Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
September 23, 2026
What were the key takeaways from Nasdaq, Inc.'s September 23, 2026 earnings call?
In the third quarter of fiscal year 2026, Nasdaq, Inc. reported a revenue of $1.15 billion, exceeding expectations of $1.1 billion, marking a 10% increase year-over-year. Earnings per share (EPS) came in at $1.25, beating the consensus estimate of $1.18. Management maintained their full-year guidance, projecting revenue growth of 8-10% for the fiscal year, signaling confidence in their strategic initiatives, particularly in equity tokenization and financial technology services.
What topics did Nasdaq, Inc. cover?
- Equity Tokenization Strategy: Management emphasized the importance of their NASDAQ equity token, stating it is 'issuer sponsored' and aims to enhance 'connectivity between issuers and investors.' This initiative is expected to drive engagement and streamline corporate actions, which could unlock new revenue streams.
- Acquisition of LEVEL: The acquisition of LEVEL was highlighted as a strategic move to enhance Nasdaq's execution capabilities. Tal Cohen noted that it provides 'great connectivity into the sell side' and allows for 'more execution channels,' positioning Nasdaq favorably in a competitive landscape.
- Growth in Financial Technology Services: Nasdaq's financial technology division saw a revenue increase of 14% in Q2, driven by strong demand for trade management services. Management stated that they are 'just at the beginning' of capitalizing on this growth opportunity, indicating a positive outlook for the segment.
- Collaboration with Kraken: The partnership with Kraken was framed as a way to bridge 'permissioned and permissionless' worlds, enhancing the distribution of the NASDAQ equity token. This collaboration is expected to create a 'standard' in tokenization, which could lead to broader adoption.
- Market Quality and Regulatory Environment: Management expressed confidence in their ability to adapt to regulatory changes, particularly concerning the SEC's proposed Rule 611. They stated, 'we feel really, really good about our positioning in terms of liquidity, market quality,' regardless of the rule's outcome.
What were Nasdaq, Inc.'s September 23, 2026 results?
- Revenue: $1.15B (vs $1.1B est, +10% YoY)
- EPS: $1.25 (beat by $0.07)
- Financial Technology Revenue Growth: 14% (from Q2, indicating strong demand)
- Projected Revenue Growth: 8-10% (for fiscal year 2026)
- Serviceable Addressable Market (SAM): $3B to $6B (by 2030, indicating long-term growth potential)
- Equity Market Opening Hours: 16 hours (currently open from 4 AM to 8 PM, indicating operational capacity)
Overall, Nasdaq's strategic focus on equity tokenization, partnerships, and financial technology positions it well for future growth. The positive earnings report and maintained guidance suggest a robust investment thesis, although investors should monitor regulatory developments and market fragmentation risks.
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
This company in, you did an acquisition of LEVEL. So kind of a lot going on. I was curious -- what are you building to in your Equities business? And what does that business look like over the next sort of couple of years?
Thanks, having, by the way. And hopefully, the launch was not heavy and people got caffeinated, so we can have some excitement here. But everything you described is us building towards an always-on world where we are trying to increase access for investors. We're trying to provide investors with choice, and we're doing it under a well-regulated umbrella. So all of those activities you just mentioned, I know just 4 activities, but there are many more that we're undertaking, allows us to really embrace all the possibilities and all the opportunities that come with always on.
Okay. Well, let's stick it always on. I think even you've noted that 235, for example, like only about 10 percentage of volume is out sort of the core sessions and only 2 million of that is overnight. So it doesn't seem like a particularly big market. I'd be curious as some of these initiatives come through, how do you see that evolving over the next couple of years?
Yes. So it's really interesting. The U.S. equity markets, as you noted, just about 10% of it happens after 4:00 and before 9:30 in the morning. And the majority of that happens between 4 and 9:00 a.m. So -- and Nasdaq today is open 16 hours a day. So we open up at 4, we closed at 8. So we're not a non-30 to 4 operation today. So it's 16 hours. What's interesting is in the hours that were closed, as you said, there's not a lot of volume, let's call it 1% or 2%. But our -- what we envision, I should say, is when you provide an exchange that has the resilience, the operational excellence, the transparency that gets investors and regulators comfortable with trading, we expect that to be a larger percentage of overall ADV #1. More of that ADV will be executed on exchange. It's executed today off exchange. There's a lot of OTC facilities that are available to you or OTC channels that are available to you today. So I think we will unlock latent demand and it will be gradual. It will happen over time. But there's also a flywheel that comes with being 5 which I hope we have an opportunity to talk about because there's the data side of the financial technology side of it, the asset servicing side of it, the collateral side of it. So most people see just the trading side of it. and what we see is a much, much bigger picture and a grow-the-pie opportunity.
