conference of the fiscal year 2026, third quarter earnings results by HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering. This conference will start with a presentation followed by a divisional Q&A session. Now we will begin the conference of the fiscal year 2026, third quarter earning results by HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering.
[Interpreted] Good afternoon. I am [indiscernible], Executive Director of IR for HD Hyundai Group. As in the previous quarter, we will give today's earnings presentation as brief as possible and allow more time for Q&A. English interpretation will be provided consecutively. After the earnings presentation, I will comment on the shipbuilding market before moving on to Q&A. Let me begin with the key highlights for the third quarter, followed by our operating results. First the FX impact the average exchange rate in the third quarter fell by approximately 6% or by KRW 79 from the previous quarter, resulting in an operating loss impact of approximately KRW 70 billion, which includes KRW 45 billion for Hyundai Heavy Industries. Second, one-off costs Hyundai Heavy Industries recorded 47 working days in the third quarter a decrease of approximately 14 days quarter-on-quarter, and this represents about 4 more days than the typical seasonal decline and the additional reduction lowered operating profit by approximately KRW 50 billion regarding wage and collective bargaining agreement, which we successfully concluded yesterday, we're [Technical Difficulty] proximately 70% or [Technical Difficulty] We apologize for the inconveniences caused by the technical issues that interrupted the conference call. The investigators, understanding for this conference will be very appreciated. Apologies for the technical glitch. Let me resume and second, one-off costs Hyundai Heavy Industries recorded 47 working days in the third quarter, a decrease of approximately 14 days quarter-on-quarter. And this represents about for more days the typical seasonal decline and the additional reduction lowered operating profit by approximately KRW 50 billion. Regarding the wage and collective bargaining agreement through which we produced desirable outcomes yesterday, we recognized approximately 75% of the related additional costs in the third quarter with the remainder to be reflected in the fourth quarter. We are unable to disclose the specific amount and we kindly ask that you refer to relevant press reports for further information. Finally, our third quarter revenue mix by vessel type, HD Hyundai Heavy Industries large-sized ships LNG carriers 42%, LPG carriers and real ACs, 23%; container shipped 24%, tankers 9%. For the midsized ship segment, container ships accounted for 24%; product carriers 32%; LPG carriers 26% and bunkering vessels, 8%. HD Hyundai -- LNG carriers 40%, container ships 32%, tankers 14%, LPG carriers and [indiscernible] 10%, with no significant change from the previous quarter. Moving to Page 4. Here are the consolidated results for HDKSOE. Consolidated revenue decreased 7.2% quarter-over-quarter and increased 9.3% year-over-year. Despite the continued rise in vessel prices, revenue declined slightly from the previous quarter due to seasonal factors, fewer working days and the lower exchange rate. Operating profit decreased 12% quarter-over-quarter and increased to 37% year-over-year, reflecting the lower exchange rate, fewer working days and higher one-off costs. I will cover the nonoperating items later in the presentation. Please refer to the table on Page 5, and let me move on to Page 6. Consolidated revenue in the Shipbuilding division decreased 8.2% quarter-over-quarter and increased to 10.3% year-over-year. The quarter-over-quarter decline reflected fewer working days and a lower exchange rate despite higher vessel prices. On an HD Hyundai Heavy Industries basis, consolidated revenue in the Naval and special vessels segment decreased 14.6% quarter-over-quarter and 30.8% year-over-year. The decline was mainly attributable to fuel working days and a change in project mix. In the offshore segment, the Ruya project continued to ramp up, while the [ Trian ] project entered its final stage. As a result, revenue increased 1% quarter-over-quarter and 35% year-over-year. Next, engineered machinery revenue was quarter-over-quarter and decreased 10.3% year-over-year, mainly due to fewer production days and the lower exchange rate. Moving to Page 7. I will now cover operating profit by business segment. Shipbuilding operating profit decreased 18.1% quarter-over-quarter due to the lower exchange rate and one-off costs but increased 32.3% year-over-year. The operating margin was 16.7%, slightly lower quarter-over-quarter, but continuing to improve year-over-year. Operating profit in the naval vessel business increased sharply 114% quarter-over-quarter despite lower revenue, supported by higher export mix but decreased 24.5% year-over-year. Offshore operating profit 110% quarter-over-quarter and turned profitable year-over-year, supported by the full scale recognition of revenue from the Ruya project and KRW 18 billion in change order. Engine and machinery operating profit continued to grow, increasing 8% quarter-over-quarter and 19% year-over-year. Higher selling prices and a greater share of dual fuel engines more than offset the lower exchange rate and reduced revenue, and it is for the first time where that we disclosed our revenue from onshore power engines, which is approximately KRW 11.4 billion this quarter. Please refer to Page 8 for the operating results of the consolidated subsidiaries, and I will provide more detail on Page 9. First of all, HDKSOE on a stand-alone basis. Higher revenue from the SD business division and overseas yards helped the company return to profit, while dividend income also contributed to a significant increase in operating profit. HD Hyundai Heavy Industries, its revenue decreased 9.1% quarter-over-quarter and operating profit declined 13.5% quarter-over-quarter due to fewer working days, the lower exchange rate, one-off costs and a change in vessel mix, including a lower share of LNG carriers. The engineered machinery, offshore and naval and special vessels businesses nevertheless delivered stable operating results. Now HD Hyundai Samho despite fewer production days, which were around 10 days lower from the previous quarter and the lower exchange rate in the third quarter, the company continued to deliver solid operating results supported by a higher share of LNG carriers and continued productivity improvements. Revenue remained at the previous quarter's level, while operating profit decreased 10.3%. The operating margin was 20.2%. Let us move on to Page 10. HD Hyundai Marine Engine despite the lower exchange rate, revenues surged 65% quarter-over-quarter, and operating profit increased 92% quarter-over-quarter, driven by effective FX hedging, higher selling prices and increased share of dual fuel engines and higher delivery volumes. The operating margin came in at 28.5%, which is the highest in its history. And next is HD Hyundai Energy Solutions, despite the seasonal slowdown and the lower exchange rate, revenue increased 24% year-over-year and operating profit rose 38.8% year-over-year, supported by higher selling prices and increased exports to the United States. On Page 11, nonoperating results included approximately KRW 610 billion in foreign currency-related losses following the sharp decline in the USD Korean won exchange rate as well as KRW 307.8 billion in gains on financial instruments. On Page 11, all subsidiaries remain in net cash position with consolidated net cash of approximately KRW 11 trillion. And that concludes our presentation of results for HDKSOE and its subsidiaries and then we will walk you through the outlook for the commercial shipbuilding market.
Good afternoon. I am [indiscernible], Senior Executive Director in charge of HDKSOE Strategic Marketing Division. I will now walk you through global newbuilding market trends for the third quarter of 2026 and the order intake of HDKSOE shipbuilding division and for [indiscernible] market trends. From January to September this year, the global newbuilding market saw very strong ordering activities across all vessel types reaching a record time that versus past same period of 2007, the previous peak in terms of GT. In the third quarter, container ship led the market, while solid ordering momentum continued across major [indiscernible] types, including tankers, which has been strong since the start of the year as well as LNGC, LPGC, bulk carrier and car carriers. Geopolitical risks, including the wars in the Middle East and Ukraine persist and disruptions to shipping logistics caused by factors such as transit restrictions in the Panama canal and deepening the supply-demand imbalance in the shipping market. Against this backdrop a combination of factors, including unprecedented shipping market conditions, a growing focus on energy security, response to environmental regulations and demand for replacing aging fleets is having a significant impact on the new building market as well. Global newbuilding investment this year has already approached last year's full year level as of the third quarter reflecting unexpectedly strong demand for new building investments. Newbuilding prices also continued to rise, driven by sustained ordering from ship owners who have secured substantial profits and by shipyards accumulated backlogs. And lastly, our new order trend. The group's shipbuilding subsidiaries secured a total of 176 vessels worth $19.1 billion on a cumulative basis in the third quarter, exceeding our annual order target. These results reflect the success of our selective order taking strategy and our sales efforts focused on high value-added vessels and once again demonstrates the group's competitiveness in winning orders in the global market. In terms of our new order portfolio, we secured a number of high value-added large gas carriers. In particular, we won a total of 45 VLGCs, including real [indiscernible] on a cumulative basis through the third quarter, capturing more than 50% of global orders. In the midsize segment, we diversified our order portfolio by winning orders across wide range of vessel types, including not only medium range and long range to tankers, but also midsized and large LPG carriers, liquefied CO2 carriers, PCTCs and roll on and roll off vessels. Last but not least, market outlook. Going forward, the shipbuilding market has favorable factors, including limited capacity and major shipyards, steady growth in seaborne trade volumes and demand for replacement with eco-friendly vessels. At the same time, risks remain, such as geopolitical tensions, uncertainty in the global economy and expansion of shipbuilding capacity worldwide. In this environment, the group will continue its order strategy focused on high value-added vessels, leveraging our extensive shipbuilding experience, technological capabilities and stable supply chain. We will also respond more flexibly to make changes in customer needs, striking a balance between profitability and growth. And this concludes our presentation of HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering Third Quarter 2026 results. Thank you for your attention.