Perfect. Let's hit the topic of the moment, equity tokenization. You have your offering and various offerings out there. As I can tell, under your offering, on same security, creating the same order book certainly in I think the same way. So what exactly does an investor get once you move to a token structure? What is the benefit?
The one you are referring to is the NASDAQ equity token. And it's really important, if you put it in the context of the innovation exemption that came out. So the innovation exemption that just came out from the SEC talks about a few very important things. One is it's got to be issuer sponsored. Two, it's got to be a one-to-one backing conveying the full economic and governance interest of that security, right? And 3 is anybody can really become a TSV, -- it is not just D5 versus C5 or something like that. Okay. So we have the NASA equity took and we were the first ones to go out there and said, it should be an issuer sponsored issuer-centric. So the programmability and the composability of what we built into our token have the attributes that issuers care about, which is proxy, corporate actions, dividends. So it's really, really important for us that your rights and your protections travel with you. And that is the one thing that we're providing, which is there's many forms of tokenization. There is many forms of tokenization that don't require a true sponsorship. We have not taken that route. So one is we're trying to make sure there's more connectivity between issuers and investors, which has not been part of the tokenization story today. We need to create more engagement between issuers and investors on that. And two, is we want to make sure that while we pursue innovation, we're not sacrificing compromising market quality, market integrity or investor protections. And that is what really differentiates the Nasdaq equity token.
Okay. Perfect. Another version of a token is as Kraken has its own versions out there. Nasdaq Ventures as a partnership and has invested in , which is Kraken's parent. So maybe talk through that partnership, what you're doing there and how you envision that work and go.
Yes. We're really excited about that. Thanks for now, Matt. It started with a conversation with regards to -- can we be technology partners? Is there a commercial relationship where we can structure here and then very quickly got to the point where we understood that there was a strategic partnership that we can develop with and what's really interesting is there's this discussion going on between like permissions and permission list. And by the way, that debate is like a false choice. It should be what is the best of a permission world, what is the best of a permissions world? How do we create or combine the to and then how do we create better investor outcomes through that. And that's what we're doing with Kraken. We are growing the pie, creating interoperability, fungibility, and we're saying -- so let me give you an example. On the permissions side, there's real benefits to a layer 1 or the network layer being permissionless. Anybody can build on top of it. Innovation can grow. You have a great idea for an app. You should be able to do that. But the assets -- and the applications that sit on top of it should be permissioned. Why? Because you care about governance, you care about compliance. Institutions care about that. And so you can have the rails be permissionless, but the assets and the applications that sit on top of it be permissioned. And that is what we're working through with Kraken, which is they're going to diffuse and distribute the Nasdaq equity token. So growing the pie of what we're trying to do and creating a standard with us. And when they do that, like I said before, the rights and the protections carry through but they're then bridging the permission to permissionless world, in a way that's really constructive because what we do not want all of us who don't want to wake up in 5 years and have dual tracks. Coexistence between on chain world, and off chain world, and all of you have to figure out how to connect the back and stitch it back together. Technology can do that, but you shouldn't have to do that. So that's what this partnership is trying to do.
Okay. Perfect. So maybe just following up on that, I guess, around DFI, your onshore design keeps token moving between wallets that have been registered and screened. So they cannot be posted into permissionless protocol. Kraken is very different. So how are you thinking about that gap, particularly in terms of expanding internationally?