[Operator Instructions] The first question will be presented by Korea Investment Securities. Please go ahead.
[Interpreted] I have 3 questions about your engine business. The first question is, you mentioned that your engine business revenue for this quarter is KRW 951.1 billion. And can you clarify, can you give us a breakdown of this revenue by low speed, mid-speed engines and then pricing components? The second question is about your onshore power generation engine. As I said, the end is [indiscernible] we have 2 cases of 854 GV and H3540 GV. So is it for large output power generation engine? Or is it an engine that is used for usual onshore power generation? Can you also give us the classification or distinction. Lastly, our inquiries that you have received this year, are there anything that would give you visibility in terms of actually being awarded any contracts. It's because we need to ensure a bit of visibility about the 4 gigawatt facility utilization that you mentioned.
[Interpreted] For your first question, I give you our revenue breakdown. The large size engine 50% and mid sized engine, which also includes power generation was 35%; and the other category, 15%. To answer your second question, I am [indiscernible] shipbuilding engine business, as to the power generation engine project, we have been quite steady in undertaking existing projects which amounts to 100 to 300 mega project. So these orders were given 2 to 3 years ago, and this is ongoing. As for now, as to the ones that you mentioned, I mean, H54 GV and 15H54 GV, we we can now produce these engines with our Ulsan factory alone. So there would be a split of production between our -- so the production will be made feasible when we have a new plant ongoing. So there's going to be a split of production between our existing plants and our Mipo plant. And to answer your third question, which was about inquiry we have both PPPs and [ Helipad ] projects, 1.6 giga which were already disclosed but we have 1.4 gigawatt project, which we are undertaking but we have to close [indiscernible] target because they did not meet disclosure criteria and by year, we would be operating at our full capacity by 2028 and 2029. So as to additional order awards we need to see what's going to be happening. And as I mentioned last year, we have continuing demand in the AI data center sectors and as well as national electricity grid development. And as you know, electricification is a global trend. So we continue to receive inquiries about national redevelopment as well as AI data centers. What's different is previously, AI data center project has been undertaken without serving an intermediary kind of intermediary. So there would be demand, but they will now be coming directly to us. But these state hyperscalers tend to come to us directly and contacting us directly. That's 1 difference. Our strategy will be to striking the right balance between our capacity and projected revenue and our order taking capabilities. And as to the power generation volume that have -- that are quite firm or that are projected going to be 1.5 giga in 2028 and 3 giga in 2029.
[Interpreted] The next question will be presented by Jeong Dongik from KB Securities.
[Interpreted] I have 2 questions, the first question is about offshore plant. You mentioned there's an one-off gains of KRW 80 billion, and that's very high because that's almost a 30% increase in operating profit. And in the previous quarter, your OP margin in offshore plant was also 16%. I think these are unsustainably high levels of operating profit. So I'd like to know the background of logic behind these 2 consecutive where very high margins were made available. And what you -- what your view on the following quarter or next year in your offshore plant? My second question is about your commercial vessel market outlook. As you mentioned, the show's ordering activity was the highest ever, maybe better than what was recorded back in 2007. And then how do you view the 2027 next year? Because clubs estimated and forecast but there's going to be around 30% decline in the overall market. But I wonder what your internal view is about the commercial ship market next year.