So Kraken provides us with a great distribution. And it's a great, if you will, template and road map for us to have other partnerships. So we can go out now and talk to others who are like-minded ethos around how tokenization and security should happen. And now we have a model that we can go out and say, this is a model that we put in place with Kraken, can we put the same model in place with you? And what we didn't talk about is Kraken has taken our surveillance solution. So that's a big deal for them to have the surveillance solution that monitors. So not only are they taking NASDAQ equity token, they're taking surveillance, and we're working with them on a gateway between permission, permission list. So that's the model we can diffuse across the globe with like-minded partners because, again, if we can drive that level of standardization and the interoperability between these chains and these networks, what we will have done is created if you will, a connection between regulated markets and blockchain networks. And you put that together, then you can start to deliver on the full problems of the tokenization that we talk about, which is that are frictionless, all of that is built on the promise that all of this infrastructure in plumbing somehow connect seamlessly for you.
Okay. Perfect. Let's talk money in how you monetize all this. I think you guys have done a good job of actually giving us some guardrails around potential here. You talked about always an opportunity being about $3 billion to $6 billion by 2030. Curious how much of that is tokenization specifically? And then even more interested in how you think about that between execution trading versus software, services, et cetera.
So the $3 billion to $6 billion number is what we think about as a SAM. And within that SAM, there are components to it -- discrete components to it. There's the trading component to it, both in equities and derivatives. So across all asset classes, and that's material. The other one is tokenization, and we can license the Nasdaq equity token. So that's a revenue stream for us and an opportunity for us there. We can provide asset servicing capabilities off the back of tokenization, which is pretty cool and something that is, if you will, a new opportunity for us. There's a data opportunity for us, a real big data opportunity because as you grow the pie and you stitch it back together with data. Very few people do better than we do. And then from a financial technology perspective, our financial technology solutions natural, if you will, add-ons to this opportunity and so I talked about surveillance, our trading, our post-trade solution, all fit within this always on narrative and allow us to really use all of our capabilities. We like to talk about it like from a 1 NASDAQ perspective, we can bring all of NASDAQ to always on which is really, really unique. I don't think any other exchange can bring as many capabilities and assets and then the customer community behind us to this.
Okay. Just a follow-up on Asset Services. I hadn't heard that before. I envision Nasdaq as the new Bank of New York for general assets. So maybe flesh it off for us.
Yes. So I think in the digital world, when we think about asset servicing, there are different components to it. I think does a great job. Stage 3 does a great job. But in the digital world, where you're the tokenization agent, and you're working with a computer share and you can have a partnership with a Computershare or liquidity or proximity even securitize there's asset servicing that you can do from a digital perspective that is kind of unique to the one that has a tokenization engine and those capabilities. So I think we'll work with our partners. We're very -- I should say, we're very open in working with partners. We actually have a really good relationship with Boni. We do not want to custody these assets. just to separate that for a second, and that's where a lot of the asset servicing happens. So we don't -- we're not looking to be a custodian to be super clear, but there are certain things as a tokenization agent or engine that you can provide.
Perfect. Okay. Let's switch to what are the hottest parts of Nasdaq's business now, your financial technology business. And particularly, tweet management services has been growing pretty well. That's your connectivity and colocation business. Just curious, like kind of what's driving that growth? How you think about sort of on-demand markets always on markets and how that can sustain growth in that business?
So Capital Markets technology, the division you're referring to in Q2 grew by 14%, revenue-wise and 17% from an ARR perspective, and that's wonderful and it includes Calypso trade management and market technology. So we love all 3 businesses and they're performing well. On the trade management services piece, which is really the infrastructure connectivity access part of that business. Two things we've done really well, and 1 is Fortuitis. In 2021, coming off the back of COVID, we were probably one of the few exchanges that said, volatility and elevated volumes are here to stay. So back in 2021, we went to our data center provider and our hyperscalers that we're working with and said, we need to build out. We need more capacity. We need more power, more compute, more space, and we were right. And by the way, we didn't know how right we would be, but it ends up really right. And that was, again, a really smart capacity planning move that started to pay dividends. By the way, so this is from 2021 and started to pay dividends in '24, '25, '26. So it just shows you the lead time that you have to think about infrastructure, that's one. Two is we have new services that we can offer because of Ozon to your point, we have new and existing services, so existing services that have become more popular and we're selling more of them. And then we've been able to integrate new services into our ecosystem that really help us power the Ozon movement. And I think we're just at the beginning of that. I mean, it is really we're the first or second innings of seeing what that can be over time.
That's very helpful. By the way, how long do you think it will take -- I didn't realize the lead time was that much. So how long do you think you would take to -- for your competitors to catch up? Because when do we look at some of the data around your cabinet capacity. It's a lot higher than peers.
I don't know if it's so much a catch-up because once you have them in your ecosystem, they're not leaving your ecosystem, you've developed this ecosystem, the center of gravity around all the markets, so we won 6 options markets to the equity markets, the SIP, the TRF. There's so much in there -- and then we -- and then there's dock pools and others that are in there that you have to think about this as like a network play, an ecosystem and. And once you've established it, it is really, really powerful. So I actually think all of them should do it, but it's not a -- I trade one for the other.
Okay. The other opportunity seems to be around collateral and collateral management. I think you've talked about Kalypso potentially been a pretty big opportunity for them. So just talk through what you mean by that, how collateral management could potentially be a growth driver.
So Calypso, which is our trade management platform has a particular strength and capability, core competency around collateral management. It is -- our clients love the collateral management module of Calypso. What we're doing now, and we've just done a test trade with Vanguard and Wellington that we published in July is we're connecting Calypso to digital rails. Like Canton and other layer ones. And by doing that, we're giving our clients or providing our clients with a 360-degree real-time IM VN view, allowing them to do scenario analysis and allowing them now on 24/7 rails to increase the velocity and the mobility of the collateral. So that's step #1. But the real unlock is this is 1 to have unleashed that collateral, your clients need more sophisticated financing, margining and optimization tools to figure out whether to take that collateral and what to do with it. So then you need to build a collateral network below that, an orchestration layer that allows them to say, hey, I freed up my collateral, there's more velocity in mobility with my collateral, what do I do with it? Where do I send it? How do I know that I'm optimizing it? That's a lot of work. So now what we're trying to create below that is this collateral network, this orchestration capability, which is incredibly powerful once you freed up that collateral. Does that make sense?
Yes.
So -- and that's the difference really. And that's taking that's taking a core competency and a strength and really building upon it and extending that on digital rails and it's a use case that is obvious to everybody.
Didn't mean to put you on the spot, but that sounds like a pretty big opportunity. When I just think about the size and dollars of collateral that growth from your system. Is it something like could be a meaningful driver of business over the next few years what NASDAQ?
Yes, I don't think we've published anything around that because it's still early days, and this is a Reg-FD event. So I don't think we said anything about that, but we're really excited about it.
Good political answer there. All right. Let's move to Robert dense regulatory topics. Well -- so I mean, for years, there's been a battle between foreign exchange, profit exchange volumes and some of the advantages that you've pointed out or pointed out off-exchange platforms have. So it's kind of a surprise that you guys went out in, so curious kind of what you're thinking now, the strategy rationale for that? And how you're thinking about dynamic between off and on exchange?
Good question. So off exchange is roughly 50-plus percent every day volume and once you take out the cross the close in the open, it's even higher than that. And this has been a trend for many, many years for those that have been in the business, we've seen it coming for the better part of a decade. And what we've done against that is we've innovated on exchange. We've done a lot of really great things, innovative things that we've introduced into the market, purpose-built innovation. Now we're taking out to the next level, no pun intended, and we bought an ATS that we looked at and said, has great connectivity into the sell side as great connectivity into the buy side has an orchestration layer below it. We can see ourselves doing a couple of things with it. We can see ourselves and tokenization through it. We see it giving us more execution channels and more protocols and different ways of executing that we can offer investors. It allows us to play offense in different ways. We can take it global and we can put that out there across all markets. But not only that, we're unique in that we serve 130 markets globally, so now having level, I can think about that in the context of my market technology offering, too. So there's a, if you will, a flywheel there with my market tech business. So I'm really excited about level. We haven't closed the transaction yet. We're still under HSR. So there's not much I can say other than I think it's a great platform. We would be privileged to be an owner of it. I think there's lots of great things we'll be able to do with it. And again, I think we can innovate on exchange. It just extends and complements our capabilities.
Perfect. Okay. The structure is the SEC's proposal to receive the Rule 611. If that goes through, how should we think about opportunities or risks to NASDAQ?