[Interpreted] To answer your first question, yes, that's KRW 18 billion in change order then that's recognized as revenue. We have the [ Trian ] and Ruya project and the Ruya project specifically is proceeding at its full capacity. So these 2 projects are very high margin ones and aside from this, there is nothing specifically nothing specific that I'd like to mention. But in the following quarter, in Q4 on the [ Triumph ] project, revenue may decline a bit, but the Ruya project will be making good progress. And again, in the following quarter, we believe we can produce profits with high margin. And in the offshore sector, we don't believe we will be suffering losses or any sudden drop in our revenue. It's because revenue may decline slightly in 2027, but I think we will be able to produce a profit because we would be considering [ BLA ] construction as well as the LNG inputs as well in preparation for any possible decline in our offshore business. Let me give you my answer to your second question as to the market prospects as especially new build orders for 2027, while we expect [indiscernible] was around KRW 190 million. And so that was above the KRW 176 million that was recorded before and as just said, [ Clarkson ] is expecting around 30% reduction, and that will be amounting to 125 million or 130 million tons in 2027, but still the level is quite high compared to usual years. So beyond the 2027, yes, new build orders may decline compared to 2026, which was the highest ever in history. But still, we expect a solid market outlook in this new build activities. There ever reasons why. First of all, we are experiencing supply chain disruptions because of candid restrictions on the Strait of Hormuz, the Panama Canal and the Suez Canal, and this leads to increases in ton-mile, the overall ton-mile, which respite demand for new builds as well. And now ship owners have the financial capability and they can afford investing in new vessels as well. So that increases demand for new builds. And even though this war in the Middle East comes to an end, we believe supply chain disruption will be established as a new normal, which means there won't be big changes in seaborne trade volumes. So in 2027, yes, there could be a slight reduction, but still, we believe that we're going to have solid performance in the new build market. I'd like to make some additional comments about our offshore plant business. both the Ruya and [ Triumph ] projects are increasing their contribution to our overall revenue and these 2 projects are highly profitable, and that's our expectation. So until they are fully delivered in 2027 these 2 projects will be producing desirable outcomes with improvement in our overall profitability. But as to additional and orders and additional projects after beyond these 2 projects, in fact, earlier this year, we were working in a project in the Middle East, which did not lead to successful outcomes. But there are some new projects that we haven't disclosed yet, but are ongoing. For instance, there's an offshore substation project and only work has already been done, but due to contractual reasons, we're not disclosing this project. And we also have a gas production facility project for which all the work is ongoing as well. So we believe early 2027, we will be able to disclose relevant information about the subsequent projects. And as to our offshore energy business, I think all projects would be and are being undertaken just this plant. So they would be producing profits just as trend as well. And behind this stellar performance lies our selective order-taking strategy, which focuses on profitability and as well as our excellent execution, which ensures that these projects are undertaken just as planned.
[Interpreted] The following question will be presented by [indiscernible] Investment Securities.
[Interpreted] My first question is, please give us an updated vintage year for your order taking activities for the third quarter. That's the first [indiscernible]. And second question is about your projected joint venture in the United States with key wins, so your company has been rather conservative. So -- but you are now pursuing this block manufacturing operation, we're joint venture with the U.S. counterpart, which is Kiewit.And without amendment being made to the Jones Act or [indiscernible] at many people concerned that such projects or business may entail greater risk. So I'd like to know more about the background behind making this rather bold investment decision. And who are the major players in this joint venture or future U.S. operations. It's going to be 6 subsidiaries of your group.
[Interpreted] If I give you updated vintage year data, first of all, Samho, 28% for 2023, 48% for 2024 then 24% for 2025. now Hyundai Heavy Industries midsize ships first, 9.6% for 2023, 55% for 2024 then 25% for 2025. Now large sized ships for Hyundai Heavy Industries 4% for 2022, 45% for 2023, 31% for 2024 and 20% for 2025. To answer your second question, as covered by media press, yes, we have established a joint venture with the U.S. company, Kiewit, and the intention is to establish a local manufacturing footprint in the United States. The MOU was signed back in July and as a subsequent step, the joint venture was established. And our goal is, as to combat ships that would require further discussions but we're making preparations so that we can receive orders for logistics support ships from the U.S. Navy or [indiscernible], that would include console tankers, for instance. As to the background behind this investment division back in August through the presidential memo published by the U.S. government foreign shipyards who will be making investments on U.S. soil, U.S. territory would be subject to bridge stretch provisions, which should make investment in the U.S. possible. So we believe that without establishing a local manufacturing footprint, we won't be able to have business opportunities for the United States market. And they prompted our investment decision. But as to who's going to own this project, whether that's going to be 6 to 4, nothing decided yet but according to the Wall Street article which covered [indiscernible] shipyard, the investment volume or the production volume should be secured first before we finalize any level of investment to be made in the United States. Internally, we have looked at several scenarios, and we have our own [indiscernible] made internally and the U.S. Navy and with the U.S. government, we are currently making discussions on detailed volume. And if that's determined, then that will determine the level of investment that we'll be making and who's going to be owning the business as well. And internally, our plan is to finalize in by the end of 2026. And then after that, we will be able to make official disclosures or announcements about our U.S. business.
[Interpreted] The following question will be presented by [indiscernible] Investment Securities.
[Interpreted] I have 3 questions. Basically, the first question is we saw a surge in operating profit for HD Hyundai Marine Engine. And I wonder whether this is sustainable or not. That's my first question. The second question is about your new venture joint venture in the United States. As far as I know, Kiewit doesn't have any track record in building naval ships. So in association with new partnership with Huntington Ingalls Industries, what's going to be the role of Kiewit? And what's the division of growth among these companies? The third question is about your floating data center project. I heard that there were some delays. And in your discussion, we speak tech companies as to onshore engine business. So any update on about your floating data center project.
[Interpreted] To answer your first question, yes, Hyundai Marine Engine demonstrated stellar performance this quarter. And as I mentioned in the previous quarter, there were 2 units that were not delivered, which were supposed be delivered in Q2, and these were recognized in this quarter. That's part of the reason and there are some deliveries that have been recognized in Q3, which are supposed to be recognized in Q4 the following quarter. And foreign exchange rate will be -- the Korean won will be depreciating further, we believe -- and we have an increasing share of dual-fuel engines as well. So overall, we expect excellent performance from Hyundai Marine Engine, and our goal was to achieve 100% utilization rate but utilization rate already exceeded 110%. But again, we need to consider a weaker Korean won in the following quarters. So given all these, improving productivity, increasing orders and increasing share of dual fuel engines and increasing ASP, you may guess how Hyundai Marine Engine's performance, which we believe will be improving further. To answer your second question, yes, the company Kiewit was -- has not been involved in the shipbuilding sector previously, but Kiewit is a leading EPC company in the United States. It's a sizable company, and it has excellent track record in the EPC business, and the company has long been involved in offshore plant business as well. In generally, Kiewit wanted to expand its business from offshore plant to shipbuilding. So the willingness of the company Kiewit and it's very natural fit with our company, a combination of factors worked behind this investment decision. And previously, we looked at several shipyards in the United States as a target of acquisition, but we realized that their facilities for aging and we needed to optimize our logistics operations as well. So acquiring an existing shipyard was almost tantamount to building a new one in terms of CapEx. And as a result, those U.S.-based shipyards were demanding higher price for acquisition. And in addition to that, offshore plant companies share many foundational technologies for shipbuilding companies. In the sense, we share technological capabilities between our 2 companies and that makes Kiewit a very good partner in terms of producing synergy, both in terms of staffing and talent development and training as well. So with Kiewit, we're going to be focusing on the basic naval vessels first. For example, we're building 2 vessels here in Korea as the initial delivery, we would be making CapEx investments in the United States to build the necessary facilities and with Huntington Ingalls Industries we're having discussions with the company to look at the possibility of block construction. And as to combat shifts, we would be -- I think there is a need for further discussion. Your third question is about nuclear submarine business. Currently, there's a special bill, which is pending at the National Assembly of Korea, the discussions are ongoing at the National Assembly level. And for the first time, nuclear submarine budget has been allocated for the year 2027. It means starting from next year, the nuclear powered submarine project will begin here in Korea and we're making necessary preparations for that. But given the duration and the scale of constructing nuclear submarines, it cannot be done by any single company alone. It requires that there are national level capabilities mobilized. So we are planning to propose to the Korean government and not just the shipbuilding companies, but there should be other adjacent industry companies that come together to make this project possible. Turn to your question about floating data centers between KSOE and Hyundai Heavy Industries, discussions are ongoing to change among our group affiliates and not just the data centers themselves, but we believe we have the potential to produce synergy as to data center equipment and facilities as well. And at the group level, we believe we have the capability to supply these equipment pieces as well. But as to ship level capability for FDC we are internally discussing which yard will be responsible for building such FDC vessels. And it requires [ BMPP ] and we have currently available technology, BMPP technology already in the market, which means we are capable of supplying necessary engines. But it concerns large-scaled engines, for example, 21-inch 35GV or 50-inch 54 DFV. So we have technology to supply this engine. That's what I can tell you. And about whether the maturity of floating data centers themselves, we are not 100% for sure. But we have ongoing discussions with hyperscalers, and it's for sure the demand is growing for floating data centers One of our concerns would be about power source because it may vary compared to what our industry peers have in mind. But for FDC, we need BMPP. And here, we believe we have a room to apply our [indiscernible] engine.