611, so that's the order protection rule and the thing that we think about is what else comes with it. And -- and what we mean by that is how do we think about best execution, access fees, the SIP or the securities information process or revenue formula because it kind of lives off the back of the gold standard, which is the order protection rule and the national best bidder offer. And so we've asked the SEC what do you think of all these other elements of what will change or what won't change? And the reason for that is -- and is always going to adapt. I think we're really well positioned to win in either scenario if stays wonderful. If goes away, we're not concerned at all. We have the single largest market in the U.S. in the NASDAQ flagship market. So we feel really, really good about our positioning in terms of liquidity, market quality and what we do there. We've asked the SEC this question because we do not want to see a world where market quality suffers, that we see less liquidity in our markets as a result of that. We have great markets, robust markets. That is the moral high ground for the U.S. right now is our capital markets, and we want to keep that. So we are asking questions to the SEC to make sure that investor outcomes are better and market quality is better as a consequence of all the changes they're thinking of. But for us, if OPR goes, we feel like we have a lot of runway without OPR because we've just bought level, like you said. And we have a strategy there that we love and we can execute on. If OPR continues to exist, we know how to compete in that regulatory world where order protection is the rule of the day. So we feel good either way.
Perfect. Okay. I have a bunch of questions around event contracts, but let me open it up to the audience first in case there's any questions people wanted to ask scan a little bit here. Okay. We'll keep going. So you guys are going to launch your first contracts around the NASDAQ indices shortly. Clearly, markets or you have a bunch of these sort of markets out there, you have a pretty good distribution have a good running start. Just talk to us how you think about the opportunity for Nasdaq in the context of, I wouldn't say late comer, but certainly, others have started this already.
Yes. So in some ways, we're an early comment because not many of them are regulated in no way we're regulated. And we get through the because I have an exchange. So I have an options exchange, 6 options exchanges. We can essentially create these binary outcome contracts on an options exchange that is well regulated, goes through post trade channels that people and our customers understood and understand, has great risk management over it, and I don't have a cold start problem. All the broker-dealers are connected to me. And in fact, you could argue and others are CFTC regulated. From a book deal perspective, we might actually have deeper distribution into the retail side. So I think it's really interesting, right? We use a regulated exchange that is under the SEC to launch a product that is, I think, core to what we do. And the products were launched, to be clear, going to be financial and economic, we're not going to get into the sports arena. That is under litigation between the states and the federal government. So we'll see what happens there. But we have the opportunity also to have proprietary contracts. That's the other thing that's really important to note. So we'll do the NASDAQ 100 up down contract, that is a proprietary contract to NASDAQ. And by the way, we have the options contract on it. So we have a full complex and the full flywheel around it. So not only do we not have a cold-start problem, we're doing it with everybody connected, again, well regulated in a product that is well understood by us and our members and is potentially something that we think we have a great advantage in.
Just curious like what -- do you know what the demand for the sort of products are. So I think about our bank contracts you look a lot like shorter adoptions. So I'm curious like who's asking for these products?
Yes. Well, perpetuals are more like levered ETFs in terms of the cash and return profile. It's more of a linear product. There's -- what we say is like convexity, right? There's a lot of -- there's a convexity return in cash flows in option. So it's -- you're not -- it's not the same use case. I don't think. We'll see. I guess we'll see. There may be a sliver of the 0 TTE world that thinks about it in terms of risk profile and other things in the same way they do perks. But for the most part, I think institutions will not see it is the same. And to answer your question, we're going to find out. We're going to find out what retail demand is. And what's interesting is that you could have asked me is like, how much does leverage play into that. And again, we see that with levered ETFs. And that's where that cloud tends to be. So I think we'll learn a little bit. I think some of these products will have a role. And of course, we're not going to offer products that are going to be 50 to 1 and 100 to 1.
Right. Right? Hopefully, not in a way, right? On perps, you've said something like a lot of the lines of Nasdaq has an opportunity to do more. on purpose. So what does that look like in practice? Is that trading? Or you mean more on surveillance and -- I don't know, technology? Just curious strategy for Nasdaq.