[Interpreted] The following question will be presented by Choi Kwang-Sik from DAOL Investment Securities.
I have 2 questions. The first question is about your LNG business. Your company share price has decreased recently and Chinese shipyards are increasing their market share, especially in the LNG sector. And the Chinese companies are 1 of the reasons why LNG vessel prices are going down, that's what some people say. And these Chinese shipyards are gaining orders not just from domestic clients, but from overseas clients, including MSP as well. So the LNG price for the price-wise, Chinese shipyards are not demanding as much as Korean shipyards. But still, the Chinese shipyards are increasing their influence in overly orders for LNG vessels. So can you give us an update about this market situation? And as well as I'd like to know what your take is on the decrease in LNG vessel prices as well as increasing China's shipyard's influence in this market segment. My next question is about [ Shinzen Amgen, ] which will be allocated for data center applications. You mentioned 1.4 gigawatt project. But according to the data and monthly engine on price data, I don't believe we have increases compared to previous year. So when you mentioned specific gigawatt numbers, does it reflect the orders that are already recognized in your book or orders that you're expecting as well?
If I answer your question in the LNG market, yes, it's true that Chinese shipyards are increasing their orders in the global LNG market. And YTD basis, these Chinese shipyards have secured 32 vessels, the 3 shipyards in China, [indiscernible] but aside from [indiscernible] are our direct competitors across the global market and 1 of the reasons why they are successful is significantly lower price compared to our. But in spite of that, you deep dive into the orders with Chinese shipyards have taken this year, then they are mostly coming from Chinese shipowners and Chinese projects. As to the 10 LNG outsold, they will already buy MFAC. Its parent company is [indiscernible] deals with Chinese shipowners primarily but it's rather inevitable that the shipping company chose a Chinese shipyards and awarding its LNG ship order. But for us, Korean shipyard we are producing industrial level LNG carriers, which means our clients want supply chain stability, reliability, and on better access to any ports across the globe, whether it is U.S. or other countries. But these universal access is critical. That's why our global company's clients would like to work with Korean shipyards, including our company. So on a life cycle perspective, I think Korean LNG ship builders are competitive across the global market. Yes, LNG prices have gone down, partly because of the impact from China and as well as decreasing orders themselves. But I don't think the prices will go down any further. It's because shipowners already recognized the current level at the bottom. So behind the scenes, they are very much interested in new LNG ships, and they are in discussion with Korean shipyards. And as you know LNG produced in [indiscernible] has decreased which means shipowners are less active in making new investments in LNG but there are ongoing very active LNG projects across the U.S. and Canada, and they are going on right now. And we believe that in 2027, that is the reason why LNG newbuild projects will begin starting from 2027. But I'd like to mention LPG as well, which had a record high year this year. So on a daily basis, it used to be USD 30,000 to USD 40,000. But currently, it's $240,000 even $250,000 on a daily basis. So shipowners are being interested taking interest in LPG as well. And at our company, we're taking a proactive stance towards LPG, developing technology and put in the necessary effort into this market and our efforts are being translated into actual outcomes. For next year, our progress on LNG and any resumed project on LNG, this would contribute to our business success actually. If I make additional comments about our engine order activity, the 1.4 gigawatt project so most of the projects that we have won are reflected in our disclosures that we make. But in 2024 and 2025, it was mostly vessel grade engines. And during those years, our performance was great. But it was back in 2023 that the vessel demand was at its highest. So as a result, in 2024, we had a record time year in terms of orders that were awarded. And that meant our backlog amounting to 3.5 years or even more. So our flat would be full by 2028, until 2028, and which means some of them would be fully operational be fully occupied by 2030 as well. So even though it seems that our order activity is not as strong as before, we have enough backlog to address and if offshore engine demand increases, that means that in our engine and machinery business, both our order activities and our revenues would be great. So this concludes our earnings presentation. Thank you very much for your participation. [Portions of this transcript that are marked [Interpreted] were spoken by an interpreter present on the live call.]
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering Co., Ltd. transcript - plus 257,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.
Get an API key View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering Co., Ltd. earnings transcripts and 257,000+ others is available through the
EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server.
Quarterly plans from $145 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search,
and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.