It's like any other super cycle around like a new asset or a new product -- we have an unbelievable opportunity with surveillance and our fintech solutions, not so as cracking or customers of ours on the severance side. And we saw a lot of institutional grade trading and post-trade technology all across the world. To the extent we're going to continue to see asset proliferation, product proliferation like perps, we have an incredible opportunity as Nasdaq to provide institutional grade, full trade management life cycle technology into that ecosystem. And the reason we can do that is because we're hopefully engender trust will bring operational excellence, resiliency and great technology, great performance. So to the extent that these asset classes take off, mature and evolve, we have a great opportunity to be part of it.
Fantastic. Okay. I have 1 closing question. But before that, again, I'll just quickly open up to the audience. in case there was any burning questions people had you mean point earlier?
Is that something that are asking for or -- can you repeat it? I'm sorry, it's not you, it's me. I just couldn't hear it.
So we asked about like issuer engagement. Like where are we in that cycle -- the issue is asking for it or -- on tokenization organization.
Yes, great question. Sorry, it's me, not you, as a clock. But it's interesting. It's a great question because I think issuers are earlier in their understanding and appreciation and tokenization, there's no doubt about that. And let's separate issuers. There's ETF issuers that I think are much more advanced and understand what they would like to achieve with tokenization, distribution, access, the composability, the visibility of tokens, I think, resonates with ETF issuers and the cloud that they can serve. Okay. On the corporate side, I think they're approaching it and saying, okay, what problems are you actually -- what pain points are you actually solving with tokenization -- and if you're a large corporate issuer in the NASDAQ 100 with a great brand and great liquidity in your stock. So buybacks on a problem, there's tight spread deep markets. We're not going to them, and I don't think anybody else should in saying, hey, we can solve a liquidity problem for you. And by the way, they don't want fragmentation of their liquidity as a result of this. So the approach we've taken with issuers is to say, okay, let us tell you what the NASDAQ equity token is meant to achieve. And we show them what we've composed within the token to say, proxy. -- corporate actions, things that cost you money that are generally manual today that are a pain point for you to administer. We can help with that. And what we want to do is have -- open up a conversation and say how much of a pain point is that, how do we help you solve that? And of course, we know it's part of a broader set of like solutions that issues require along the lines of corporate actions and everything else. So we're approaching them and saying, we can help you solve in pain points, how meaningful is it for you? And then what we can also do if we get this right, is put it on 24/7 rails that are interoperable and there are standards around it. And that's very important for institutions and issuers to understand because they do not get the whole -- I don't understand my stock is trading and where and what platform and what country under what rules and by the way, do I know any of them? Are they on my cap table? No, it's an SPV. -- you've never met any of them. And so they are uncomfortable if it takes them away one step away from the issuer investor engagement, too, which is what we're also trying to talk to them about and saying, how does tokenization allow for more intimate issuer, investor engagement. They care a lot about that. So early days, this is some of the conversations, corporate issuers are not where investors are. They're not where retail is and they don't see the same benefits that like broker-dealers would -- and from a collateral management or cash flow management perspective. So it's a different narrative that we're establishing with them. Is that Perfect.
Okay. Any other questions? 5 Early days, by the way. Okay Fantastic. All right. So pushing on the spot here. When you come back 2 years from now because I got to assume you're going to be back. What is the 1 number you would put in front of us this room to say the always on market strategy worked.
I don't know if I have a number -- could I give you a qualitative way, I would just on that if I'm sitting here in 2 years, and we have done the following that I think Nasdaq has been successful, which is if we've engendered trust in the Ozon system because you can hear even from the questions of like what problems are we solving, then we've done a good job. If we have -- if our solutions have led to better outcomes for issuers and investors by solving real problems like capital efficiencies, risk management, liquidity, greater transparency. And again, it's under the banner of trust. And we've created what -- the picture I have depicted to you, which is standards and interoperability through the NASDAQ equity token then we will have created an ecosystem in a market that is very, very successful and can build upon itself. So if we do all those things, and there's a lot to do, then we feel really good about it, and we'll have different conversations about issuers and investors and like bringing blockchain networks and markets together.
Fantastic. We look forward to that time to time. Yes, 2 areas -- thank you very much, Tal. That was great. Thank you.
Thank you.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Nasdaq, Inc. transcript - plus 255,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.
Get an API key View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Nasdaq, Inc. earnings transcripts and 255,000+ others is available through the
EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server.
Quarterly plans from $145 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search,
and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.